🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 Steven *Toulmin, not a jurist but a significant figure, provides insights into the structure of argumentation, particularly in the legal context, emphasizing the interplay between the context of discovery and justification.* 01:09 Toulmin *introduces the concept of "pretension," a legal reasoning product stemming from accumulated experience, forming a hypothesis to address a legal issue.* 02:29 The *transition from a psychological conjecture to truth occurs when the legal reasoning is analytically justified using humanistic tools like topos, dialectics, and rhetoric.* 03:08 Toulmin's *formula involves integrating the analytically justified legal reasoning into legal language, using indeterminate legal terms and seeking precedent or jurisprudence to strengthen the argument.* 04:18 Toulmin's *formula outlines a systematic process for a perfect argumentation, involving specific forms of reasoning, legal norms, and reference to precedents, providing a structured approach to understand legal argumentation.* Made with HARPA AI
Hola Maestro, siguiendo su canal, que es espectacular. Pero le explico el modo en que opera la politica argntina, al pasar del modo inquisitivo al acusatorio, por medio de fiscales escenifican precedentes. De esa manera despues operan con algo que no es una conjetura, sino todo un proceso juridico que ellos mismo armaron, como precedente casuistico. Por eso yo anticipo cuando están escenificando, y despues me toca el fiscal de la causa la puerta con un ejército de policias violentos. Si yo anticipé, si lo hice.
