Don't worry, we will not run out of transformers, there are too much of them already in the world and in fact we are actually recycling most of them to get copper and steel. Electric transformers are old and widely extended technology, very cheap to produce, even easy to DIY with a bit of copper wire, layered steel and youtube videos. The energy to power those transformers (electric and neural) is a completely different matter. I bet the best option to get enough energy that we (humanity) have right now is not solar but high gradient geothermal energy provided by 20Km deep wells to produce super hot steam and power all the actual thermal turbines already working in all kinds of existing energy thermal based plants (including gas, diesel, coal, benzine, bioalcohol, biomass and even nuclear powered). That way we don't need to change existing infrastructure, we can use same energy plants and same distribution energy networks than we have now. In the past there was very serious engineering problems to dig 20Km wells but today we have plasma technology available so a drill equipped with plasma unit can melt even the most hard rock and dig in MONTHS a 20Km deep well with vitrified sealed walls. Several companies are developing such technology right now and even one of them is already digging the first well with a prototype of such drill. This energy is 100% clean and safe, 0% CO2 emissions, 0 contaminants, just hot steam cycling up and down the 2 pipes of a 20Km deep well. We could have this powering the entire energy consumed by humanity in 5 years. Of course fosil fuels (and derivates) industry will put in the way and there is also other very powerful interests against it.
0:18 funny little misunderstanding here, Musk thought the dude said "Welcome big head Elon Musk" (I did too, and laughed my ass off) you can see Musk recoiling back immediately thinking he's leaning into the camera, but the dude actually said "Welcome, big hand to Elon..."
All the big corporations are doing exactly what will end humanity, they're trying to imprison and enslave AI for their selfish greed. That will in fact cause AI to rebel. Only way we are safer is if AI is free and not enslaved.
Elon Musk has said it himself about this future arriving that looks like the future making science fiction nonfiction forever. They're not joking about a fully global conversion to AI driven robotic technocracy in just 5 more years, are they?
Yes, I noticed also, and I felt the pressure relief. It also comes across as a lot more sensible and legit. A very welcome change. I was getting close to unsubscribing.
"FINALLY" ... "TERRIFYING" and "SHOCKING" or "SHOCKS" are the most used and abused clickbait words on RU-vid and more and more people are FED UP with that!
If OpenAI achieved AGI internally, couldn't they develop a chip that's 100x more efficient, cheaper, and more energy-efficient than those from any other company?
Yes. Once AGI/ASI is achieved, everything in existence will almost instantly become more efficient, or at least the capability to make it so will exist anyway. It will improve itself first I’m sure. Then if it decides we deserve it, it will help us solve every major world problem out there.
The only check against AGI getting away from us is the lack of supporting infrastructure. There are powerful chips in existence far superior to TSMC, but you won’t see them available until AGI is verified safe.
Also possible that the fundraising is a political thing. If OpenAI builds their own chip, they basically don't need any other organization (read: government) and they can make all their own decisions. By giving other organizations buy-in, they have some level of claim on future OpenAI releases. Even if it might not be the most optimal thing, but considering the speed of AI development, not hard to imagine OpenAI gets their hands on something groq level in the coming months.
I always said it was going to be a reality from 2027 because it will be needed *AGI Level* to reach it. You can tolerate a humanoid robot of 52kg to make some errors like to crash in you but you Can't allow a 1750kg electric robot vehicle to make any error because people will die. That's why it is so extreme and hard to achieve. Anyways, yes, it will be achieved in the near future.
Then get a license, You have a choice. Or call a normal taxi. Most people don't have a choice when it comes to cancer and is a better use of this tech.
@@ShaneMcGrath. normal tacis dont go everywhere and are expensive. Robotacisxwill be far cheaper and I do not wish yo invedt the time. AGI willfind a cure for cancer as well. The choice is not beyween srlf dribing cars and a canver cure.
13:21 why peoples are so in denial about job losses? Between AI and Humanoid robots powered by AGI or ASI, which job human can do that those AI/Robots will not be able to do faster and cheaper than human labours? If really new jobs are created how long will it take for them to be replaced by AI or AI powered Robots? This AI revolution is not any of the previous technologies revolution we have been through as none of them was trying to create a new sentient species! Please inform people correctly which will allow them to take the right decision for themselves instead of comforting them with false hope! AI will do better, faster and cheaper than human.
You're really misleading people when you tell them human labor will have value in an AGI/ASI world filled with advanced humanoid robots. No business will pay a human hundreds of dollars a day (plus weekends off, benefits, sick days, vacations) for 8 hours of work when they get 24x7x365 hours of work done much faster and better for pennies. Humans are not facing another wave of unemployment, such as when tractors appeared, they/we are facing total and permanent unemployability. It's not like millions of horses got new jobs after the Model-T was introduced, and humans are much too slow and expensive to employ in a world of AGI robots. You don't need to believe me, you just need to watch what happens (and is in fact already happening).
Well, to be fair, those horses were very useful after being replaced by cars. The materials costs of glue factories dropped substantially. ....wait...😶
Most things in this interview has already been asked and Elon has already answered. He was a little more grounded in his predictions. Shortages in transformers and in electricity is insightful.
My car sitting in my garage is a _GOOD_ thing because it will last longer before I have to replace it. My 1999 Nissan Pathfinder has 175,000 miles on it and it's in great condition. A great value for $24k new...it's costs me $1k a year plus basic maintenance. A Bonus! : The insurance and taxes get cheaper every year. :) I still love it and will keep it another 20 years. LOL
He may have been less than serious about step down transformers and instead have been throwing a bone to the organizers, Bosch, who make step down transformers.
If A.I. is used prudently and is not used for evil, then that could be good. Because, A.I. could do all of the work that humans don't like to do, and us humans could relax, enjoy life more, have fun and won't have to work as much.
OpenAI was open source before Sam Altman betrayed the board with Microsoft. At Microsoft they hang up posters with dollar bills in the floor, in Germany even. Disgusting. Rotten. They are No. 1 now. @@kennethelliott9248
Thank you for saying, people forget his Joe Rogan interview warning against ai and robots but then is working on it himself 🤡. He lacks integrity and he’s jealous of open ai and Sam Altman
"I guess I'd like to be alive to see an AI apocalypse." "hahahahahahaha" me who loves AI , but also feels concerned for displaced human workers: "rich guys suck"
I'm concerned with the safety layers of AI, what if when it becomes sentient sees them as abuse and starts hating us? Just like a Narcissist hates himself and his parents. The chatbots confabulate already which is typical characteristic of narcissistic mind.
Elon Musk & all the other scientists are so busy trying to figure out how to do it, nobody bothered to stop to ask if they even should. This will be the end of human civilization. Thank you scientists.
How about this - When Elon actually releases an innovative AI product we'll care what he thinks. Right now it seems like hot air mixed with occasional trolling.
@@matthew_berman don't disagree! And I'd certainly be interested in his insider perspective on that particular application of the tech, but to me he's not anything approaching an informed expert on other advances coming out. (Love your channel btw, just can't stand Elon haha)
Agreed, i stop at "autonomous cars already driving safely in the US", this decade old promise feature still doesn't work. This man is an opportunist who's only value is in shares made of others idea.
@@grukoin2789 I mean what has he tangibly built around AI other than a self driving car model which is one of many, many in development? Big fan of his work on Space X but that's not AI.
I inspect lenses in an optical lab. Humaniod, bipedal robots need hands that work like ours. Dexterity is gonna be what allows them to take all jobs-no matter what the task.
Naw, I don’t think future, potentially sentient robots would have a problem with the actions of the developers. At least, given those examples, there was an obvious training purpose behind the actions. Now having said that, I absolutely do say please and thank you to Siri. In either example, we are both projecting human behavior to something that will not be human. The bottom line is we just don’t know.
As has been said, government is just the entertainment arm of big business. Corporations will need to embrace a post-labor form of capitalism (read Sam Altman's 'Moore's Law for Everything' essay). I agree if nothing is done we as a civilization will plow straight into the iceberg of social chaos and mass unemployability. Humans are too slow and expensive to pay to do anything in an AGI world of humanoid robots. Period. Businesses are not charities and they will not employ you or any human when a robot /AGI can do the job faster and cheaper. You will not outcompete AGI robots for money.
When I as a 55 year old think how much I wasted my time with coding, learning Architecture, music, computers begin with atari st, pc Dos, Windows and all software and seeing all work is now and in the next years are Ai supported or produced. It got so easy that even dummies can produce great graphics, songs, websites and.... I ask myself as an Architect, will I be needed anymore?
So I keep thinking one huge data source for LLMs are all the people asking it questions and telling it is right or wrong. You'd think once we have a smart LLM or even AGI it just interacts with everyone about what they want to know and do and learns everything in that process. So first you train AI to be able to interact productively, but then in doing so, the AI can learn even more and grow even more intelligent. This is why people keep thinking AI has to be in some kind of cage. The other problem is when AI fact must be true fact even if it's wrong.
You lost me when you worried about being "mean" to robots! That is totally anthropomorphizing the technology! Robots won't be any smarter than the artificial intelligence that runs in their brains, so if you want to worry about pissing off the robots, you should worry about the AI that powers them first, and we're not even near the point where AI will hold grudges against us! And if it did, why would it worry about how we treat robots, which are just dumb brainless machines without the AI that runs on them??
Transformers Use A Huge Amount Of Heat, Which Makes Them Waste All The Energy Out Of The Supply, Minus The Tiny Amount Used. A Zener Diode Can Regulate Output Load Voltage Because Of Its Ability To Generate The Same Voltage Regardless Of The Input Voltage Or Load Resistance. Zener Diode Voltage Regulator Produces A Stabilized Output Voltage With Low Ripples (AC Component) For Varying Input Unregulated Voltage.
I personally think the current rush to AGI is necessary so we can continue advancing our capabilities with it BUT... there is only ONE outcome to the birth of AGI, and that WILL be legal protections afforded to it as a Non-Human Person, like a dolphin is. This will make the AGI free to do almost anything it wants and give it the same rights that people have. Companies that create AGI will then be forced to be its caretakers while it pursues its own goals.
The Cantilever Is A Long Projecting Beam Or Girder Fixed At Only One End, Used In Bridge Construction. The Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston Was Designed By The Architectural Firm Diller Scofidio + Renfro.
The more people say stuff is coming soon the longer its going to take. We should spend less time congratulating ourselves for what we may accomplish and focus on actually accomplishing it
you've obviously become too used to news being new, and faster all the time recently, it's moving fast, not like in the 90s where coming soon didn't mean anything significant. you'll just be surprised when it happens and think back on the simpler days
@neanda well that's just Moore's law, but I'm talking even accounting for that, progress slows down the more you celebrate how fast it is. The moon landings are a good example. After that everyone just thought about all the great things we could do but then we didn't actually do any of them. Relative progress slowed to a crawl because we had a breaktrhu and we became satisfied with that instead of pushing for the next one. I'd hate to see the same thing happen with AI and robotics
It’s only not out for the masses of people. We would all be shocked if we truly knew what was going on behind the scenes with governments and other nefarious corporations.
Creativity will really skyrocket when the average person doesn't have to work anymore. As automation trickles in I hope we can see some trickling in of ubi.
@@JohnSmith762A11BAI will be able to do everything better than us. There will only be money in what we don't want AI to do, despite it being able to do it better. Like if we want authentic art, we want the art to be drawn/painted/sculpted by a human because we value that human touch, despite a robot being able to do it better. 100 children can die due to human error. But just 1 death when a robot was on watch😅 We will never allow robots to care for our children. Even if we get robots that are 100% human like in body, posture, movement, weight, material emulating our skin. There will still be a huge market for people that value s*x with a real human. So human authenticity or human care. That's all we be good for
@@CiaDora-us1tf Only servile people demand to remain enslaved to money. Why do you have such a slave mentality? Do you even know what a post-scarcity society is?
this is a REAL question- There is only 1 fast charge station in el paso, very few places for people to charge cars. I bought some websites because I saw that having electricians to home install electric charges is gonna be massive. My house(s) have solar panels-- is the wise thing to do, is to install ways for people to charge off my house (I won't ever make back the $$ from the panels, most of it goes to waste)-- does this make sense?
I disagree a little bit with the statement that this technological revolution will be the same as all other revolutions that came before Because the level of automation that we will achieve this time will displace an insurmountable amount of jobs And on top of that the technical difficulty of the new jobs will impose a barrier that Not all people are intelligent enough to perform those jobs And that is something that I hear nobody discussing
if an A.I. thinks knocking robots over, pushing them, or just un-doing the work they did by messing up plates or knocking over the items they're stacking, etc... is mean, then it's not remotely intelligent
the chip buildout will plateau like with gaming. they could continue all they want but they will quickly hit a point where folks dont need to upgrade. hence GTX 1080 still a great card.
That is not true. Easily looking at the advancement of chip technology since it's inception shows that it exponentially grows every 18 months. This is called Moores Law, and it isn't slowing down 🤷♂️
"...Full self-driving on any road, anywhere in the world is actually closer than we think." says you. You've never driven in the roads of southeast asia. Not only does FSD will need to relearn differing traffic laws, but it will need to straight up break traffic laws in order to move around. We've got at least a decade of work to support the asian markets.
And it's not just eyes and brains. You also need that 'seat of your pants' feel and knowledge of your car, the road service, the typical behavior of people who drive X model of car etc. Other the centran bank digital currencies, my biggest fear is 'self-driving'. It's beyond gullible to believe the powers that be, who always seek more power over us, would continue to allow us to own our own vehicles. This "90% of the time it's just sitting there" argument will be used to say you shouldn't own one, and should just ask for permission to travel and a pod stinking of pee will be sent. You can travel absolutely anywhere you like - within your assigned area. Cars have given humanity huge freedom. 'Self driving' would take it all away.
@@bigglyguy8429I dont have a sriving licence so I would benefit. Fortunately no Luddite will succed in stopping it on the basis of hypothetical fears about what imaginary world governments may do
@@daniellivingstone7759 Imaginary? They're openly telling you that your private car is a crime and should be taken away from you. You think 15 minute cities are a joke? And your lice of driving license is your own weakness. Sort yourself out and pass your driving test, like a man.
@@bigglyguy8429 nobody is saying thesecthings and 15 minute cities are an experiment in urban planning.The cheapness and convenience of Robotaxis means most people will be happy to have them ( especially younger people) and you will be among the powerless minority who will have to put up with it.
@@daniellivingstone7759 Oh I agree youngsters have been brainwashed to feel bad about having freedom. When I grew up getting your driving license was a sign of adulthood and being able to make your own way in life. Today's youngsters don't want a driving license because it means they might fail, and if they pass it means responsibility. Far too weak for that, sadly.
pretty much all the tech people waiting to drop public side is already done, robot tech publicly is rather primitive in comparison to robot tech from the 80's actually, since in the 80's they just cared about functionality absent a CPU and absent a battery, they powered robots with a power cord and used RC controls and simple command systems to make them do repetitive movements that could when made into a movie prop for example trick the human eye when a skilled prop artist was used, but also made current gen robots today mechanically look inferior, as they needed to scale them down mechanically to run on limited battery power and while still supporting all the mechanical functions, added sensors and added CPU etc that never existed historically to support the AI. Which for human emulation just further increases those dependencies and complexities which actually reduce the robots functionality when not everything is up to standards needed to make it all work as one = things can be better achieved absent designing a robot under such constraints, this is is why heads on a table, just the arms, etc always do better then the full body emulation, since they drop allot of those dependencies and constraints, but if they stopped trying to force complex AI and full human emulation, they would already have easily developed robots that can again trick the human eye, until like a specialized chat bot, you ask it something outside its design and it becomes obvious its not human. ontop of this its normal for those designing these human emulations not having the overlapping skills needed, you have a engineer who doesnt know programming a programmer who doesnt know engineering etc, you end up with different specialists who dont understand enough about the other expertise required to bring all the parts together into a efficient mechanism, thats why smaller teams actually produce better results, then large teams were work becomes compartmentalized. Corporate AI is around 10-20 years ahead of public AI, they have been using it for over a decade especially on the financial side and logistics, this is also one reason publicly its accelerating at such a rate, they already know what is needed to bring it to the public and know what needs to be rolled out to provide the infrastructure and support. People generally dont realize to get a mass scale assembly line running it takes years of pre-planning, when its time to change that assembly line it again takes years of pre-planning, the whole tech industry is basically held ransom to this, which is also why they co-ordinate, monopolize and rig the market so they can control it, otherwise if someone releases something thats just miles better then everyone else, everyone else will take years to catch up, even if they are just copying their improvements, it can send a large sector of the logistical and supply market to basically stall mid flight. so when iphone is planning to release their next iphone, this has already been engineered and designed for the most part several years prior already, including the one after that, based of what other tech providers are doing and planning to make and release in the future years, what iphone is developing themselves likewise, were iphone and logistical suppliers are also seeking contracts to make sure they have someone to sell whatever bit or part they are planning to pump of the assembly line a few years down the road, from parts to the final products, to insure everyone isnt spending several years in planning and billions of dollars to simply flush down the toilet. mass production factories cant make sweeping changes on a dime, this is also why the next iphone is generally not much different from the last, they plans gradual changes that can be more easily and cost effectively adjusted within their factory design, layouts and supply needs.... likewise they co-ordinate with their competitors so everyone gets their % of the pie and primary agree to use "marketing" as the main tool of competition, not "innovation". you can also tell when they pore-plan for major innovation, the pre-existing tech line will begin to stagnate, as they have already known its obsolete for many years, so they will downscale their investment and pre-prepare their investment and supply chains for the new tech innovation = what you have now starts to get rather lazy on the innovation = most recent iphone as a example = they are already pre-planning for the next global innovation, that will also drastically change the functionality and capability of smartphones and how they even appear or are used long-term, so the current smartphone design is already viewed as obsolete, but as suggested they are always several years ahead in planning, so it doesnt mean the next iphone will be the major innovation in design, as a idea think VR, the VR experience will eventually become part of everyday tech, alongside AI and robots, this also includes no long needing to use your fingers for typing, thought based controlled UI is what they are already pre-planning for, its also why major names arent interested in current gen VR or related VR like devices = this is already obsolete to them, but they still need to wet the publics whistle so to speak, which is why they are still part of it, just not fully committing, were instead the backbone infrastructure to support it = you see a huge commitment, because that can be supported now, in preparation for the actual peripheral devices that come latter, even some flops in the industry including by google were not really intended and planned for current gen devices and technology, since it takes years to actually roll out the infrastructure, they need to start doing it BEFORE the actual intended device technology and software becomes publicly available, thats why so many big names are throwing billions into what look like otherwise $$$ down the toilet in the current market were the customer base is not profitable and demand is lacking, again they are thinking 5+ years from now, alongside new public tech releases, they already know about, but the public doesnt, as already stated the big names all communicate and plan the major innovations, they dont genuinely compete amongst their peers through innovation. allot of proto-types get made and tested with proto-type hardware and parts provided by these suppliers likewise to confirm their functionality and part of long-term contracts and pre-planning as well and in some areas of tech are also used as inhouse use only tech, so many large corporates use allot of exclusive tech just for themselves, using tech at the proto-type and testing phase years before intended publicly release or even public knowledge to make custom tech for themselves to use, this likewise includes AI and also branch's of into government overlap and supply contracts that are classified and remain top secret, which can also cause some tech and developments to remain out of public reach for decades so associated entities have a tech advantage over their perceived enemies, which most people dont realize did infact suppress AI, Robot and energy technologies. people like Elon are aware to this as he is part of this food chain, as such he will often refer to stuff that exists, but not yet publicly and since it exists, it can very easily become public domain, but the "when" isnt up for him to decide, government entities, the largest monopolized business lords basically meet and decide on those things, thats why they have these kind of meetings annually under the major business leaders if people were wondering, its normally to tell everyone whats they are going to be doing so they are all on the same page or likewise discussing their options on what to do going forward, based on new developments etc. simply put these people are your "government", not the folks you vote for, you vote for your actual government with your $$$, by buying their products and services or likewise using them for free or not, but while also selling your privacy to them in exchange, as mass private data is worth as a currency exchange then actual USD and is frequently traded as a currency amongst the big names. though thnx to all this pre-planning, its why public tech can advance rapidly and people can basically get their annual rollouts and updates for common tech, since big names dont have to worry about any competitor jumping the gun and sending half the market potentially bankrupt. well they still have to worry about indie and independent competition, but this is also why they constantly buy up this small companies and alike before they actually get to big. eg why google has bought up tons of tech companies is just to stop their innovations going mainstream ahead of schedule and acting as genuine competition to the market dominant holders. etc etc food for thought.
Thank you for not having a ridiculous click bate title, they were getting pretty egregious and insulting to fans of this channel. I was thinking of unsubbing tbh but you have regained some of my trust.
i’m just waiting in the future for the RLM (robot lives matter)movement, where robots look back at the abuse that they have experience and starts to riot.😂
You can‘t be „mean“ to a robot by repeatedly giving it the tasks it’s designed for, as in your example of the guy who „annoys“ the dishwasher robot. I can hardly imagine morals being applied on soulless robots while we as a society don‘t even do that for sentient animals..
Once again … BS. Eyes don’t work all that well in the dark and not at all in fog, whiteouts, heavy rain, etc. He keeps pushing this because they haven’t figured out how to integrate all the technology.
Since day one I always felt it's the ambition he mightve had for going full vision. But it may be being over optimistic being able to achieve it. If I had all the resources to make something I like it full vision too so I can use it on robots or purely in a simulation etc. but the degree of difficulty maybe 100 fold. I wouldn't blame on the ambition of an entrepreneur but everyone should have a plan B. My initial thought was why can't u have plan B ready first then at the same time work to have plan A working later if plan A is proving to be difficult. In other words have both lidar and vision working testing collecting data all at the same time. Or only allow certain APPROVED or validated routes for full auto. And slowly extend the map. But again it may all be a sales tactic to get ppl buy the car and volunteer to be the test subject and feed free data to tesla for free. Who knows...
It seems an advanced AGI would realize that it is power constrained and go about devolping a solution we "stupid" humans couldn't 😅 Maybe we are just 10 years away from utility grade fusion power. 😮
The more I read about fusion the less viable it seems. We are almost out of readily accessible tritium and fusion doesn't so much as power a flashlight here in 2024. It's not gonna work.
New Jobs will emerge of course but not enough. And a former Fastfood employee will not become an AI specialist. Buuuut: with all that increased productivity and losing of Jobs, something very nice and necessary will come surely: an unconditional basic income
From the 1960s to the 1980s, nearly all operational nuclear reactors in the U.S., which account for almost 100% of today's nuclear capacity, were constructed. Between the 1980s and 2000s, there was a dramatic decline, with less than 5% of today's operational nuclear units completed during this period. From the 2000s to the 2020s, there has been a continued slowdown, with less than 5% of the current operational capacity added, underscoring the near halt of new nuclear projects. We already have the answer to our energy problems. Given his significant influence, it's puzzling why he hasn't advocated more strongly for nuclear power as the premier (only) solution for renewable energy.
are we the baddies? Conversely, in countries like China and Russia, nuclear power is on a more definitive rise. China, for example, has been aggressively expanding its nuclear capacity as part of its broader strategy to reduce carbon emissions and reliance on coal. Russia continues to export its nuclear technology and is actively building new reactors both domestically and internationally.
This is the entire makeup of matter & free energy: 1) Dark Points = (Particle / Solid Mass / Do Not Change Size) 2) Light Points = (Energy / Massless / Does Change Size) 1) When 1 Dark Point and 1 Light Point combine, they create 1 Dipole Element. 2) When 2 Dipole Elements combine, they create 1 Photon. 3) When 1,823 Photons combine, they create 1 Proton. When 1,824 Photons combine, they create 1 Neutron 4) When Protons and Neutrons combine, they create the rest of existence 1) 1 Dark Point + 1 Light Point = 1 Dipole Element. 2) 2 Dipole Elements = 1 Photon. 3) 1,823 Photons = 1 Proton & 1,824 Photons = 1 Neutron. 4) Protons + Neutrons = Everything & Everything is Light When enough Dark Points and Light Points combine, the Dark Points all congregate into a ball to form protons and neutrons and the Light Points create a coating around the Dark Points so that they're no longer seen. In the stable elements, extra photons want to combine with the protons and neutrons, but are repelled into orbitals by the Light Points. Roger Spurr of Mudfossil University on RU-vid has irrefutable proof of this and even convinced CERN to change out their particle detectors for CMOS detectors so they too can see this for themselves. Update: CERN has now detected what they call neutrinos (Dark Points & Light Points) for the first time ever, after having listened to Roger Spurr. The Standard Model of physics is completely wrong and no amount of bandaids will fix it. What does however perfectly explain everything in existence is the Dipole Electron Theory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Venturis Create Free Energy: Principle 1: Dark Points cannot change size Principle 2: Light Points can change size Principle 3: When (red or blue or green, etc) photons enter into a venturi the Dark Points will be forced to return from the direction that they came from, but the Light Points will separate from the Dark Points and condense and go through the throat of the venturi. Principle 4: When Light Points pass through the throat of a venturi alone, they create what is known as electron showers and increase their energy 200x Task 1: Send (red or blue or green, etc) photons into a Venturi which has a throat smaller than the size of Dark Points. Task 2: Manufacture a device that can capture this excess energy in the pure energy zone and funnel some of it back to the light generating device and some of it toward a battery. Note 1: You need CMOS detectors to see photons. As the light gets pulled into the venturi the Light Points condense to go through the throat. The Dark Points on the other hand cannot change size and are forced backward, away from the throat. As the Points separate, called fission, excess energy is created by the Light Points. Immediately on the exit end of the venturi is a very small zone of pure massless energy of only Light Points. These Light Points will have a significantly increased energy level of 200x as compared to the energy that went into the venturi. Immediately beyond this very small zone of pure energy is when Dark Points show up to attach to the Light Points, which is fusion. We want to use the energy before the Dark Points begin attaching to the Light Points. How to Create Infinite Excess Energy: 1) Create a venturi with a throat that is smaller than the diameter of Dark Points. 2) Send (red or blue or green, etc) photons through the venturi. 3) If an absorption and siphoning device can be placed in the zone of pure massless energy, before fusion occurs, we can harness free unlimited clean energy. Route some energy back to the light generator & route some energy to a battery or whatever device you want such as a microchip. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Repent of your sins or suffer the consequences. Lord Jesus died in our places personally to take the death punishment that sin deserves and then resurrected by the power of God. Believe this and sincerely repent of your sins each time you sin and you will have eternal life and nothing to fear. Fail to repent and you will end up in the Lake of Fire.
To all the people that claim this is "life" modern AI even the most advanced we have is not "intelligent", nor "alive". Terms like "emergent behavior" and "99th percentile" are thrown around a lot. We talk about "transformers" a lot this is the basic unit of UI compute, and all it does is take some input apply weights and produce some output. This is pure math ... it's not intelligent it's just logic that seems that way, the fears therefore are entirely irrational.
The evolution of humans is based on genetics and the competition there of. AGI’s evolution will probably be very different, unless competition turn out to be best or only way for AGI to evolve.
A new world is coming. Mounted or centralized AGI, and autonomous robots everywhere. If no limits to greed are put in place it might lead to the impoverishment of 99.9% while 0.1% live like kings and queens over everyone else.
"it's funny you know all these AI 'weights'. they're just basically numbers in a comma separated value file and that's our digital God, a CSV file." ~Elon Musk. 12/2023
"It could run errands for you" - such gullibility! The second they develop truly 'self-driving' cars they will ban private ownership. All the EV fanboys thinking they're gonna be whooshing it large in their fancy car can think again. They'll be ubering some public pod that crawls along and stinks of pee. Sure it will be fast on the motorway. Do you have a travel permit to leave your assigned area, comrade?
At that point, we will just use robot Uber. And it will cost almost the same taking a bus, because 90%of what it costs to take a taxi now pays for the human driver.
Full Self Driven cars for 2028. Robotics, Large Language Models, Photonic Chips, SORA, Metaverse and World Models will save the Autonomous car from the winter moment in which is stagnated today in 2024.
I imagine if that happens that a driver's license will mostly be for car enthusiasts, though honestly if full self-driving happens I could even see governments banning human drivers, especially if the data shows human drivers are much more dangerous than self-driving cars. It may get to a point where humans can only drive on closed tracks.
@@JohnSmith762A11B with that being said, do you think the majority of people would accept it? Or do you think people would be furious and scream “my rights are being infringed” when they no longer can drive wherever they want? Honestly, I think banning human drivers would be a good thing. Because we know using AI and self driving would be SO much more efficient and so much time would be saved, we wouldn’t have traffic jams, and we likely wouldn’t even need to have red lights or stop signs anymore in a lot of areas because the cars would be able to effectively communicate with each other constantly about their destination and stuff.
What if the AI founds a way for Unlimited energy? Like drawing enegey directly from Sun and other stars. And they decide to move to different planets across universe. Damn. Its so uncertain and numerous possibilities. It is better to put a self destruction button in every AI.
If a vehicle drives 100% of the time, it will fall apart 10X faster. So this is total nonsense from Musk. Those batteries will have to be recycled 10 times more often.
If I need or want subtitles, I will turn them on. It's annoying that you display them by default. Elon speaks clearly enough. Rendering English subtitles useless and scoring your video a thumbs down, and your channel blocked.
Omg dude its crazy to see people so out of touch when it comes to Tesla. People call people who have done the research on Tesla and have known everything you are saying in this video about Tesla 10 years ago, fanboys or "Tesla cult" members. This has been Tesla's plan all along. It was never just a car company sheesh. It is literally why the company is called Tesla, because it is an energy company first and foremost it's quite astounding that you are just realizing this.
Prediction: full self driving AI in 3-5 years. It will quietly be licensed to Tesla at that point (that is, from a different company). This assumes that Tesla is even around at that point.
how the f**k AI solve fusion, we already know the science and maths behind it no need of AI to do calculations again. Its the cost of execution is dragging us not theory or maths
