Absolutely fantastic! I don't think I've understood a physics concept faster. I hope your students realize how lucky they are to have you. Thank you so much.
I have a BSEE degree which obviously included multiple classes in high level electromagnetic field and calculus....in the 5 minutes it took to watch this video i now understand the physical component of this concept better than i ever have...bravo sir!
What determines the magnitude of flux? And how much energy escapes from the system because of flux? Is flux the same as friction? These are the questions i have had in my head all week. Hope the video answers them.
Can you please help with the following questions: 1) every demo on this topic uses a rotating coil or copper loop or a magnet fixed to a rotor and facing a stator of copper coils. Sometimes a magnet is pushed into and pulled out of the coil. The question is: Is one method superior to the other 2) along your line of rain analogy. What if instead of rain I had a powerful garden hose opined right in the middle of the loop as you rotate it. And compare with giant drum of water that when poured consumes the entire area of the loop. Assuming the exact same amount of water sits through the loop is one type of flux preferred k we the other )super concentrated bs large surface area?
Number 2) I assume you mean what if it was between 2 small magnets which produce a narrow B line. Well it doesn’t change much because eventually flux is still going to equal 0. It just means that it would take a little longer to actually start making a difference from maximum flux
BUT> what if you had 2 loops to collect rain, both loops perfectly aligned (as in a wire coil)? Would the flux double? You are still collecting the same amount of rain, but your 3D area has doubled. Would the RATE of flux change stay the same or double?
If two like sides (two magnetic north polarity sides or two magnetic south polarity sides) of wafer or ring magnets are forced together with super glue or epoxy cement, would this create a high density or concentrated magnetic flux field? If so, would the flux field produce a scalar wave energy field around the two magnets glued together? If anyone knows, please leave me a reply. If the two magnets glued together are placed on a sheet of copper, would the concentrated magnetic flux field energize the copper? If the two magnets glued together were placed inside the resin of an orgonite pyramid or orgonite charging plate, would the magnetic flux field of the two magnets cause the orgonite to convert positive ions into negative ions?
@@PhysicsHigh plz can you explain further why the rate of change for magnetic flux start from maximum I can't understand why it starts at the maximum value!
@@mohamedtaha2025 If you graphed a tangent to the flux function, you would see that after 0 the gradient of the function decreases until it reaches 0 (local max)
Hello sir, around about 2:56, for the graph for flux, instead of oscillating between the positive and negative region shouldn't it always be positive? As flux is purely just a measure of the amount of field lines threading through the loop?
I think you're right. I've never seen "negative rain" in a bucket ;-) But mathematically there is a change of sign after a rotation of 1 pi in a sine-function.
The cosine vector changes from 0° to 90° to 180° to 270° and back to 360° which is equal to 0°. Substitute the angels and that's why it oscillates through positive and negative side.
Emf stands for electro magmetic field right ?? Does this emf represents the electron motion in the atom so negtive means electron nearest the next atom and postive means the electron farthest away from thr next atom and this change is what causes the production of emf radiation
It stands for electromotive force... The idea is that when you have an induced electric field (so one created by a change in magnetic flux) it will create a current. A current is basically the motion of electrons, and to move the electrons there must be work done. The current moves over a closed path: consider the work done to move a unit charge over the closed path as the emf. It gets confusing, because the emf is not actually a force, it is a measure of work per unit charge, and therefore has units Nm/C or simply Volts. It is an example of unfortunate naming in physics.
