Once only and only used to fly Boeing. Trusted it the most. Now avoid it as much as possible. Plus asking a company to speed up planes they already are unable to make properly is a recipe for a bigger disaster.
My late Brother was a Concorde design leader and was often asked to work in US- he always refused because as he said they’re always in a big hurry to get their planes flying and never did enough research and testing - that was 30 years ago .
Boeing does not need more management oversight . That's what got them into trouble . It needs more engineering oversight to ensure the build quality is to the highest standard
As far as I know, Emirates argued with Airbus in commercial terms and that led to give Boeing a chance. Despite all these 777X attributes, the A350-1000 will be a huge competitor!
Emirates has invested heavily in the 777X, and these problems must be incredibly frustrating. Im curious to see how Boeing will address the engine and certification issues.
My smallest problem is the B777 being used by Emirates on the Saigon - Dubai route has terrible business class seat. The arm rest on one side is at shoulder height while the other side in at normal height. The lay flat seat is narrow which make it impossible for me with a slight back problems to sleep on the 7hr journey. Seat are set in two's so having to clamber over the passenger in the aisle seat is not pleasant. The second leg to London or Birmingham is aboard an A380 and the seat is bliss and I can catch up on much needed sleep. I have heard Emirates is refitting 777 interior's so I hope the next time I fly some of the for mentioned problems have been solved.
As an aviation enthusiast, its concerning to hear about the ongoing issues with the 777X. Boeing needs to ensure they meet all regulatory standards without further delays.
Boeing's biggest short-term problem is the labor union strike coming up. The IAM hasn't had a new contract in 16 years and the pay has been relatively stagnant.
So what's the difference between the original 777 and the new one sounds like the same problems as the original 737 aircraft same original body but just trying to put new engines on it and trying to improve the wing a bit other than the fancy mood lighting inside don't seem like a big improvement to me might as well bring back the 707 it looks better
Its disappointing to hear about the delays with the Boeing 777X. Emirates must be feeling the pressure, especially with their ambitious plans for this aircraft. Hope Boeing can sort these issues quickly!
Emirates is a major player in the aviation industry, and the 777X delays are not just a problem for them but for the whole sector. Boeing has a lot of work to do to regain trust.
With some airlines, it seems they always want the latest and what is perceived as the best aircraft in their fleet. Otherwise, why would they turn their noses up at the updated 747? There will be a point in time when aircraft engines become as economical as they are going to get. Then what? There is no limit to how high fuel prices can go. Then what? Maybe there should be fewer planes flying, not more. The world didn't fall apart when COVID hit and planes were grounded.
The issues with the GE9X engines and FAA certifications are major hurdles for the 777X. Emirates and other customers must be eagerly awaiting a resolution from Boeing.
With the A380 production halted and the 777X delayed, Emirates has a lot on their plate. Boeing needs to expedite solutions to avoid further complications.
400 seats vs. some 500 seats of the A380 - it's not a replacement, but a massive reduction of capacity on routes like LHR-DXB. Airbus needs to relaunch the A380.
Imagine when they get to a healthy production right A3 50 so many enhancements this aircraft is an amazing aircraft by the time this starts making money. The 350 is gonna be so much more advanced gets high and they do a stretch that holds the same amount of people, just won’t be able to compete. I don’t think.
The delays,only tell me, of a FAA getting tough on safety, at last. That means that many of the assembled 777x had problems re safety and the delays came about because of the FAA intervention. That does not fill me with comfort. Boeing still with the same management, makes you wonder, just how safe are any of their aircraft? For me, I will still look for a Airbus carrier to do my long haul flights.
Many assembled 777x had no problems of safety but the delays were due to scrutiny and engines and some few flight control issues (pitch event) 2 years ago. Why would this not fill you with comfort? Boeing is not under the same management. they are having new management now. All of their planes are safe. just look at a flight radar! Why should you still look for an airbus carrier to do your long haul flights with?
Seeing the 777X face such challenges is disappointing. Emirates is known for their high standards, and Boeing needs to meet them to keep their reputation intact.
It is a shame that while the 777x is such an improvement over the 777 in just about every way, thanks to issues and delays in development, it is likely to disappoint, or even fail in what is most important for Boeing - that is to provide a healthy profit. Even if it is a great success numerically, I would be surprised if it even came close to the old 777. Hopefully, it does not end up like the 787 as one if those aircraft that the airlines love, but could be disappointing in Boeing's balance sheets. One external problem for Boeing apart from the current and ongoing supply chain issues, could depend upon how far Airbus can, or are prepared to stretch their A350. Of course if they did, they really would have a significant advantage over Boeing. As relitively simple stretch (when compared to the 777x major upgrade), the development costs are greatly reduced as is the time it takes to be certified and to enter service. I suspect that the degree of stretch will depend upon what can be done within the existing airport category dimensions without having to resort to folding wingtips, or how cost effectivly they can be incorporated, be that as a modification to the current design or something completely new.
@@eleazarreyes1915 Trent XWB 84 now in development for another upgrade , later XWB97 follow on, the rumors also say RR Ultra fan now in development. Yes the GE9X is the most powerful turbofan, but the A350-1000 isn't need such power, also the A350-1000 still 30 tons lighter, lighter airframe save fuels.
@@TonyLee-th1vvand still the 777-9 has a lower per seat cost with its massive wing. When there will be an A350neo one day Boeing can follow with a re-engined 777.
I could never understand why Clark would buy an end of line aircraft, the 777x, with no realistic improvements possible in the future. AIRBUS on the other hand have everything he could possibly want from a fleet of modern, high tech. And with years of development left ahead of them aircraft. US. Politics say you buy my aircraft and I will defend your country. This is the usual purchaser of the 777x. Plus lessors who have a readymade market of course. BOEING is finished as a new aircraft producer. 20 years of 787 updates are the best they can do. When the 1950s 737 and the 1960s 777 have run out of updates and gimmicks. Then what ?
Why would the 777x have no realistic improvements possible in the future? Airbus have everything he could want but he denied an A350-1000 order due to the XWB 97 engine not being on wing long enough for him! The 777x is a high tech and modern with years of development left ahead of it. Boeing isnt finished as a new aircraft producer. 20 years of 787 and 777x will come. Airbus A350 updates is all they can do? Just gimmicks as well from a330neo and a320neo!
1:23 Emirates Airlines President (The CEO of Emirates Airlines/Emirates Airlines Boss) Sir Tim Clark's face similar and compared to U.S.A. President Joe Biden 🇺🇸🇺🇲.
This video was all over the place, a jumble of stuff not directly related to to the clickbait title. And you padded it out so you could get an ad in, not that I see ads because I've got ad blocker. This why I don't subscribe to your channel, you're just chasing clicks.
Leaving aside the question how the projected sales of hundreds/thousands new aircraft strokes with our 2050 zero carbon goals, the time that there is a business model for aircraft construction seems to be over .. commercial airliners have in any case been cross-subsidized by military orders. So instead of taxpayers paying indirectly for the production of commercial aircraft, perhaps all should be merged into one international, government-owned aircraft company. With the government regulation stepped up to current levels it is governments that call the shots anyway. So: move away from an inefficient 20th century business model ...
@georgeszurbach444 I'm actually amazed you know that. I designed hydraulic landing gear system for 777x. I never consider EASA standard since it's much easier to obtain than FAA.
@@TamPham-rv9qn the FAA has subcontracted certification to Boeing for Boeing planes .This is a well known fact that has lead to hundred of deaths , injured passengers , plane losing doors!, parts of the landing gear .. Clearly transparency still doesnt exists as you as a Boeing employee seem to be unaware and believe in fairy tales.
Refurbish to extend their life lol their fleet is still young even an early build A380 is not even 20 years old. And aircraft age by cycles and hours. The 777 fleet and the A380 are fine for another 15 years. So lame
