Another misleading headline by FLIG AVIA. So much incorrect information given followed up by the word "however". Totally irresponsible post .If you are unfamiliar with the topic you would feel significant negativity about the A350-1000 and the Rolls Royce XWB powerplant. I get the distinct feeling that this site is supported by Boeing and General Electric. Some of us just want actual facts. Lets all just remember How many years late the 777X and it's GE engines are any why .
I'm not trying to argue any of the other points you're saying. I just wanted to state that the reason the GE9X is being delayed is because GE really cares about the safety and quality of their engines. GE has an incredible reliability record, especially when compared to Pratt & Whitney or Rolls Royce. They've also, through multiple instances over the decades, been very quick to admit their mistakes and work incredibly fast to fix them whenever any have occured. The A350 is a wonderful aircraft and I agree that this channel is portraying it and it's engines much worse than it actually is. I'm just saying that I don't think it's right for you to be upset about delays due to General Electric, because between them and Boeing working on the 777X, At least one of those companies cares about safety.
Sorry man, but the informations in this video is not correct. Th ME carriers have about 120 A350 on order and Turkish + Singapore about 120 units as well. And A350 are rolling out every month. A350 tally 1300 orders while 777x about 500. So most of the info you give is misleading
Your comments concerning the possibility of a two-engine Boeing 747 are completely wrong. Yes, the existing 4-engine 747 has approximately four times 250 kilonewtons of thrust.This gives approximately a total of 1000 kilonewtons. You are right up to here. A GE-9X engine has approximately 500 kilonewtons of thrust - two engines would give also the "required" 1000 kilonewtons. Yes and no. You forgot the requirement of all passenger aircraft to climb-out after an engine failure that occurs before lift-off. The true requirement is therefore that the remaining operative engine(s) provide 750 kilonewtons. (Four-engine 747 = 4 times 250 kilonewtons). One engine-out trust is 3 times 250 kilonewtons = approximately 750 kilonewtons to give the 747 the ability for a shalow climb angle and later the possibility to accelerate for a zero-flap configuration. The engine-out case for your proposed twin-engine 747 with GE-9x engines would be UNABLE to climb or accelerate with the remaining single engine giving only 500 kilonewtons of thrust. There are presently no engines under development in the 750 kilonewtons (165000 lbs force) thrust category. So your proposal is a "school boy's dream" without any aircraft engineering consideration. The "Twin 747" with GE-9X would be deadly underpowerd for the engine-out case so that it would not able to be certified.
It’s all about politics. If you purchase Boeing aircraft the US Will guarantee your defence against hostile countries in your region ie. IRAN. The Airbus A350 is new with years of development and upgrades ahead. The Boeing 777x is a 1960 creation at the end of its development and upgrade cycle. Other Gulf. Airlines are flying the A350 1000. without any problems. The 777x by contrast is a long way from carrying passengers anytime soon. As I say, it’s all about politics.
Please do not use ecofriendly or ecoconscious in the context of any plane. A tiny reduction in emissions per passengerkilometer does not yet make it a clean enough transport option. In fact, no plane does. So to save the climate, only very limited airtravel (for instance for engineers required in a specific place) can be maintained. All other travel should be by bicycle, by foot or by train. And yes, tourism will have to drastically change.
Emirates hve a total of 65 Airbus A350-900 0n order. It is the -1000 that they have an issue with as Sir Tim Clarke says that the engines are not poerful enough for the aircraft. So this whole video is misleading.
Emirates has been playing with both Boeing and Airbus, always criticizing one or the other. It probably wanted to be at the top of the list for its A-350 but didn't work, Airbus will not lose its name and customers because of one in particular.
I absolutely love A350! Has driven exploration of alternative. This is a beautiful aircraft to fly on: it is quieter than any Boeing plane . When I’m booking flights ( and I fly a not on Delta and its partner airlines), I always try to find one that flies an A350, particularly on long-haul flights.
News from the day before yesterday? It´s September 2024: The first A350-900 arrives at Emirates. Serialnumber 684. Plane F-WZGA.from Paris to Dubai. 64 more planes of this type will follow.
Same just like QANTAS, QANTAS says "NO" to BOEING 777X for the project sunrise because of probably cheaper and then QANTAS choose on AIRBUS A350-1000 xwb/ulr for the project sunrise future. Except for Emirates like this, Maybe Emirates choose on AIRBUS A350-900 xwb/ulr than A350-1000 xwb/ulr because so many BOEING 777-8/9X orders for Emirates.
With all do respect, Airbus have retained 2 094 orders from which 735 were delivered as of December 30, 2023 whatever Emirates think about it. It is not the first time that Emirates complains about either Boeing or Airbus.
Emirates will have pedal powered airplanes from Boeing from 2025 on. Boeing has made a perfect security system, installing parachute under each and every seat. Are they crazy?
I am looking at comments and I am concerned about accuracy of this report- I just enjoy aircraft and flying in general and much respect for both Airbus and Boeing. Greetings from Ireland!
Cool Whip. Kooclip. Why are you saying it like that? Say cool. Cool. Say whip. Whip. Now say cool whip. Kooclip. Exactly. Emirates. EmMarRats. Say Em. Em. Say irates. Irates. Say Emirates. EMatttttttsssssss. Exactly.
Just bland and clearly AI produced. I'm not even going to comment on content as this is already well commented on. Entry level reporting with AI assumed correct but totally wrong pronunciation of basic airline names.
So GE9X hasn`t even entered service & yet it`s more `reliable` than any RR or PW?! Your GE bias makes you make the most ridiculous statements. RR holds the world record for time-on-wing endurance for their RB211on a B757. GE90 isn`t even a relevent engine as the B777300-ER isn`t manufactured anymore. Both T-XWB -84 & -97 have proved their reliability & excellent economy this being proven by their order books. Twelve months after EIS for the GE9X then you will be able to assess it`s reliability, but then GE90 & GEnx issues on their EIS are blotted from your mind I guess?!
