Emirates Stadium Changed Arsenal 

4 FA Cups?

@@scorelineupdate12913 titles, 10 fa cups, 2 league cups and a european cup winners cup ?

Growing up in the USA, my sixth-grade teacher was a huge Arsenal fan and visited Highbury before it closed. He told me the stadium had a touch like Fenway and Wrigley.

@@zenkaiforms at the Emirates you dinlo

They lost from soul and lost a lot pf fans (like me)

And what have we won at the Emirates? How about NOTHING.

4 FA Cups?

We top of the league with ten games to go ❤

@@riofarai6928 just play for 0-0 Bore at Man city and title yours

yes, since we moved to the emirates weve had so many corporate fans who aren't too bothered about atmosphere. bit of a shame

Thank you ! 🙌

That sounds like Wenger is a quite poor manager. I wonder where his three League and seven FA Cup titles came from. Did he inherit them too?

Over paying mediocre players such Bentner, these players took advantage of the situation. Right upto recently they were being over payed. Arteta got rid off these mercenaries and at least now the wage bill has come down allowing us to spend in the transfer market.

@@axro well and you can say AFC is one of the biggest teams in Europe /CL team that ended up not even good enough to play in Europe... The three league titles/FA cups (first 4-6 years) were due hat defense/culture that was inherited .. FA cups were good .. but Portsmouth Wigan and Leicester City won FA cups...Yipeee

@@Sai_Saracen 1) Wenger won his last League title 2004, almost eight years after he took over at Arsenal. Obviously Wenger benefited pretty long from the inheritance of George Graham; 2) Considering that Leicester City won the Premier League too, they are not a very good proof for your theory according to which crappy clubs can win the FA Cup.

Sai: Either your memory fails you or you have some need to rewrite history.. Arsène Wenger's 'Invincible team' were composed of Lehmann, Cole, Campbell, Toure, Lauren, Pires, Gilberto, Vieira, Ljungberg, Henry & Bergkamp + (Keown, Kanu, Wiltord, Reyes, Parlor, Edu, Clichy, Cygan, Aliadiere, Bentley and Hoyte) Of those above, George Graham had signed only Keown & Parlor..! ALL THE OTHERS WERE WENGER'S SIGNINGS.. Yes, Arsène had a terribly efficient Graham built team, espically the midfield/defence (not forgetting David Seaman)with whom he had his earliest titles, but not only did his training/diets/ discipline improve those players mentally but also prolonged their careers by at least 3 years on average. Look up the real history if you are not familiar with it.. I write this, who as a boy, actually watched games with George Graham THE PLAYER at Highbury and much later, learned about and had the fantastic luck to watch Arsène Wenger's successes at Monaco.. and believe me, at that time, I could only dream then, that he would one day manage my team.. When I watched a 17yr old Thierry Henry's first game, under Arsène, at Monaco.. George Graham was nowhere near that game wishing/hoping to buy Henry.. or even the other Wenger man.. Emmanuel Petit..!!

I know they've should of just upgraded it

We had to leave. The area was too small to increase the capacity

@@Aaron-og8lv did you even watch the video

@@game1414 there was enough space. If they did really want to, there were some solutions

@@sebbelebb yes about no room for development

Agreed

So I've learned 😅

That is incorrect. The Emirates project was mothballed for 12mths after banks withdrew their funding. This was after the club had started to decontaminate the old refuse site and therefore, the land had already been acquired (via a highly controversial and bitter CPO) long before any economic crisis. The problem actually stems from poor directorship at the club namely, Keith Edelman. He ‘negotiated’ an embarrassingly poor, lowball sponsorship agreement with Emirates which handcuffed the club for 15yrs. Why? Because (see above) the banks pulled out and left a huge black hole in the finance. Not long after, Edelman was sacked; a reflection of his inability to retain the confidence of the City and his inability to defend the commercial position of Arsenal. The properties built on the vacated Highbury site actually sold very well and served to provide a one-off wind fall receipt; initially quite significant (tens of £millions) before tapering to more modest sums as less units remained. Indeed, it is probably the most successful component of the whole project. The ‘reason players were sold’ was due to the fact Wenger opted to build a cash reserve which equalled the debt owed. This gave rise to the myth that “the debt has been paid off” when it never had been. That cash reserve was subsequently plundered when Arsenal slipped out of the top 4 and chose to gamble on acquiring dross like Pepe for £72m; and offering Ozil and Auba £350k/wk contracts to buy their loyalty. Sadly I’m one of those weirdos who remembers everything.

​@@imconfused1237like it or not, I think we are in a better financially place because of Arsene shrewdness, Manchester United are the complete opposite imo

Games the game

💯 External factors have affected many teams

no one cares When Woolwich was in Kent

Was going to say the exact same thing

The stadium was built with the possibility of expansion however It is difficult to achieve the expansion, the local council will reject the plan unless the club renovate the Underground station to accommodate at least 200 more trains for the extra 20K capacity.

​@@MotiJourneytubeWouldn't that affect the whole Piccadilly Line and not just Arsenal station

If you didn't move you would still be playing in a tin pot stadium

The introduction to the Emirates was certainly a rude wake up call

Little Brexiteer mate... It's not even a real English name unless it's Woolwich-on-Thames-upon-tweed-in-England-in-Europe-upon-straffordchestershire-on-planet-Earth.