#MakeKar98kUsersGreatAgain (but also make every faction have lots of players thank you vm x) Livestreams to suffer as Germany with me: www.twitch.tv/majormcdonalds 🔴 Discord server to find others to suffer with: discord.com/major 💬
Explain me why they fix other iron sight but broke it completely for M3 grease guns? Also why stg is AR and for assaulters while M2 the stg counter part is not AR and it's not assaulters weapon even it's PDW ??? I lack logic in the game and if they gonna release it at this state the players just leave or didint even try the game it will be an exodus, us also missing higher tier anti tank weapons
@@JaHail-oy6vq jagdtiger is overkill bro they cant do that a kingtiger is hard enough to destroy imagine a jadgiger grayzoning you cant do shit against that
As an Axis high tier main, I've lately noticed that I'm the only one building rallies, people using STARTER weapons at BR 5 and people with 9 squad deaths at the end of the game with only 4 kills.
Another problem is that German players get divided among soviet and US queues, not so much a problem in low tier but high tier is f-ing crippled due to it, since most of the times there's 2 or 3 tier V players, and the rest of the team is tier III, making them have to fight about 5 or 6 high tier soviets/Americans, and that's simply an incredibly hard fight to win
I retired from enlisted I loved the game but the campaign merg and the fact they keep adding tanks like the tiger 2 h and is2 1944 are just so annoying it was fun while it lasted tbh
@@AKUJIVALDO Except WoT and WoWS is made by a completely different dev. If you mean War Thunder than yeah, people complain Germany suffers, but it's untrue there as well.
As someone who made the mistake of starting as Japan a month or so ago….I was not aware you could win matches for quite a while. I assumed the point was just to see how long you could delay the loss. It feels a tad better now, but that was a brutal start. I spent most matches wishing it would have just let me keep playing against bots for a while longer
Japan is hands down the worst faction, _especially_ in lower battle rankings where you get to pick between an open top tank the enemy snipers can hit you inside, or a tank that won't let you shoot the turret and the machinegun at the same time as they're separate positions. All against proper US light tanks of course. Not to mention Japans first planes entire loadout is 4 bombs and it takes you 45 seconds just to get out of the water
@@ReikerForgeThe plane thing did not become apparent to me until I started playing other factions. Jumping into the Russian starting plane I thought "Wait, you just start in the air?" followed by "oh god, the weapons are so much better..." I have stopped playing Japan, as a result.
@@YoungClarke the issue is, a lot of japanese starting equipment is from the 1930s, fighting against american stuff, from the 1940s. as such there is such a massive technological problem.
Japan after second battle rating is kinda over powered against waves of americans. I started japan after it was released, they suffered so much but after adding br's its easier to play
War thunder doesn't have much of a bias. It exists, but at the same time. You still see kids go around a corner and get sniped by a tiger 2. The snail bias kicks in when an IS2 shows up.
@lsing6406 in war thunder* shocking news dont try to cry about soviet or any kinds of biast when you don't even bother to learn the f'ing game kid. simply skill issue on your part. "You still see kids go around a corner and get sniped by a tiger 2. " oddly specific I don't want to jump to conclusion but I bet you where those people who did exactly that.
I am a German main before and after the merge. Back then we were Blitzkrieging the match and it felt to easy to grind points. Now we are literally being stormed by US paratroopers with US Thompsons, Bazookas, and P-47s from every direction. Some of these players have some eagle eyes pointing out the perfect coordinates.
. . Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
I call this the see-saw phenomenon - one side carries the most weight and then forces the other to be lighter (and easier to play), but once something comes up it always come back down for the other side. Germany will probably see a resurgence once the steam version releases.
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Romans 6.23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
I'm from the future and got the free release from steam started as an All American we would every now and then get smashed on by the Axis but one thing I noticed different factions will be good at different time zones. Pretty much prime time Europe would be smashing and primetime Asian pacific time they smash us Americans I was home all last week playing so I got to get a feel on the algorithms.
I remember when the Italian paratroopers came out. When it happened the couple months between that and the merge it was almost impossible to win as Tunisia allies
I never fought the Italian paras. I was playing Berlin and honestly didn't even know about that event. Don't know what was going on but I missed the whole thing. Last time I played Tunisia was when it was an axis slaughterhouse with nothing but 300 kill allied games for anyone who knew their way around a Lee Enfield and a radio operator
Playerbase < Matchmaking TBH Stacked players should face other stacked players in a game(should be mandatory), not solo players facing a stack of sweats on the opposing side unless they have a stacked team on their side. Players with specific battle-rank should be distributed evenly and not engage against a bunch of marshals or generals from the other team while you get newbies assuming they know what to do. Leaving a match should be heavily penalized, timeout, or zero exp gain and it affects WR if that match they left is lost.
Eh, it sounds good on paper. But doesn't really work in practise. I do agree that leaving a match should be penalized though, since it's a pretty scummy thing to do. But really, if you think about it, when's the last time you had fun with a KDR around 1 in any game? Of course, I'm not literally saying if skill-based matchmaking were implemented, everyone would have a KDR of 1. But it's essentially the goal of it, more or less. And well, quite frankly, disparity in performance is what makes PVP games fun. We don't watch RU-vidrs like this one because we want to see someone get one or two kills, then immediately die. We watch them for the feeds, carrying games, smashing effortlessly through enemies. And likewise, we play PVP games for the same reason. Because we want to do the same. Skill-based matchmaking is just inherently designed to prevent that. Not to say it makes imbalance okay, but having both good matches and bad ones is unavoidable to make a PVP game that's actually fun. I do think an approach that could work, is still having random players in matches though. But giving each a skill value (like you mentioned), and just sorting them so each team has as close to an even amount compared to the other as possible. So, there would still be players who are a bit better than others in matches, but overall, there wouldn't be a significant gap in average skill between teams. Allowing you to actually progress in terms of skill while maintaining some degree of balance.
I'm just going to reiterate my point here, but shorter: Skill-based matchmaking sounds good on paper. But we play games to get good at them, and do good compared to others in matches. If you aren't doing good compared to others in matches, then you almost certainly aren't having fun, and aren't being rewarded for being skilled. Since you're effectively on the same skill level compared to everyone else, instead of progressing in relative performance. So, all it basically does, is ensure everyone has a mediocre-at-best 1 KDR experience. (again, not literally, but it's effectively what SBMM mechanics try to achieve with the way they're normally implemented) That, and it's also the only mechanic that makes smurfing a thing that exists. And believe me, people are going to.
@foxxowoxxowillow7855 When’s the last time you had fun getting your team/game run by a single player who’s infinitely better than you. You and I may both play for the thrill of the win, and we may both be bad at pvp games, but at least I have the dignity not to sink to the point of resisting changing the game because I want to curbstomp noobs.
Usually its neither. They cant aim and they dont play the objective. Its really frustrating sometimes having to make you do some crazy carrying that will result in early onset hernia. Being also a axis main in war thunder im somewhat used to it tho
The axis faction may be losing in public matches but it doesn't help that we're mostly stuck with defender maps most of the time and the allies have perfect weapons for room clearing and breaking through objectives and I'm looking at you rocket spam
Finally someone who actually understands the source of the problem. Still, giving some sort of reward for playing with the "all factions" setting on would be the easiest solution to this dilemma
I pretty much always play with join any team selected, with US BR 3 and the rest at br 2, and it almost exclusively puts me on GR/JP teams. In fact I don’t think it has put me on a U.S. team in the 3 weeks I have had br3 selected
This is how it is in a lot of FPS games. I remember playing Battlefield 1 and I won 9 straight matches, then a few days later I lost 7 or 8 matches in a row lol.
Not in enlisted, and not with axsis. Most of the games that resulted in victory were hard-carry from 2-4 dudes (including myself), its never the case with allies, there is never such a split between 3rd and 4th player.
German main, of course i don’t play BR 4-5 because full sweat against, but low tier is still a bit painfull especially when the game put you against BR3 and you suddently can’t pen ennemy tanks, planes got rocket and ennemies got full squad of 9 SMG/HMG somehow , and ally are as good as abscent, been 1st is rewarding at first, but 5 times in a row with more than 1k more than the 2nd is a bit boring, especially when it’s all defeat
Ong I switched form Maxed BR 5 to BR 2 but I somehow get flamethrower, grenade launchers and Sherman’s in my games. I mostly play on Normandy maps even tho they are BR 5. I rarely get into BR 2 matches but when i do, it’s always a win and Top 3
@@milchbrot0608 idk man. i think its because of its frontal angled armor that is around 70mm, im not sure how much angle affects for Warheads but seems to be alot, and sturmpistole just sucks in general, low ass damage after penetration and a bad ass acurracy.
@@tankenjoyer9175 I prefer the Sturmpistole over the Granatbüchse 39 because I used both and I realized that the sturmpistole has a better penetration while I couldn’t penetrate anything with the granatbüchse I could with sturmpistole and you can even kill jumbos with it which i learnt a 2 years ago when noobs could still play with high level players.
If developers don't incentivize "play any faction" as the default option, this is bound to always happen. Even giants like battlefield can't afford to divide the playerbase by factions and mains.
They can offer more exp/rewards for inferior factions to encourage people to play that faction more. Hence, balance out the game. Hero and General used to applied this method i believe, Enlisted can learn a lot from that game.
i remember when this game was casual fun when it released, just more games being ruined by the modern mindset of everything has to be hyper competitive
A big problem with axis seems to be the maps. At least half of the maps have a massive bias against them. Tractor factory is a prime example, every time I see that map half of the German team instantly quits because its both miserable to play and basically unwinnable. Goebbels street is another one. Basically unplayable from the spawn on the side of the mannor.
I think that's an Enlisted problem in general. Many maps have chokes for one faction or another. D-Day hell on the beach, then on the mountains if you don't hold it, that one Moscow map with the lumbermill and the river, the other Moscow map with the pillbox, univermag attacking side... Sometimes the game just gives a massive advantage to the defenders for some reason
@@ihatehandleupdate Defenders should always have a map advantage, attacking is much easier than defending in enlisted if neither side has a map advantage. The problems come when attackers have a big map advantage. A bunch of Soviet maps literally spawn the attackers closer to the point(often in the same building while defenders have to cross open ground) than the defenders or have a grey zone so close to the defenders it’s practically impossible to defend.
Closed alpha test veteran here, I concur equipment was never an issue, except maybe for some exceptionally poor or massively overpowered tanks at certain tiers in certan factions. Unstable player base distribution among the factions have been causing this issue since the very beginning and Enlisted is constantly glossing over the fact by filling the teams with bot players with real player sounding names. I guess they're using that dynamic to sell premium squads hoping that most people won't notice that what they're perma-dominating are teams that have one real player at best. Here's some signs you might be the only real player on your team: - When you're attacking in Assault and the only point ever captured is the one you're capturing while your teammates fail to even contest the other one. - When in invasion, a bot team defending will put up no resistance and the enemy will run through each defense in less than a minute because a capable player will realize there's no need to smoke out pockets of resistance because the bots lingering around are no impedance to him making a run for the next capture point. Conversely, when a bot team is attacking, they'll fail to take the first capture point as the bot squads keep running into the same kill zones where the savvy opponent may have erected a stationary machine gun to keep mowing them down. Additionally, the enemy will have no difficulty going into the offensive and repeatedly raiding your engineer's spawn points out of commission and even erecting a forward defense at the very boundary of their battlefield. - The inherently dynamic conquest mode will turn rather static as you are only able to contest a single capture point while the others are always in the hands of your opponent. So no, Germany alone doesn't suffer. Enlisted suffers and that's Enlisted's fault. If it's annoying to you, then stop playing until things have shifted again and playing is fun and balanced again. Don't fall for the feedback loop of frustration that Gaijin is so fond of capitalizing on. Fuck that asshole snail, even if it makes some sick looking games don't let it hijack and control your life.
To make it absolute balance, USA - Air Superiority Soviet - More ManPower (Squads, Basically 10 Unit per squad or more) Germany - Armor Superiority and equipments Japan - Ability to deal 2x less damage when using banzai
Major be selling his soul to the snail and jumping on the “Germany-Suffers”-Armored-train just so he doesn’t have to make a new golden weapon order review But jokes aside I’m still waiting for that review tho
That's not what happened though??? Two fronts against up to ten countries with the allies and the Americans still suffered 75 deaths oer 25 German... It was numbers and that's it
@@KC-nn5wcAre you seriously using KD ratio on how successful a country is in a war? With that logic the US won in Korea and Vietnam. Also, Germany is on the defense, which is often an easier role in a war. Something like island hopping, which the US did, is way more logistically manpower intensive.
I am also one of those axis mains that were heavily against adding both the Tiger E and Tiger 2, I just saw no place for it in Enlisted and found both unnecessary
I remember when they inaugurated the infamous Stalingrad campaign, and its campaign pass system. I completed that campaign on the Soviet side without buying the pass, facing Mosin carbines against SGT42. In that campaign the imbalance was noticeable, even more so between premium and non-premium players. Since many premium players finished completing the high tier within a few days thanks to the experience bonus. The Soviet side was very abandoned, most of the time I had to play with allied bots that only went to the front to die in a stupid way and harm all the effort I had made to capture a point. I can't believe that in 2024 and after the merge there are so many people crying because they took away the possibility of farming points easily.
Nah they didn't, they just gave it exclusively to the US in BR 1-3 games against Japan players. Not enough of them play Japan tho, so you're lucky when you get matched against Japan essentially.
@@funtecstudiovideos4102 rallies being built don't change the fact bad players either A don't use them or B aren't good enough to capitalise even on good rally spawn locations. It is what it is man
@@Gogosqwezethegreatest It’s the Low tier that Germany suffers in. It’s hard to play against better stuff with bad stuff that’s not possible and then I get 0 kills because all I do is build cuz no one else does all they do is spam request coordinates
@@milchbrot0608 dude i be playin low tier Germany just today, and yeah, the enemies got way better inf equipment but it dont really matter when you kill 16 soviets with one blast of the Panzer 3 N
Incoming permanent 200% XP boost for Japan..... (It's the only incentive that would work for JP low tier grinding against fucking Shermans, Thompsons, and BARs)
Enlisted was fun during the alpha and super early on when it was just bolt actions, SMGs and light tanks. Now it's everything wrong with war thunder: Infantry edition
The first thing I thought when this whole meme started was "Didnt allies used to suffer in Normandy and Japan dominate in Pacific". Glad to see someone bring it up. After playing Planetside 2 for years this same stuff would happen every month, and it all came down to population and the groups of people who were playing and actually playing well. One faction would get a really good weapon people would complain on the forums, and then you would play an opposing faction in a good team and dominate said weapon users with ease. It truely is for the most part psychological.
Formerly an Enlisted player, I played both German and Soviet armies but I progressed further on the German side. Played mainly in the Stalingrad Campaign because I enjoyed fighting in the city, and around snow covered factories in the country side. Before the merge, I could just buy items for specific campaigns because I was good at doing challenges but now I have to grind to unlock things I use to be able to just buy. The worst part of the merge is the destruction of historical accuracy in terms of armourment. I was thrown off seeing specific tanks, and guns that shouldn't be in certain battles. I miss being able to select specific battles I'd like to participate in. Likely I'll never return to Enlisted but I had a lot of fun playing it till the Merge.
Never liked the merge tbh. Felt like it wasn't as good as it would have been if it was kept. Also i lost my extra Stalingrad slots (after pre-ordering it) so that was just a slap to the face or an insult rather
Soy jugador de todas las naciones, (menos Japón) y hay demasiados panzer 3 en la línea de investigación, tier 3 es complicado, las armas son poco variadas y están “nerfed”, y las opciones son limitadas, los estadounidenses son la mejor facción actualmente a mi parecer, la más equilibrada y divertida. Comentario escrito en español para evitar conflictos con la traducción.
so I played the axis faction yesterday and I think that its regaining a playerbase again, but the problem is that most new players either choose the US or axis faction at first, and by now they will probably earned a gold weapon order by now and spent it on a late game weapon like the FN model etc, and they dont know that those weapons automatically put them in high tier matches, and with the current tech tree (which is miles better than before the merge, I was wrong) doesnt give players a clear sign of engineer squads, and because of that the new players dont know the significance of engineers, and then the high tier matches have players who cant really contribute much in rallies etc. and then the few players who remain playing tier V axis matches leave because they just solo carry the entire team only to no avail, but now i think its going back, its like keepy ups, the ball changes foot every or every other kick, just like the player base at every update or so
As someone who is full Tier 5 I still stay Germany suffers. But personally I think that Tier 1-3 is the part where Germany actually suffers because of all the uptiered matches.
@@milchbrot0608 I agree everyone says Germany suffers cuz its true , playberbase shifts , Noobs with one t5squad its not because bad weapons and vehicles .
I've honestly never had a complaint about being a Germany main. I'm still grinding the tree, and all the good players are against you, but the weapons are good and the variety of maps is excellent.
Kinda funny how post merge I’ve done like around 20 berlin matches and only won 2 of them as Germany, both conquest mode because motorcycles don’t win games lol
Hey I hope you could make a video about the Japan faction, since like in lower BR you lose like ALL the time. It also doesn't help that American tanks are so op like for example the Mk1 Grant, no BR1 tank of Japan could pen that, even the ha go tank (the one with the most armor in BR2) unless you know the weakpoint. Life is pain man playing as Japan
0:22 Its just the historically accurate progression of the war LOL As an Axis main though this is unfortunate news. My USSR main friend will be pleased though.
American Teams when you play axis: basically space-marine-doomslayers American teams if you play America: Can't get the first cap, even if it is the one u cap in 10 seconds.
I ended up quitting because 7/10 matches ended up feeling boring because my team would just crush the enemy team. I couldn't get any kills all the obj were done it was just boring while the enemy team had no rallies kr anything
@@milchbrot0608 if you meant faction I was playing both krauts and americans, while indeed it wasn't a huge number of matches I played(only about 15 or 20) I just lost all motivation since my friends moved on from the game and work got in the way too.
I survived the dark days of axis Tunisia main b4 the merge. I learned to embrace the suck and learned to have fun whilst the defeats by learning how to troll the allies.
I am suffering as an Axis player, I've just lost 3 battles with boosters in a row, I kept losing because I'm a tier 1 but I kept fighting against tier 3-4. Please make the pain stop..
This is honestly why i believe Hell let loose is perfect because both all factions are balanced and both get something similar in terms of gear and even get diverse gear specific to their own faction/nation
I stopped playing the game because it felt soulless, the community felt invisible and dead, the game is way too easy when I had like 200 kill games with low tier equipment and all the pay to win stuff, braindead AI, dunno, the game could be good but eh, oh and on some maps we would just spawnkill the enemy team and I would literally have to wait at the front of the enemy spawn and sit there for 5 mins to find one enemy squad
You're absolutely right. Balance doesn't just mean mirroring everything across factions, but giving different factions different strengths. Giving them flavour. And in a combined arms game, that also means having different factions being strong at different features. Your faction is weak at infantry but strong at armor? Well, how about you bring a vehicle to the fight. Your faction is weak at armor? Maybe bring aircraft. Use the strong part of your faction to overcome the weaknesses. I don't play Enlisted, but I know the same situation from other games. One faction seems completely overpowered and imbalanced, than suddenly it shifts and a different faction starts dominating. Without any changes to the gear, just a change in player population.
Funny that I returned to Enlisted after some time on the same day this video went into my recommendation. I played four games, one for each faction, Allies won every one, and only one of them wasn't a total wipeout
Axis player here. At BR V the thing I see the most is mostly skill issue on german side. I went from near 68%wr to near 43% since Christmas and most of the losses were with suicide planes, suicide infantry (suicide players in general, to be short) BR I or II tanks on BR V, people with only Horn squad as tier V and the rest very low tier and so forth. More than "equipment balance", I feel there is a lot of people just camping or doing nothing. I'd seen things so extreme as 6 kills and 14 squad respawns with some regularity. After the 251 event, with people still not building rallies but the 251 doing it's work, things got a bit better in my experience. I don't know in other servers, but in NA often the experience seems to be "steamroll" or "be steamrolled"
I am a german main and US second, with a good squad you can win. But it's such a pain without having to sacrifice wave after wave. It's like when Japan first came out, every match was a slaugther with Japanese players blitzing the map. It's a matter of server and player competency sometimes when half the team is tier i-ii and you have tier iv. People have to pull their weight in a server.
One idea would could be, wich sjf and me brought off an underdog bonus: if the playerbase is 50% of what is needed, an bonus of 50% extra xp, and for every ai replacement 10% xp extra. would improve other problems of player leaving an non winable game to a degree
Thank you so much for this video! Like you said, each faction is strong in their own right. The Soviets with their rifles, the Americans with their planes, the Germans with their tanks, and the Japanese with their submachine guns.
yeah, I have to agree more with any point here that it's really just a self-fulfilling prophecy. Way too often I see Axis players - both in War Thunder (as Germany) and Enlisted - just playing well, kind of stupidly. Crutching on their Tigers, STG's, and so on because they're supposedly just superior and better. And when that doesn't work, it must just be some kind of mistake on the developers' part. While those they're fighting against think the same thing, and actually take them seriously as opponents. Because they aren't expecting their rifles, tanks, etc, to carry them. Instead playing smart, avoiding throwing themselves into the meat grinder, flanking, and placing rally points instead of the typical W + M1 gameplay you see from Axis/Germany. Honestly, even so, I'd say you can argue either faction is stronger or being biased toward/against. But at the end of the day, no FG42 or King Tiger can defeat a player who simply shoots first and plays smarter, regardless of what they're using. And really, I've played either side in both games, and as simple as it sounds, just recognizing the patterns of players and getting better at the game makes up for any disparity in balance. I wouldn't say this effect is as pronounced in Enlisted as it is in WT. I see similar things from both Axis and other factions more often, and it's more associated with tanks than small arms. But it's definitely present nonetheless. My advice though, for anyone who's struggling: Don't play absent-mindedly. You can get good at the game in a matter of days if you think about why you died, instead of getting frustrated about it. Change your tactics, try different loadouts, and different flank routes. Learn to read maps, and you'll start noticing the patterns. Doubling down on what you're already doing, just more aggressively, only rushes you to your death faster.
I’m a German main (tier 5 I believe). But this is news to me. For the games I’m in it’s relatively balanced on wins and loses. And the most common matches we end up losing are against the Americans. But on the other end with fighting the Soviets it’s even more balanced from my experience. Sometimes I have a win streak or a lose streak but majority of those battles are always really close. One I had not to long ago we were getting our asses handed to us and we were pushed to the last defensive point really quick. Like one after another. But we help that point with tooth and nail and when there troops went down to about 50 left everyone just pushed forward and cleared out the stragglers. Like a full line cinematic counter attack. One of the best matches I’ve ever had.
I started playing the game again a few months ago, I always play with allies and axis. I think I lost a total of 5 games with the Americans (I'm BR 3) and 90% with the Germans (BR 4). I have more fun with blondes, I want to unlock the Italian weapons so I would hate to give up. I also tried to start leveling the Soviets, but after losing two games in a row after only 10 minutes, I abandoned the idea. Im glad that you ve talk about this huge problem in a video.
As a German main hearing that, not only do soviets get better assault rifles (this I knew), but they also get a 10% damage reduction, which is insane. On top of that the fact that they get access to panzerfouses is utterly stupid. Gajin has always been biased toward russian factions, and in enlisted it shows more than ever.
I'm an axis main and usually the only one building rallies ANS playing the obj. I love tanks, but often can't okay them because if I don't sweat the obj we lose
I don't play Enlisted but played War Thunder extensively. I remember during New Year sale, BR 10.0 for Russia became absolutely unbearable, pretty sure I was losing at least 8/10 games. The reason being a lot of new players buying 10.0 premium tanks during the sale, causing the win rate for 10.0 Russia to plummet.
3:35 so you ask of us remaining german player to abuse the king tiger 2h and ap spamm?😂😂😂😂😂 perhaps by enemy quitting the game we win more(actually i noticed that way more german players play very unfair, like grayzone camping with king tiger and ap spamming didnt happen yet)
I know a way to solve the problem that DBD (Dead By Daylight) uses. The game was suffering with long periods of match making, because in diferent times of the day there was too many killers or too many survivors, and to make a game start it needs in minimun 3 survivors and 1 killer (yes, you dont need the 4th surv to start). So to solve this, whe the game notices that there is too many killers the game gives a 100% coin bonus for every match for every survivor until the number of the killers and survivors reach a ballance or the survivors reach a bigger number mking the killers receive that bonus, and the bonus can be 50%, 75% and 100% depending on how big the diference of players is.
As a German main I must say I am having easy days just by the start of this month. Team balancing is now more optimised to German. For the few months before, I could hardly find a half team of true human players in German, it is easy to confirm it when you try blacklisting a bot it won't show the unblock command, but just keeps the blacklisting command by the 2nd click
Back when berlin campaign was still in closed beta the axis had a small powercreep problem, US side on Normandy had the infamous Jumbo tank which could not be penetrated frontally with pz. IV unless you got lucky with the gun port. And that tank often camped behind the battle zone line. To counter it, your only option really was the large bomber plane, but the problem was to use that plane you needed to be very high lvl. Most players at that time didn't have that plane unlocked so the jumbo players had the field day. As time went on, more and more levels were grinded out and Axis players became dominant because late game gear on Axis was god-tier since FG 42 could be given to any soldier in squads, snipers had scoped variant but point remains. Allies did not have such a multi-class weapon thus max grinded Axis squads always had FG 42 on all soldiers that could equip it. Allies had their fair share of fun too but late game gear was not as good as Axis. As for Moscow campaign, that was the most laid back and balanced campaign you could play as most weapons were bolt-actions and semi-automatic rifles were unlocked at late game. It didn't matter if you were soviets or Axis there, games were always fun and challenging at same time. But once the Berlin dropped, it was heavily Soviet sided not because all players played on soviet side, but because some of the most powerful soviet weapons like PPSH was unlocked too early in the game. That weapon alone was the reason why Soviets were so dominant at the early days of Berlin campaign. Axis who were able to grind out MG42 were able to put up a fight but the map design itself didn't help too much either as Axis did not have any solid terrains to set up a proper defense, making rushing control points meta. No matter how good Axis were, they HAD to tryhard to even have a slight chance of winning. And my final campaign before quitting, Tunisia, Axis was a joke, Not only did Allies get semi-automatic weapons early on, they also had better tanks and planes. Late game Axis could put up a fight but the terrain and map layout was built in a way that neither attacking or defending side could do anything properly Whoever got on the point mostly likely dominated the point. I believe the main reason why 1 side or another was more dominant was due to tech tree unlocks, if OP weapon was unlocked early on, that side automatically dominated like PPSH squads in Berlin. Overtime that wouldn't matter of course but only ones who would grind out the good weapon are tryhards, average player would only get like 5-10 levels and be done with it. And since Axis had better stuff unlocked like after lvl 20, it made sense why Axis suffered at beginning while Soviets and U.S had fun at lvl 4-9.
the American Sherman may lack in armour and armour penetration but there were studies shown the the American 75mm was the best infantry support gun of the war compared to the 76mm 90mm and 105mm and coming from a game many tanks main role is infantry support unlike war thunder where the M4A3E2 Jumbo is so out matched by German heavy tanks
Biggest culprit is the matchmaking system imho, it should create a balanced lobby before launching a match. Seems like the game creates a match (with factions and map selected) and then fills it up with any players available. Leading to those matches where there's one experience player on one side and a full veteran team on the other.... Adding the lack of a middle BR bracket and sometimes I'm the only experienced player in BR 3 fighting a full team of veteran BR 5 My solutions would either be: - Create a middle BR2-3-4 bracket - Count every weapon BR towards a total points level --> gets you in a precise BR range (rather than having one good weapon shifting your whole BR)
as a war thunder player i knew this was gonna happen before enlisted even released, flashy german equipment commonly known as "undefeatable" attracts players who want to use it as a crutch but when presented with the reality that it's not as unkillable as the documentary they saw once claims they get destroyed and then rage on forums and the like
As someine into game statistics, 60+% loss rate is VERY noteworthy. It speaks to something like, perhaps the factions bonus isnt quite enough. In a well balanced meta, you should see around 45%-55% win/loss ratios. Those few extra % dont sound like much, but each is thousands of frustrating games for one faction.
People seem to ignore the fact that playerbase starts out as neutral, any playerbase-wide effect is caused by the game in some way. Happened in CoD, Overwatch, WT, we see it time and time again that game design makes better or worse players, or more or less toxic players.
@@DivyanshuRai-zb3ie true, the browning. I thought the comment was funny bc they were acting like not caring about realism was a new thing, but gaijin nerfed semi autos for balance years ago, so now they have like half the power of bolt actions firing the same cartidge or even smaller cartidges. Even the 50 cal on the tanks dont seem to have noticibly more stopping power against infantry than a 6.5 arisaka carbine, just wounding people the first shot a lot of the time.
comming from planetside 2 this is just a normal thing in games with pre determent factions. some faction starts to dominate and all the playser flok to that faction, but with that there are so many new and bad players in that faction that another faction starts to dominate and the cycle repeates. it not a balace or X faction problem, its just the nature of theres playerbases
About the players being biased - actually, in the Russian enlisted community people tend to believe that the Axis is INCREDIBLY overpowered and that it is absolutely impossible to play against. There even have been some accusations about the devs being “nazis” for overpowering the Axis. Which is…. Yea, a very post-soviet thing to say. I also must comment that as a person who played ALL of the factions for a good while I have never personally seen any under/overpowering issues with one faction or the others.
2 Things that I have found that have shifted my america vs Germany performance drastically since the merge. 1: With the North African campaign getting folded into the western allies vs Germany war, the amount of times the map gets rolled onto dday has fallen alot, if the Germans are even mildly competent on DDay the americans never leave the beach as there is very little cover to work with for advancing allied infantry or armor and German tanks are immune to any infantry attacks while deep into the gray zone firing from the hilltops. 2: The rapid acquiring of weapons, I was able to rapidly get my hands on the bazookas which were locked deep in the pre merge faction unlocks, hidden behind piles of random upgrades. The piat is the worst AT weapon in the game from my experience, having a akward arcing projectile that has never gone where my sights are regardless of range and often do so little damage I can empty the load of shells before stopping the Puma armored car, so getting the m1 bazooka gave me a large improvement against enemy armor and the m9 bazooka I unlocked not too long after meant all but Germany's thickest tanks are in severe danger if not being guarded by infantry.
Bruh, no one went to play high tier Germany, I was building rallies but no one was going on the point even though there is tank support. So it's everyone fault
I actually think something that could be the "problem" here is that winning an assult mode as the attackers is rough. I almost always see the defenders win in that game mode. And it seems like that's the most frequently matchmade mode. Honestly, I'd rather have an option of what type of match I matchmake for.
I just started playing again and not having decent enough weapons to counter high tier experienced players is unnerving. Especially since I have the skill, just not the equipment. Its annoying, and also quite demoralizing.
I've been strictly Axis because I'm grinding all my research, but getting ready to switch to doing all Soviets to finish refreshing their weapons. By sticking with Axis since the December update my k/d/r dropped from 1.8X to 1.65 at present and that's after almost 2000 total matches since beginning playing in September. Since new season started I've reached Major and demoted back to Captain 8 or 9 times due to being on losing team so much...
