Enough - How We Can All Tackle Violence Against Women and Girls 

As per usual!

If you think this is misandry you need to get your head looked at

@@aaronb2779 If you think that a group of mates messing around in a park constitutes “harassment” or “misogyny” or that men are “savages” that need to be “civilised”, or that almost everything constitutes “violence against women and girls”, then it’s you Aaron, that needs to get your head looked at. Or maybe you just need to visit a developing country to see real examples of VAWG

@@aaronb2779 A woman replied to me "misandry does not exist" she has 16 upvotes. THousands of women and few men in the video comments section read that comment. Not a single person refuted her or said to her "come on; this is wrong". That is your reality. Men will say miosgny exists. But women refuse to acknolge that misandry exists. A country of great democratic behavior just said men do not domestic abuse. Yes every gets angry when they see a old predetrmined* perverted man harres a woman and say abuse against women does not exist. That is what you do basically. It is not hard a computer would simply follow orders and not devivate but you do.

@@aaronb2779 If you don't then you're a sexist. Be a better person.

The women in the advert won't sleep with you, James.

First off James, it’s not just men who have a bone to pick with this PIF and messing around with your mates in the park does not constitute “misogyny” or “harassment”. Also, to make a PIF that treats half the population as potential predators does constitute misandry, just as it would constitute racism if you made a PIF (just take this as an example) blaming East and South-East Asian people for causing traffic accidents and not everything that happens to a woman is automatically VAWG by default

@@that.twittergirl.lisbeth If it’s a boy/man or group of boys/men, who shout stuff like in the video (or usually much worse) at a random girl or woman, that is misogynistic harassment. It’s not saying that half the population should be treated as potential predators, it’s saying “don’t be misogynistic or harass people, call people out if they do, and try to help the person being harassed if possible”. Nothing about this video constitutes “misandry”, it’s telling people to not tolerate misogynistic harassment and violence. Its baffling that people actually have a bone to pick with this advert.

@@Depep4729 A group of boys/men shouting “Oi, oi, look at the body on that!” at a random girl or a woman is not “misogynistic harassment”. As for adults shouting those sort of things at children, that is already illegal, since the difference between children and adult women, is that women don’t need to constantly have people like you stepping in over what is, if anything (as far as adult women are concerned) actually, completely minor things (although according to people like you, there is very little difference between children and adult women). You also speak about how men usually shout “much worse things” than in the PIF. Give me at least a few examples of these “much worse things” that these “horrible men” are supposedly shouting at women. This PIF may not be explicitly saying that half of the population are potential predators, but the PIF is implying such a thing by telling men (as in the whole population) not to be misogynistic or harass women, as if it is up to every single man on planet earth to constantly step in no matter what the actual situation is, as if they somehow need to take responsibility for actions of somebody of the same sex. You say that this PIF is about telling people not to harass people and call people out if they do, and try to help the person being harassed if possible, but if this is supposed to be representative of everybody and if this is supposed to be for everyone, then why is it that the message only consists of telling men not to be “misogynistic” and “harass women”? Why is it that men are constantly expected to go charging into certain situations like a knight in shining armour (although nine times out of ten in this case, the armour is made out of tinfoil) where a woman looks as if she’s in distress, or at least into situations that the man may personally consider to be bothersome? If a woman were to shout similar things at a man (which some women do and there are actual instances of women doing so), Would you count that as “misandrist harassment”? If somebody were to shout similar things at somebody of the same sex (which again, some people do and there are actual instances of some people doing so), what exactly would you consider it to be? Internalised misogyny? Internalised misandry? Homophobia? I would really love to know what your take is on women and people who may be from the LGBT community engaging in similar activities to those group of men. If you choose to go about this in a hypocritical manner or not to answer such questions, I wouldn’t be surprised, considering that you are 100% behind what you would consider anti-VAWG campaigns and totally do not think that this is a waste of taxpayers money. This PIF does constitute misandry, everything about it constitutes misandry because men as a whole are being expected to constantly step in all the time, no matter what actual situation is, as if it is up to them to take responsibility for the actions of somebody that is of the same sex, which is exactly why me and many other people are calling this out. You find the fact that people are calling this out for what is actually an implicit form of anti-male bias to be baffling, but what is actually baffling is that people like yourself (even though you, I presume, are a male) think that the entire male population needs to constantly step into every situation that may seem rather bothersome to you, regardless of what the actual situation is, and take responsibility for the actions of somebody that is of the same sex. Women do not need to constantly have people like you, let alone men, to step in all the time. Women can defend themselves. And on top of everything that I have just addressed, to consider a group of men shouting things like “Oi, oi, look at the body on that!” as an example of misogyny and harassment is actually an insult to people who have actually experienced harassment and violence and is also an insult to women who have actually experienced misogyny, especially to women and girls in countries that actually have problems with real examples of VAWG, such as girls getting shot for going to school, women getting stoned to death, women and girls getting raped by militias, women having acid thrown at them (an example of VAWG which we heavily condemn in this country) the normalised and socially acceptable practice of FGM (another example of VAWG which we heavily condemn in this country), forced marriage of women and underaged girls, etc. Also, if you actually look at the ONS, you’ll find that although most victims of sexual violence happen to be female, males are actually more likely to be physically assaulted, mugged or even murdered when they’re walking home alone at night than females and according to the very same source, most perpetrators of sexual violence are actually known to the victims. To wrap this all up, women and girls in the UK actually have it much better compared to women and girls in some countries and compared to some countries, although misogynists do exist in the UK, the actual number of men who are misogynists in modern-day Britain is actually a very small number

A woman replied to me "misandry does not exist" she has 16 upvotes. THousands of women and few men in the video comments section read that comment. Not a single person refuted her or said to her "come on; this is wrong". That is your reality. Men will say miosgny exists. But women refuse to acknolge that misandry exists. A country of great democratic behavior just said men do not domestic abuse. Yes every gets angry when they see a old predetrmined* perverted man harres a woman and say abuse against women does not exist. That is what you do basically. It is not hard a computer would simply follow orders and not devivate but you do.