Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S: I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the Quran & Ahlulbayt). II) Subscribe: Connect with us on RU-vid & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/447897047062 III) Support: Producing content like this is not possible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution on thaqlain.org/support
Salam Alaikum Syed and Thaqlain channel, jazakallah for all your content and hard work you are all gifted teachers! I tried to join the WhatsApp group but I get the message that the number is not on WhatsApp? Thank you
🤔 if there was a “double agent” who knew about both the assassination plot and the prophet’s escape plan, this person could have originally informed the prophet about the plot, which means there would be no need for revelation 😅 Occam’s razor.
Few minutes ago you just created the impression that it seem only imam Ali was aware Rasurullah was escaping that night. Now you want to rope Abu Bakr into it.
Sayed has mentioned various Sunni and Shia viewpoints. The common viewpoint of School of Ahlulbayt is that the meeting between the Prophet (s) and Abu Bakr was a coincidence or Imam Ali told Abu Bakr after the Prophet left.
The solution is in the following verse of the Quran: O you who have faith! Obey Allah and obey the Apostle and those vested with authority among you. And if you dispute concerning anything, refer it to Allah and the Apostle, if you have faith in Allah and the Last Day. That is better and more favourable in outcome. Quran 4:59 Love for companion is never obligated in Islam, because they weren't presented as the guides. It was in fact the progeny. Hence the famous narration of Thaqalayn found in Sahih Muslim on which this channel is based 🙂
Adam, brother Islam is different to other faiths. Islam is part of all that you do, it forces you to ask questions and learn. I truly believe the right path comes to those with earnest belief. It is not hard to find the right direction, though it can be hard to walk that road.
He tries to use sunni sources when it benefits him and then disregards the same sunni sources when it goes against his proposed narrative. A neutral observer can understand that he reads in his own thinking/opinions to misguide.
Salaam Alaykum. The answer to your concern lies in the initial episodes of this series. This series aims to present the Prophet's story as presented by Ahlulbayt. So we use Sunni sources only when they coincide with the narrative of Ahlulbayt or when they prove a point considered valid in the School of Ahlulbayt. If there is a contradiction, we examine why we disagree on those points.
The verse of the cave was not a virtue for Abu Bakr at all. As a matter of fact, it was a clear sign of his hypocrisy. Allah Almighty sent down tranquility upon one and only one person. That was His Messenger.
The man speaking, does he even realise he's contradicting himself? First he says that Abu Bakr joined the prophet (pbuh), then he says someone was telling the Quraysh that they've failed and he (pbuh) left, and he could be Abu Bakr, how can he be at two places at the same time? 🤨
You have tried to let people base something of which you are not sure of, suggesting not having 'concrete evidence', and you have also made assumptions, yourself as well as on the behalf of The Prophet (S.A.W) (when talking about why He offered Abu Bakr (Radhi Allahu 'anhu) to join Him, ''the Prophet was concerned that they would interrogate if had gone back ..'' etc. How can you 'put clues together' having no ''concrete evidence'' to arrive at truthful beliefs. It appears that you are trying to put doubts in the hearts of people, trying to tarnish The Prophet's (S.A.W) team who were followers of His message. Do you bother to describe the Companions' lives and struggles together with the Prophet (S.A.W) as well or would like to just focus on ambiguities to try to justify your opinion. Did the Prophet (S.A.W), na'uzubillah, did not know who was sincere with him and who was not for all those years they were with Him, and who spread the message and system of Islam forward?
Salam Sayed Qazwini has mentioned all of it from Sunni sources also Its rational that prophet Muhammad (pbu)has offered to Abubakr to be with him in order to Abubakr doesn't betray him by informing pagans about leaving Mecca toward Medina which Abubakr has terrified t in cave that pagans would kill him for betraying to them by not informing them about leaving of Mecca by prophet Muhammad (pbu)
@@ashvazdanghe He can quote all the sunny sources and not pick trying to justify his clouded opinion. Can you prove that the Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was concerned about betrayal from these closest comapnions, who served his mission of Islam as evident?
@@naveedalam9260 The Prophet of Islam ( S ) did not offer to Abu Bakr to come with him. Where did you get that from ! The verses of the cave say it all. Almighty Allah sent down tranquility upon him. Him who ! ? Not both of them. The tranquility was sent down upon the Prophet simply because he was and is on the side of Allah Almighty. Others are not entitled to receive tranquility unless they are true faithful. In other parts of the holy Qur'an you find that Allah sent down tranquility upon the Prophet and the faithfuls. So, why only one of the two in the cave received tranquility and not the other ! ?
@@adamnouri23 ‘Laa Tahzan Inallah Maana’ (grieve not, surely Allah is with us). Obviously, there is a difference of opinion - Sunni vs Shia, the different schools of thought, everybody knows, and I think these differences would persist as they have for centuries. Unfortunately, I don't have the time or interest to change your beliefs/opinions :) With that said, I wish you peace and guidance, and protection from the evils of sectarianism, along with all of us! I hope you have a good day!
Agree strongly with you.Both sides continue to fan the flames of sectarianism.People are so gullible.Prisoners of their emotions,prejudices and thinking they were born into and indoctrinated.Let us unite on what we agree upon and to each his own on differences.Salaams. P
It is also possible that the Prophet ( S ) instructed the remaining Muslim NOT TO LEAVE THEIR HOMES FOR SOME TIME OR SOME NIGHT ( S ) ,,, KNOWING THAT, ABU KARB MEANT TO BREAK THE PROPHET'S COMMUNIQUE WONDERING WHAT THAT WOULD BE ABOUT. Abu Bakr had access to both sides of the struggle. No virtue at all.
Again, many Muslims worldwide are fascinated with the - two face to face hands - symbol of appreciation and " love " to use it. Muslims ; especially , the Ahlulbait followers should not adopt any use the " icon of appreciation " . It reminds me of other people ways of praying and supplications ,, let's say in temples and churches ,,, Why would Muslims be so attached to such a thing ! لا حول و لا قوة إلا بالله العلي العظيم.
Why? Don't we do dua like this too 🤲 in our salah? It might remind you of others but it also reminds me of our salah. I don't use this emoji much but I don't see the harms in using it.
Your own mission is to project Ali as greater than other companions. You can run them down to actually achieve your mission. That's tragic and very unfortunate.
What about the personality of Abdullah bin Uraiqit who was hired by Abu Bakr RA as a guide for the migration.? My dear why are you negating these incidents by suppositions. Yes it is true that no one has more virtues than Imam Ali AS and the family of the Holy Prophet pbuh but why are you so adamant to deny the contributions and sacrifices of the As Saabiqoon Al Awaloon which include Abu Bakr RA.
Salaam Alaykum alam. The point of Sabiqoon al-awwaloon is answered in Chapter 3. A dedicated episode explores Islam of Abu Bakr and his family. As for the guide, the next episode will explore that 🙂
If nobody had more virtues than Ali, why did the Bakri caliphate force him to wait three long tenures from men far beneath him, before he was finally given a chance by the Ummah to lead them onto the straight path?
I agree with you that the status of Ali(as) is not defined by how good or bad anyone else was. That said we are allowed to undertake a honest inquiry of the personalities & character of the historical figures in play. I believe the first three Caliphs tried their best, but they didn't have the intellectual, moral spiritual or religious capacity of Ali (as). Ali(as) was ordained by Allah swt and guided/mentored/trained by Mohamad ﷺ all his life. I can also say that I believe his rights to leadership were usurped by individuals more concerned with this world than the here after. Does that mean I should curse them, no, but I can point at their faults because if Ali(as) was not infallible and he was a man just like them, they they are nothing but men in power whos actions are up for critisism.
@@b.m.a.k570 “Tried their best” in what sense? Is there any allowance in the religion of our Prophet for “trying your best” while the one CLEARLY equipped to take charge (Ali, who had already been clarified by the sermon at Ghadir e Khumm) was forced to watch primates ruin the Prophet’s legacy for decades? There is no “trying your best” in divine leadership, with a position appointed by Allah. If you know you lack the skills to lead the Ummah, but attempt to do so anyway while the true leader is marginalized (all because of your love for Dunya and/or hatred of Ali), then you are nothing but a hypocrite. And we know how Allah addresses hypocrites in the Quran
@@corpsefoot758 Did you read the whole reply? Because the point was that these are fallible men whos motive was worldly power. They had the best among them in Ali(as) and they pushed him aside for their own desires. And even if I accept that they tried their best it will be nothing compared to the one chosen by Allah. Was my point not clear?
So just because he happened to be with the Prophet in the cave we should accept him? While rejecting the one whom the Prophet made to sleep on his bed?
The prophet knows how to deal with people. Don’t degrade the prophet knowledge and will. Allah chose him because of his honesty and pure sole. The prophet will not assume something will happen. He will take things as he goes. Degrading his intelligence in the lecture is beyond disbelief. Focusing on other school of thoughts proves that you are concerned how truthful they are that u need to bash them.
Notice how you responded, unfortunately when truth is out there you can’t argue. Very sad how ignorant you may be. Instead of opening your eyes to what you are preaching. See the flaws you are presenting. Let be real, why would Allah allow a companions that is not good to go to the best journey with the prophet. He could have used anyone else but he didn’t. Notice I said Allah ( swt) the one who controls the universe.
Why would Allah let Shaytaan be so close to angels? Why would Allah let evil lady be wife of Prophet Lut? Why would Allah gave Adam Qabeel? Why would Nuh get a disobidient son by Allah? The answer to these is the answer to the logic you are presenting 🙂
Prophet Muhammad is the greatest man on earth. So you can’t compare him to other. Your reasoning is too weak. Allah chose Muhammad as the last prophet for the ummah. His heart was pure and clean and followed the commands that Allah has given him. He went through wars and suffered to save this ummah. Shame on how low you put him. I don’t think you understand who was Muhammad. To be from a Hal bayt. Very sad. May Allah guide you on the blessed days of dhul Hijja and have you really understand how you choose to talk about Muhammad close people. If they were sooo bad as you claim. Allah would have mentioned thier names clearly in the Quran. So, Quran against you false stories. Very ignorant… instead of arguing try to understand don’t go to your so called sayad. Salam
Sheik fear Allah and follow Quran and sunah and treat all of the beloved companions the same not to differentiate them and stop choosing one above the other or choosing a sect you gain nothing by disrespecting the companions they’re already in jannah so ask Allah to make you a neighbor with them inshallah
Maybe you have a good intentions but you are wrong. So if all companions were good , to which people "munafiqine" verses have been revealed ? And it's known that their have muslim's appearance and title but not their heart.
@@khaledgbadamassis5268 now you answer, why did Allah give many praises to the muhajireen in surah tawba? Abu bakr rAa is part of then incase you dont know
Salaam Alaykum. Thanks for dropping by. Answering the questions very briefly: 1) The companions are not all the same. Some of them are sabiqoon. 2) Not all companions are in Jannah. This is against the Adl of Allah to put a group of people in heaven just because they were born in a certain timeframe. 3) Your saying that companions are all good is itself an act of making a sect. Why not follow Quran and the progeny as Prophet has asked us to do (mentioned in Sahih Muslim and is considered Tawatur) 4) Not all Muhajireen are praised in Surah Tawbah. And calling Medinans as hypocrites is also a racist comment. Sabiqoon al-awwaloon of both Muhajireen and Ansar are praised. And those who follow them in virtue. Similarly individuals from both Muhajireen and Ansar and admonished in Quran and Sunnah. JazakAllah.
@@Thaqlain i don't need to watch the succeeding episodes. Prophet taking him to migration is one of the greatest virtue he had. When a person is travelling on such a dangerous journey, he will usually take with him person whom he trust very much. That's basic common sense.
@@Thaqlain that's easy. Ifprophet didn't wanted him to come along with him, he wouldn't take him with him. Shia narrative makes no sense. If prophet took him with him because he was afraid that he will give away his secrets to kuffar, then that means he knew abu bakr was a hypocrite. Taking an hypocrite in such a journey is far more dangerous than to leave him to expose his secrets.
Like the previous one, if we have any proof, from the Quran or Prophetic narration that being with the Prophet on that night is a virtue, we are here to surrender 🙂
