IF you have any questions just let me know. I will try to reply every time I can. Otherwise enjoy it! BTW IF YOU FIND MY REPLIES USEFUL, please consider leaving a LIKE to THE VIDEO. Will be THE BEST way to say a warm "Thanks"! 😊
@@abylaikhanqaliman4037 Hi there, I believe Dreamstrike is a bit nicer, more elastic and Bounce is more traditional more like EVA foam, denser not as squishy and probably heavier.
@@abylaikhanqaliman4037 I'm not expert by no means, but I believe that both are the same material and "Dreamstrike Plus" has the EVA roads as a second layer of foam in the midsole where the "Dreamstrike" it does not having that second layer of foam. The compound should be the same for both types of Dreamstrike foams. Maybe I'm wrong, if someone else knows better is invited to share here his/hers knowledge.
@@EasyLifeES You most likely know better than me :) please tell me, is lightstrike more durable than a simple dreamstrike? The manufacturer said somewhere that the lightstrike is made of tpu
I don't like the oursole found in Response Super but I feel that is still slightly better than the one found in Kayano 28... If you can go for the Adidas Response M... They have full rubber outsoles !
I have slightly flat feet and slightly wider feet than normal. Currently i am using asics kayano 29 which is a good fit for me. Should i go for Addidas response or response super? I am thinking of getting response super as it is more stable and it has more room for my toes.
Those models aren't available here in Spain as we speak. Maybe in the future... will see (thanks for the suggestions). Although I have many episodes that are already recorded, I just need the time to edit them before post them (that takes the most time for me).
But one with Dreamsstrike one without, suppose Super is better? 2nd question, why the naming bit confusing, with on going sales of Response Super 3.0? Thanks!
Google Translate did a poor job and I'm not sure that I understand well your questions. In general from my experience sometimes is more important the stack of the midsole than the softness of the foam. It has to be a good equilibrium in between the stack and the softness of the foam in order to have a good result. Not always newer is better ! Lately I see all the brands looking to cut the costs reducing the materials. We have to choose wisely the next pair of sneakers if we don't want have something with good performance that also is durable. Adidas Response seen in this video is one of the very few that actually still worth our attention. I hope this reply is useful to you!
Thanks! The naming of Response Super series is a bit confusing. What you have covered in this video is "Response Super", but I can also see Adidas is selling another Response Super 3.0. but that's an older version I guess.
@@dinoyong Yeah... Is true... The naming is sometimes little bit weird. Especially of the foams, they will make think they are plush and surprise! Not even close. Most of the time are very rigid. :) About being a older or newer version... The only way to check "that" is to verify the internal labels found in the sneakers (when is possible) and to compare the date that is written in that model. Also usually an older model will have some article written somewhere on internet where is says the date when it was published.
I believe with the Supernova Running 3 you will probably be more vulnerable to everything that goes under their soles... having more exposed foam than Adidas Response Super M. So my choice will be Response Super M or even better if you can opt for "Adidas Response" seen in Ep142 (that are more economic and BETTER made than Super version!).
I am already using ultraboost 1.0 and ultraboost Light. I bought these for dirty situations where they could be more damaged. A more affordable shoe would be better.
I did compare them in the video. I don't know if you watch it?! And as I said there, I didn't seen any benefit for 15€ or so. Response remains the better one for ME in few ways.
