Just wanted to give a big shoutout to the new editor! The improvements are noticeable-great job on the pacing, transitions, and overall vibe. It’s really elevated the channel's content. Keep up the fantastic work!
The claim is not that vestigial organs have "NO function" at all. But, real claim is that vestigial organs evolved and they had a "primary" ( or you can say main function) in ancestors of species. But, now these vestigial organs don't serve this "primary" function in our body. But, they have some "secondary" or (you can say less important) functions in our body. This is the claim who proves evolution. For example, whales pelvic vestiges had "main function" of walking in past. But now they don't serve this main function. But, they have some less important secondary function of store some small amount of minerals in body. You can't say that bcz whale pelvic vestiges store small amount of minerals, that's why they are not vestiges at all. What Qaiser Raja has tried to did is that he thinks vestiges should have "NO function". But , he brought up some secondary function of vestiges. And then said that this who concept of vestiges and evolution is wrong. Sounds like strawman fallacy.
@@Member_of_MENSA What defines primary and secondary function? Thats subjective bcz by that definition i.e gradual change of basic function, most of organs would be vestigial according to evolution and mew species would be inferior as all organs would be doing secondary functions. This argument used by evolutionist therefore goes against the survival of fittest. You may argue the secondary functions may become more important as the environment changes, but then that defeats your earlier argument about the vestigial organs doing less important functions as they could be useful in the future. The problem with evolution is the wild extrapolation that arises from specific observations. 😊
@@Member_of_MENSA Thats presupposition bias ,, before darwinists said vestigial organs are the reminents and are not needed. Now they are going into the disucssions of primary and secondary functions
At first vestigial organs were considered as organs without any function but when science came to find their functions evolutionist changed their perspective that they have some secondary functions. Well in future when, further scientific evidence will show that they have some important role in functioning of human body, evolutionist will come with some new lame excuse just to proof their theory of evolution.
Dear Qaiser Bhai, if you believe that the theory of evolution is entirely incorrect, I kindly request that you make a video explaining your understanding of how all species came into existence on Earth, while considering the timeline of their origins. Specifically, I would like to know how you address the fossil record, which shows that some species are very ancient, while others appeared more recently. When you explain the concept of the special creation of different species at various points in history, please clarify the process you believe was involved in their creation, either some biologically understandable process or merely some miraculous creation. Are you suggesting that God created each species independently at different times from nothing? To be clear, my questions do not concern the creation of humans, as I agree to the point that humans may have been created by God with a special purpose. Rather, I’m asking about the creation of all other species-when and how did they come into being? Finally, I’m curious about whether it is possible, in your view, to believe in evolution as a God-driven process while still holding that humans were specially created with a purpose. Would such a belief be logical to you? I ask these questions because, even if we dismiss the theory of evolution, as a student of science, I am still left wondering how we can explain the diversity of life on Earth. So, if you conclude your series by disproving evolution, please also provide us with an alternative explanation of what actually happened. Thank you, and I want to add that I love your content and appreciate the important work you are doing. These are just a few doubts I have as a student of science. I look forward to your response, especially in a video format. Thanks!
Yes qaiser ahmed raza you wins tonsils ,appendix, are secondary lymphoid organs which plays an important role in providing an important sites for interaction of lymphocytes with the antigen which proliferate to become effector cells which play an important role in immune system of our body clearly mention in my class 12th biology ncert book page no.153
The claim is not that vestigial organs have "NO function" at all. But, real claim is that vestigial organs evolved and they had a "primary" ( or you can say main function) in ancestors of species. But, now these vestigial organs don't serve this "primary" function in our body. But, they have some "secondary" or (you can say less important) functions in our body. This is the claim who proves evolution. For example, whales pelvic vestiges had "main function" of walking in past. But now they don't serve this main function. But, they have some less important secondary function of store some small amount of minerals in body. You can't say that bcz whale pelvic vestiges store small amount of minerals, that's why they are not vestiges at all. What Qaiser Raja has tried to did is that he thinks vestiges should have "NO function". But , he brought up some secondary function of vestiges. And then said that this who concept of vestiges and evolution is wrong. Sounds like strawman fallacy. 🙂(using QAR favorite emoji).
@@Curiousperson-cr5rv it means nature is intelligent? Because according to you nature is deciding which organ going to be diminished or work as secondary organ in future so nature is so conscious for human being and is continuously working for human welfare so why some time nature is so cruel, earthquake, floods, valcones, drought,
The claim is not that vestigial organs have "NO function" at all. But, real claim is that vestigial organs evolved and they had a "primary" ( or you can say main function) in ancestors of species. But, now these vestigial organs don't serve this "primary" function in our body. But, they have some "secondary" or (you can say less important) functions in our body. This is the claim who proves evolution. For example, whales pelvic vestiges had "main function" of walking in past. But now they don't serve this main function. But, they have some less important secondary function of store some small amount of minerals in body. You can't say that bcz whale pelvic vestiges store small amount of minerals, that's why they are not vestiges at all. What Qaiser Raja has tried to did is that he thinks vestiges should have "NO function". But , he brought up some secondary function of vestiges. And then said that this who concept of vestiges and evolution is wrong. Sounds like strawman fallacy. 🙂(using QAR favorite emoji).
What defines primary and secondary function? Thats subjective bcz by that definition i.e gradual change of basic function, most of organs would be vestigial according to evolution and new species would be inferior as all organs would be doing secondary functions. This argument used by evolutionists therefore goes against the survival of fittest. You may argue the secondary functions may become more important as the environment changes, but then that defeats your earlier argument about the vestigial organs doing less important functions as they could be useful in the future (hence validating Intelligent Design) The problem with evolution is the wild extrapolation that arises from specific observations. 😊
@@JackReacher340 Im not disproving or endorsing evolution but the argument itself is based in presupposition of primary/secondary functions and goes against other arguments evolution which includes survival of the fittest.
The claim is not that vestigial organs have "NO function" at all. But, real claim is that vestigial organs evolved and they had a "primary" ( or you can say main function) in ancestors of species. But, now these vestigial organs don't serve this "primary" function in our body. But, they have some "secondary" or (you can say less important) functions in our body. This is the claim who proves evolution. For example, whales pelvic vestiges had "main function" of walking in past. But now they don't serve this main function. But, they have some less important secondary function of store some small amount of minerals in body. You can't say that bcz whale pelvic vestiges store small amount of minerals, that's why they are not vestiges at all. What Qaiser Raja has tried to did is that he thinks vestiges should have "NO function". But , he brought up some secondary function of vestiges. And then said that this who concept of vestiges and evolution is wrong. Sounds like strawman fallacy. 🙂(using QAR favorite emoji).
Sir I am your big fan❤ I love u and I am practicing islam and love Islam very much and believe in one true Allah but Sir here is the problem in your video that your trying to explain vestigial organs improperly .vestigial organs doesn't mean no functions but means organs of very few functions but having previously many functions or primary function. Actually Sir I also deny darwinism or this type of evolution but due to many other reasons not due to this.
Qaisar sb please stop spreading lies you don't know the definition of the phenomenon which you are debunking. I have made a video on that same topic. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_kA-JcyUYcs.htmlsi=FepyUKAAc1ygKnDM
Qaiser bhai ap bhi atheists ki tarhan hain, hum to doobain hain sanam tum ko le doobain gay. Adam and Eve ki magical story to koi digest nahin kar sakta chalo evolution ki MC detay hain 😂😂.
راجہ صاحب ارتقاء کو غلط ثابت کرنے سے پہلے ویسٹیجئل آرگنز کی تعریف تو صحیح پڑھ لیں رد بعد میں کرلیجیۓ گا۔ عیسائی کریشنسٹس حضرات کا مواد کاپی پیسٹ کرنے سے پہلے خود بھی تحقیق کرلیا کریں۔
