This is the link to the 1891 Lecture of Nikola Tesla, which is discussed in this video: magstar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/1891-lecture-New-York-Columbia-college.pdf All pictures are included, but the numbering is -100 so instead of fig. 129 in the video, in the book it is fig. 29 This is because this is the original released lecture
@@emichael06 the flyback has the diode, it rectifies the ac high voltage into dc. A zvs also has diodes but they have other functions, you can look it up.
30:01 This might be why certain inventions with spark gaps can develop frosted tips on them, or why some circuits can actually cool the wires as opposed to heating them: electrostatic implosions and explosions sweeping away the energy with them, giving a cooling effect!
@@Gnaritas42Nice BS. Lenz's law can easily be circumvented with partnered output coils parallel with each other using a single loop core where the primary winding envelops both of them as a solenoid.
Do you really think that the control freaks would allow freedom at all? We're talking about the clash of the classes(elite vs mortals) here! That's the right dividing line!the worst ever motivation is money because it leads to division!
High voltage needs distance with the paper in the center and the electrostatic turns to charge. In fact the charge is so strong the paper will weigh (in force) 4-6x as much. I did a video on it. It also used 2 dc flybacks to produce the electrostatic effect. As you reduce the amps the frequency and voltage increases. 2 simple circuits can do the same thing. A trigger switch and a frequency generator with a duty cycle. Tesla was right on this one.
Ivo, this by far has been my favorite video. I can see the light bulb moments going off in your head and it is exciting to watch. I greatly appreciate this long format video. Although I'm sure longer videos get less views, I really really appreciate your labor and efforts. Best regards. And I love the VR too btw...I'm a visual learner so it helps a lot.
Key thing is to decouple the source exciter from the load side. That way, the load doesn't pull from the source side but from the ambient field itself.
@Ivo I wanted to share a story with you that your video reminded me of. Back around 2011, I attended an energy conference in Southern Maryland, hosted by Larry Jarboe (presentations from that event are on RU-vid, but not the one I'm about to share). It was there that I witnessed an extraordinary demonstration by Carl Falsenis, which left a lasting impact on me. Carl's demonstration featured a variant of the hairpin circuit, connected to a series of eight spark gaps that crackled with energy. This circuit also incorporated a mysterious bottle that had been evacuated and sealed through an intricate process involving bee pollen and some kind of vinegar solution, a detail Carl mentioned but kept mostly secret. In the dimly lit room, about 15 of us watched in awe as Carl activated the circuit. A mesmerizing purple mist began to pour into the bottle, like a breach in the fabric of space itself. The mist was deep and vibrant, yet also dull and spectral, almost ghostly as it floated in the darkness. The true marvel of the demonstration occurred when the bottle was brought near my hand. The same purple mist seemed to be pulled from my skin, as though the bottle was siphoning the very essence of energy from my body. The mist, which had appeared ghostly when held in the darkness, became much brighter near my hand. It was as if there was more energy density, more of the purple substance, being pulled from my skin. The sensation was intensely cold, as if the energy itself was being extracted. This eerie process was not only felt but seen, with the energy manifesting as a plasma-like purple mist, following the fluid dynamics of a mist or fog. The mist appeared to emanate out of space itself, seemingly pulling energy from the very fabric of reality, and drawing an even larger degree of energy from living beings. This was evident when it was near a human hand, as the mist became far more vibrant and intense. Having researched Tesla's circuits extensively, I was familiar with the principles at play, but I had never seen anything like this. Yet, despite my familiarity, I was unable to replicate the circuit. Carl was unwilling to provide the details, show the schematics, or explain the exact steps he used to prepare and seal the evacuated bottle. There were proprietary steps that he kept secret. Your video brought these vivid memories back to the forefront of my mind, and I felt compelled to share this extraordinary experience with you. If you ever wish to delve deeper into these intriguing phenomena, please do not hesitate to reach out.
That sounds amazing, I would love to witness it. No doubt the bottle was near vacuum, with just a little gas inside. Tesla's 1891 lecture mostly refered to producing light, so I advise you to read it!
That's amazing! I'm not sure if it's related but in the early days of Eric Dollard's work he experimented with evacuated bulbs of a specific type of old street light that had burned out with evaporated metals inside. When energized in a monopolar field between 2 Tesla extra coils a purple plasma like mist started to form inside the bulb followed by galaxy like structures, sometimes the bulbs would breach with a hole but rather loose their vacuum it got stronger as the purple mist flowed out of it, other times the whole thing would explained and the galaxy would remain without its container for a second or 2, I wonder if Carl's experiment and this are related?
you need the bedini voltage spike or potential to fill the capacitor. You have to work on the other side of accepted energy. It is high voltage spikes.
I had an experience once working as an electrician, were plunning in wire cables. Like a extension cord only a flexible metallic jacket and connector. With plastic insulation, then the connections. Having L1, L2, L3, neutral and ground, i was in a awkward position making the connection. Didn't notice the damaged connector. I get a bright flash. That is normal from a short to ground, what was strange , is the feeling of a large balloon being filled rapidly then poping! I actually felt pressure seemingly centered at the shorted connection. I don't know if it was magnetic or what it didn't seem like only the metal having the pressure, it seemed to be a force pushing against me, for a fraction of a second. It happened nearly 25 years ago. Its crazy the things we think we know, and what we do not know! Things that can be very interesting to discover the things we fo not know!
interesting, how high was the voltage? I heard similar stories of people feeling pressure near a sudden discharge, E P Dollard also showed it in one of his 80's borderland videos, but that didn't have a discharge it was near a lamp that was electrostatic driven
I have the design that I redrew from a man who was building a plasma reactor that noticed his meter was showing 650 volts through the air, as it was not connected to anything, he wondered if he could collect it by placing a coil around reactor and yes he could, so he built a second reactor and did the same with it, the he got a car battery and sparked the first, collected the power and ran it through an simple enhancement circuit and pulsed the second one, then it repeated the prosses pulsing the first one again placing the reactors in resonance with each other. He then placed coils around the reactors for collecting power for use, it created 11kw at 190ams and consumed no fuel.
Tesla said his best Tesla Coil was the static powered Tesla Coil, he had a paper belt running over a think was a rubber roller at top and a glass roller at the bottom, that ran up the center of the HV coil, with a brass collector wire that rubs on the flat surface of the paper very lightly. If you look up home made static generator you should find out the best materials to use.
So ahead of his time. @Master_Ivo if you translate some of the terminology into the terms we use today then the whole thing doesn't seem so esoteric. The part about discussing the possibilities of harnessing both the "electricity" and the electrical energy within a "globe" and the two "moving in the same lines," well he basically just invented the vacuum tube right there. He, at that point, already knew that the electricity (aka electrons) in an electrical circuit flow within the conductive element, but the ENERGY (fields) actually flows in the dielectric space around the conductor- something that a lot of today's engineers STILL don't know.. So he's talking about setting up a capacitor within a vacuum-sealed globe and the fact that it's going to kick ass because of the constrained dielectric space- Electricity and electrical energy shooting across the dielectric in tandem, in one direction, and in a real big hurry. So what's another word for a capacitor inside vacuum-sealed glass where the dielectric is a gap and it operates at very high voltages? Tube. Combine that with his comments about the ease of lighting the filament within the vacuum and he's basically at the brink of inventing the vacuum tube. He's like 95% there. Of course Tesla will not get credit for that, some British dude will. But this is exactly what Tesla is describing. He goes on to say when you "excite the luminosity with AC the medium is either strained or released, giving rise to only one kind of wave- contact or break" so he's talking about feeding it an alternating control voltage and getting a bigger wave out of it- an output wave produced by make-or-break conductivity. A voltage controlled voltage amplifier! Where an AC control determines the flow of electrons off of a heated cathode thus modulating conductivity to the vacuum capacitors anode. It's a tube, man. A vacuum tube. But it seems Tesla was too ahead of his time for his own good. In this same lecture there's evidence of this when he gets into the the next part. The controlled "disruptive discharge" of the condenser (aka the not yet invented vacuum tube) preferably at very high frequencies, NOT oscillating (AC), but rather going in the same direction (DC). So the terminology "Alternating Current" and "Direct Current" don't even exist yet but Tesla is keenly aware of the two, and he knows how much power he could basically get for free if he could operate this high-voltage vacuum capacitor with very high frequency DC pulses. Can you say "Switching Power Supply"? Well before you say that you've got to say "Field Effect Transistor" first right? Slow down, Tesla. Slow thee F*CK down. He's wanting to do FET stuff. And he does essentially have a really really slow FET (FETs with pilot lights aka TUBES) but he's jumping way ahead into switching power supply territory when he hasn't fully baked the concept of the vacuum tube yet. His plight was that his ideas were too advanced for the physical technology of his time and I think he didn't know how to properly cope with that. Who would? We're predating the existence of basic electrical terminology here so how was he supposed to know what size steps were appropriate to take when a crawling pace hadn't even been established yet. If Tesla has been viewing the progress of EE from the afterlife, you can bet there was a point when he turned around slowly, looked God right in the face and said. "1856?..... You had me born in eighteen fifty motherf*cking six? Was that funny to you? Did you have a good laugh at that? Ha f*cking Ha, you can get your own damn Netflix subscription I'm deleting your profile."
Time 16:00 high voltage takes on a carrier frequency. Think magnetron resonance chamber. The microwave produced has the frequency set by the chamber of the magnetron.
I have a machine that uses high voltage as static electricity and it produces a field bubble. The 2 rotating plates with a wire that goes through the tesla coil ( not attached ) will make another field bubble. By increasing the power of the tesla coil you can move the static field. If you reverse the high voltage and the tesla coil it will hold in the static field and begin to charge the air. The system is open air no chamber needed.
This infinite energy experimenter, me, (happens to be in rotary magnetics) seems to be following similar path to yours. If-this-then-that -so why doesn't it work. Year by year we inch closer to that light-bulb idea moment. In different fields (ha ha) we delve the 'impossible'. Like Tesla but without big-buck$ interests' hinderance. Good luck to us both.
Have you heard of Ken Wheeler from the Theoria Apophasis channel? He might be good to talk to in relation to ether perturbation. There is also HUMAN INITIATED CONTACT, with some interesting math.
@@Greysen2025 Search within his videos to find his talks on proportional geometry in relation to Phi (search Phi), and how that relates to toroid/hyperboloid fields.
Just a reminder, the inverse of propagating energy from a tower to deliver free energy is a very similar construction trying to pull ambient energy out of the atmosphere and likely teslas potential real plan to power the town with static energy was mocked or discredited to steal more of his work.
interesting idea to reverse engineer it. not a broadcast of power, but a reciever or better said creater of power by using the electrostatic voltage from the ambient medium
Do you know why you agree that "high pulses generate electrostatic"? If you understand the reason, the "generate more energy than the electric pulse itself" is clearer. Source: I've just been thinking about this for several years.
*Energy can flow between + and + and - and - and ground and ground. *Shake a bottle of tourmaline tumble rocks next to a fieldmeter for the electric AND magnetic field.
Your discharging circuit has own oscillating frequency and coil around that bar has own. They both overlap each other. This is not harmonic frequency. You can add ferrite rod inside that coil or in close proximity to see that frequency will change.
[23:33] energy in the form of light and motive power (The teleforce). A curious phenomenon to be examined later. Explaining the teleforce concept. Tesla was a genius!
Note: Ether is not the only form of conductivity though empty space besides inductance fields and radiant transmitable frequencies. It took me many years to understand, there is another option Nikola Tesla and the teleforce exploits.
17:21 You still don't get it. No offense. But he's simply talking about the harmonic content of waves that aren't perfectly sinusoidal. 16:59 No, he says what kind of waves he's talking about in the same sentence. Note the semicolon "...this giving rise to only one kind of waves; a sudden contact or break." What type of waves? The contact or break type AKA square waves. Actually, any wave that's not perfectly sinusoidal "are essential for the production of superimposed waves." So he's saying sine waves don't inherently produce harmonics. Do we know this to be true? Yes. Waves that have an abrupt contact or break point (square, triangle, sawtooth, anything other than sine) are "essential for the production of superimposed waves (harmonics)." Do we know this to be true? Yes. So you see, you are unnecessarily complicating what he's saying, man.
Well, I see it differently. a sudden contact OR break, not AND like a square wave has. So after a slow drop, a sudden rise in voltage OR after a slow rise in voltage a sudden drop in voltage. You are absolutely right in the production of harmonics, I am very curious how these harmonics can serve us, when tuned to a lower sub harmonic. My "what are impulses" video might clarify this for you, as the longitudinal fast displacement of energy needs to go in one direction, not back and forth. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YnijhZdAseA.html So a current impulse is needed from a capacitor diacharge, not a voltage impulse (or square wave) from a coil discharge. Why? because we need a net inflow of energy into the conductor, so the load can use it. that means a fast negative to positive voltage discharge. (and a slow charging of the capacitor to a negative voltage).
The circuit that tesla is talking about matches Ed Grey Circuit, so all this makes sense the dampening of the oscillations in a vacuum using a resistive element while breaking and making the circuit at high speed seems to match what is being described in the lecture. collection of the electrostatic effect is how the ed gray circuit was described to work. It's not easy to create a vacuum with a tungsten rod with a graphite or similar resistive element. It's hard though, I've tried. I've not seen anyone really replicate that circuit either due to the vacuum requirements or a decent disruptive discharge or correct material for a resistive element to dampen the oscillation. I can generate great static discharge (enough to impact the wiring in the house to light the bulbs in the house but I can't collect the energy using this type of circuit (I'm assuming because my experiment wasn't in a proper vacuum and I was just energising the air (you see static discharges on metal and usb ports and monitors and tv's get interfered with and cut out even at a significant distance while the experiment runs). Maybe look at that circuit see if that takes you in a different direction, after all I think the ed grey circuit was thought to have been acquired from Telsa originally from what I understand.
Fantastic presentation, thank you. I am trying to learn electronic design. And spelling, says the red lines you won't see lol. Any recommendations to true information. I try to be discerning, and it has become easier as I progress, but finding them can be hard.
Some can be found on my website, but as I am learning I also make mistakes. the best source is nature,she doesn't lie. do experiments and learn from her.
Tariel Kapanadze,foi o que me veio a mente, parece ter relação e pode ser a chave, hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Nikola Tesla e no Original de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação e esforço ao longo deste anos...👍
Also Tesla said the pancake coil Is a must for the electrostatic field, as the magnetic field goes into the center and outward to outside of the coil and the electric fields goes upwards and downwards
@@doubleooh7337 in the context of free energy the pancake coils can be stacked on each other and duplicate the same energy without depleting the magnetic of the original. You focus on the magnetic instead of electric and create unlimited energy
@12:22 Tesla's vacuum was not perfect, and in such, the molecules left (and there were definitely some) have a huge mean-free-path, and such a lot more kinetic energy ( and easy to create light on impact), vs when they are close together in under 1 atmosphere pressure. Tesla actually discusses exactly that but in another writing, do not remember if it were in the "Electrician" or in one of the other magazines sometimes he was publishing/discussing his experiments. @23:00 If you build and run the circuit you will observe the "curious" phenomenons. Basically the circuit is a single loop primary of a Tesla coil as the same effect can be observed there too. The impedance phenomena is clearly visible/sensed when human touches the terminals and conveys current proportional to its (dynamic) impedance, vs the rest of the circuit, based on the chosen discharge frequency. Can not recommend more for anyone interested to read Tesla's "Colorado Spring Notes 1899-1900". Ones these writings are understood it is very clear what Tesla was thinking was. By no means though it is easy. Tesla writes in the 19th century terms and concepts and learning how to dive in his thinking, with capacitance and inductance measured in cm2, takes quite some time. But understanding that book it totally worth it for demystifying Tesla's work in the electric field, at east.
E hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Tesla e de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação esforço ao longo deste anos...
My reading of Tesla suggests he was inadvertently generating uncontained cold plasmas of open air. High dv/dt EMFs selectively energise electrons over much-heavier ions, adding energy to them and boiling them off atoms and molecules. Cool ions in a sea of superheated electrons constitutes so-called 'cold plasma' (actually the kind of plasma for which the word was borrowed from biology, their remarkable self-reactivity reminiscent of immunobiological processes in blood plasma) - AKA non-thermal or non-equilibrium plasmas. What happens next is basically condensed-matter physics - under duress of high-energy / high enthalpy, lower-entropy contingency states become available for the system to drop down and relax into, especially as regards spontaneous formations of coherent quasi-bosons, comprised of spin-coupled electron condensates clustering around stripped ions. The tiny bullets of metal being ejected by the dome of his radiating emitter - one notably striking just above his heart and, according to him, nearly killing him - are consistent with descriptions of 'strange radiation' emanating from various charge-clustering / EVO experiments. Likewise, the misty white glow that progressively ensheathed his apparatus the longer it ran is consistent with a cold plasma forming around his equipment. If you look at the progress of his patent applications around this time, they're focused on ever-faster dv/dt impulses such as mechanically spinning switches; basically high-speed pulsed DC. This was Tesla's 'undiscovered country', an uncharted wild frontier of new effects awaiting discovery as the thresholds of high-frequency switching were steadily improved. He basically believed the vacuum could become superconducting, if he developed the principles far enough, and this was the basis of his proposed breakthrough energy transmission system. What he was actually doing however was increasing the conductivity of air, by ionising it. This was prior to Enrico Fermi or Wolfgang Pauli, or the discoveries of spin angular momentum and the distinctions between fermion and boson, let alone the nature of superconductivity as we now understand it. This is obviously not to demean or disparage his work, but at this latter stage in his research he was obviously too far ahead of his time and so lacking the conceptual frameworks to interpret his results in the same way we can today. The transmission system would never have worked the way he intended. He correctly identified that the white glow was obviously a dissipative mechanism, thus concluding it represented a systemic inefficiency which would have to be ameliorated if he were ever to reach his goal of lossless transmission. This is why he chose to scale up the radiating emitter, finding that this allowed him to attain higher switching frequencies before the white mist began to accumulate, also eliminating the potentially-deadly shrapnel discharges from the dome. Yet eliminating the plasma likewise eliminated the conductive path it had been forming.. He was simply trying to go too far, too soon, his ultimate objectives doomed to failure.
Karl Palsness was trying to get me to understand this two decades ago when he was working with the hairpin circuit. This is also related to other research such as the "water fuel cell" where we have unipolar pulses of high potential.
On the topic of WFC's a vital element not talked about enough IMO is the use of Nitrogen, Meyer used an air intake to add the atmospheric Nitrogen to the Hydrogen mix to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel, I seldom see people talk about this vital information. As for running the fuel cell, spot on, it helps if there's no conductive contact between the - and + electrodes.
@@JenkoRun Absolutely. Good points. I used distilled water. I suppose all of this relates to the PROTELF system as well Where we have a high voltage unipolar discharge across a tungsten/carbon gap with alignment field (b-field). Thereby ejecting energy outwards at 90 degrees to the current flow. This system being well tested at lower voltages, but not high voltage which may transform the equation.
I have seen 4 places in the world where 3 energy balls float around looking for spires. When the energy ball touches the spire, the town lights go on, the whole town. WEF our enemy destroying as much as possible.
@@JenkoRun This is the problem with parrots. You need to conceive things on your own. Ken would call you the f word for believing the ether is composed of gas or matter itself. How can something be non-Cartesian and a gas at the same time? The ether isn’t made of anything. Matter is a mirage of the ether.
@@FVLMEN I am aware of what parroting is and I am not doing that, you might as well be asking how a non-cartesian dimension exists at all with that question. We have a non-cartesian dimension, counterspace, already, so what's wrong with it being composed of a non-cartesian substance? I never said it was composed of gross matter did I? I see no issue here. And if you want to debate *refrain from mocking or insulting me,* I won't entertain that attitude with you.
I had a Tesla patent called The Orgone Generator that he built after going to Egypt that drew power strait from the earth that under testing was said to be 20,000 times more powerful then the power we use today, all for free, I did a video about it on my channel if you want to know more about it.
@Master Ivo, I'm sure you have figured out how Tesla's magnifying transmitter worked. Of course, the technology works. Technology is not the problem. People are the problem. Knowing how the device works, it reveals other aspects of the electrical nature of our planet. The earth has many electrical layers. The surface and ionosphere are negatively charged. In between those two layers is another layer, which is positively charged. It seems to be the same altitude as the ozone layer, which is at the bottom of the stratosphere. With these facts in mind, I have determined that the electricity that causes lightning is not generated by clouds, as is the popular belief. The electricity is already up there. Water vapor condenses around the positively charged particles and pulls them towards the earth. It is not the voltage breaking down the air that causes lightning. It is the rotation of the earth and its magnetic field that compels the positive ions to return upwards. It is magnitomotive force that causes most lightning. (Sometimes the ions can be pushed all the way to the ground and you get what looks like upside-down lightning. ) An interesting fact; like charges normally repell each other but when they move together in the same direction they generate magnetic fields which causes the particles to be deflected towards each other. This forms a filament or bolt. Of course, it wasn't until 1899 that Tesla accidentally discovered how to pull energy from the electrical layer above us. He does say in his patent that the central coil B does short-circuit when the voltage applied occurs more rapidly than normal. The 3, 6, 9 chord produces a sawtooth waveform, in which the voltage in one part rises very rapidly. It's such a simple and elegant method of producing a DC impulse with an AC current. Of course, the coil B would have to be non-insulated. That is why he wound the coil on an insulator. It also explains the necessity of the hood at the top of the coil.
Actually the high voltage Sawtooth wave in the low inductance primary produces 3rd harmonics in the secondary, Tesla even worked with higher harmonics.
@MasterIvo That sounds about right. Naturally, the center coil (coil B in the patent) should have the largest inductance so that the voltage could overcome the smaller radius of the turns and behave as a conductor with a diameter of the insulated drum it is wound upon ( in other words, short-circuit). My dad paid a guy to give him the secret of Tesla's free energy. I think it was Don Smith. He didn't want to my dad directly so he told me as I was only 4 years old. He simply said that it short-circuited. Reading Tesla's patent, that is what Tesla says but in other words.
Hello Ivo, I am experimenting in the same direction. Donald Smith explains countless times to focus on the magnetic field produced and high voltage. A capacitor regardless of the capacity, the capacity gives the charging time, if it is charged with 1000V and the coil has 1 ohm, when discharging it produces a peak of 1000A and as you know the magnetic field produced is directly proportional to the Amperes! In addition, Kapanadze, Tesla, and Don Smith use SPARK GAP, and these devices are prepared to withstand Kilo-Amperes. I wish you success!
Yeah - and Don tries to remind us to fill and empty that Cap millions to hundreds of millions of times per second - I think Don used positive wave superposition with quarter wave generated by high Q resonance - his Caps were also like 8000 volts ? or higher
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 I love the Electronics guys cause they reply super fast - In D Smith's case - his pumps were 1/4 wave producing HV and HF that discharged current at peak voltage and were rectified and charged his huge 8000 volt 2uF Cap bank - then DC to AC conversion into a large low frequency transformer - not sure we are on the same page - the secrets to me are how to load a 2ndary without loading the Primary with the Primary tuned to high Q resonance - D Smith somehow used 1/4 wave resonance - I've not done it - but it makes sense - thanks for the reply
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Oh - I've not done that yet - I am just relaying the logic - you talk about 'impedance' - but is impedance real or just imaginary ? - that is is impedance just a model for effective "resistance" - Our Transformer coil has an OHMIC resistance of 1 ohm - we apply 120v and yet the current is just 5 amps -when it 'should' be 120 amps - why again ? I believe there is ONLY Ohmic resistance so I believe we get to 5 amps because there is really only 5 volts on that coil - can you see that ?
Observing the 1000 A current peak when discharging a 10 nF capacitor charged to 1000 V through a 1 Ω resistor requires proper and very fast equipment because this peak is extremely short in duration. Here are some considerations: High-frequency oscilloscope: To measure this peak, an oscilloscope with a very high bandwidth (on the order of GHz) and a very fast sampling rate is required. The oscilloscope must be able to capture extremely short transient events. Current Probes: The current probes used must be able to measure very high currents and have a very fast response. Clamp current probes specially designed for high frequency transient measurements would be required. Correct measurement setup: Mounting must be done carefully to minimize stray inductances and contact resistances that can affect the measurement. Using short, thick wires for connections is essential. Protection and Safety: Given the very high current involved, it is essential to ensure adequate protection for equipment and operators. Measuring such current can be dangerous, so personal protective equipment and safety measures must be strictly observed. From CHAT GPT4 !
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Don Smit device have 6000V and 3A output... and if the impedance is high, what is the problem? connect light bulbs in series until you find another solution! :)
@@221boss221 I would call the aether charge carriers or ambient background and also term it energy because it's an actual thing ( energy as a substance)
@@scraw3 the aether holds different pressures at different vectors or points. The co-relation difference that you call charge carriers are different pressures. There are also elements in the aether that hold different charges. You must have atlease two or more to measure. I never seen a multimeter with one probe.
@@221boss221 may not be able to measure the ether directly but you can according to don smith measure the magnetic component of the ether or ambient background as he called it. For example you measure one miligauss on the EM field radiated by a plasma globe and that's equal to hundred thousand volts of electrical energy because the magnetic and electrical are two sides of the same coin. The ether won't register anything when measured directly since it's in a state of equilibrium and its not until it's disturbed (charge redistribution) that energy can be harvested from the particles return back to ambient (ether). that explanation is enough for me to understand how my overunity devices that I built work
@@scraw3 same here, hence why i called it "pressure". But we are talking about the same thing basically. Diturbing the aether is still considered as "two or more" as far as potential "differences"
Thank you for this video. This is the best use of VR on RU-vid. I would love to see 3D VR shorts detailing each concept. Us viewers can then walk around each model as you sketch them. Please don't ever get discouraged.
In T Moray experiment the antenna is the entrapment of radiant energy using (I believe) a fly-back valve using germanium as the dialectic. By tuning the antenna to the fly-back and the resonance of the planets harmonic , the caterpillar effect of building magnetic resonance around the antenna was accumulative in effect and milked off by a harmonic arc in a vacuum tube containing helium… The germanium back in the day was a hard to obtain material at the time and emphasis was placed on that to draw attention away from the helium valve. The arc in that tubes gas was hidden from the public’s eye with tape over the valve hiding the colour of light emitted..
There is a Fourier transformation in space and a Fourier transformation in time. When time becomes a part of space, there is no causality, the electric source interacts with itself simultaneously, therefore (E x B) is the coupled electric field, with 2 basis vectors divergent and curl (this is spin). Apply an external magnetic field to the coupled electric field [( E x B ) x B] this is an evanescent wave, the second perturbation of derivative action. Each perturbation creates an additional time axis, since the previous time axis became a spacial component. The coupled electric field is space-time, oscillation in space time have a wave vector (k). But conservation of space-time is broken if k is complex (k = k' + ik'') however energy is conserved in hyper-space-time - as a result, space-time can now be warped (have multiple k values) but still conserve energy. In reality, this creates directional space-time, so the electron has a unique mass in the direction of propagation and a unique mass in the transverse direction (anti-gravity)... In terms of free energy, having multiple k values to represent your wave function (Bloch wave) means the energy of any k value is arbitrary because conservation in space-time no longer exists.... its all a Taylor series. But for real though, the imaginary part is represented by complete internal reflection, so simply use soft-switching for a resonator circuit with two counterclockwise coils and a spark gap at the end.
that last sentence. what is "soft switching" and a spark gap at the end? if it is the end, then there is no gap as it needs 2 ends? Theory is fun, but how to engineer it and prove it works is a whole other game
@@MasterIvo soft switching is for feedback. Hard switching is used for pulses. The goal is to reach an island of stability in the harmonic modes of the waveguide. The island is where the frequency distribution is nonlinear, so there will not be any nearby freuqencies to destabilize resonance. These islands occur at high frequencies. But you don't need to do it this way. This is an experiment in waveguide theory. One person I saw, simply used two counterclockwise coils, using zener diodes on each coil to make the switching more effecient (soft switching). He applied a 20mhz frequency generator to one coil and carefully tuned to resonance. Additional effort was taken to physically drive a 10ft copper pole into the ground for a stable ground source. He verified the experiment by powering a dc motor from a tin foil ball placed between the two coils, with the other end grounded. In my test I had a $10 amazon toy tesla coil. It used a "slayer exciter circuit" this is a feedback switching circuit. From the top of the tesla-coil where sparks shoot out, I soldered a connection to another coil (counter clockwise) from the end of that new coil was a open spark gap to a free standing piece of metal. I nested the coils inside eachother too. My experiment coupled the waves inside the conductive material of the coils. The other guy coupled two seperate coils, being unconnected... I verified my experiment by holding the cathode of an LED and touching the anode of the LED to the conductive material of coil, then see the LED light up... I also placed two anti-parallel LEDs in the circuit of the coil I connected and saw both light up. When it was in resonance with the spark gap the LED glowed strangely. And the Volt Meter sitting freely on the table would just read "Err" It was unstable and took hours to tune, and could not be easily repeated. So I have to build my own now. I will use IGBT transistors for soft switching a resonant transformer (tesla coil), and then use SCR diodes for pulses, the high frequency components of which should have a sympathetic vibration to an island of stability in the modal structure of my waveguide. You may like "the Hutchinson effect" on RU-vid the videos should still be there.
Very interesting especially your last experiment. Electricity actually flows from negative to positive contrary what the books tell you.If you pulsed the coil the other way around negative to positive high side using n channel mosfet. You then may get different results.
Correction on previous comment sorry in the previous video Tuning Dual Resonant system, you used DC on capacitor voltage coil and AC on current coil. Just wondering why AC on current coil to produce oscillations for magnetic field current? Thanks
I think some of Tesla's toroid inventions had CCW + CW winds that are sort of Bucking Coil like - not sure but my guess is those Inventions were essentially Free Power but not spelled out overtly
Super imposed vibrations? Harmonics? Replace the lightbulb with a receiver plate separated by a dielectric. Now you are starting to get into the magnifying transmitter receiver and the teleforce receiver. Both will oscillate changing polarity, however with a diode (or half or full wave bridge rectifier) power can then be harnessed fro. The alternating pulsed frequencies to be converted into a battery or a capacitor as the storage device into usable energy. This is the other side of the tesla coil wireless power transmission people don't know about. It works with both directed ungrounded energy and omnidirectional grounded energy. Tesla was a genius!
It might also be possible to produce a "force field" effect with longitudinal waves by transmitting ever larger positive or negative waves designed to merge at a predetermined distance. As you know these waves can travel at different velocities depending on amplitude, a tiny tail on the end of the wave of opposite charge can be used to prevent repulsion.
Disruptive discharge pulls energy from the etheric field and it manifests as a blue plasma. In the late 1800s, industrial workers whose job it was to switch on huge DC motors were getting killed by this plasma discharge. They solved this problem by heavily insulating the whole switch assembly. Question: Is it etheric energy flowing around the conductor or is it electrons?
Electron particles do not exist, all electrical pioneers including Tesla were against that idea. Electrons are a unit if measurement of Dielectric induction as its own discoverer JJ Thomson defined them. To use a crude analogy, they are the footprints left in the snow (matter) by the invisible man (fields).
magnetic field swirls around the conductor, static field sits between conductors but also non conductors (dielectric materials) radiant energy flows through "empty" space which is filled with non polarised energy (Aether). so these fields can attach to the conductors, maybe rise up from the surface of conductors. tied to them.
@@MasterIvo I recently saw an image of an experiment from somewhere that had a large thick bar wire in a magnetic liquid solution with a DC current running over it, the fluid aligned itself into a swirling vortex spiraling down the wire from one end to the other, it look incredible and is the first time I've ever seen the current in its (almost) full form.
When I see the weird oscillations I think on a superposition of two frequencies - one of the primary discharge and the eigen frequency of the coil and its self capacitance. And I think of runtime effects and reflections on the end of the coil or wherever the impedance abruptly changes.
Excellent video Ivo, thank you for sharing. Here's what catches my attention in your video to explain what the longitudinal magneto dielectric resonant mode is. For your experiment with this resonance mode, you used electro-magnetism, i.e. the electro-inductive force. You explain that the difference between your experiment and Tesla's, who used an electrostatic electrostatic resonance mode. What I understand from your graph is that, like AC electricity, when a magnet's field line passes through a winding 90° out of phase with it, electricity is produced. If we compare the dielectric lines of force that push on the ether around the winding wire (coil) to those of a magnet's field, we realize that we're getting a 90° phase shift again, which should result in the production of radiant electricity, don't you think Ivo? Thank you !!
Do you have a link to his lecture notes you're showing? I'd love to go through it myself. I checked the description but I can't see anything (could be blind, a possibility lmao), also loved watching, keep it up. Searching on the googles and duckducks yields stuff that seems to transcribe the lecture but I can't find the exact one you're using.
If the spark discharge is strong enough, a small nuclear explosion occurs at the anode, which creates a blast wave inside the conductor that can be picked up
the lecture is a long text, time to try again to dive into. in my view the magnetic component is used as a flux multiplier to drive more current (specifically in bucking mode of output coils), the static component is used to create the electric potential in those coils.
Static charges are all around us as well as Having gamma waves at the beginning of lightning passing through the ground up discharge the entire process of ball lightning is a literal vibration of gravity to the point of waves bubbles in the mindset looking at these formations up close and personally I think of them as the new born technology of up down quarks
This explains the Flame Jet Generator from Thomas Townsend Brown in his lab notes and on the T T Brown Family Website. Project 4 Electrokinetic High Voltage Generator. ElectroHydroDynamic Part 3
I believe lightning is only a trigger to the amperage current in the strike . It’s an accumulation of radiant energy as the high tension path is achieved..
A Jacob’s ladder or arc as it grows upwards is the radiant energy accumulation. The initial spark jump was the path of least resistance and the heat build and current is the resultant from the radiant energy. The longer the arc is sustained in dc (not AC frequency, but perhaps I’m not sure) the greater the accumulation effect. In the Jacob’s ladder experiment the flame is divergent from heat rising and heat building..? Isn’t it..?
At 48:55 that is self interference between the different harmonic waves which are non aligned. Both constructive and destructive.....resulting in dissapation maybe?
Yes vacuum . But. Vacuum can not hold the ignition or the condensator . I know their support method is the issue . Condensator can be suspended by the wire ignition coil could be held via plastic cap so metal can do not touch anything . 40000 volt affair .
Ivo, how can I send you a link to a new research paper on the effect of inductive pulses on batteries? Seems like my earlier post has been removed, presumably due to the link it included.
Congrats, you are getting very close to getting it.. Think more about the dielectric that is between the plates of the capacitor. More specifically, the dielectric that is permeated with the aether. If the aether is Paul Dirac's aether then slow charge and fast discharge (with a positive voltage) will result in a dielectric that has net (but fluctuating) positive charge. If the aether is electrons, then you have succeeded in reducing the net number of electrons (aether) within the dielectric. Got it?
Consider that what you may need is a fast, spark gap type charge (resulting in the dielectric having a asymmetrical pos/neg charge) - then a period of time ( with no connection) to allow the dielectric to equalize - which is does quite naturally in an electron aether). Then slowly discharge the capacitor/dielectric and retrieve the extra electrons added from the aether.
And you're espousing absolute bullshit. If you're on meds I'm sorry and I don't want to offend you but there is zero Truth in anything you just said here.
There is an issue with your idea, Electron particles do not exist. *all* the electrical pioneers (Tesla, Steinmetz, Maxwell, JJ Thomson, Heaviside, etc) rejected this idea of Electron Particles.
@@JenkoRun Yes. Experiments to detect an electron aether that permeates all space and matter have failed and the conclusion was that it does not exist. Now, there is evidence that something exists and is described as mysterious, dark, and even non- baryonic. We are a lot like fish in the ocean trying to detect the presence of water.
Not Electron Aether, electron particles, the electron particle does not exist. Period. You are correct that the Aether exists, you are wrong that it's made of electrons. @@asiseeit...6915
sadly tesla idea required braided wire . Not solid wire . Imagine that , an ignition coil with braided wire inside . I suspect this gave manufacturer headacke . Today thheyy could use the plasstic core of the. Oil filtter lol . But back then ? Solidd wire was thee onlyy opttion
Good point. Braided wire allows the _Skin Effect_ to work to its fullest potential, so if Oxygen Free Copper was used, there would be far fewer barriers
Tesla said longitudinal energy is perpendicular to transverse, and this is easily proved with only a large body of water, and a rock. So magnetic is not at 90 degrees, in electromagnetism….
Check out Griffin G Brock's work replicating Tesla bulbs. He's getting some incredible results, including replicating Tesla's xray-like "shadowgraph" bulb, which he has been using for years without getting any cancerous effects.
@@MasterIvo He's using a spark gap diathermy device. Does that not produce the same waveform? I appreciate your insight and this was an incredible video. Excited to see your progress, brother!
Have you checked out bob greenyer on the martin fleishman project you tube and the work of Ken Shoulders and EVOS (Exotic Vacuum Objects) effectively smoke rings made of Either!
If you start trying high-voltage electrostatic disruptive discharge in your house, the FCC or CRTC will visit you. Generating these electrostatic thrusts cleanly will take some ingenuity.
In some circumstances, a Tesla coil powered by an electric arc starts to generate static electricity. All surrounding items also become charged. Yes, Tesla knew that there is a difference between static electricity and the oscillating current that produces an electromagnetic field.
I insist! His extra coil already solved it. The load messes up impedance (i.e. resonant freq of the system as a whole), Meyer had THE SAME issue with his water capacitor. Water pollutants and same water during startup of the resonant cavity would change resonant freq. he built a digital freq scanner around his voltage intensifier circuit to maintain the system in resonance.
@@juanmf That's not what Meyer was doing, resonance came later to optimize the system, Meyer's method is to mix Nitrogen with Hydrogen to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel.
@@JenkoRun yeah but how would you get the hydrogen in the first place? His technology did use resonance to generate HHO at overunity compared to faraday electrolysis. Then he altered the gas with noncombustable gases to make its burn rate equal to that of gasoline so he can run it in a gasoline engine. There is also the idea of him mixing the gas with ionized gasses that can lead to the energy yield of the gas beeing 3 folds greater.
HOW would I be able to get information about the supposed stolen trunks that disappeared when the FBI was involved ??? Now did you get the information that was presented on this video Sir ??
do experiments and find out. nature doesn't hide her secrets. Just look at what the experiments show and with an open mind ask her why those things are happening? If tesla could, so can you and I
Ivo, (1) Do we go with sawtooth waves now? In the past you were using square waves except in the propulsion video. Is there still a useful benefit of square waves, (2) I understand using DC to charge capacitor. In the precious video Tuning Dual Resonant I believe used DC on current coil. Is using AC to provide oscillations so that we get the magnetic field for current? Thank you.
Square wave for driving the mosfets sawtooth for the primary(might need to be combined with parallel resonance) ac for the secondary. -hV dc offset could be given to the secondary maybe... need to be tested
[20:20] Electrostatic field of force. Can also be known as the concept of teleforce. The single direction of discharge following an electrostatic path. There is another name for this.
Best video yet Ivo. That was a magnificent catch on some detials of that lecture. I can't help but think about some things Gerard Morin was seeing in some of his experiments and prototypes. I have watched this over a couple times here and on my phone this morning. This will be resonating in my brain. What kind of resonance do you suppose that would be called? LOL
I want to thank you for your latest effort to increase human energy, as you continue to clearly inform and systematically educate, and in so doing, remove the retarding forces of ignorance and stupidity which haunt us still in this modern day and age.
Vacuum is a infinite potential to fill , depending on dynamic stance it eather fills with mather or energy , negative tension of a vacuum has a propperty to equalize with surroundings and is in need of a container just like pressured air to maintain its state
So how do we make a flying carpet? Obviously it has to run on longitudinal. Clay is a compound in the carpet. Historical pictures looks like they start maybe 6 feet off ground. A coil I’m guessing is the front and back of rug curled for the coils.
