Eternal Question...First time hearing | Hopsin - ILL MIND OF HOPSIN 7 

You aren't human if you have never had these thoughts

❤✌️ Sometimes it's good to let it all out no matter what you believe we all human as far as I know.. 🤔

Would never have listened to this if I hadn't seen you had it on your channel, a great reaction and I appreciate your views.

.wow 🔥❤‍🔥🔥 Gonna have to do a lot of thinkin' on that one,

You're funny without trying to be, I love it 😂

No, God doesn't hold our doubts against us, I pray that Hopsin finds a path that is fulfilling as the one that I have traveled.

7:50 it is truly the intention behind the spell that is casted not the word itself.

Damn, another one. And ma’am I have a habit. I still do what I have to in life but I have vices. You’re too real and however I stumbled on these I’m grateful. Have a good one ❤

Hi, love your channel, and was excited to see that you reacted to this track, let me start off by saying, your reaction, coming from...maybe not a devout religious person, but at least a theists point of view, I thought you were very fair and respectful, I hesitate to watch too many reactions to this song, because sometimes it reveals some hateful or just pompous religious views from a reactor that until then, I really enjoyed and respected, so I was very glad to see that wasn't the case here. You did mention a few things I'd like to push back on, purely in the sense of civil discourse on a topic too often people are scared to talk about, not throwing shade or hatin' on ya, I promise. It might be a little long, I was diagnosed with job related PTSD last year with a side dish of agoraphobia, every since then, a little bit due to my meds, and little bit of not getting out of the house enough, I tend to be long winded, and I've gotten REALLY fast at typing, so don't feel bad if you don't have time to read my entire diatribe, my therapist says as long as I'm not "rage responding", typing out my thoughts can be therapeutic........................ Ok, on your first main pause, you compare religion and science, couple things there, it doesn't sound like you're a fan of science, or maybe you're disillusioned in general after the pandemic, or just the way people so arrogantly place it over faith, which I totally get. Lets start with the Big Bang, which, as you stated, is a theory. Now the word theory, when used in social commentary, just in the last 25yrs, for some reason has become defined as something like "having a hunch" or "a notion", but in science terminology, which is where the word "theory" comes from, those things more accurately describe a hypothesis. In science, a theory is created using hundreds, maybe tens of thousands of, facts, a theory is as confident a scientists can be about something in our universe more than anything else other than a natural law. Without getting into the weeds too much, but really wanting to stress this point, a hypothesis is rigorously tested and peer reviewed by the global science community, a competitive group mind you, that loves nothing more than poking holes or disproving a fellow scientists work, this is repeated for years, maybe decades, before it can pass the sniff test with scientific panels and our top minds, and receive the moniker of "theory". Even then, new discoveries/evidence, can discredit that theory, and cause it to lose it's moniker. Not that you flat out stated it was "just a theory", but you kind of inferred that sentiment, also, while not losing it's moniker yet, most scientist are not happy with the actual name "Big Bang", because it infers an explosion, or something happening instantaneously in a spectacular display. The initial singularity is a singularity predicted by some models of the Big Bang theory to have existed before the Big Bang. The instant immediately following the initial singularity is part of the Planck epoch, the earliest period of time in the history of our universe, and is the model most scientist now adhere to in regards of the Big Bang Theory. This brings me to why I disagree with your summation of the "science/religion argument", you claim that science used to "believe" that blood letting was an accurate medical practice, but that science evolved past that. That's skipping over a whole lot, blood letting was based on accurate knowledge that had been learned about the introduction of a substance foreign to our bodies, making ones funeral a current event..lol.. it didn't just "evolve" naturally. The process of science "evolving" has almost ALWAYS been done by building off what has already been learned, through trial and error, it's a very slow, and often costly, process, and one whole field or theory doesn't just fall out of favor, it evolves very meticulously and intentionally. There are only two exceptions, the extremely rare cases of dumb luck, like the discovery of penicillin, which still involved massive testing, or the case where religion gets involved and erases or outlaws whole swaths of research or discoveries. My point is, just because science evolves, and is limited to our current technology, and the evolution of our actual brains, doesn't mean it can be categorized anywhere near religion. With science, even out of date science, at least at one time, scientist can always show their work, and prove how they got to their conclusion. Religion CAN NOT, AND HAS NEVER, been able to prove, or provide undisputable evidence, at any time in history, that a divine creator or supreme being exists, in any way shape or fashion, theist self describe as "having faith". I'm sorry, but rigorous timely testing resulting in hundreds of facts and an intimate knowledge about something in our natural world, trumps faith, or just believing something is true because of ancestorial peer pressure, every single time. ᴵᶠ ᵉᵛᵉʳʸ ᵗʳᵃᶜᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵃⁿʸ ˢⁱⁿᵍˡᵉ ʳᵉˡⁱᵍⁱᵒⁿ ʷᵉʳᵉ ʷⁱᵖᵉᵈ ᵒᵘᵗ ᵃⁿᵈ ⁿᵒᵗʰⁱⁿᵍ ʷᵉʳᵉ ᵖᵃˢˢᵉᵈ ᵒⁿ, ⁱᵗ ʷᵒᵘˡᵈ ⁿᵉᵛᵉʳ ᵇᵉ ᶜʳᵉᵃᵗᵉᵈ ᵉˣᵃᶜᵗˡʸ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ʷᵃʸ ᵃᵍᵃⁱⁿ. ᵀʰᵉʳᵉ ᵐⁱᵍʰᵗ ᵇᵉ ˢᵒᵐᵉ ᵒᵗʰᵉʳ ⁿᵒⁿˢᵉⁿˢᵉ ⁱⁿ ⁱᵗˢ ᵖˡᵃᶜᵉ, ᵇᵘᵗ ⁿᵒᵗ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ᵉˣᵃᶜᵗ ⁿᵒⁿˢᵉⁿˢᵉ. ᴵᶠ ᵃˡˡ ᵒᶠ ˢᶜⁱᵉⁿᶜᵉ ʷᵉʳᵉ ʷⁱᵖᵉᵈ ᵒᵘᵗ, ⁱᵗ ʷᵒᵘˡᵈ ˢᵗⁱˡˡ ᵇᵉ ᵗʳᵘᵉ ᵃⁿᵈ ˢᵒᵐᵉᵒⁿᵉ ʷᵒᵘˡᵈ ᶠⁱⁿᵈ ᵃ ʷᵃʸ ᵗᵒ ᶠⁱᵍᵘʳᵉ ⁱᵗ ᵃˡˡ ᵒᵘᵗ ᵃᵍᵃⁱⁿ. - ᴾᵉⁿⁿ ᴶⁱˡˡᵉᵗᵗᵉ On your next pause, I agree that many people find the bible and faith in general hard to accept, and doubt is easily sewn because god does not appear to people or send a clear message. But I don't believe that the bible was "inspired" by god either. There is absolutely ZERO evidence of that, in fact, IMO, if you are dealing with an intelligent person who can critically think, what better book than the bible, to convince them to become a non theist. The amount of hypocrisy alone should be enough for people to steer clear of Christianity. Let's be real also, the Bible is one of the three holy texts for the three main Abrahamic religions (Torah [Tanakh, Mishna, Talmud ] - Judaism ; Qur'an - Islam), taken from ancient scripture, and originally written in, what is now, three dead languages (Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek), from 300yrs of word-of-mouth stories passed down to the original authors of each book of the bible, then the books composing the bible were specifically chosen, and some eliminated, by the Roman Empire, specifically Emperor Constantine, and since then, it has been translated into English alone over 200 times, with there currently being 17 accepted versions used by hundreds of branches/denominations of Christianity.

good reaction, subbed :)

Religious or not, everyone had an experience where we are just attuned with earth and we say “someone had to be genius to put us here in this system”

fire

It was the aristocrats that deemed some words to be dirty or “curse” words because the peasants used them.

Found you from hubby now i love this channel

Everyrhing you have said is exact in my opinion. I'm religious but I also see the sense in science. Both sides resonate with me. Like you said we will never know until we're there.

In my personal opinion, science is not always 110. Ture. But they have been consistently improving while the religious theology doesn't move off of "you have to believe" Kings took the bible and redacted what they didn't like I will never trust anything based off the word that was edited by royality, because they only had their legacy to worry about, not the unintendeded consequences their editing carried. I firmly believe the purpose of life is absolutely nothing. We are living in an unintended consequence of another unintended consequence on a long line of unintended consequences. It is up to the individual to make their life worth something. I don't need fictional bed time stories of unsolidifed consequences to not be a shitty person. If thinking i'm hypothetically going to rot in hell for eternity is the only thing from keeping me from being a shitty person, i'm a shitty person. Character is who you are when nobody is able to see you.

Hey, Lady!!❤😊

There may or may not be a god, but it isn't up to me to decide that. I'll gladly be one of faith but it takes convincing, evidence for me to do so, otherwise I am exhausting energy and time into something that could very well be used on improving myself and the lives of others around me.

Eminem darkness Please

Hey, L

The only part of the song I disagree with is the part on humans cannot provide an answer I believe you CAN. We cannot grasp what God’s thoughts and intentions are. BUT, we can grasp THE DIVINE PLAN There IS one God, the Most High. Which was divined to everyone in different languages as well as different forms under different names The funny thing is? It actually says this in the Bible. Not directly though. It talks on God, being present BEFORE the first day Things parallel in reality. So think like a server. Even when you enter, there’s a proxy to speak for you. You give it words but it says them, not you Jesus is the proxy for the Most High Humans CAN provide an answer. It’s just SUPER hard to find it as well as not be deluded or biased

"everything to gain and nothing to lose" it's the other way around. Id rather live my life the way I want and be true to me and die happy. If I'm wrong I'd get used to hell over eternity. Swear words were made up by humans, kings revised the revised version of the revised version of the reinterpreted Bible. If you truly believe in God, drive 90 mph down the freeway for fun and then take your hands off the wheel. If you truly believe the afterlife is the last life. Then you have nothing to fear.

Lastly, I think your reasoning is flawed in regards to the whole risk/reward dichotomy of having faith, I shouldn't say flawed, let's say I feel you overlooked a few things. What you're implying is, if one has no belief in a god or afterlife or being judged by a creator to determine how they spend eternity, and they're wrong, that's a pretty big oopsie, right? I could get behind that narrative more, if there was but one religion for the human race, or even if there were just a handful of religions, but they all agreed on how the after life, heaven and hell worked, but there's not, there is appx. 3000 deities currently worshiped world wide, with hundreds of different belief structures that encompass the afterlife, how we get there, and what it entails. So going by your risk/reward hypothesis, a Christian would only have the slightest edge over an atheist when it comes to being judged, for what I assume would be due to at least having faith in a god, if the judging is being done by a being other than the Abrahamic God. But they would have the same odds, percentage wise, of their deity being the one true creator and omnipotent supreme being, as any other religion, or lack there of. On top of that, lets say Christianity has the basics correct, and there is a supreme being, that wants you to worship him, and live your life in accordance to his will in order to make it into heaven...Really? What kind of "supreme" being would be so narcissistic that 4 of the first 5 ultimate rules (10 commandments) for those who he created, would be specifically about kissing his arse, and praising him, while simultaneously having a brain fart and forgetting to include things like slavery, rape and incest. A being so insecure and broken that he demands you do as he says and always honor him above all else, or he will send you to a place of unimaginable pain, torture and suffering for all eternity, but he loves you unconditionally. With all of this existing in the only place we know of or can go to, planet Earth, were he's at best, left the most poorly constructed scavenger hunt, or set of clues possible, with hundreds of mixed messages, bad faith actors, and crazy pit falls, impossible to navigate without using magic or someone who can predict the future. Sounds a heck of a lot like a sociopath to me, one that, even if you followed all the rules laid down in order to make it to heaven, would have absolutely no problem not letting you in, simply because he didn't like your face, or you dared touch or made of fun of a piece of art deco he keeps in his waiting room to the pearly gates....lol. I'm an agnostic, and also from Missouri, the "Show-me" state, and I don't consider myself on the fence either, I'm not as convinced as the die hard atheist that we're nothing but worm food after death, nor do I buy into any current belief structure religion has to offer. I am open to anything and everything tangible, that can be logically proven, and if there is something after our time in our Earthly bodies, good or bad, I will be ready to deal with it. One thing I do have faith in, is that if I lead as full of a life as possible, always appreciating how precious of a gift it is, and treat my fellow humans with respect, kindness and love, while doing my best not to cause suffering or hurt to anyone, as my parents taught me to, regardless of what any books or religions tell us, that if I am to be judged by some being after my time on Earth, they will look favorably on my actions, despite all of the confusion surrounding our afterlife. That's it, easy peezy. If you made it this far, I truly appreciate you taking the time to read all this, my therapist is correct, it does help, and clears my head, to just hit the keyboard for 20min or so, and type out my thoughts and feelings, so even if you skimmed it, or just glanced at the end, being able to safely and comfortably express myself in your comments is of great value to me, so thank you, and have a great week!! ✌💚

Just subscribed..Love your analogy.. What a powerful but painful song...I do know that there is a God (a higher power) because I have been fortunate to experience amazing, miraculous and spiritual events that has happened to me, especially on the day my mother passed away which was an amazing experience which led me not to mourn her death or anyone's death. PS: Would love to hear your reaction to 9 year old Angelina Jordan singing a cover of Screaming J Hawkings "I Put A Spell On You" which had 11 million views ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nwFloCPXzCs.html She made her very first studio recording at the age of 6 years old singing a cover of ""I who have nothing" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OtPkxHf_r0M.html She won Norway's Got Talent at the age of 7... She is now 18 years old and has recorded an EP with awesome original songs. WARNING, once you start down the emotional rabbit hole with Angelina you will be hooked. Enjoy☮.

I'm basically agnostic, but tend towards that the bible was written as a kind of scam cult thing (my personal opinion), that got way out of hand for some reason. In any case, I appreciate religion if it helps you be a better person, no matter what you believe in. There's only two kinds of people: decent ones and shitty ones.

Religion and science are an interesting duo. I think a big contradiction in the two is the fact that god is omnipotent and immeasurable. Science is all about data, quantifying and recording such data. Since god is an immeasurable being, he cannot be recorded, cannot be proven with numbers that he exists. And how can we when, if he does exist, he is such a powerful being? We can't even capture dark matter in any shape or form but we know it exists because the math tells us something is there that affects gravity so much. Another subject is that religion, just like science, hasn't had the best history. Just think about how many crusades there have been because one or a few people convinced the masses that one specific plot of land was holy and it was their right to take it back. Religion has been used to control people for centuries and we all know that solemnly do the people in power have the best interest of us in mind. Take that saying from the bible for example, that it's easier for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of god. That could have been re-written as mentioning a man with avarice, pride, greed, jealousy not being able to be with god. But do you think maybe those in power wanted to make the masses believe that being poor was a virtue? That's one way to keep them down and you up. As an atheist I believe religion is a blight on human kind and should be disposed of. I think if people want to find the strength by believing in a higher power then so be it, a lot of people need that in their lives in order to continue moving forward and I don't want to condemn others for that. I would like there to be less religion and more spirituality. If god does exist then he exists inside all of us, there's no need to go to a specific building and give someone money on a Sunday to worship him, we can worship him within ourselves. We can read the bible and interpret it ourselves. Of course churches sometimes help a lot with fundraisers and kitchens but I don't know if that's individual goodness or pack mentality, for lack of a better word. I've written too much so I shall leave with something I heard years ago that has stuck with me. If the threat of eternal damnation is the only reason you're a good person, then you're not a good person.

I just believe in 1 less god than you do. We both dont believe in thousands of gods. I dont believe in thousands +1.