Evening Conversation with John Lennox (September 29, 2015) 

I am with you Prof. Lennox. That God is is enough to believe in God. Robert Sam Raj. Tamil Nadu.

I have been following John Lennox now for maybe a decade, the guy is outstanding as an apologist. But he also seems like a decent guy, like a great guy to have as your neighbor, I listen to just about everything he says, and I agree with just about everything, and that itself is a bit scary.

❤ I'm now trying to learn French and Spanish other than the 2000 languages i studied from my country 🎉❤

The telling of the account of Joseph so so informative

your life is important. praise to the Lord

Brilliant!!

I enjoy Dr. John Lennox. A brilliant man who makes a lot of sense. I love the way he shuts down all of these well-known atheists.

Love Dr Lennox!🙏💪❤️

I was at a similar lecture some years ago at Cal Berkeley. Amusingly Lennox pointed out that the motto of that institution is Fiat Lux, which is translated, "Let there be light". After a short pause he then said, "That's why I am here tonight". He went on to talk about a trip he made to the Soviet Union (when such an entity existed) and a talk he gave, in Russian, on The Theistic Roots of Western Science. He described an older gentleman seated near the front who became more and more visibly upset, getting more and more red in the face and starting to pound a fist into his other hand. At that point Lennox departed from his usual Q&A format and gave the gentleman an opportunity to speak. Turns out he was furious but he was furious that he had been deceived his whole academic life. He had been told that no rational, scientific thinker ever believed in God and hearing Lennox, he realized that he had been duped and lied to. Regarding Q&A, to this day I regret that I had not lined up in Berkeley. I would have asked something like this: Richard Dawkins often asks the question. "If God created everything, then who created God?" Having spoken with and debated Dawkins, do you think he is intellectually incapable of understanding the concept of an eternal God or is he just stubbornly resistant, not wishing to have moral accountability?

❤mr.bill opened opened gateway to momy siri😅❤

Atheism logic: The expensive toys on Mars evolved from unguided random natural forces because the creators of the toys are not contained in the toys. There are unlimited God-honoring good things to do now and forever.

The Vatican not only has astronomers, it has an Observatory. It has astrophysicist and cosmological, in the tradition of priest Georges LeMaitre who was one of the first to propose what is now called the Big Bang Theory.

8:00

I think that Lennox is on shaky ground to criticise Dawkins for talking about a subject he isnt trained in as this is exactly what Lennox does everytime he has a debate! Lennox is not a biologist pealeontoligist anthropologist astrophysicist or cosmologist but he still criticises the work of all the scientists in these fields and acts as though he understands these subjects more than those professionals as he says that God is real and created everything even though those studying these subjects have said they have not found the evidence!

Regarding the idea that God can't be an explain of anything because He is more complicated than the thing He's explaining. I can think very easily of many examples of how that didn't make logical sense. I will list some of them. We can't be explanations of the existence of computers for while they are quite complex they are no where close to being as complex as we are. Not only are our thoughts complex, but our very structure is exceedingly complex right down to the cellular level where chemistry and physics come together in complex systems which resemble machinery in a high end factory more advanced than any factory we have currently created, and these cells form structures with varying degrees of hierarchy of organization far beyond anything we have created. The first automobiles were even simpler, and then there are the basic machines which include things such as pulleys. Surely if a being cannot be more complicated than what it creates then we couldn't have created anything. Now, as it happens, as far as beings go, a being such as God seems to be fairly simple in that He is a disembodied mind, He is not made up of a bunch of parts. His thoughts are exceedingly complex, but His being is as simple as it gets. So either way you look at it, claiming God is too complex to be an explanation seems to be a remarkably foolish argument to make.

All of his talks, lectures, are almost the same. Sorry, but it's true.