@@masahirosakuraikirbysda6976i mean i found my first set in the honest hearts dlc exploring the sorrows caves if anybody needs to know you just need to walk through like a dozen traps and it’s just laying there with almost full durability
@@masahirosakuraikirbysda6976 there's some in the ncr ranger safehouse and it's just free to take along with some salvaged power armour if you want that too.
@@Nintendeano64 combat and gun design aren’t the same thing, but yes I agree. The gun designs are absolute shit, PPSH + BAR = combat rifle??? and a lot more bad stuff. But they still have the best combat system
@@Nintendeano64 Ammo crafting is definitely amazing. also FO4 isn’t my favorite game by any means, I like NV far better im just saying FO4 has better combat system + bayonets
@@SukhoiSU57FighterJet how? How tf is the most Unity looking aiming and fighting better than NV that has the best iron sights and staggering effects ever
I always see people saying they prefer the NV desert wasteland over 3 or 4 and I honestly can’t understand why it’s so empty and boring outside of marked areas and lesser poi’s their is nothing except some fiends and random ambushes, I get it’s a desert after a nuclear apocalypse but come on, then on the other hand you’ve got a metropolitan area covered in ruins, interesting buildings, dangerous hotspots, amazing world building, weird secrets and all other manner of stuff. Not saying NV didn’t have any but it’s more few and far between
@@Balle207293 had lukewarm world building with excellent world design and fallout 4 had neither. World building is the process of creating a world that works well within the confines of it’s own set rules and filling it with characters, locations and societies that fit in with those rules. 3 did an okay job but failed to inhabit that world with actual characters or factions, leaving the player with a lot more questions than answers, like how and why megaton was made as an example. 4 on the other hand just shit all over itself and left you with nothing but unanswered questions and completely underdeveloped world building aspects, all of the factions are half baked, underused locations, underdeveloped characters, lore inconsistencies, and no explanations for simple things such as where people get their food (F3 had this problem) where people get their ammo (F3 had this problem) why are their no major societies formed after 200 years, who facilities trade? Why is trading done with bottle caps? Who the hell pays the gunners to maintain such a strong fighting force? No individual or faction employs them! Yada yada yada i can go on about how little thought went into it.
@@Balle20729it is based on the landscape and towns around vegas and the hoover dam. You have to find the adventure, it wont be pointed out to you. ED-E best companion btw.
@@stop8738Fallout 76 being better than FO1 and 2 is a crazy take. Maybe from a gameplay perspective I can understand that but from a narrative perspective no, just no..
Fallout 4: I WILL GO FULL LIAM NEESON AND TEAR THIS WASTELAND ASUNDER WHILE KILLING ANYONE WHO GETS IN MY WAY. Fallout New Vegas: Well howdy partner, I have to finish my delivery! Delivery matters.
Fallout 1: “Shit we finna run outta water” Fallout 2: “My granpapy was finna run outta water, also Frank Horrigan” Fallout 3: “Cuh shit wildin here in the capital wasteland” Fallout NV: “FUCK my head is killing me. Not as much as I’m killing you though.” Fallout 4: “Wtf literally 5 minutes ago I was preparing for a fucking speech, where is my son, who killed my wife, why is my garden fucking toasted?” Fallout 76: “Ok fellas, we’re the only hope for the great America- yeah fuck this that’s fucking mothman.”
76: best community and upgrades and perfect 4s mechanics 04: best gunplay and settlements 03: best atmosphere and extremely different dlcs NV: best story and rpg elements
@FederalBureauInvestigation911 Go whine if others like the game that's their opinion. you don't have to undermine their opinion as if you were personally working for the state police of Nazi Germany
@@lucasstrucker7680 number 1 the guy was clearly being comedic, number 2 so your a nazi if you disagree and argue with someone. I've always hated that logic
@ninebanger7559 you feel like the very air is getting hotter and as you look up a Bright beam of light smites you down as if some god that has heard that uttered sentence just had enough took direct control of archimedes and decided to smite any legion that utters that sentence.
1.Fo4 - settlement building, amazing combat, amazing locations and story 2.FoNV - perfect rpg 3.Fo3 - kind of a classic 4.Fo76 - it could have been thr best fallout... but its fine
FO4 Deathclaw Fight: you see that wreck car over there!? that is my weapon FONV Deathclaw Fight: you need have Anti-Material Rifle load with.50 Explosive or you gonna die by my hand - Deathclaw himself
That song was the only thing that came in my mind when someone mentioned fallout. Allong vault boi and nukes ofc Now that I learned the lore and shet I hear the yippi yae lol
@@AfroDyke I’m not saying I don’t want to set the world on fire is not in other fallout games, I’m just saying that Fallout 3 is best represented by I don’t want to set the world on fire. It’s in the opening cutscene, it’s obvious.
@@stevenbolen tru tru,but something for me about fallout 4 guns is like they feel more responsive,but with the stupid legendary system,it gets all weird for me
@@Nintendeano64 But the gun play is great,and it's designed to be used with their great PA designs,makeing it bulky,I'm not defending those monstrosities,BUT they are good once you get over it looking like a baby made it
@@aalbanian fallout 76 is better at it than 4 lmao cause at least the majority of the mods and such make the guns cooler looking. Like I’ll take a plasma caster and a Crusader pistol over the FO4 Gauss Rifle and FO4 double barrel shotgun any day!
Fallout 3: where’s my dad Fallout 4: where the fuck is my kid Fallout NV: [JOKE COULDNT BE GENERATED BECAUSE GAME CRASHED] Fallout 76: where the fuck is my refund?
Fallout New Vegas is the exact same game as Fallout 3 with minor additions and a better story. It is not better overall, it's just the best story and roleplaying experience aside from the first and second games.
@sickotato3208 then compare the story to the "I must find my dad" (and must buy a DLC for basically the full main story) and "Must find son" of F3 and F4. It is superior
Ngl the 4 will always be my favourite because it was the first i played and no other fallout could give me back the feelings i had when i first approached the fallout universe.
Don’t forget 76. It may not be earthsattering and be a different type of fallout game (gtaV compared to GTA online) but it’s still good if you like that genre.
Only fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas are good fallout games, fallout 3 is a bad fallout game and the rest are so bad that you can't call them fallout games because they have none of the core concepts that make a fallout game a fallout game.
@@kellogg770076 is by far one of the worst games in the series, they shouldn't have even called it fallout 76 if they were just going to destroy everything fallout built. Only good thing fallout 76 does better than the other games is animals and environment, literally they offer nothing else game changing or even interesting.
Ehh honestly compared to previous installations of the game and other products of the same game. The only thing that fallout 4 had was the most replayability because of the included modding support as a fan of fall out. I really don’t like Bethesdas games I personally would rather see Microsoft take a bunch of the dedicated fallout team because a lot of moderators and really dedicated fans have been hired to Bethesda in the past couple years like the guy making the fallout new Vegas remake mod for fallout four now working on 76 which is why we are never going to get that new Vegas overhaul mod. But like take the dedicated team and take the team from obsidian that was X inter-play developers, and other just great RPG developers because the features among outer worlds are great, but the game is very bare-bones and has very little to it within the RPG sense. Both of those teams will basically be more like the team that worked on fallout new Vegas. Microsoft owns both companies It wouldn’t be too hard to do but if the next fallout game isn’t up to par with red dead redemption two either Microsoft needs to sell the IP or change the development team the fallout IP is too great of an idea of a game to shelf, but the only company I would ever see buying it would be Sony or a Tencent owned company, or take two interactive, which would be the only company I would be fine with buying it Tencent would ruin the game. Sony would make it a PlayStation exclusive, and take two would just take a long ass time and release a mediocre online as well as having a kind of empty feeling game at the end , which is kind of consistent after getting 100%, in most rockstar games and take 2 at least from my experience after you do everything and doesn’t feel too great doing it all again. my only issue is take twos subsidiaries rockstar and 2K have never made a fall out of style game. They’ve made very similar games of complexity, so it’s not like they haven’t but neither company would be good working on it by themselves that is like the only IP I could ever see either of those two company sharing when it comes to development, main reason being is 2K has made borderlands, BioShock, the civilization games, which are pretty complex, mafia, and a couple more games and rockstar obviously has red dead redemption in GTA LA Noire so like each company has games under their belt that they have made that are master classes of their genre from their time like borderlands two was one of the best looters shooters of the time and I would say it’s probably one of the best not online one. And I feel like the development team from the people that made all of borderlands guns, and some of the open world features and character development would be a little better, as well as how rockstar is pretty damn good at map development, story writing, and filling the game with a bunch of Easter eggs.
@@reallyreal1057 yea some are ok but mostly big iron blue moon and aint that a kick in the head and jingle jangle are what i call good but the other ones except johnny guitar are ok
The whole game can be summed up as "Sup Fuckers?" The courier is someone who is pissed that someone shot them and decided to become the king of new Vegas after killing Benny because a robot with a funny face asked him to
I actually find it nice that even the lowest ranking game is still a gigachad doge. All of the gamed are great despite being different from other releases.
Being Bethesda games, they do a lot of things really well. Being Bethesda games, there are also things they horrendously drop the ball on. See HBomberguy's essay on 3 for a "brief" example. But as janky as 3 is, it's still in my top 30 and I've been gaming since '95
Honestly when it comes to gunplay exclusively I think 76 did it best, brining back ammo crafting and expanding on what fo4 did with new weapon and ammo types
I am surprised to see the Fallout 76 as the great doge since even bethesda is convinced its so bad that when they found a player with shit ton of stuff they just banned him not even considering he liked the game so much he wanted to grind as a possibility
Not really…..do you even play the game? It’s not uncommon to find 1,000+ accounts nowadays and surely by then you’d have collected a shit ton of stuff. Meeting players with more than a thousand hours is not uncommon at all.
@@EMBEEAY it was kind of a meme when fallout 76 first came out it wasnt that good and buy one player liked it so much he grinded it day and night earning shit ton of stuff after bethesda heard about him they just instantly banned him not beliving somebody could like the game that much to grind all that shit and its kind of a meme
@@CrimsonDemon0Ok but the question is, have you played it recently? Fallout 76 is a great fallout game if you like looter shooters/ grind games such as borderlands or gta/rdr online. Play it with some homies it’s a blast, completely changed from launch, with reputation, npcs, factions, hundreds of weapons only in 76, new events, new storylines etc
@@kellogg7700 well I tried to get in to the fallout by plsying new vegas I started it and after closing the game after my first playthrough when I try to load into my save game doesnt allow me and I'm not really fancy on buying another fallout game while I already have one I havent managed to play yet
FNV is obviously the goat, but if I may be so bold as to point out a few things that I feel the Bethesda games (76 excluded) do better than FNV, is... make their wastelands feel like wastelands. (If we're also not counting 1 and 2) How to explain it? Fallout 4's Wasteland just looks the part, but the big difference is between 3 and NV. 3's Wasteland still surprises me with random encounters to this day, their locations not the same every playthrough. Which I love not knowing what I'll encounter next. NV's wasteland however is 1. less wastelandy (which makes sense story-wise and I still wholeheartedly love the Mojave) 2. All it's encounters are scripted in some way or another, which makes the Mojave pretty samey on subsequent playthroughs.
Agreed. The Capitol Wasteland is also just a better Fallout setting imo. Generally NV has better locations though, and it’s easier to get from place to place because you don’t have to use subways like in FO3.
Given how long it is since the bombs fell, New Vegas is far, far more plausible than what we see in either FO3 or FO4. People would've cleaned the place up a bit. All that rubble is still useful building material, and it's also blocking places off unnecessarily. Even if people are living in ruins, they'd patch the place up and seal it off from the weather. NV doesn't do this perfectly - it had to stick to the FO3 aesthetic - but it still manages to at least seem plausible.
@@talideon the real reason on why the mojave seem less "wastelandy" is because the region barely got hit by nuclear weapons, Robert House defense shot most of them before they reach the ground and disable some of them, i think only 4 drop to the ground but didn't hit Las Vegas directly. The Mojave's also mostly a pretty chill place. Washington D.C however is a diffrence story. As the capital of the USA, it's expected that China would've heavily targeted the capital of their nemesis. Not too mention that they have Supermutants scourge that is far dangerous than the west coasts that continuely destroying settlements and kidnapping people for their army to kill more peoples, hindering any large settlement to form except for Rivet city and Megaton. Slavery is running rampart in the region, makes you wonder how the people there survived before the arrival of Lyons Brotherhood Chapter to D.C.
Fallout 76: wholesome and good community, amazing upgrades and an actually fun grind for cool weapons Fallout 4: best gunplay and you get fun partners to break the game with, as well as being my start to fallout Fallout 3: great DLCs NV: great story and music, just overall iconic as hell
HEY EVERYBODY, ITS THREE DOG, BOW-WOW. Let me ask you something. Have you ever seen a tree? No, no not those shriveled black things! I mean a tree! Brown bark, green leaves!
Bethesda doesn't exactly learn. If they change anything or put in a new thing it's because they just decided to do it on the fly, not because anyone asked. They don't really take anyone's advice or look at what needs improvement. Interplay/obsidian does learn.
@@cake_9510 ehh obsidian is pretty bad too the outer worlds was terrible and if they keep up the writing they showed off in the trailer I think the outer worlds 2 will be terrible as well
Because Bethesda are bunch of tasteless geaks who believe that paying homage to their favourite childhood franchises is creativity. I remember reading an interview with OG Fallout devs, how they tried hard not use cliches from the movies like Terminator while designing robots, and what Bethesdas philosophy? "Lol, lets make our game revolve around the replicants, yeah the one's from Blade Runner but we call them different and same at the same time, and lets make them look like T800 endoskeleton, this is gonna be cool"
@@flimby872The bullets in NV/3 fire in random directions in a certain radius depending on multiple factors. If your character has a higher value in the relevant weapon stat, has the proper strength to wield their weapon (only in NV), uses a weapon with low spread, is standing still, crouching, and is focusing their aim (or aiming down the iron sights in NV, but that’s just an animation overlay, and doesn’t actually effect anything differently), the possible spread is reduced. It’s supposed to make your character’s skill in their chosen weapon type noticeable in the normal gameplay like how their accuracy in VATS does. It’s a detriment to gameplay, but one that emphasizes roleplay and makes weapon skill more valuable than just increasing the damage weapons deal.
