There is an entire film documenting its existence, no one really questions its authenticity. You might even say it's the one holy relic that brings all religions together, as virtually everyone can at least agree that it is holy, and also that it is a hand grenade.
Santa being short and physically active doesn't conflict with my image of Santa. And since I knew he was a Greek man since early childhood I always imagined Santa with brown eyes.
History shows us Rome crucified thousands of Jewish people in their occupation of the region, during the time of the bible. So there's no real way even with science to prove they were from Jesus's death specifically. Even among the faithful many doubt it's a real religious artifact.
Just a fun thought, given how the blood type AB is present on the shroud and the headcloth, wouldnt a dna analysis be beneficial? Given that the Catholics also have eucharistic miracles, and have also shown an AB blood type. You could compare all three. It would be interesting for sure.
@@jesusaguilar-sanchez8336correct me if im wrong, but im prety sure that the whole crucifiction of jesus is historically confirmed. And as long as their is no bloodtest i think its fair to believe that his followers simply made those. I mean the had a deadguy wnd they had cloth. Its way easier for me to believe than for example the spear ^^
As a Theravadin Buddhist, I'll say that, in my experience, the "authenticity" of cetiya (memorials or images) are a distant concern compared to what purpose cetiya are meant to serve, which is to give us a tangible and powerful reminder of the blessings of the Buddha's teachings. When I recollect the virtues of the Buddha before any given statue, it's very unlikely any given statue accurately reflects the likeness of Prince Siddhattha Gotama as he lived, particularly considering aniconographic representations were common for the longest time until Buddhism made contact with classical Greek art. What's important to me with any given Buddha statue is that it represents a person who really did teach and whose teachings have benefits as tangible and immediate as the statue in front of me. I'm not Sri Lankan, so I can't speak to the meaning of the tooth of the Buddha to Sri Lankan national identity, but Buddhism is inextricable from Sri Lanka.
the most doubtful pay off the shroud of turin is that it bears the image of a modern Western depiction of Jesus, who most likely did not look like that
We know that people have (and still are to this day) reenacting the crucifixion. The stains on the first two items could come from a reenactor's wounds and sweat.
If you are talking about the Shroud of Turin the first Catholic priests that found it told the Pope it was a forgery and the artist that had been paid for it confessed. Also the “blood stains” are just plant organic matter, you can’t do blood typing on blood that old and putrified and also if you do “blood typing” on bacteria you’ll get “AB” as a result.
what proof do you have that crucifixion reenactments took place in 13th C europe? can you show any connexion between the religious practices of modern filipinos and 13th c europe?
@HenryLeslieGraham We have reports from the Church itself that tried to stamp out the practice. We have court testimony on the practice. As for the Phillipino connection. This reenactment practice went everywhere the Spanish Church did. We've photographs of a crucifixion reenactment in Northern Mexico. Video tapes of one in Columbia. Reports of eye witnesses from 18th century California, 17th century Peru, 19th century Argentina, and 20th century Cuba, Ecuador, and Panama. It's a well researched practice. Go to a nearby University Library and look it up.
@@thomasdevine867 simply asserting that it took place is not enough. what does a google search provide from the information you've provided = a litany of modern reenactments. can you provide any primary or secondary source which records the practice of crucifixion on individuals from the 13th century? simply asserting that passion plays featured crucifixion reenactments is not evidence. can you point to a primary or secondary source that records imitative crucifixions in 17th century peru?
Thank you very much for the neutrality and not distorting any of the beliefs, as well as the transparency that is not only in this video but in the rest of the videos on the channel.
I can't really explain the theory in any detail since I haven't done a lot of research, but I'm pretty sure some of the scientists concluded that the image could've only been made by a very brief and powerful blast of radiation, which some people believe lines up with Jesus resurrecting. I'm sure Google has better answers than me though.
Kinda like screen burn in or something like that, like an extremely bright light. Holy light from Jesus, I guess? You know how a nuclear blast's light could cause shadows to burn onto a surface and stay there? That's the answer I see most Christians rocking with.
@@ragequ1t944 That means you havent read the hadith. The hadith doesn't say that your sins are forgiven by kissing hajar aswad. The hadith just mention that Prophet Muhammad used to kiss those stones. And prophets actions are ibadah therefore we do it out of following the prophet. The hadith don't mention that hajar aswad 'absorb' sins. Hadith merly mention 'because of humans' sins' it became black.
The prophet kissed/touched it then we followed and some hadith mentioned that it makes your sins to be erased. we Indonesian believed that. I'm not saying the sunnah is bad. My points are.. some hadith kinda blur the hikmah.
That’s his cousin Cesar and they already know that’s not a true depiction but if you drawing Superman you want it to resemble yourself. Jesus had hidden codes we just had to read his words. Him and John literally predicted all the way up to this time but missing chapters really display he was somebody plenty ppl hated on. He might’ve been a nudist 😂
@@zzgrgriggrgr I appreciate ppl who spread more knowledge cause you get we trying to figure out the truth. I been looking at the statues of Greek deities a lot of them have angel locs showing there hair was like matted together
@@passahsky What I’m talking about is a truth which supports Christian tradition. I know that people looking for so called forbidden knowledge are looking for truth. The only thing is that the “truth” which they find can be disproven through historical sources. It’s more people looking for something which is new to them and which contradicts what has been established in the past. The New Testament and the church fathers provide the truth! What are these codes which you think Jesus and St. John spoke of? And how do these depictions of angels having locs matter? They’re immaterial beings who took on the forms of men to speak on the behalf of God.
@@zzgrgriggrgr a Bible is from a tree so the knowledge with any text made us our own father but the women chapters taken out reveal more spiritual awareness John predicted this exact era where we would have so much information we’d have to wake up to the truth. All our knowledge is based on artificial intelligence cause technology took over to make the material world more real but heaven was made before earth, words or numbers that got children of God trapped in time.
