Every US Amendment Explained in 8 Minutes 

Ok

I use ground news and it is great. Great sponsor integration.

4th amendment got wrong icon in right top corner 😡

you forgot the h in eighth

Love your videos!💚

😂

That’s actually how I remember them! In the US, you’re an adult at 18, but can’t drink. You can however, drink at 21

@@ECunninghamdamn thats gonna be remembered forever thanks to that

@@ECunningham THANKS, thats ingrained in my brain forever now xD

@@ECunninghamsame with smoking

Especially if its a private entity.

What kind of dumbass do you have to be to think the 1st Amendment makes it illegal to disagree with people? That's the opposite of protecting free speech.

Thank you. Everyone should get this.

Unfortunately this comment won’t teach them this because they can’t read.

That's why it's a part of the Bill of Rights

FR

You have the right to privacy except for this In section 5 a B7 of that random social media app that you picked up it says that we can look through your entire house and also scan your balls

@@How_To_Drive_a_TARDISexcept for the entire existence of the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc

The 13th amendment even states how they got around in the amendment itself.

@@How_To_Drive_a_TARDIS TikTok in a nutshell Allowing a foreign app to collect frightening amounts of data on people... Great job guys 👍

*Now there is a happy little fantasy. I don't contest the necessity & usefulness, but ultimately the Golden Rule will win out.* *You **_do_** know the golden rule, don't you?* *_HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES!_*

@@HM2SGT I thought the Golden rule was do onto others whatever makes you the most money, but your Golden rule is better.

@@zigzag321go 🤔 I can't take credit; I learned it from the Disney film aladdin, before that it was a line of dialogue from The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allan Poe.

That will never happen because they themselves will have to write it up and vote on it

Except it isn't surprising at all. Prohibition was a large component of early women's suffrages movements amidst other things such as education and prison reform. Prohibition was favored by many feminists because it represented a violent household, the drunken father/husband, the drunkard on the street, etc. Feminists across the board pushed for prohibition and its passage into legislation further paved the path for women's right to vote as a whole.

The temperance movement. There was no social safety net they thought that alcohol caused abusive partners and a great lot of sin. Even got to the point where the makers of harder alcohol Lobby in favor of that Amendment because they thought it would only apply to beer. Little did they know they would be hoisted up by their own petard

@@memesarekeem man I _know_ , just let me get these jokes off. I’m saying the order of it is hilarious lol especially out of context

Every amendment date: First Amendment - December 15, 1791 Second Amendment - December 15, 1791 Third Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fourth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fifth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Sixth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Seventh Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eighth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Ninth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Tenth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eleventh Amendment - February 7, 1795 Twelfth Amendment - June 15, 1804 Thirteenth Amendment - December 6, 1865 Fourteenth Amendment - July 9, 1868 Fifteenth Amendment - February 3, 1870 Sixteenth Amendment - February 3, 1913 Seventeenth Amendment - April 8, 1913 Eighteenth Amendment - January 16, 1919 Nineteenth Amendment - August 18, 1920 Twentieth Amendment - January 23, 1933 Twenty-First Amendment - December 5, 1933 Twenty-Second Amendment - February 27, 1951 Twenty-Third Amendment - March 29, 1961 Twenty-Fourth Amendment - January 23, 1964 Twenty-Fifth Amendment - February 10, 1967 Twenty-Sixth Amendment - July 1, 1971 Twenty-Seventh Amendment - May 7, 1992

Prohibition and Suffrage actually went hand in hand. It was considered unacceptable for women to go out and protest regarding their rights, but demanding action about drunk husbands or domestic abuse as the result of alcohol was fine. If anything, prohibition led to suffrage, and suffrage led to prohibition.

Geoffrey Rush delivered that line so bloody well, too. 💪😎✌️

"Ensures the right to a fair and speedy trial' American Justice System: "Let's just ignore that last part... and maybe that first part too..."

That's better than the 9th and 10th amendments which were completely ignored right from the get go

Well, they give you the option of a fast trial, but no one wants that because they're more likely to be found not guilty if they don't take it

Well on top of that, if you are locked up but not convicted your demand for a speedy trial may fall on deaf ears for awhile before it makes it to the proper channels. After that they can still hold you for 60 days before that trial happens... unless they find a reason to delay it, which they can do. The 60 days itself is enough to completely derail someone's life if they are innocent and have nobody to bail them out.

He would probably get outright banned from RU-vid if he did that. Or just "disappear" the next day.

@@ShwappaJ uh can u tell me people that disappear because they made thid

​@@diegolopesme people dissapear if they talk about too much politics and about the governement. There is a limit in this society you just shouldnt go down too much in the rabbit hole.

@@TRUEFISTICUFF ok

Could you name a couple of your own personal favorite examples of the gov and companies exploiting the amendments?

pretty sure they already did "generations explained..?"

someone else did religeons explained

all movie tropes would probably be a very long video but id be here for it

@@TOLOTTUNESATL probably just the biggest ones

@@pl0ks567 who?

Every amendment date: First Amendment - December 15, 1791 Second Amendment - December 15, 1791 Third Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fourth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fifth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Sixth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Seventh Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eighth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Ninth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Tenth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eleventh Amendment - February 7, 1795 Twelfth Amendment - June 15, 1804 Thirteenth Amendment - December 6, 1865 Fourteenth Amendment - July 9, 1868 Fifteenth Amendment - February 3, 1870 Sixteenth Amendment - February 3, 1913 Seventeenth Amendment - April 8, 1913 Eighteenth Amendment - January 16, 1919 Nineteenth Amendment - August 18, 1920 Twentieth Amendment - January 23, 1933 Twenty-First Amendment - December 5, 1933 Twenty-Second Amendment - February 27, 1951 Twenty-Third Amendment - March 29, 1961 Twenty-Fourth Amendment - January 23, 1964 Twenty-Fifth Amendment - February 10, 1967 Twenty-Sixth Amendment - July 1, 1971 Twenty-Seventh Amendment - May 7, 1992

dude seriously. and until today i didnt even know the 22nd to 27th amendments even existed at all and really only knew the 13th-15th and 18th and 21st ones. oh and the 1st one

@@tristantheoofer2 abracon linham

@SteveSherman-ij5gm I grew up a low iq'er, I can translate

"We have to pass the bill before we can read it" -Nancy Pelosi

This country (or should I say corporation) will destroy itself before that ever happens

Stated in the constitution already but it varies on what elected government positions you are in that’s why the Supreme Court for example doesn’t have term limits because they are not elected and I agree that the people enforcing the laws of the constitution should not be elected because it would just end up being judges that are very partisan and corrupt just like politicians are but I do think they should have term limits of at least 30 years or so though

How about this... One term. wait one term before you can run again this way they have 2 year to collect campaign funds and won't need to get tax payers money.

Term limits wont work, unfortunately corporation will just prop up the next person that will serve their interests, and it would cost them less too.

We already have term limits, it’s called voting kid! Smh..

Cops invade homes without warrants all the time. The 3a is not being effectively enforced

There were lawsuits against our government recently on the grounds of the government violating the 3rd amendment by making it illegal to remove occupants from your property during the pandemic. One of the only times the 3rd amendment was ever used legally.

Especially in the form of the second ammendment, it protects our lives and rights every day.

@@kidfox3971 The First Amendment is the one that protects our other rights, not the Second. Without speech, assembly, and petition, you will be powerless when the government decides to take the Second Amendment away from you through legislation. As important as the Second Amendment is, people tend not to measure it up to the First Amendment properly. The First Amendment is the single most powerful sentence ever written into law.

@@kidfox3971 ...I am baffled that RU-vid saw fit to auto-delete my reply to you. I guess discussing the importance of the first amendment is off the table.

Isn't it true that "the common law of Northampton", although often cited, when research has drilled down deeply (and anything firearms/Second Amendment related is usually of intense interest), there is no "there" there? That the source document cannot be located or confirmed? If so, then the citation itself is invalid. If anything, confirming this is the case -- maybe by a simple "despite diligent research, we have been unable to confirm the oft-cited 'common law of Northampton' is a legitimate and true citation; that we have found no evidence that it existed within recognized scholarship." NYSRPA vs. Bruen, Heller, and McDonald would experienced far fewer interpretive perversions if Northampton's legitimacy had been challenged early on.

You blew your own foundational argument when you tried to cherry pick the well regulated militia language saying it means something completely different today. Using your logic all you can have is a flintlock. Dismissed

@@edwardpoe7323 Not only is the individual right to keep and bear arms separate from the states right to maintain a ‘well regulated’ militia, but your technological argument falls flat on its face when considering semiautomatics like the Ghiradoni rifle and repeating arms like the Pickle Gun existed well before the time of the founding. The well regulated militia of the time period was *literally* any able bodied gun owner, and during early America, as part of maintaining said militia, local governments would survey local gun owners to ensure they had a rifle capable of firing the caliber of ball that the local armory stored (typically .50 or .55 I think) in the event the ‘well regulated militia’ (any able bodied gun owner) was needed to rise. This is not cherry picked, go read DC v Heller. As for supporting recognized founding documents, see below "I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 "Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of." - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788 "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789 "...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..." - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788 “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788 "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." - Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789 "[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788

No right is unlimited, the 2nd is the only one that mentions regulation

@@zaurakdigis "well regulated militia" is antiquated language that literally refers to every able bodied gun owner. I literally posted primary sources. Also every right enumerated in the constitution is unlimited. Point to me where it says "but sometimes" in any of the amendments.

Every amendment date: First Amendment - December 15, 1791 Second Amendment - December 15, 1791 Third Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fourth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fifth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Sixth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Seventh Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eighth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Ninth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Tenth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eleventh Amendment - February 7, 1795 Twelfth Amendment - June 15, 1804 Thirteenth Amendment - December 6, 1865 Fourteenth Amendment - July 9, 1868 Fifteenth Amendment - February 3, 1870 Sixteenth Amendment - February 3, 1913 Seventeenth Amendment - April 8, 1913 Eighteenth Amendment - January 16, 1919 Nineteenth Amendment - August 18, 1920 Twentieth Amendment - January 23, 1933 Twenty-First Amendment - December 5, 1933 Twenty-Second Amendment - February 27, 1951 Twenty-Third Amendment - March 29, 1961 Twenty-Fourth Amendment - January 23, 1964 Twenty-Fifth Amendment - February 10, 1967 Twenty-Sixth Amendment - July 1, 1971 Twenty-Seventh Amendment - May 7, 1992

Indeed and we think that Free Speech only applies to defense of the government. I'm sorry but the idea of free speech goes far beyond the First Amendment

Every amendment date: First Amendment - December 15, 1791 Second Amendment - December 15, 1791 Third Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fourth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fifth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Sixth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Seventh Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eighth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Ninth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Tenth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eleventh Amendment - February 7, 1795 Twelfth Amendment - June 15, 1804 Thirteenth Amendment - December 6, 1865 Fourteenth Amendment - July 9, 1868 Fifteenth Amendment - February 3, 1870 Sixteenth Amendment - February 3, 1913 Seventeenth Amendment - April 8, 1913 Eighteenth Amendment - January 16, 1919 Nineteenth Amendment - August 18, 1920 Twentieth Amendment - January 23, 1933 Twenty-First Amendment - December 5, 1933 Twenty-Second Amendment - February 27, 1951 Twenty-Third Amendment - March 29, 1961 Twenty-Fourth Amendment - January 23, 1964 Twenty-Fifth Amendment - February 10, 1967 Twenty-Sixth Amendment - July 1, 1971 Twenty-Seventh Amendment - May 7, 1992

From the government only The government, with enough people signing it, will have to consider a petition.

@@8MinutesExplainer Okay?

What does this mean

When he doesn’t get them wrong like his video about paradoxes

I ran the script through an ai detector and it came up as written by ai.

Depends on where you went to college.

they made me do this in 7th🙏

We need term limits for Congress 100%. Too many life long politicians who make dirty money from insider trading and corporate greed.

And all elected officials must pass a cognitive test & be medically cleared of dementia. 29th Amendment: abolish no-fault divorce, and make the division of assets in divorce proportional to the amount of income each spouse makes. 50/50 custody of children is the default. Children must pass a paternity test to receive child support, and no alimony once all the children are 16.

@@quinnroberts3158Being competent and sane? We won’t have any people left!

IT HAS ERRORS , SALUDOS

no its not buddy

@@batsuitjoker yes it is

Every amendment date: First Amendment - December 15, 1791 Second Amendment - December 15, 1791 Third Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fourth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Fifth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Sixth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Seventh Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eighth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Ninth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Tenth Amendment - December 15, 1791 Eleventh Amendment - February 7, 1795 Twelfth Amendment - June 15, 1804 Thirteenth Amendment - December 6, 1865 Fourteenth Amendment - July 9, 1868 Fifteenth Amendment - February 3, 1870 Sixteenth Amendment - February 3, 1913 Seventeenth Amendment - April 8, 1913 Eighteenth Amendment - January 16, 1919 Nineteenth Amendment - August 18, 1920 Twentieth Amendment - January 23, 1933 Twenty-First Amendment - December 5, 1933 Twenty-Second Amendment - February 27, 1951 Twenty-Third Amendment - March 29, 1961 Twenty-Fourth Amendment - January 23, 1964 Twenty-Fifth Amendment - February 10, 1967 Twenty-Sixth Amendment - July 1, 1971 Twenty-Seventh Amendment - May 7, 1992

No it’s not. I learnt all of the first 10 amendments plus a few more within a week in the school system. I’ve memorized every one and I wasn’t even in school when we went over them in class.

​@@insertusername310 How do you learn about something in school if you weren't in school?

I came looking for this comment. Well said sir.

@@thewanderer7307 Same bro. Repeal the 17th amendment.

I disagree with your assessment first because as an American I do understand how the two bodies differ in function and their respective roles, and I would be very reluctant to allow somebody else to select my state senator for me.

What grade did you get?

@@Warnerus2005 86 I mixed up the 4th and 5th

​@@jthemegaviru8681 Not that bad. Good job man.

@@jthemegaviru8681 out of 100?

@Warnerus2005 Yeah, there were multiple questions on the two

I heard that California changed the law not too long ago, at least to a certain extent; officers pulling you 9ver have to give you the reason for which they're pulling you over

In any reasonable country with habeas corpus properly applied, they have to tell you before you are in a cage. Maybe before you are cuffed too.

@@orlandomoreno6168 In Devenpeck v. Alford, the U.S. Supreme Court explained that although it's certainly "good police practice" to let a suspect know the reason for his arrest when taken into custody, there is no constitutional requirement to do so. They don't have to tell you, but if they arrest you, they have until they question you to read your Miranda rights. However, anything said before is inadmissible in court, which is why they say it the moment of arrest because most people say dumb shit during an arrest.

@@gamer-vh9sh That's their internal SOP, no one is above the constitution.

@@chltmdwp the law isn't breaking any part of the constitution, wtf yoh mean? Like I hate Cali, but I am totally fine with that law.

And their responsibilities

you mean used to have. There are many exceptions to the first 10.

@@SteveSherman-ij5gm Each and every right creates a limitation for others Like the proverb goes "My liberty stops where the liberty of somebody else's begins"

@@SteveSherman-ij5gm Like Rousseau said, "The law is a reflection of the general opinion" There's a balance to be struck between individual freedoms and general interests

Amendments aren't ratified often if you really think about it. 10 amendments were added at 1 time. 3 amendments were added in the immediate aftermath of the civil war. 1 amendment was simply to overturn another amendment. Not to mention America is almost 250 years old.

one side will eventually lose and we will achieve a new normal for the next 50 years until this happens again

It's not so much polarization that no Amendment will pass again. It's due to the fact the Amendments nearly everyone can agree upon. Are Amendments that would actively "harm" sitting legislators. 87% of Americans support Congressional term limits, 79% support an age cap on federally elected officials, and 74% favor placing a mandatory retirement age on Supreme Court Justices. All three of those would be Amendments Congress, regardless of Party, has an active interest in making sure never get ratified. And the only way any Amendments will ever be made to the Constitution again would be via an Article V Convention. Which 19 of the 34 needed states have already passed resolutions calling for one. North Carolina passed a resolution in the House last year. And if it ever passes the Senate they'll be state number 20. Edit: Numbers came from Pew Research

@SteveSherman-ij5gm The Constitution was a piece of shit right from the start. I don't get people who claim it was inspired by God. The very document that proclaims that all men are born with inalienable rights that cannot be taken away then proceeds to take it away for slaves and women. The document prohibits the U.S. from having a standing military (thus, the Second Amendment's necessity to be able to raise a militia), yet we've had one for many years through a dubious legal loophole. Inspired by God, indeed.

Stay where you're at and fix your own country.

​@@VeNoM__007Rude

@@VeNoM__007same to you pal. Enjoy your private healthcare

@@constant249 only poor people complain and want everything free

@@VeNoM__007where is your family from? I'm sure it's not America 😂

Yea?

There's always one jackass.

@@SteveSherman-ij5gm Except that the Constitution clearly states that all people are born with rights, which it immediately violated by treating Blacks, Native Americans, Chinese, and Women as non-human.

It’s the foundation for our country to work and to help preserve individual rights, liberties and freedoms. Every country should adopt a constitution that outlines the rights of their citizens in my opinion.

@@nickbono8 Most of the countries include that stuff as part of the constitution, including mine.

He left that out on purpose because he doesn’t think it’s necessary. Shows his bias without even saying it

damn north america kinda nuts

Yup. I stopped taking him seriously the moment he mentioned “muh voting rights the republicans wont talk about!!1!1” and started shilling his news platform.

As an independant, I find alot of this guy's content to be very good, I wonder if he will take the time to chime in on this and fill us in on his opinion?

​@@theorangeheadedfella Considering they were pretty much fighting against what they called tyranny, it's not shocking. The 1st amendment exists to allow you to live without fear of government oppression The 2nd amendment exists to ensure that the 1st is followed.

Kansas, I'm suing you Kansas: nu uh

And they cap any monetary judgment like false imprisonment...speedy trial is bs also...

No it’s about suing states in federal court not suing states in general and states have to abide by the constitution so if you sue a state let’s say for example on an unconstitutional search warrant the state would have to abide by the federal laws required in their constitution so taking them to federal court would do nothing really and states would still have to enforce federal laws in their own courts

@@Poopyhead304 the suing a state with federal law only became a part of the 11th amendment with torres vs texas department of public safety.

The 11th amendment is the constitutional equivalent of a software patch.

Richard Nixon did that so they could lock up hippies

There are many people that need this. I saw a clip of Americans trying to take the citizenship test. One of the questions had to do with amendments and the constitution. One lady answered: “The only important ones are the first and second.” Give you one guess why the 13th and 14th didnt matter for her.

Bro is from the future fr

How

And that really doesn't work even in theory anymore. How would a group of armed hillbillies rise up against the US military or solve systemic issues in a corrupt government?

@@LamirLakantry because 100 million people with a gun is more dangerous than the 2 million soldiers, most of which would not follow the unconstitutional orders … silly idiot

@@LamirLakantrylike if you honestly believe the people couldn’t beat the military, you are a sad sad individual

@@JBoo00 A barely organized small malisia against the US military. Good luck. If that's how you think political change should happen then you're a sad individual.

@@LamirLakantry did I say that’s how to influence change? No. It’s a last resort for when the government starts crossing the line. And do you understand that this country was born from farmers with make shift weapons fighting a superior military, outnumbered, outgunned, and out supported? Don’t be dumb

Through the right of assembly

What does that mean

@@rustyrodgers7566 means you have the right to freely associate with who you choose. For example you can't be forced to be in a political party, company, organization etc. And reserve the right to join whatever organization you want. Only exceptions includes duties to the state like conscription and country citizenship

@@rustyrodgers7566 It means that a Christian baker is not forced to sell cakes to gay couples.

@@Flyingclam oh ok

Only solution is to raise the age limit.

i honestly think that 21 is too young for anything given that science has proven that the human brain is NOT full matured until the age of 26. i would be OK if the age for everything gets bumped up to that age for that reason

They vote blue, which is why they want 16 year olds to vote now...

Which is why lowering the voting age to 18 was stupid. The 26th Amendment should be repealed.

It shows we live in a corrupt government but alas don't tell that to the fascists authoritarian right, they'll try to say it's perfect the way it is 😅

I doubt you could find any ideology that is actually content with our current state of things. But the real scary thing about fascism is that it is a laterally-centrist philosophy, which is what caused it to be picked up so easily by all of the younger university students back in the 1920s.

Also that it protects a well regulated militia, aka an armed force with reasonable laws and restrictions to protect everyone.

@@I-do-not-exist-here that's absolutely NOT what it means, this is a lie spread by politicians now to propagate the idea that only the military and police should have weapons. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms >shall not be infringed

@@I-do-not-exist-here >right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

@@mav.- “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” It’s the first 4 words, I agree that people should have a right to bear arms but it’s clear that some people shouldn’t have guns in the first place. And I shouldn’t have to bring up that at the time, a gun couldn’t shoot hundreds of rounds a minute, and actually required skill and discipline to use. No one at that time was worried about a child taking a gun out in public and killing rooms full of people, because it just couldn’t happen. Also, background and mental health checks are easy to pass if you have nothing to hide and are of sound mind. If you have guns and are responsible with them then any gun control laws that the moderate left want to pass won’t affect you, it’s only the radical left that don’t want any guns and they have the least amount of power in US politics. TLDR: please just have a little gun control, just enough to keep kids safe.

@@I-do-not-exist-here HISTORICAL (in the US) all able-bodied citizens eligible by law to be called on to provide military service supplementary to the regular armed forces.

It has been severely crippled by the feds and several states since 1934.

🔥🔥🔥

...did you pass?

...did you pass?

...did you pass?

@@IrnestCODMYeah I got a 100

It was specifically for the people to have insurance to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. But the founding fathers also recognized the right to self defense

Reeeeeeeee!!!

Ok, Jethro.

@@0oo00 Just the kind of well thought out and persuasive response to be expected. 🙄

It’s about personal safety from tyrannical government. The populus are the militia.

@@danielclemens4509 some people can't read, nevermind think

@@danielclemens4509 No, it is NOT. Just because you WANT it to be, doesn’t make it true.

I think he's referring to democratic values, not necessarily a democratic government.

Same

It gaurentees the continued existence of all the other amendments...the communists hate it...

Me too. Although they got the reason wrong. It's for protection from a tyrannical government. Not self defense and hunting.

@@brianc1481 Yeah, that's what the video was saying at least