EVERY vocal track NEEDS THIS plug-in! (Airwindows DeBess) [possibly disturbing imagery] 

Thank you! Turning down Intense... That's a nice tip! BTW, I was asked (and I wondered myself) if it'd be possible to modify this plugin to tame plosives? DePlode? :D

@@unfa00 Once I get back home I can try. It would be more like a special case uni-polar version of the ToTape head bump :)

@@airwindows That'd be fantastic!

I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you, Chris. You make wonderful plugins, they are very handy and help to achieve great results.

Thanks! Yeah, that's awesome news :D

Thanks! Regarding ToTape6 - I'd need to do some solid search on it first to make an "in-depth" video :)

Hey! I use Ardour. Mixbus is built on Ardour with proprietary DSP processing added - I never tried it, as it's just not up my alley. Also - every competent DAW that uses 32-bit floating point audio processing will have perfect sound quality (unless something is really messed up) - there's no secret sauce needed to achieve that. This is how digital audio works - it's perfectly transparent by default. I guess Mixbus has that "sauce" added for emulating a hardware mixer, though using Airwindows Console plug-ins you can simulate analog summing in Ardour or any other DAW for free. It is open-source code as well :)

@@unfa00 Ultimately the real “transparency” Of digital boils down to clock accuracy and converters but thats been discussed AdBarfium lol

I think that's a really cool idea. I was looking for a good way to remove plosives for a long time, and I think maybe a variation on this algorithm could finally do that cleanly?

@@unfa00 I use the Kenny Gioa (Reapermania) method of getting rid of plosives: basically, just slice and zoom into the plosive and reduce the volume of that tiny seqment. It becomes too short for the ear to register it & works a treat - problem solved!!

@@unfa00 Accusonus ERA Bundle, now it´s free.

Only if they are sufficiently sharp.

This is one I think I use most, 2nd place would be ToTape5.

@@unfa00 explains why you're so on my case about using de essers for vocals

I've used Pin Connections on the Track level to route the unprocessed signal to the left channel of the x42 Simple Scope Stereo, and then passed the processed one to the right channel (or reverse, it doesn't matter). In SiSco you can click Common Y offset button and that'll make the two waveforms overlap additively, so where they are on top of each other you see yellow, and either green or red where one is present but not the other. To route the dry signal I had to swithc pin connections fro Debess to manual, add an extra output, and route the input directyl to it, bypassing the plug-in. This way I had both dry and wet signals passing down the processing chain so I can connect them to the Simple Scope for visualisation. I hope that helps?

Great! I am going to try that out, it is very useful. Thanks

DeBess is a part of my recording/streaming setup so I am pretty sure all dialogue was processed with it, unless it's the pre-recorded demo text that was deliberately recorder raw. Why?

@@unfa00 Im afraid the sibilance of your own voice are a bit tough 😂

@@johanjof5613 Darn!

Negative as always :D

@@unfa00 this is not negative! that looks my work like

@@andx4024 show us your work \o/

so your mic won't pickup the frequencies in a sibilant sound ? sounds like you need a better mic .. sibilance is actually a tool used by writers like Shakespeare and some guy named Bob Dylan but what the heck would they know, one don't always want a total absence but to be able to control it

@@RobvandenBerg290569 and a photo of this magic mic would be nice as well .. LOL even louder !