Ding , like Carlsen can capitalize on the smallest of inaccuracies and turn it to his advantage . Hope he wins the remaining candidate spot . Within a very short while has completed 22 games of required 30 while getting to number 2 spot in classical ranking .
Honestly it's crazy how the super GMs are able to calculate. Within a few moves they find themselves in unique positions and have to maximize calculating different outcomes in advance of their opponent to win. I think Magnus is a memory card though, he will never forget a particular situation.
@@sunset1394 That's right. Bobby was much stronger. Last time Tal beat him was in '59, when Fischer was 16 years old. After that, Bobby totally outplayed him in all formats and all time controls -- 4-0 all-round score in his favor.
@@sunset1394 I really hate when people say "the latter" and "the former" when the context is already clear and the forum is casual. Moreover, I also cant stand when people use the word "moreover" instead of just saying "also" or "and' in similar environments.
Fun fact: The 'Yi' in Wei Yi's name is 奕, which is the word used in Classical Chinese for the board game Go/Weiqi. In a sense, his name is literally 'chess'.
#suggestions Hey Agad Could you find and make a video on the following match ? Mikhail Tal vs Manuel Aaron at the Chess Olympiad in Germany 1960 Aaron is India's first IM and Tal was his idol .. this match was their only meeting and ended in a draw
Wei Yi just accepted his a punching bag for Ding in his workout to be a Chess Candidate. Hahahahha no pawn intended 🌫🌫🌫🌟🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥keep up the good upload thanks for the video.
You can always tell who is going to win by Antonio discussing the strategy after each move of the person who’s going to win, then the person who lost moves, Antonio doesn’t say a thing lol just back to the winner
I don't think that's really fair. Ding was being analyzed because Ding is the one we care about whether he wins or loses at this point, and there was a distinct possibility this game could have just been a draw with some interesting moments. No one's going to waste time digging in depth into the finer points of the opponent's strategy here when the stakes here are all for Ding, and therefore all of the strategic analysis is going to be on Ding's moves here mostly even if he had LOST.
7:12 If White plays Knight xe6 & Black plays Queen xe6... Then White can't really capture the Rook on d8 Because after Black plays Queen to e4 + check! , Black picks up the pawn on b7 for free White *could* play Queen to d3 + check! and after Black plays King to g8(NOT h8) & White plays Queen to c4 + check! (getting in position to "force" Queen trade on c6) Black plays King to f8 and now after Queen trade on c6 the Black King has time to stop White's last Queen side pawn AND still make it back to his pawn on g7 before the White King can get a chance to capture it. "...and it was in this position that both players agreed to a draw'
In general you want knights centralized on outposts. I will say that some of my best moves include knights on the rim. So don't completely discard the idea of putting your knight on the edge of the board.
I saw Rxd5, but I would not play it because it violates a principle based upon the possibility of human error. For the move to be sound you have to calculate a concrete variation accurately that, if wrong, will put black back in the game. This is called "winning the same game twice". It is a risk that does not have to be taken when you have an already winning position with simple technical moves, as evidenced by the resignation after a couple more moves. Also, there is no requirement in chess to end the game in the least number of moves. If you play a move that preserves your advantage at minimal risk and reduces any chances of counter play, then that is a safer choice than winning with a complicated short tactical variation that you may have miscalculated.
@@PDJMDS lol, no but I did spend 4 months mastering Basic Chess Endings as a teenager. Most grandmasters were not that accurate at endings until recently. I have tried to emulate Capablanca's style in my own games but fail miserably to win. My style is no style - the Bruce Lee of chess. Just kidding.
Ding might be the only one that can beat Magnus for the title. At least I believe Ding will be a far better match for Magnus than Alireza but MC is still hoping he gets the easier guy.
