At 71 I doubt I will ever tote this kind of gear around but I still love watching your videos. Your enthusiasm, knowledge, and philosophy are addictive. Even for a guy who will only be shooting on an iPhone. Thanks!
This is why I prefer to watch your reviews, because you cut through the B.S. I see the focus breathing as more of a slight zoom in and doesn’t bother me at all, as you showed with DaVinci there are fixes for some things as well and I want these lenses even more now. Those that complain are just looking for anything to bitch about it seems. If they just want the clinical clean look and don’t like the character in these lenses then why are they watching an anamorphic lens review to begin with? Thank you for the video!
Bro. Couldn’t have explained it better myself. I think a lot of this community has been infused with tech bros who care more about the gear rather the TOOL.
I think most of the time focus breathing helps tell the audience that their 'focus' (pun intended) should be shifted to a new spot in the frame. The anamorphic breathing looks great.
One of the most compelling things about these lenses is that they fit full frame and look good. My go to for full frame anamorphic is the Orion with the atlas full frame expander. I’m in no way comparing these to an Orion, totally different beasts (although a surprising amount of similarities too). BUT When we want to shoot gritty anamorphic even if the client doesn’t require the Orion that’s still typically what I go with because it’s just the option that checks all the boxes we need. But for lower end clients, the Remus checks those boxes as well and we can buy a full set for the same price as a 4-5 day rental on a SINGLE Orion. Crazy times we live in!!!
@@cammackey , Yeah, I really don't get the varying opinions on these lenses, man. Like, how can people not understand that we're getting full frame anamorphic for $800 PER LENS?!?! That's insane and the only correct response to that is that it's freaking cool. Embrace the quirks and make some dope shit. That should be the whole narrative on these lenses.
@@SamLucas26 agreed. Like less complaining and more utilizing them when you need them. And if you don’t need them.. then just look away and zip it haha.
@@cammackey Keep crushing man! I've largely lost my desire to watch a lot of RU-vid material (probably largely for some of the atmosphere we're talking about in these comments above) but I always take a beat to check your videos out when I see them. Refreshing to see some reasonable, tell it like it is, approaches to filmmaking and gear here on the platform
This channel is quickly becoming 1 of my favorites, I like it when people express just their opinions without being influenced by others. I appreciate the time you put in your videos man thanks a lot!!!
The 100mm I found really soft IF, IF I'm shooting subjects that are really close. Once that subject moves about 15-20ft away, GD it looks awesome. Shooting landscapes on the 100 at T4 looks amazing.
Great breakdown. Love how cinematic the footage of your reviews are; from the color grade, to choice of font, music, style, etc. At 2:27, when talking about sharpness, is this a window around your head? Leftover from an unfeathered matte or from the lens? Was really studying this portion of the review (I'm a guy that likes to shoot anamorphic in the desert, wide open, tons of ND and a Pola, to give blurred/bokeh texture).
I seem to like the 1.5x stretch of the Remus vs the new Cato at 2.0x. Also with 16:9 UHD you would need to cut some of that extra "wideness" for standard cine aspect ratio. Also being able to slide in ND's and other filters in the back with the adapters is a killer feature as they're not as deep as other PL lenses. Thanks a lot for the amazing review and tips!
@2:50 when you talk about f8, your hand is so sharp and the background visible yet soft and frankly separated that you seem to be standing in front of a decor (not in a negative way). Just to say that this sharp/out of focus separation is of high quality for those who can manage.
I don’t think a lot of people realize that most films are shot that way. Environments are part of the story. Like the zombie movie that Snyder made.. the way he shot almost annoys my eye and makes it hard to watch cause it’s all wide open
@@cammackey It was a pain to watch that movie, I spotted the f1 first scene and hoped it won't last. 2 hours of shallow depth of field is extremely painful. It's like he was a newbie discovering f1 and wanted to do everything with it. Depth of field must be a conscious and motivated choice that helps the story and helps the viewer read the scene, not just an aesthetic choice that becomes a running joke.
Thank you for your video, it’s definitely good quality. Do you think it's worth buying the complete kit? The 100mm scares me for its blurry side, which makes it a lens that cannot be used everywhere.
I mean like I stated, even if the 100mm was clean at T2.8 I still wouldn’t shoot that wide open cause there’s too much bokeh. I def use the 45 and 65 way more tho. But at the price they’re for the set.. think it’s well worth it
My clients level currently does not warrant for me to get an anamorphic but damm these are getting smaller better and affordable! And YO that intro has to stay each for each new video lol SICK
Also they are REALLY fun on my friends GFX 😮💨 Shockingly the 65 almost completely covers the sensor and the 100 does great! They are SO wide on a medium format sensor
Man you're truly setting a new standard with these videos. Love the way you mix the review part with some truth bombs here and there. From what I've seen, general consensus seems to be that the 65mm is the sweetspot. Do you think it would be versatile enough to be used alone as an EDC or would you rather go for the 45mm and use clear image zoom to get some added reach here and there? Thinking of the Creator being mostly shot on a 75mm Kowa anamorphic.
Man it’s so hard to say! Like if you’re only narrative stuff, the 65mm all day. But if you’re doing anything else… the 45 and 65 is such an amazing combo
Thanks Cam for doing this, I agree, people are forgetting the price point here, they are fricken awesome for the price. Already used mine on a job and the image came out nice. They do have some drawbacks, which I am going to talk about on my channel, maybe not drawbacks, just limitations. Cheers
Yup, yup, and yup. Well said Cam. A lot of people that are new to anamorphics that were otherwise priced out, are looking at and evaluating these lenses like they're spherical. IMO, these are the very first set of affordable anamorphic lenses worth taking seriously. All the Laowa/Sirui/Viltrox lenses try to be as optically correct as spherical lenses, and lose the plot.
The character is nice. Thanks for the review. I might try to pair one of these with a moment 1.33 adaptor to sort of double up on the anamorphic effects and get (roughly) 2.0
I’m definitely loving these lenses character the more reviews I see them! Great review. Definitely looking at snagging a 45mm for my s35 fx30 cinema rig by the end of the year! If you’ve got a good recommendation of your preferred pl mount adapter that you used on the fx3 that worked well with minimal shimming of the lens I’d love to know!
Watching your films I really wanted to film with Blazar Remus on the Panasonic GH7 camera. Could you tell me how this lens works on a Micro 4/3 camera, on the GH7, regarding distortions?
I was literally looking into the mercury lenses from atlas a few weeks ago and then I noticed these lenses at an even lower cost. Kind of incredible time to be a filmmaker because these could pass as C series if you shot them right. A tip on the lens distortion bit from a VFX guy, you can shoot lens grids to accurately replicate and correct distortion to pinpoint accuracy. Just day before the shoot print one out on a big sheet of paper, but it in front of each lens and record a few seconds. In the Fusion tab of Davinci you get much finer control over the type of distortion including anamorphic squeeze options.
Just wanted to come back and let you know I ordered the 3 lens set based on this video. Thanks so much man! I see to use the Poco PL adapter. Do you suggest that one or are there others you think may be better? I’m using a Lumix S5iix
You're moving to my hometown?! I hope to meet you in person. You're one of the main people I watch when it comes to video. I resonate with a TON of your sentiments when it comes to video (Even though I'm a photographer more-so). I love your style, but especially your "LOOK". I can almost recognize something when you've touched it based on the amount of videos and pictures I've seen from you. I rock the A7RV, but hope to eventually move into a Komodo X someday. Thank you for the amount of time, effort and information you do creating these videos. -Eric
Focus breathing? Not sure if I‘ve ever heard of this term before! Yeah, you‘re absolutely right! I don‘t think that anyone cares about it. This anamorphic lens simply looks stunning! Thanks for the extensive review 👍👍
Yeaaaaaaah I think my hesitation on the Sirui's was justified. I want that like old school vibe / distortion... and at 1300 Canadian... I mean, thats insane... I can mess around with a narrative piece for that!? Insane.
Thank you for such an in depth video cutting through all the things that don't really matter and concentrating on the things that do. For me they will be an entry point into shooting anamorphic. I shoot mostly on Blackmagic Ursa 12k and 6k Pro but also on an FX 3. Assuming it would be best to get these in EF mount? and then can also use them on my FX3 with an adapter. Anything that I need to keep in mind in terms of using them with an adapter? Shimming the lenses would be new to me but I'm assuming that's specific to each lens and not in using those lens with an mount adapter.
Yes all cinema lenses you buy should be checked for shinming. And I personally recommend to get PL cause you can use PL on literally everything and the adapter are made way more sturdy
What do you think about using these with EF mount on Sony Alphas with an adapter? Looking into buying the triple kit. Edit, heard you say FX3 later in the vid!
Hey man! I’m looking at these for my c70 but I’ve got a question about the adapter. I have to use an rf to ef adapter, would this interfere with the flange distance? Awesome video man you’ve got some serious taste and skill!
Hey, good video. I’ve had exactly the same experiences with the set. But one thing that might be falsely implied in your current thumbnail: the lenses are not waterproof.
Did you get a chance to test out the blue flare version? Curious on if it's "tasteful" or "over the top". I personally prefer neutral flares, but very few anamorphics have those, and certainly none at Remus pricing.
The rant parts were funny!!! But, dead on though. Just find what gears you like and use it!!! Stop complaining and go create what you want to create. Use whatever tool you think is best for the job.
You want to take focus breathing out of commercials. it’s a story telling device for narrative work. You want barrel distortion and character, that’s why you go anamorphic. I don’t know who this group of people is who want fast clean sharp f2 anamorphics without character…. But please choose a lane?? If you want clean lenses go spherical, if you want anamorphic…. Don’t expect a clean lens. Expect something different.
Agreed. There’s a lot of new comers out there who complain about anamorphics because they haven’t been educated properly on the purpose. A lot of my fellow RU-vidrs too, so I’m just trying to do my best to spread the knowledge on the purpose behind anamorphic
I will go and get your LUTs. This will be my personal recognition for the amazing work you have been doing on this RU-vid channel + plus I will enjoy using one of the best LUTs created for Sony cameras.
Great review man ! Thanks for educating us 🌞 Have some of you recommendations of the mount (ef or pl) to choose and the adapter for someone who shoots on sony fx3 and want to buy a set of Remus ?
I’ve been hoping someone will compare & contrast the Remus to the Atlas Mercury .. even if it’s just a description of personal experience / not technical. Is the cost of the Atlas justified if you’re an anamorphic enthusiast?
Have you tried both amber and blue flare now? Which do you prefer? And does it affect the overall image temperature or something like that? Thanks for a beautiful video!
Cam, I am just curious. Why do you run your test at such a close distance? Do you have confidence at 8 ft? if your 3-4 ft test are solid? Just curious on your thought process. Thank you in advance! Great lenses and demo!!
I would buy a anamorphic lens for the characteristics and extra horizontal FOV, and since I use s35 sensor (xh2s) I would belive buying a FF lens like this is not the best options as would loose a lot of the image characteristics near the edges because of the 1.5x crop, like its often softer or fuzzier and stuff near the edge, or Im I wrong? should you use s35 anamorphic lens to get all the "quirks" in the image circle of a s35 sensor compared to a FF lens?
right,, it should be overall sharper bc you're using more of the center of the lens with the S35 crop.., BUT.., if you decide to go FF at some point.., you'll already have a lens that can accommodate.., BUT..., if you're sure you're going to stay S35..., a dedicated S35 sized anamorphic lens would be of use to you.. it will be cheaper, likely smaller and less weight.. and meant specifically for your sensor size.. by nature, I like S35.., its what I grew up using.. its what cinema was built around, often leads to smaller lenses.., the main reason I like low light is for the dynamic range.. that's the main thing.. and achieving a wider field of view more easily.. the more shallow DOF.., I don't really care for.. S35 is plenty for that aspect.. So yeah, it all depends on which anamorphic lens in.. you could get a Laowa Nanomorph.. OR.. you could get a Vazen MFT.. (which is manage to do S35 in most cases) and that way.., you're using all of the Vazen's lens, so you'll definitely get the focus fall off that you're talking about.., whereas the Nanomorph.., even though its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than a Vazen.., its a much sharper lens all-round so its going to have a little more of the old anamorphic character and a lil more of the modern sharpness.. not to mention the stretch isn't as extreme as a Vazen.. and its convex.. not concave like most traditional anamorphics.. I do prefer barrel over pincushion.., but, its not the end of the world either.. Cooke's have pincushion and they're essentially the best cine lens optics ever imo.. along with Zeiss and Panavision
I agree a lot with the other comment. But I will say the nanomorphs don’t really have any character, Laowa went more for a clean look. Which is great if you like that! Vazen actually were making great lenses. Their 27mm was my fav S35 lens to this day. But if you’re planning on shooting s35 open gate on your Fuji, a 1.8 or 2X lens will suit you much better. Cause 1.5X on open gate is just basic 16x9
I find myself becoming a very attentive student lately 🤓✏️📖 Ordered my first REMUS Note: i always liked smooth focus breathing.. gives character, a special edge .. Thank you for sharing with us your passion 👉⭕️REC 🔥☕️
I´ve just spent the whole night testing clinical canon lenses vs a super takumar that a friend bought for me in Japan.....i really loved the "organic" and blurry edges......gave some character....sometimes clinical is a bit boring.
Finally got round to shimming my Remus set, and boy has it made a nice difference. I thought they were great already, but now, wow. I did find it hard to do though. I've shimmed plenty of lenses before, but to do these I found I had to switch to 6:5 and turn on in camera sharpening to max, otherwise all I could see on 4x monitor magnification was blurred lines ;-) With the 100mm I did have to stop it down to T4 to be able to see the chart's lines clearly enough at 3.5m, but now its images are fantastic. Well worth spending some time doing this.
i dont even shoot films seriously (not yet, mostly do silly shite on my IP13Pro) yet i still watch the whole thing lol. i'm thinking of upgrading to a run & gun cinema cam in the future, so i'm filling up my wishlist with affordable gears. thanks for the review. and yeah, F those specsheet warriors.
Superb video, Definitely going to buy a set of these lenses and also Visit Arizona, If Blazar & Arizona tourism board don't have you on retainer... Big mistake!
Door channel bro!!! Question. You were talking about shimming your lens professionally. Is there a company that you would recommend to get it done properly?
Do you recommend ordering in Blue or Amber flare? I remember you said you didn't like Amber, because it kind of smeared with the ceiling lights or something.
First of all I really appreciate your unique opinions on filmmaking and photography. Your independent spirit keeps me watching every video you release. Thank you for being different. Second, would your LUTs work on 8-bit video? I'd love to use them on my a7iii.
Thanks for taking your time to break down all the myths and chatter and show us real life usage examples of these lenses as well as some of your post processing tweaks. I was surprised to see the 100mm on the projector at T4. I think that lens has a lot of potential. For my usage, I'm still undecided between getting this set vs 2 Proteus lenses. My main concern is the funky edge on the 45mm but seeing how they clean up with a little bit of lens correction, kinda make me lean towards the Remus again. If only talking about the look. incl. flares, I think the Mecury's are better, but those are beyond my budget and out of all other available options the Remus removes the barrier to big budget looks like no other lens and I really love that!
I was going to DM you but maybe you’ll see this comment. I’m like 99 percent sure I’m going to get the Sirui Saturn 1.6 anamorphic just because they are even smaller. Not perfect like these but I think I would value their compact size as I’m just starting out with anamorphic and they mount directly to my Sony. Any huge cons that would make you stay away from the Sirui vs just getting the Blazar Remus?
Man. So much I could say. Cant really say it all here haha. My opinion is.. the Remus are the first budget anamorphics that actually look anamorphic. If you want the real anamorphic look at the same price.. the Remus are it right now.
@@cammackey cool thanks. I think I’ve decided after research to get these instead. If you were to start with just 2 which ones would you get? I’d either do the 45mm & 100mm or the 45mm &65mm
I would reformat your question first. “How do I desqueeze my _._X lens?” In your media pool, highlight all your anamorphic footage, right click, click “clip attributes”, you’ll see “square” click that and you’ll have all the desqueeze options. From there just chose what you want your final timeline deliverable to be and fill the footage to that ratio.
@@cammackey Awesome, you are the only youtuber I have seen to purchase the blue flare version. Every other video I have found on these are of the amber version. However, some of the other videos (namely, the one from mathieu stern) have shown that the amber version actually will take on the color of the source of the light (shine a blue light and the flare will be blue!). This just makes me wonder if this is the case with the blue flare lenses as well. When you shine an orange light at your lenses do you get an amber flare? Or is it amber but with a cooler tint? Thanks!
Oh wow.. these are only at the $1k mark?? Full Frame T2..!?? And that small..!?? I'm definitely getting one for my ZV-E1.. holy shyt.. I just assumed they were gonna be a few grand.. think I'll go with a 65mm., thank you for this
sure thing : ) I'd like to see as much as possible ! now that I know its actually in my price range lol,, (I won't really spent over 2k for a lens) so i just assumed this was out of my budget@@cammackey thanks for shining light on these,, haven't really set sights on anything new in like a year
I am on a RED GEMINI - 4 per s35 not TINY s35 like Komodo - big Bob Richardson fan so I was thinking 45mm as I am also a tad broke would you go with 45 or 65 on Gemini?
idk if I have a lens that doesn't breath..., I think it looks much much better and more professional... I have an old Cooke S16 cine lens and bc there is zero focus breathing.., it just looks so much more fluid and seamless.. that being said.., anamorphic focus breathing is much more acceptable to me.., simply bc it looks cool hah
@cammackey ppl forget that it wasn't all that long ago, when pro-sumer level anamorphic wasn't even a thing lol.. 10 years ago I was using a Canon with a 1.6x crop in 1080p/24fps with a 10 minute recording limit and it would overheat before you'd even get there cause it was hot enough with all the fresnel lights you needed bc of the like 4 stops of DR they had 😆 Grateful for all the advances in digital film.., one of the only aspects of modern tech I really like
