Everything Wrong With Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom 

Way to enunciate that

Same. It’s like he literally has to spell out the gravity of the situation to Willie because she’s ditzy. WE ARE GOING TO DIE! 🤣

I love the DO IT NOW!, and shaking his fist through yhe hole too. 🤣

The face he makes after saying it really hammers it home.

@@madamejenkins86 way to enunciate that

Yeah that was a surprising drop in her tone!

I always thought it was Indy saying 'You' for some reason.

“GOOD!” -Indy

She gets too much crap for the role but she nailed it imo.

Always thought that was funny

yeah kinda missed out on the whole chekovs gun there

Probably has to do with a deleted scene or maybe they were doing it and then were like nah

What if... fire burned the support beam causing a cave in? Idk, I haven't watched the movie in ages.

@@Real_Moon-Moon I believe that's precisely what happened

Agreed, but it wouldn’t be the same without her

Lol😂

Maybe get urself checked out. Idrk how rabies works but if that is u should probably see a doctor

🥺

@@randomdude6719 seconded bat bites are so light/small they can go unnoticed! They need a doctor

sounds like it was quite the....bat-tle :D

Nice.

This is like sinception

Also, the old guy didn’t speak English, so Steven Spielberg had to say the lines to him which he then repeated to make us believe he was saying them all along. - 1 sin for us not noticing this the first time around.

@@Harmthuria This is actually very true. He spoke like a lot of Sri Lankans speak English; it was seamless and believable.

@@akashdefonseka Yes, I know. It surprised me when I learned about it. It was some behind the scenes special when I was around nine that I saw it, and never forgot it.

Willie's not that bad.

Yes, the problem was the character, not the actress. She was covered in real bugs and throw away a real snake, that's dedication! And i need to say the character wasn't THAT bad.

My question is, If Kathleen Kennedy was Spielberg's great assistant, why couldn't she do something to make Willie Scott likeable?

@@alm2187 She really wasn't, she was playing the damsel compared to Marion Ravenwood and the one blonde chick from the third movie, who was a traitor. It can't even be compared because all three are different.

@Paul the shortbread Yes. Since my last post I learned about Marcia Lucas. If they hadn't divorced, maybe she could have made Willie Scott redeemable, or at least have something to do to advance the plot, and not have us wish she died in the fire pit.

🥰❤️❤️ Todas muito lindas. Mas em primeiro lugar juntas as de números 10 e 1. Uma👉 .Zeimbut.Host morena e outra loira.Seria injusto se eu escolhece 4..fo..Love duas são as minhas preferidas no topo da son,..a

Sounds like walking on fortune cookies

We. Are going. To DIE.

Especially When he said We Are Going to….. The look on his face tho 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Willie: There are two dead people down here! Indy: There are going to be two dead people IN HERE!

seriously, Short Round is a treasure! best comic relief character ever written.

Yeesh; Willie is not that bad.

That would be "_Mademoiselle_ Screams at Everything", actually.

​@@alm2187 She really is though. She's one of the most annoying characters in any movie ever made.

Short Round is the absolute cutest. He reminds me of a childhood friend. He's my favorite part of this movie.

I still say Jar-Jar tops that!!!

@@danielleking262 At least with JarJar, you *expect* the "bumbling oaf sidekick" trope. 😀

@@danielleking262 Tea leoni from JP3 comes third

wish I could upvote this sentiment by 100!

@@e.enriquez4589 hahaha I totally forgot about her. The only thing that annoyed me about her was she kept screaming her kid's name even when they repeatedly told her to stfu because DUH, there's dinosaurs around lady!!!

AND the shaman was waiting for Indy's arrival by the river! He knew he was coming (and that his prayer would be answered)

These videos are more for humor than anything else.

Right-oh, @@Zyk0th. Let's keep our brains on, but let's also remember that analyzing story logic is all in fun. 🙂

Anam; good show on correct use of the word "literally" to distinguish from the figurative expression "falling from the sky." There's a ridiculous trend of misusing that adverb and insisting that misuse is somehow legit. 😉 The sage doesn't actually use that expression, though. He says of Indy's expertise "it is why Siva brought you here."

Do you question Shiva

He had a great tune too

Shut up

Well the grail did provide eternal life, but seeing as how he no longer had it, maybe just slightly better constitution granted by the cup. After all, it DID manage to keep his father alive and completely heal the wound instantly just by pouring the water on the wound.

And the build on the plane sequence up the point of the raft (in terms of editing, scoring, and sound design) was so good that them jumping out of the plane was a delirious high point which (for me) overwhelmed any qualms about how unlikely their survival was.

the thing is the movie completely misunderstands the purpose of the nuke. they were purposfully put far enough away to test how a town would survive, not get atomized. the house would have been rubble but it wouldn't have been any worse than a tornado except for the fallout everywhere. He'd be fine stumbling out of the fridge if Spielberg and Lucas hadn't decided to toss it a hundred miles away where that would have crumpled like a can. also they had people everywhere on the survivability tests, including painfully close to the blast zone so they could immediately enter and collect specimines, and more importantly they had people working in and around those towns up to nearly the last minutes setting up cameras, recorders, and putting out live animals because its the 1950s, so they wouldn't have even set off the bomb because they'd have canceled the detonation

The movie attempted to make the nuke scene to be theoretically plausible....Alpha waves by a lead line frigerator. The problem, is it's always going to be 0.00%...Indy would have died immediately from whiplash symptoms. It's impossible for that reason alone.

Having worked as a background extra on a bunch of movies, I remember a few times in crowd scenes where they would just tell us to randomly run around… No one was supposed to notice us not doing anything logical!

This seems to be a common visual trick in Hollywood. There's an old B movie called The Creeping Terror in which the titular monster attacks a dance party. While the monsta is "eating" people in the foreground, you can see people in the background gathering at the venue's side entrance... and just kinda standing there, like a bunch of kids lining up to go out for recess. And another B movie called Outlaw (Of Gor), where the hero travels to another planet and stumbles across a slave caravan (or something) in the desert, the prisoners/slaves have escaped and are being chased by guards on horseback... but the slaves are all running around literally in circles. And it's not being covered up with fast tricky editing either: we get a hilltop shot where you can see the entire thing from afar, and the "escapees" are very carefully, very obviously confining themselves to a specified radius as they gad about.

I want to know where's the stage where they performed the musical number? It doesn't look like it's in that room.

I don't think the thuggees were known for child slave labor since they were also bandits but considering the time period I wouldn't doubt children working in there fraternity

They were bunch of highway bandits. And yes they did have ritual sacrifice. But the British exaggerated it way too much. Primarily the work of Colonel Sleeman who wanted to make his mark with his so called Thugee suppression. The time period of this movie is around 1920s-30s. By that time Thugees were gone. They were not there. Sure bandits were still there. Sleeman never mentioned about child slave labour in his accounts.

@@sena3941 british and child labor... never heard that one before

@@Shek1nah I wanted to say that he didn't mention that there were child slaves with the Thugees. Maybe he didn't care to mention it. But it is more likely that he didn't see it. Sorry for the mistype. One should never write at midnight.

@@pyrojunkyz510 their

It's that sudden frowny face he makes at the end that makes me laugh so hard. I love that you included it in your quote

Yes me too! 😂

My oldest brother has a master's in physics, and we've been saying "We. Are Going. To DIE ☹️" to interrupt family holidays since we were kids. Favorite movie moment for sure.

@@alexrizzo7874 Kleenex was originally developed as an insert for gas masks and unless I'm missing something, the fact that your brother has an MS in physics had nothing to do with the rest of your comment.

@@reshpeck I assumed it’s because of some fun things he’s researched/done at work (or just read about since he’s interested in the field) that comes up in discussions at family gatherings.

You're like that Shrek post.

Thats is..thats concerning.. and a whole new rank of obsession

bet you, vote democrat...

@@rogertrent9842 You'd lose that bet.

@@Comqromized I was 10 years old.

But they have kids doing actual mining and carting out all the rocks they break out.

🥰❤️❤️ Todas muito lindas. Mas em primeiro lugar juntas as de números 10 e 1. Uma👉 .Zeimbut.Host morena e outra loira.Seria injusto se eu escolhece 4..fo..Love duas são as minhas preferidas no topo da son,..a

The Crystal Skull had to battle some pretty strong criticism as it ended.

@@rickstaism I know a lot of people don’t like that one. I just hope Indiana Jones 5 gives us an epic climax like Temple of Doom when it comes out next year.

"I love you! Wake up!" (apply fire to the afflicted) When Jeremy questioned why this works, I wondered (and for the first time ever) if this was the "shut your eyes, Marion" of Temple of Doom. Word is Indy learned in an unfinished scene that the trick is never to look at the exposed arc. Is it possible someone told Short Round the steps to wake someone up from Kali's Sleep and we missed it?

@@alm2187 I'm not sure...

“Read the room Mola Ram”!!!

Say what you want, but Mola Ram is one of the best villains in this series, or any other for that matter.

lmao

wow

Mola Ram is the only real villain in the franchise. The others like Belloch and Elsa and even Irina weren't evil per se(Belloch was simply a sell out while Elsa and Irina were using their positions to get the treasure for themselves) but Mola Ram was pure evil hence he being a priest of Kali who, if you didn't know, is the Hindu version of satan.

It's also a nice breath of fresh air from all the Judeo-Christianity versus Nazism.

I always thought it was ridiculous. It took me completely out of the movie, so I was sitting in the theater thinking "wtf am I watching?"

Kingdom of Skulls

Seriously the Last Crusade video could go on for 8 straight hours.

There's a demon called kali as well in hinduism

Also, I wouldn't take Thuggee religion seriously. They're meant to pervert Hindu beliefs the same way jihadists pervert Islam.

@@MrFlamoose Really? Did they specifically say it was the demon or Kali (I am taking that's why it is called Kali Ma) although tbh, I doubt the people that made this really knew the difference. They just probably saw blue woman with a crazy face. Evil. And that's what I said Kyle! I thought voodoo was in Haiti.

@@MrFlamoose yeah but the demon isn't called Kaali ma. Ma as in mother

Maybe they had a Haitian/Hindu intercultural exchange program.

Same here….as a kid I actually saw this film before Raiders. Which would actually be the correct order.

Yep, it's the second movie I remember seeing in a theater and I was blown away! I mean, come on...so many great moments. I still love it.

Agreed. She is a great character. She also has all the pluck of an early Hollywood heroine when it comes to standing up to the machismo of the male. Would people have preferred it if she just melted in Indy's presence instead of being a strong foil to him?

I liked Kate Capshaw with Dudley Moore and Eddie Murphy in _Best Defense._ That was a flop, so either not enough people saw it, or I liked a bad movie. I can't think of its sins, but take one off for "Iraq just invaded Kuwait, and you're in a Kuwaiti tank!" in 1984.

I recently watched the movie again and I agree. I actually think the transformation she makes throughout the film is cool too.

YES! This always bothered me. I didn't even know this was a prequel when I watched the trilogy first.

According to Lucas et al it's because in Raiders he's a good guy but here he's still mercenary about "fortune and glory"

I didn't clue in it was a prequel either. I guess I never paid attention to the dates it was set.

I have heard it was because George Lucas didn't want every movie to be Indy fighting the Nazis.

George Lucas has stated that the he made it a prequel so people would not wonder what happened to Marion Ravenwood from the first movie.

Yeah at the beginning there’s a subtitle that says ‘Shanghai 1935’ but it’s only onscreen for a short time and shot against a busy background, so it’s easily missed.

Dan Brown totally copied it, replacing the supernatural stuff with conspiracy theories.

At least archeology is real and some archeologist have been quite famous. Symbologist the study of symbols is not a valid section of study because it either to broad a subject, just the different uses between cultures for the colour red is massive for example, or it a very narrow subdisicple of sociology, antropology or archeology or even possibly linguistics. It is/was a hack writers excuse of a disicipline to cover his shitty treasure hunt/ conspiracy books

Agreed

This is the very first Indiana Jones movie I ever saw, I was about 4-5 and thought it was the coolest movie ever. Therefore this film in particular will always be special to me. Indiana Jones is still one of my favorite fictional characters.

I was 12 when this came out; had already seen Raiders and was, at that point, Indy nuts. I thought Temple of Doom was one of the greatest films ever made and the intervening years have done nothing to diminish that opinion. Can't understand the stick it gets, personally.

I like Temple of Doom because they tried something different. Last Crusade seemed like a retread of Raiders.

​@@danbitgood429 truth, I see temple of Doom did alot of good for the trilogy, kids that were never into archeology, or Nazis, got into Indy with temple, temple was the doorway to the more adult 1st and third movie

Less than 200 sins? Must be a good '80s movie.

I think it's important to acknowledge these sorts of differences in older media. A lot of George Lucas's work has racism in it, both in Star Wars and Indiana Jones, mostly focused on east and southeast Asian cultures/ideas. The comments made in this video didn't come across as "whining" to me, but instead as addressing that the portrayal of Indian culture in the movie was and is harmful to that community. Notice that the white protagonist is presented very differently from the POC villagers and cult members. Even Short Round is played as a jokey sidekick, there for comic relief more than plot. White Americans get to see themselves as the dashing hero, while everyone else gets relegated to the poor foreign community that needs to be saved or the horrible villains that must be killed. What isn't being said here is that you can't like these movies. It's that while you like them, you need to also keep in mind that they aren't perfect, and are, like you said, products of their time. That being said, the time period and its social standards shouldn't be an excuse, but an explanation, so we understand why the creators were able to get away with reinforcing stereotypes and a cultural "other" in the mind of an American audience. Those things may have been "the norm" in the 80's, but there's a reason that's not the case anymore. Part of learning and growing is recognizing mistakes and making the effort to correct them. That may look like taking the concept of what makes Indiana Jones movies good, and applying that concept elsewhere without damaging the way people perceive a culture. Additionally, it's not just media from the 80's. Some of Lucas's work has harmful representation of eastern hemisphere cultures as recent as the Clone Wars Animated Series (think Hondo Onaka and the pirate hideout). All of the lyrics for Duel of the Fates are in Sanskrit, chosen specifically to sound foreign and ominous. Even the sequels hang onto the ideas of the Force borrowing directly from Daoism. It's an unfortunately common and long-running practice. I think this channel is still fun, and I personally like that it takes the time to say "okay, yeah, this bit is bad or aged poorly." And even so, there are still moments in this film that the CS guys really like and point out as key pieces of film history. No piece of media was, is, or will be perfect. In 40 more years people will be picking at what we make today. And honestly, if CS pointing out racist stereotypes makes you uncomfortable to the point of considering dropping the channel, maybe you should reevaluate why. Something that doesn't seem malicious to you may seem that way because it doesn't directly and negatively impact you. To another person, it could feel horrible to see themselves presented that way. Maybe try seeing it from outside the bubble??

@@capslock4604 I'm 100% Sioux (Well. My great grandmother was Hopi, but hey.) I actually have some form of life experience with racism _(Real racism. Not some high-school cheerleaders wearing feathers in their hair yelling 'scalp'em', or a football team named 'redskins.' That is not racism to any but the most shallow of individuals. It's merely quaint.)_ - though my life was far better than my father's or grandfather's. The 'bubble' I am seeing this within is the bubble of 'this channel is a satirical comedy channel.' That, I might add, says countless offensive things _themselves._ As such these soap box styled comments are both unwarranted, and blatantly hypocritical. It is merely an effort to assuage the old complaints, in the comment sections of older videos, concerning the fact that Cinemasins did not address certain things more seriously. _(I.E. sexism, racism, etc.)_ Complaints made by extremely few, I might add, and were often roundly, rightfully, thrashed by the rest of the viewers as the purpose of the channel was comedy. Not making political or societal commentary. This fairly new, trendy idea that every single person(s) with a platform capable of reaching more than a dozen people are somehow bound by an unsaid oath to openly condemn that which, by and large, near all of society condemns already - or be lumped in with the worst dregs of society? Is becoming quite tiring. It accomplishes nothing. You do not change either hearts, nor minds, by incessantly reminding people about their failings. Punishing them merely solidifies their ideas and hatred as well as it shows them, in their already twisted logic, that there truly ARE people that are treated better than they, defended by society more than they, and are given more from society than they. These are the fundaments of most racism already. Endless crusades to punish the 'racists' merely ensure their hatred will never waiver, and seeing how their parents are treated will ensure that hatred moves on to their children. When these condemnations are made out of a feeling of obligation, merely to avoid a select few launch a scale of vitriol and hatred towards you that, despite being few in number, they can create such a sensation concerning your 'evil' that society punishes you? Merely because they felt that you _have_ to say something in support of their ideals, or you quite obviously support the opposing view? _(I.E. if you do not make an obvious, and public, attempt call out a racist remark then you, yourself, are just as racist as the person who uttered it in the first place.)_ Is an entirely new form of oppression, coercion, and subjection that is not, in _any way,_ different than the forms of ideological persecution perpetuated by those carrying out Stalin's Purge of the Intelligencia, nor Hitler's Sturmabteilung in their search for possible Communists. No... this is not hyperbole. It is a precise, and frightening, similarity that is only debated by those who either do not know the history of how those things began, or by those who misguidedly believe such activity justified. _"You do not say the things that we feel you should say in order to be a 'good' person, and as such you should be excised from society, life destroyed, at best - blatantly exterminated at the worst."_ To say this is not the attitude of the growing number of individuals supporting those who push these ideas is to be willfully blind to the things they say to those who refuse to signal their glorious virtue to their ideals. So. Cinemasins is a satirical comedy channel. They should, as they once did - to the point that they had, at one time, made an open statement concerning this - stay out of the societal commentary, and continue with the comedy. Why? Because it is _not real._ They, themselves, stated that they do not feel that older movies should, or could _(logically),_ be held to the current cultural climate. The reason they have begun to do so, at a level that could barely be deemed 'token support,' is merely due to the incessant whining, reporting of their videos with unfounded claims, and other nonsense that was happening until they kowtowed to the Social Justice Police. Therefore it is hollow virtue signaling. The members of Cinemasins long ago proved they were not only more than intelligent enough to see beyond this nonsense, but they also understood why it was nonsense. Don't bother replying again. I will not bother to read it. This is a fairly hollow topic, and really has no depth or argument for either side of this than has already been stated by the two of us. Furthering it is merely wasting time. Also - if you will note - I did not accuse _you_ of anything at all.

@@thalastianjorus “I’m a POC and actually all this identifying and calling out racism is stupid, despite what other POC say about the same things being harmful to them. Also I’m going to use lots of buzzwords and dismissive language. Don’t bother replying again.” I don’t think any part of pointing out any kind of racism is shallow, hollow, or pointless. All racism is harmful. My points about Lucas’s work, which you did not address, come from my Pakistani roommate, who is directly negatively impacted by things like this in media. “Shallow” or “hollow” racism is still racism. And that’s a lot of words to say we shouldn’t make the racists upset…

@@capslock4604 The fact that we are now incapable of distinguishing between humour made at the expense of poking light-hearted fun at foreign habits and anything actually deserving of the name "racism", or to understand that the hero in an American movie is American, or that all fiction deals with stereotypes, does mean that things have changed since the 80s and they did change for a reason. It just doesn't mean that we have gotten any brighter.

We ALL lost that fight.

I guess you won't be seeing the fifth one soon.

@@sandal_thong8631 If they make another one it will be the FOURTH ONE!

Don't forget about the Young Indy Adventures

Woah slow down. Are you really saying that this one is worse than the 4th one? Edit: never mind I learned how to read again

I do. I take them very seriously. Number one, Jehovah really does begin with an I in it's original written language. The movies are bible based that's why Christians love Indiana Jones Movies so much. 🙂

@@KingHasian honestly the 4th one isn’t that terrible if you base it on B movies from the 50s

@@LittleLordSissy the thing that made it bad for me was the heavy lack of good action before the jungle

@@KingHasian the jungle IMO was goofy but it reminded me of the 50s BW Tarzan movies. I feel like the ark of the covenant fight in the beginning was pure Indy. The jungle was crazy weird. I also felt like the pyramid with the skulls should have been more akin to puzzles or something homage to INDY 3

All that said, Willie was actually sympathetic to some extent. Let's face it - while most of us identify with and imagine ourselves as Indiana, we would be just as self-conscious in these settings as Willie would be. And that would be doubly true if we were American Midwesterners from the 1930s. (The kids in the audience, meanwhile, are Short Round's counterparts, no matter how much they'd like to deny it.) I hear a lot about the anti-Indian bigotry in this film, but there also seems to be a lot of reverse class prejudice and mild sexism, with the assumption that if you're a beautiful Anglo (or at least culturally Anglo) woman tagging along with a bunch of "real" people, you deserve whatever you get. Yes, women like that often ARE annoying, but that's usually due to their being ignorant - not to their being stuck up. This movie goes out of its way to torment and humiliate Willie at every turn.

I always loved Willie Scott.

Kate Capshaw has my undying respect filming with that many bugs around her. True, she took sedatives to get through it, but I would have too. (I like bugs and I'm the first to introduce myself to any bug I see, but that many at once would still be uncomfortable.)

She is "annoying" but she's not really consistently annoying. For one, a good portion is "culture shock" humor and her fainting with the eyeball in the soup is classic comedy. Still the weakest love interest, Elsa in 3/last crusade may not have been the most interesting person but her existence and visuals used to tell us what it did made it work. Wish given Indiana met Karen Gillian b4 Raiders she'd have just been met in this one, OR they'd have kept short-round for 3/last crusade. They just kinda rushed and then ignored it even though I do find it the weakest of the trilogy (there is no 4).

@@LadyOnikara Also when she has a big snake crawling around her neck and she unchalantly grabs it and tosses it without changing expression. The character didn't know that was a snake, but the actress surely did!

"Bad" is basically subjective, so how can we hope to make sense of that sentence?

What? This is the second best film in the franchise (Behind Raiders), and I ranked it 47th of all time.

But compared to the others, it's not good

Valid if not my preference.

🥰❤️❤️ Todas muito lindas. Mas em primeiro lugar juntas as de números 10 e 1. Uma👉 .Zeimbut.Host morena e outra loira.Seria injusto se eu escolhece 4..fo..Love duas são as minhas preferidas no topo da son,..a

Wow!!!! That's a cool story. I was born a few days before Temple of Doom. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull came out on my 24th bday so it was actually my first time getting a chance to see an Indy movie on the big screen.

I didn’t even know the order of the trilogy.

I love the Family Guy cutaway of Short Round saying: Lady only in movie cause she fucking Director.

Six Days Seven Nights is a great movie!

I think it's more like if we saw someone who spoke no English hesitating to board a bus. Why does she keep stepping on, then backing off? Does she doubt the safety? The appropriateness? The bus's destination? Her ability to step over the gutter from the curb? If it's never occurred to us that not everyone's deft at bus-riding, we might gawk and scratch our heads. If it has, we couldn't be of as much help as we wanted to be because we can't ask what exactly the problem is.

@@rishisaaptacha It’s only racist to sensitive snowflakes. Plus, being “racist” has nothing to do with quality. Usually the best movies offend someone.

Agreed, all I could think watching this video was how good the movie looked. None of the so-called "sins" bother me at all. It felt like the guy had to read them off through gritted teeth while ignoring how awesome all the clips look.

@@jedijones you are 100% right

Did you mean "Gestapo tactics"? Because that's in the OTHER film, Jack Valenti was just an American hypocrite.

how does he have balls for that when he agreed to the new rating

You beat me to it! 👍

well if my choices were join or be burned alive I'd definitely consider it :D

@@sandrasnow-balvert7766 lol consider it for now until the third choice of escape, that is

@@Kentrc11 oh absolutely the first chance I get I'm out but I'll play along until then :D

Yes, Christians get laid. There you go - question answered.

That, the jumping from a plane on a raft, and Indy shielding himself with a gong were all in early Raiders drafts.

Everything has to be considered against the context of the universe presented within the movies and other Indy media. The Ark and Grail powers (and Mola Ram's powers too) are believable within the Indy universe, because it had been shown multiple times that supernatural things can occur within the Indy universe. In other words, they are internally consistent within the realm of possibilities within the Indy universe. However, the nuking the fridge is not believable because it would require Indy to essentially have superhuman strength and resilience (akin to Superman) and it had never been established that Indy had that level of strength and resilience in any of the other movies or media, either before or after this event. Yes, he's stronger (and luckier) than the average human, but not that strong. That's why it sticks out like a sore thumb. If Indy were that strong, it means he feigned weakness at dozens or hundreds of other times when there was no reason to.

its the difference between fantasy and science fiction. indiana jones did things well when you spend the entire movie watching him do normal if absurd action, only to also be confronted by something completely magical, and how he correctly handles the situation. Nothing about how the ark, grail, or the stones work or what made them is ever important to the story, and you only ever get a glimpse of the unknowable, while aliens just kind of overexplains everything

To me, aliens in an Indiana Jones movie is like aliens in a Lord of the Rings movie. They just don't belong.

Exactly what Paul said - The Grail and Ark work because they're *explicitly* stated to have mythical properties. Willing suspension of disbelief generally reasonable applications of magic and other supernatural events that make sense *in the context of that work's world.* Yeah, it can't happen in *our* world, but it's completely believable that a holy artifact that grants eternal life would heal a bullet wound, because, if that holy artifact existed in our world, it's pretty obvious it'd be able to do that. The fridge breaks it because we have fridges and we have nukes, and we know fully well that no fridge, no matter how much lead it has in it, will let you survive a nuke going off - even if you accept that it had enough lead to stop the radiation, even if you assume he got lucky enough to not smash his head, the heat from the blast would have cooked him in 100% of scenarios.

@@dusklunistheumbreon I clearly said nothing about the fridge other than it was the SAME as the people who complained about the ending of the 4th one with the aliens. And you can't suspend disbelief over aliens? Aliens are FAR more real than the bullshit religious crap of the first three movies. so to say you can suspend the disbelief of that because the movie says it is real but CAN'T do it for the 4th movie even though the movie says it is real as well is absurd.

Uh he was nine if you count Young Indy first episode

@@thebandit0256 Did he really do anything on his own at that age, though? All of the episodes taking place before Indy entered puberty simply had him meet famous people, not go around treasure hunting.

This is a comedy channel, don't take it seriously.

@@szabok1999 Yet. YOU took my comment as anything but satire. 🤔

@@i.RU-vidr1 To my defense, a lot of people hate on CinemaSins for such db reasons amd I got used to it, sorry.

The Crystal Skull us full of too much CGI BS (much like most action movies these days) to be worth the bother. At least this one has proper stunts to make it somewhat believable.

I'm always in the minority, because I like Crystal Skull, and I like Shia Labeouf. I didn't watch any of them until I was already an adult.

Yep, this is the kind of movie filmmakers make when they're going through a divorce. I think they filmed the dinner scene then went back for reshoots with grosser stuff. If that's the choices, maybe that's why many Indians are vegetarians.

The face melting at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark messed me up much more.

Dude. You just literally became Comic Book Guy. I can't read your post without saying "Toodle.....Oooo" at the end. Matt Groening and Hank Azaria would be proud.

@@jeffbaer5851 I should have prefix it wit "well actually" and ended it with "worst movie ever"! 🤣

This is actually a much better sin than most of the dumb things they came up with.

He actually goes by his real name now: Ke Huy Quan. Regardless, he is an incredible actor.

My father has the _Temple of Doom_ storybook somewhere.

Never thought about it that way

@@leonpaelinck - You can’t help thinking about it in VR. Even has the jump!

“They dig for the gems to support our cause. They also search for the last Sankara stones.” It’s in the movie.

@@rkwatchauralnautsjediparty7303 Thanks. I wasn't sure if it was in the film or not.

Her screams are SO well-delivered throughout the movie. That's one reason they don't bother me at all.

I hear you friend. I wear my mum’s wedding ring on my pinky finger as a reminder of her 24/7.

Oh my!

🥰❤️❤️ Todas muito lindas. Mas em primeiro lugar juntas as de números 10 e 1. Uma👉 .Zeimbut.Host morena e outra loira.Seria injusto se eu escolhece 4..fo..Love duas são as minhas preferidas no topo da son,..a