Evidence of Evolution:

Подписаться 1,4 млн

Просмотров 479 тыс.

50% 1

Paul Andersen describes pieces of evidence that Charles Darwin used to support the idea of evolution and his process of natural selection. He begins with the following evidence use in the Origin of Species; artificial selection, biogeography, fossils and homologies. He finishes with a discussion of DNA and how it can be used to unravel the evolution of life on our planet.
Do you speak another language? Help me translate my videos:
www.bozemanscience.com/transla...
All of the images are licensed under creative commons and public domain licensing:
"3T3 Cells." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, July 23, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t....
"File:Chathamensis.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 1, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cha....
File:Darwin-s-tubercle.jpg, n.d. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
"File:Galapagos-satellite-esislandnames.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed October 31, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gal....
"File:GNigrita.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 1, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GNi....
"File:Homology Vertebrates.svg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed October 31, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hom....
"File:Orthographic Projection Centred over the Galapagos.png." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 1, 2013. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ort....
Konversionlexikon, Meyers. Deutsch: Skelett Eines Bartwales (a - Schulterblatt, b - Vorderbein, c - Rest Des Hinterbeins), 1988. Meyers Konversionlexikon 1888. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
Lilyu. Friendly Stickmen, December 17, 2008. Own work. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
publisher, Bain News Service. Charles Darwin. 1 Negative : Glass ; 5 x 7 in. or Smaller. From a Photograph by Elliott & Fry. According to Gene Kritsky, Maintainer of an Archive of Darwin Photographs, This Was from a Photography Session at Darwin's Home, Down House, and on Another Photograph from That Session Darwin Wrote "1879" on the Back. It Was Later Widely Sold and Distributed on Heavy Card Stock by Elliott & Fry, with a Caption Dating It "Circa 1880". It Was Later Reproduced in a Wide Range of Darwiniana., 1879. Library of Congress[1]. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
version, Original uploader was Mcy jerry at en wikipedia Later. English: en:Evolution of En:horse, February 5, 2006. Transferred from en.wikipedia. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
Weston, Mike. Lonesome George, December 10, 2006. Flickr: Lonesome George 2. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
Yourdon, Ed. Little Girl Whispering Something in a Woman's Ear., July 18, 2009. originally posted to Flickr as Let me tell you a secret. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
Zell, H. Deutsch: Evolution Der Pferde. Zusammengestellt Aus Skeletten Des Staatlichen Museums Für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Deutschland., September 29, 2010. Own work. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil....
Intro Music Atribution
Title: I4dsong_loop_main.wav
Artist: CosmicD
Link to sound: www.freesound.org/people/Cosmi...
Creative Commons Atribution License

Опубликовано:

3 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,5 тыс.

@dwang663 4 года назад

People whose bio teachers sent them here ⬇️

@xx_xolotus_xx6239 4 года назад

*Cough* Me

@lemons637 4 года назад

whose*

@PipimiOden 4 года назад

@zoom4145 3 года назад

No i wanst

@kazu4652 3 года назад

Facts

@marito166 4 года назад

Intro: 0:00 Biogeography: 2:55 Fossils: 5:11 Homologies: 6:04 DNA: 7:04

@kurowa_ 3 года назад

you saved my life

@julianmarcer1892 3 года назад

I love you

@georgereichardt5473 2 года назад

tysm 🥲

@brook2660 2 года назад

thank youu

@wowie2162 6 лет назад

ya boy such a g always says "and i hope that's helpful" at the end of every video, yes it is mr. andersen we love you

@kirillkondrachov4864 8 лет назад

I gotta thank you. You saved me in physics, microbiology/physiology and now evolution. Bless your soul. Also on a side note, did you evolve from Hank Green?

@Sunsetdriver85 7 лет назад

Kirill Kondrachov lol I know, he looks like him!

@caribaez5711 6 лет назад

Noooo they don’t look same but maybe cousins

@terra_727 4 года назад

Don't you mean: "Did you share a common ancestor with Hank Green?"

@ritmaha 4 года назад

u meAn you came from RoCks? and don't use 'Bless' as it contradicts ur beliEfs. Get it right troll.

@Crazytesseract 3 года назад

When he doesn't believe in the existence of a soul, how can you bless him??? He is the soul, not his body. And he does not know it

@haydenvc616 10 лет назад

Okay. This is an educational video. Not a video for argument. I watched this video to LEARN for a HOMEWORK assignment. Does the professor care if you believe in god or evolution or whatever. No. So if you'll excuse me, I have some homework to do.

@genevieve3589 5 лет назад

@@acandoattitude3140 don't disrespect our king. at least he doesn't fill his video unnecessary jokes like crashcourse guy.

@philpickett4044 4 года назад

same here doing homework gotta big test coming up this guy is helpful

@evelynR1312 4 года назад

Gen Evieve did you just get mad at a RU-vid channel for having comedy?

@Poecstasy 3 года назад

The fact you replied to this just adds to the list of arguments. If you are here to learn and do homework, why are you in the comment section?

@user-uw8dy5lz7p 3 года назад

Why is the purpose of education if you only care about doing school assignments instead of understanding and knowing your lessons.

@coleyang4825 11 лет назад

You just taught me more in 13 minutes than my biology teacher could ever teach me in a lifetime. Thank you and keep up the good work!

@ilovefunfilms 4 года назад

Yes you tell a big lie and people will believe more than a small lie :) ... Watch Kent Hovind creation Seminar for real science evidence and proof of common designer

@aaaaaa-hh8cq 9 месяцев назад

@@ilovefunfilms😂 live your sad life. when thousands of scientists are telling lies, but you, a nobody, someone who doesn't understand sh*t about anything, with zero knowledge of anything, is telling the truth.

@user-ii6xm2we7l 5 месяцев назад

@@ilovefunfilms Evolution is a bunch of worthless crap in my opinion. God Rules!

@wesleydurham2430 9 лет назад

No argumentative stuff here... I just really like the way this man says pigeon.

@SupremeOverkill 4 года назад

So you like that he says pigeon in the most normal way anyone could say it

@MelvinArthurMurray 9 лет назад

This was out together very well.Good job

@ilovefunfilms 4 года назад

Jesus life love ministries .. really? There was no death before sin. Learn real science

@ilovefunfilms 4 года назад

@@blackatheist7369 yup it's ok. You have a right to do what you want by the life that you are living. But deep down try and be honest and know you just don't like to be told what to do

@ilovefunfilms 4 года назад

@@blackatheist7369 what you idolize in life and what moves you is what you serve.

@myaadams3339 3 года назад

Makes learning actually interesting and really helps in class

@Paradigm2012Shift 4 года назад

★ “I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science.” (Charles Darwin, 1800’s Evolution Theorist, in a Letter to Asa Gray June 18, 1857) ★

@skankhunt-zw6gg 4 года назад

Wow, that pointed portion on our ears is really cool and worth example to notice

@sabitadevi1946 6 лет назад

You make biology easy for me thanks alot

@spitama1234 8 лет назад

Thank you for the video :)

@JoeLackey 9 лет назад

The "co-discovery" between Darwin and Wallace reminds me of Leibniz and Newton in regards to calculus.

@methembethomastshuma9587 4 года назад

pippin n jordan

@aieo471 3 года назад

Jimmy and Jackson

@firebreathdragon2835 9 лет назад

Very informative. good work

@alkhafajiN 11 лет назад

Very well explained..thanks

@alanw505 10 лет назад

The layperson science denier comments on here are funny. They are why the other developed countries in the world laugh at us.

@badoodles 8 лет назад

hi just a question. if all come from one common ancestor which was a single celled organism, so dna of all living organism has similarities with that ancient organism that lived 3 billion years ago. as ive read the oldest dna found is 416million years ago, so how scientist were able to conclude that we all evolve from that ancient organism that lived 3 billion year ago if scientist did not have that dna?

@ankitmehrotraTheHitchhiker 8 лет назад

+homer guerrero Do you know human share 50% of their DNA with a banana .

@danielmonteiro2161 8 лет назад

there are 3 proofs, geological, chemical and molecular

@Armando7654 4 года назад

@@ankitmehrotraTheHitchhiker "share" is metaphysical misapplication not science

@MaverickBboy911 11 лет назад

That actually does make sense, thank you

@ozenozkul1940 4 года назад

Why I cannot share web page? Thanks,

@1949rickray 10 лет назад

So, you beLIEve god did it all? So say the creatards and godlodytes.

@spitfire6378 10 лет назад

So you believe the universe came from nothing says evolutionatard.

@deanisaacs1256 10 лет назад

Kidd Zaff so you believe god came from where exactly?

@Rowbust 10 лет назад

Dean Isaacs Your dumb x'D

@fuckthisshiat 9 лет назад

Kidd Zaff lol you're so fucking stupid, no one claims the universe came from nothing XD

@spitfire6378 9 лет назад

aaronq so tell me where did the universe come from?

@Fwhiskey 10 лет назад

For starters I thought it was a great video. Explains evolution in understandable terms. I'm surprised at how many trolls commented on this video. I hope you're trolls anyway... otherwise you're deluded and clearly incorrect in face of the mass amount of evidence.

@Alaina420ful 10 лет назад

WHAT evidence?

@Alaina420ful 10 лет назад

That's wonderfull for you. You might enjoy Chuck Missler on the Sciences of the Bible. One thing I notice is that people who deny God don't want to have personal accountability.

@Fwhiskey 10 лет назад

Alaina Reilly I'm not a Biologist. This isn't something I'm qualified to teach people. If you want to learn about the evidence I suggest you do some reading to understand what evolution is about. I suggest "talkorigins" it's an awesome website. Also I'm not sure what makes you think I deny God? there are plenty of people out there who believe in a god (whatever religion it may be) and still believe in Evolution.

@SmokeRiderSessions 4 года назад

@@Fwhiskey so which one of your ancestors do you believe was an ape? Or do you find that question disrespectful? I know for a fact not one of my ancestors is an ape. You should know that as well.

@janeking8065 3 года назад

@@SmokeRiderSessions Found the forceful creationist! Humans and chimpanzees are related because they are in the same genus of primates. Chimpanzees are apes.

@philcarr1960 10 лет назад

Great video!

@Patrick65879 7 лет назад

Evolutionist Jeffrey Schwartz, a professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, openly admits that “the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed.”

@gino14 11 лет назад

"All those pigeons are all birds." You fail to understand the simple concept of tiny changes accumulating into large changes to the point where the original version and the new one are too detached to be grouped again. Look at society. It's evolved to become completely different from its original form. We don't line up with Muskets anymore, do we? Our idea of "Glorious Battle" is 100% different from our idea 200 years ago.

@lamb8343 5 лет назад

Hmm, so if I’m getting this correctly if my mother has one genotype for a really long neck and my father has the other. There’s a chance I can become a giraffe? Or do I have to marry another long necked individual and have my children fight over just out of reach apples until only the strongest and longest neck survives?! But what if they marry a normie? How long does that set me back; if hypothetically I wanted to see the efforts of my human-giraffe hybrid nation?

@nym1001 5 лет назад

that's pokemon evolution.

@paulmillbank3617 4 года назад

Yes, you have it wrong, clearly.

@Mark-Wilson 2 года назад

my dude this is not how it works.. bro what sso hard to understand your poouplation evovles thed escedantss and the descadnets and the enxt andthe enxt slowly fill the entire gene pool and chang ethe entire population sometimes this change cna be affected by naturals election which is absed on if you can get your geens tos urvive to the enxt generation the ones who had their genes succesfully enter the enxt one and survive is probably affected by lots of factors like anturals elections gene drift and others tuff but anturals election can work kinda lieka rtififical slection or intelligent sleection ig euss but isntead the creature survives to pass on its genes

@atheistslayer8486 10 лет назад

It was big news indeed last year when Schweitzer announced she had discovered blood vessels and structures that looked like whole cells inside that T. rex bone-the first observation of its kind. The finding amazed colleagues, who had never imagined that even a trace of still-soft dinosaur tissue could survive. After all, as any textbook will tell you, when an animal dies, soft tissues such as blood vessels, muscle and skin decay and disappear over time, while hard tissues like bone

@Uenbg 10 лет назад

if you really want to know more about the tail bone, junk DNA and the appendix, it's covered in my "Debunking" playlist. Many other so-called proofs of evolution are discussed there as well with some helpful visualizations of what is actually going on inside a living cell, DNA and mutations, as well as mutation repair systems. Animations of real observable biomolecular machines which will hopefully increase your knowledge or serve as helpful reminders when you're talking about these subjects.

@InDaName 10 лет назад

Read Icon of Evolution by Jonathan Wells a molecular biologist. All I see is evidence for micro evolution but no evidence of macro evolution. This pigeon experiment makes my point. Plus the chart that shows the so-called evolution of the horse has been debunked along with Haekel's embryo. If Homology is defined in terms of common ancestry then Homology can't be used for evidence for common ancestry because it would be circular reasoning. Read Icon of Evolution by Jonathan Wells a molecular biologist.

@robotczar 10 лет назад

This is just wrong. We can see tons of evidence for evolution, whether you make up micro and macro labels or not. This is not an open question in science. That bus left in the 19th century, the evidence is overwhelming and it is not worth arguing about them.

@aussiekidschannel 10 лет назад

Couldn't agree more mate, but no Evolutionist wants to hear it, so they don't. Sad ignorance really..

@CatfishCameras 10 лет назад

It would not be circular reasoning, as our ancestral past does not rely on our current homology. Our DNA has changed from our ancestors to our current species. We will probably stop evolving now due to medicine and the lack of real-world predators. That in itself is enough evidence.

@thehumanfly5790 9 лет назад

Are you suggesting a small change within a short time period of time, isn't going to escalate into a bigger change within a much much longer period of time?

@wj8003 4 года назад

Ate the bat? We all know what happened...

@Bulova93 6 лет назад

Also on a side note, were those different finches Darwin found on the islands different species as a result of the natural selection? Like would it be possible to bring different island finches together and have them breed? They could only be considered a different species if the finches were unable to breed with those on the other island.

@jordie00bogart 6 лет назад

An inability to breed could also be caused by geological barriers and thus could be technically another species. But generally, we tend to go by the ability to successfully breed under natural conditions.

@peaco1000 11 лет назад

Great video.

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

Evolution is true based on these facts: 1. A small Horse eventually became a bigger horse. 2. Some birds in the Galapagos islands have different kinds of beaks. 3. The bones in your arms are laid out like the bones in a whale arm. 4. There are 3 kinds of turtles on the Galapagos islands. 5. Pigeons can breed into slightly weirder pigeons.

@zachary939 9 лет назад

Axel Jensen no. Those are examples of evolution's work, and the first observations that lead to the theory. The fossil record, DNA tracing, observed processes, and correct predictions based on the principles are the proof.

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

zachary939 there is no proof, just evidence, don't use words you don't understand

@zachary939 9 лет назад

The proof is in the correct predictions based on the principles and observed processes part. We have literally watched organisms evolve. Mostly in bacteria under lab conditions, but there are a couple of examples of complex, multicellular organisms showing all the signs of evolving exactly as we would expect. Add that to the massive piles of evidence found in the fossil records, DNA tracing, related physical and behavioral characteristics in family lines, and the reality quickly becomes apparent. Not to mention the mountains of evidence that point directly away from the idea of an Earth that was created all at once less than a few billion of years ago. And the most damning thing of all, the fact that each and every branch of science independently came up with the very same answers to those questions. Everyone involved in any field of science will tell you the same thing. The Universe is billions of years old, the Earth is a very few billion years younger than that, life began about a billion years after that, and the processes of evolution through natural selection lead to the present state of life as we know it. The fact that the only people arguing against it are the devoutly religious should tell you something. Perhaps the devoutly religious are less than impartial? And as I tell everyone in these discussions... None of that means that God doesn't exist. But if he does, it's obvious the his works are accomplished using the laws of physics, and the processes of evolution. I personally don't see why you guys don't see it. I see the evidence of God far clearer in the majesty of the Big Bang and the eloquence of Evolution through Deep Time than in the idea that he just wished everything into existence six odd thousand years age. Why would God be a hurry? Those desert nomads thousands of years ago tried their damndest to explain it, but they were not in possession of the facts. They got it wrong.

@moknows4996 9 лет назад

Axel Jensen go google Californian salamanders and educate yourself a little. There is living, OBSERVABLE proof for evolution RIGHT NOW, TODAY... its all there for you if you have the mental capacity to comprehend simple science. Hit me back when you've learned what the hell it is your talking shit about

@axelgrace 9 лет назад

Mo Knows Oh my God there is so much evidence for the diversity of life. You aren't showing me a salamander that has evolved from an amoeba. Species have never and will never change class or order. Hit me back with a real argument instead of baseless assertions you draw conclusions from.

@mmmmlemons 7 лет назад

I can't believe people still doubt evolution.

@jurgensamoilov9030 10 лет назад

will do

@jimmyrivera2702 5 лет назад

Great work! What software do you use to illustrate this material?

@OkenAndMosh 10 лет назад

I agree with this video for it is based on evidence.

@davidmike9389 10 лет назад

Yeah, I especially liked the part where he showed how those pigeons turned into pigeons. And since pigeons turn into pigeons, it makes since they could turn into penguins, or goats, or pine trees too. (Let's see if you get the sarcasm.)

@OkenAndMosh 10 лет назад

david mike I think there has been a misunderstanding, that is not what the video is trying to explain.

@davidmike9389 10 лет назад

OkenAndMosh I don’t know… At 2:45: “so that’s a great piece of evidence. That if we could [create different pigeons from one kind of pigeon] in just hundreds of years using artificial selection, surely we could do this in nature using millions of years.” If you’re saying that he never meant to imply that pigeons change into other kinds of animals “using millions of years”, then he sure picked a funny title for his video. I thought another great piece of evidence was when he said that the fact whales, and birds, and humans all have bones proves we have common origins (6:30). I don’t know… My Ford, and Toyota, and lawn mower, and refrigerator, and the closet doors etc. all have nuts and bolts; but, I’m pretty sure they didn’t have to come from the same piece of steel. I don’t remember science being this stupid. But, what are you going to do? When you have to explain a stupid theory, you’re going to have to say some stupid things.

@OkenAndMosh 10 лет назад

david mike There is really no need for facetiousness, personally I thought the pigeon part was a great piece of evidence, what's not to get? And your Ford, Toyota, and lawn mower are man-made machines and do not evolve.

@davidmike9389 10 лет назад

OkenAndMosh Why not "facetiousness"? The whole video is supposed to be a joke isn't it? Isn't it? I hope it is, but maybe you're right; maybe he is serious. One word: "Yikes." If you had ever seen an early version of a Japanese pick-up--the ones with three wheels--you'd know that mine certainly has "evolved". Just like wolves have evolved into poodles. Heck, even Mitsubishi has evolved from Japanese fighter planes to family sedans...but that took intelligent design. Get it?

@hayatona9395 4 года назад

Anyone else having to watch this because school is canceled due to corona virus?

@Ranger-os1ux 4 года назад

4WeirdW Yeah texas schools are shut down

@connorm4071 4 года назад

@@Ranger-os1ux Same goes for Maryland

@crocuscobraa9081 10 лет назад

awsome vid man

@crocuscobraa9081 10 лет назад

that was interesting!

@randaram999 9 лет назад

I do not Understand why creationists won't admit why evolution is true plz answer Creationists

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

For one there is more evidence against Darwin's theory than for it, another thing is almost every biology textbook uses outdated and discredited experiments and sources. I agree that there are Creationists that may not always divest fully into the evidence for Darwinism, but on the same note there are many Darwinian-Evolutionists that reject the evidence set against his theory.

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

***** The same as your evidence for evolution, only perceived differently. Also, just a hint of LOGIC. that word may scare you, but logic is considered evidence.

@zachary939 9 лет назад

Axel Jensen That's not evidence. That's a statement declaring that there is evidence. What exactly do you mean? What evidence are you referring to? How exactly do you think logic discredits evolution?

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

zachary939 If you find a watch on the ground, how did it get there?

@zachary939 9 лет назад

God damn I hate that one. It's a watch. Somebody dropped it. A watch is not a living creature. It doesn't have DNA to pass on. It's not a part of evolution. You don't think evolution is true? Fine then. What's your theory? How did all this come about?

@hunteregans70 10 лет назад

I like how a lot of people say "There is no Evidence for evolution" while believing in god

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

I like how a lot of people say "There is no Evidence for God" while believing in Evolution.

@jacksonpage1580 7 лет назад

But there's evidence of Evolution, meanwhile there's no evidence of God? Reversing the words doesn't create a counterargument.

@izzyk9- 7 лет назад

Hunter Egans there is evidence. evolution does happen. just not on a macro scale. God created a plethora of species and they diversified (like the finches) but He created man complex and unique as a separate masterpeice

@alejandroespejo3270 7 лет назад

Hunter Egans look around. there is aa lot of evidence for God. Can science explain miracles?

@zakkwylde1516 7 лет назад

Alejandro Espejo Uhhhh, please don't pass on your genes for the sake of the human race

@pinkkcandiee12 Год назад

From my high school to my university biology

@srikarbala246 4 года назад

hey that new sound whenever you like something in youtube is weird huh?

@prasannakrishna4093 8 лет назад

The problem with the evidences presented in this video is that these are not evidences at all. He(the person in the video) talked about pigeons and variations in pigeons and after saying that he jumped into the conclusion that if given millions of years evolution took place. All scientists who believe in evolution do the same thing they talk about micro evolution and asks us to believe we came from rocks and dirt. In the pigeons example the different pigeons with different variation is still a bird not a dog. The DNA is similar yes it is God used same DNA code to make life on earth but the DNA code has its boundaries, a rock can never turn into a rat. Evolution is an idea for the people who don't want God to be God because they don't want to be under some one. Evolution teaches the fittest one wins the race.That is the idea made Hitler to think all other races are inferior and his aryan race should triumph and he killed many. Joseph stalin,pol pot and many tyrants religion is Evolution.Origin of species is their Bible, Darwin is their prophet. My God, the God of the heaven and earth is righteous. He never did anything wrong and never will. Jesus Christ the king of all the earth is going to come to the city near you, every shall see the glory of the coming king riding on the clouds. Repent and believe and be baptized in Christ and his Holy Spirit.

@prasannakrishna4093 8 лет назад

According to Bible God did not used the theory of evolution. Man was created in the image of God. We lost that image. We still trying to blur the image of man by saying we came from a rock or a soup. Our lives are valuable. Jesus Christ died for our sins. If we repent and believe and turn to God be baptized and receive the Holy Spirit and we follow Christ to be transformed into the image of Christ.

@mcgregorli2166 8 лет назад

+Prasanna krishna wtf

@brandonbooker3775 8 лет назад

+Prasanna krishna I wish people like you would take the time to understand evolution before making idiotic comments like this.

@produde24 7 лет назад

The things that you don't understand is that only living things evolve, therefore like you said rocks do not evolve, however things that reproduce can pass on their dna to their off-spring, this gives a chance for mutations to occur causing adaptations within a population.

@evelynR1312 4 года назад

brandon booker I understand evolution fairly well and can say without a doubt I believe every word he said so please stop be a dogmatic, closed-minded, ignorant hater of anyone who has a different opinion or belief than yours.

@raymondstheawesome 10 лет назад

Just curious: how many of y'all came here just to argue and not even watch the video? I'm one of them.

@aussiekidschannel 10 лет назад

Haha I honestly came here to find someone new to debate, no ones is answering my questions lol..

@mexicanwootwoot 9 лет назад

lol i came here to study for bio 2 exam next week

@reeders2010 9 лет назад

justin harris lol same

@thunderbird1779 7 лет назад

i have to do notes on this vid

@jeffmckeown9639 6 лет назад

Raymond S. The most honest statement on the internet.

@MaverickBboy911 11 лет назад

That makes perfectly reasonable sense and I thank you for your response. i still wonder why though that the previous evolutions of man aren't still in existence, for example, the theory of evolution suggests that all life came from single celled eukaryotic organisms which evolved to new cells which became animals, but yet even though the original cells evolved, they still exist today along with all of it's other progressive evolutionary states. So if this is the case, why aren't the original

@SmokeRiderSessions 4 года назад

Evolution from one kind of species to another is nonsense. I know not one of my ancestors is an ape. I hope you do know that as well.

@PaulTheSkeptic 11 лет назад

Just clarifying. A change of environment is needed to produce radical changes. Many species stay static for millions of years.

@masrii60462 10 лет назад

evolution is technically just a theory, not a law of science. The video should be called "support for evolution" not "evidence of evolution"

@sikhatheist651 10 лет назад

There are no laws of science, only hunches, hypothesis and theories, including the one that allows you to stroke a key sitting at home and your ignorance exposed to the whole world.

@xdxnxbx 10 лет назад

"Just a theory", wrong and common misconception. A scientific theory is not like a theory outside of science. In science, a theory is the best thing you can have. A law explains 'what', a theory explains 'why' that phenomena happens. Both are backed up by evidence with a low error-bar.

@Moman893 10 лет назад

you realize calling it a "theory" raises it to one of the highest, most credible and accurate labels you can give anything right? Do you even know the definition of a "theory" and a scientific "law"? You clearly don't, a theory offers an explanation for a series of tested observations, a law has no explanation and is a just a summary of natural observations. You clearly have no education on any of this, you learn that shit day one, but for some reason you're so confident that you can disprove decades of scientific research? Get the fuck out of here man

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

rusty shakleford Well then the "theory of evolution" isn't a theory because there is not one tested observation on it.

@Moman893 9 лет назад

Axel Jensen That has to be one of the dumbest things anyone has ever said on the topic of evolution. Evolution by natural selection is one of the most prominently supported scientific theories in existence. If you have never studied molecular biology, evolutionary biology, microbiology, cellular biology, anatomy and physiology etc. at any advanced level then you are not qualified to say otherwise, because you don't even come close to understand/knowing anything about the science or evidence supporting it.

@MrHusseinKabil 10 лет назад

you call this evidence??? you call this facts????

@josehernandez-pu1qv 7 лет назад

Hussein Qabil Yes

@MaverickBboy911 11 лет назад

I will, thank you man

@TupacMakaveli1996 3 года назад

1) geo biography 2) fossils 3) homology 4) dna

@sullivanisgone 9 лет назад

I only came her cause my teacher made me😣🔫

@josehernandez-pu1qv 7 лет назад

Kellen McNeill omg, same

@legendofrayquazagaming5125 6 лет назад

Me too, except my mother made me.

@badideass 5 лет назад

Listen to your teacher... Don't let religious dogma prevent you from having a decent education

@sethtedder3173 5 лет назад

Don't let secular dogma prevent you from looking at all angles to determine the truth! I came here to investigate differing opinions and evaluate their evidence, true science. The evolutionary establishment doesn't want you to investigate they want you to blindly accept.

@badideass 5 лет назад

what exactly is Secular dogma??? lmao

@JoaoPauloYUTB 9 лет назад

The human brain is a great random mutation I gess shlt just happens xD

@mcgregorli2166 8 лет назад

+JoaoPauloYUTB not random selected (naturally)

@JoaoPauloYUTB 8 лет назад

You can select all the random stuff you want, their are still random. Mutations (accidents of dna replication) are kind of random, at least no evolutionist therory that i know claims otherwise. please correct me if I'm wrong

@JoaoPauloYUTB 8 лет назад

hope your username doesn't accurately describe you

@Mark-Wilson 2 года назад

you're dumb its nto a random mutation it evovled froma simple very simple nervous system and they slowly got selected by anturals elections the traits that survived to the enxt generation lived and got ana dvantag e and the yslowly diversified into many types of roganisms who have brains and ones that do not obviously split way before enrvous systems evene xistsed

@Mark-Wilson 2 года назад

@@JoaoPauloYUTB so wat? its the non random selection of random mutation

@lorilynne571 Год назад

This video was really helpful. My class didn't have enough time to go into Evolution much, so this was great for me to get to know more about the topic.

@thisismypointe 10 лет назад

Well, logically, one cannot go from one genus to another instantaneously. I can, however, link you to interesting info of the evolution through the accumulated slight changes within an order/family. For example, the transition from Homo habilis to Homo erectus to Homo heidelbergensis. It's not possible to go from a cat to a dog, but can slowly make a transition from a common ancestor into a different class/order/family/genus/species.

@jordanhenley9686 8 лет назад

in your wisdom Jesus you have created DNA. who is like you Jesus who has ever done what you have done. has any human ever created such a complex system like DNA . you alone God created life you can not hide your beauty from us your fingerprints are all over the place. your light shines though the darkness of evil . you are to good to me Jesus.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Is that the same Jesus that promised to return before the last apostle died?

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Oh, FYI humans have created life in the lab. You should look it up.

@jordanhenley9686 7 лет назад

+scottevanmacfar Was the life created from scratch?

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Yes, it was.

@jordanhenley9686 7 лет назад

+scottevanmacfar I am sorry I forgot to define what I meant. By "scratch" I meant "nothing".Was the life made from nothing?

@tokyopp 10 лет назад

where is the evidence for change in kinds? all of that evidence is called adaptation, people assumed and believe in evolution calling the people who believe in God blind faith, you are using blind faith here as well. i am not here to argue about god vs evolution, i am here to debate or listen to someone who can clarify this question, change in kinds from fish to reptiles or something of that sort.

@myoldvan119 10 лет назад

There is no such scientific term as "kinds". That's just a term creationists use. What there really is are approximately 8 classifications of taxonomy in the living hierarchy that life evolves through over hundreds of thousands of years through the process of natural selection.

@issamoe5064 10 лет назад

myoldvan119 you're a joke, you expect people to listen to this nonsense with no evidence....no fossils that show animals half fish/half land creature..nothing of the sort...and random mutation suggests we should be seeing people with 5 arms or random limbs but loe and behold, we see nothing of the sort...so again please bring some evidence or be quiet

@myoldvan119 10 лет назад

you didnt understand a word I said did you? lol

@nmarbletoe8210 9 лет назад

If by "kind" you mean "species" then there is much evidence of change in kind. From fish to reptiles, there is tiktaalik: tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/

@issamoe5064 9 лет назад

N Marbletoe like.....??? really loking forward to a reply

@tannermortimer683 5 лет назад

It was a 5 year journey not 3... Just trying to help. thanks for your videos.

@carriemoore548 10 лет назад

Cool.

@stuartmain7201 8 лет назад

So the model that best fits this evidence is the biblical model where life was created 'according to its kind' (family). Therefore what we have is an orchard of trees, not just one single tree of life. Cattle breed cattle (bovine), cats breed cats (feline) dogs breed dogs (canine) birds breed birds (avian) etc etc. There is no evidence (apart from extrapolated imagination of evolutionists) that one kind of animal has evolved into another. There is tremendous variety within each kind as they adapt to their respective environments, but they remain locked into their genome of origin.. The horse example is a poor one. We have all the various sizes of horses living contemporansously today, just like we have different sizes of dogs or humans. You can stretch them into an imaginary line of size variation over imaginary time, but this is not science. If you take out all the imagination, and extrapolation, you are left with the biblical model of origins with adaptation.

@IsaiahNields 8 лет назад

Look up speciation. It should explain more. Look at the copious amounts of fossils we have. Look at the archeological evidence. Creationism doesn't explain any of those evidences. Evolution does. Believe what you want, but don't bother others or scientists when they come to the logical conclusion.

@stuartmain7201 8 лет назад

Isaiah Nields That's a good biblical name you have.

@anngee88888 8 лет назад

+Stuart Main Ever hear of fossils?

@stuartmain7201 8 лет назад

Ann Gee Yes, maybe you would like to tell me about them?

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Ever hear of DNA? Ever hear of all the times we directly observed evolution? Ever hear of all the transitional species we have identified? Ever hear of science?

@kizahstehl1381 9 лет назад

It's still a pigeon ,, no proof

@thehumanfly5790 9 лет назад

"Hey atheists! If god isn't real, how is it still a pigeon! Lol. Checkmate atheists!"

@thehumanfly5790 9 лет назад

Mo Knows I'm proof?

@moknows4996 9 лет назад

The Human Fly meow

@axeljensen5419 9 лет назад

Mo Knows lol

@jonathanbarber1870 9 лет назад

Kizah Stehl This is analogous to, but even worse than, the "microevolution not macroevolution" argument I see plaguing internet forums. Also, Fly, Mo's just being obnoxious while contributing absolutely nothing, so don't even worry. Dumb people are capable of being mean too.

@asimshah773 5 лет назад

ii cou'nt understand what have u said in the end

@juanvera411 5 лет назад

i count smart ass

@thisismypointe 10 лет назад

What do you mean kind to kind?

@Denverslopes 10 лет назад

Above me ^ is the video below me👇is WW3 Haha.

@PlanetRockJesus 10 лет назад

This narrator makes so many assumptions that this video is laughable. Not one bit of evidence for evolution was given.

@chainezo 10 лет назад

says someone with jesus in his name no evidence for jesus was ever found outside of the bible

@squintgoob 10 лет назад

Chainezo Deathhunter As friendly advice to you, it only makes you appear very uneducated if you make statements like that. there is no question among historians that Jesus actually lived. the argument is whether or not he was who he said he was.

@chainezo 10 лет назад

squintgoob i mean the biblical jesus i could just name my child jesus and then shout all around the world jesus lives

@squintgoob 10 лет назад

Chainezo Deathhunter I mean the biblical Jesus also. I don't mean they found some random guy named Jesus. there are very few, if any, historians that would suggest that the Jesus that is talked about in the bible never walked the earth. only that the miracles and certain events do not have the proof needed but the fact that he was a real human being is not up for debate

@PlanetRockJesus 10 лет назад

That's why we date our calendar from the time of Jesus. If evolution happened, there would be evidence all around us. The THEORY of evolution is put forth by those who WANT it to be true, because they don't WANT to believe God. So, they invent something that will hopefully mask their lack of faith. Show me, from the evidence, how the anal fin cartilage of a fish became the full-blown pelvis of a lizard.

@hyunjinpark5086 10 лет назад

Reminder: this channel is "Bozeman Science," not "Bozeman Theology." If someone doesn't know what Science is, follow this link: The Scientific Method

@paulmillbank3617 4 года назад

I do know of Alfred Wallace.

@ILoveGodsWord413 10 лет назад

cool

@EntropyVX 9 лет назад

What the heck is that weird pigeon top middle at 2:35?

@basquiatvigil 9 лет назад

Bob Bobby still just a pigeon

@niklaswikstrom78 11 лет назад

"Useless" mutations might hitch a ride in individuals with advantageous mutations so to speak, but having useless body parts as you put it would very likely be a disadvantage, using more energy to build and maintain them etc. So individuals with these body parts will probably have a harder time surviving and reproducing than individuals that are more "streamlined".

@TheUserUndefined 11 лет назад

Not as far as we know, right? Or is that certain (besides goosebumps)?

@mr.croninsvideos5202 4 года назад

RIP Lonesome George

@sethlachem6611 8 лет назад

Adaptation is the most accurate explanation for this video. I know you guys know about climate change every single place on earth and the adaptation of animal to that climate. And I see in this video is just a same animals no changing of kind.

@thetruepure2 8 лет назад

+seth lachem You are very ignorant. No insult intended, just blunt honesty. "Kind" has literally no meaning among scientists. The nomenclature of zoology is pretty complicated. Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Subfamily Genus Species In that order, life as we know it is categorized, with species being the most specific and kingdom being the least specific. Notice that "kind" is not among the list. If I told you the animal behind cage one was in the kingdom "Animalia", you would have a huge array of life forms to choose from. Maybe it's a dolphin, or maybe its an octopus. Perhaps it's a cheetah, or maybe even a T-rex! Now Imagine I told you that behind the cage is in the family "felidae". You could narrow the results down quite considerably. Maybe a housecat, or a lion. Perhaps a tiger or a leopard. Maybe a serval or a bobcat. Now imagine I narrow it even further to the genus "panthera" You have the choices of Lion, Tiger, Leopard, Jaguar and leopard. I can narrow it down even further to species level. Let's say the species is tiger. Could be bengal tiger, or maybe siberian tiger. Maybe it's the Javan tiger. So you see there is no clear line drawn among animals, and "kind" is less than meaningless in the classification system. The "kind" you speak of, from the bible, could be interpreted to mean species, family, genus, order, phylum, or even kingdom. You and many other creationists most likely mean it to represent "family". The cat family. The dog family. The whale family. The ant family. The list goes on. The only reason you prefer this interpretation is that you realize there is no physically possible way for 14 of every species of the millions of species on this planet of animal to fit on an ark that is only 500 feet long. Here is the kicker. Evolution is nothing more than adaptation. The words are truly synonyms. Evolution between species can take place in a couple of thousand years among macroscopic animals. Evolution between "order" or "class" will take longer. In short, the only thing that stops us from observing "changes in kind" as you so lovingly refer to it, is time. Luckily there is such a thing as the fossil record. In the fossil record we see the changes over the hundreds of millions of years.

@sethlachem6611 8 лет назад

+thetruepure2 Honestly I honestly like your explanation. but I only believe that evolution happen to animal only when human still not exist yet and that's my opinion (it's just my opinion no need to comment that). I love when people share their knowledge and believe. Freedom of speech.

@tommyg.6542 8 лет назад

Give me a single example in the fossil record where we can observe changes of class.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Genesis 2:18-19 teaches that man was created before animals.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Tommy G, do realize that if "Class" is the definition of "Kind" then Humans and chimps are already the same kind?

@thisismypointe 10 лет назад

Yes there is. Have you yet to open a biology text?

@pipsch12 10 лет назад

When I said "biology states," I meant the scientific consensus in the field of biology. "Consensus" means general agreement. Everybody knows that there are scientists that do not agree with what is taught, but they represent a minority in the scientific community, otherwise it wouldn't be called "consensus." Science in general tries to understand and describe the processes found in nature. If the existence of god was a fact, scientists would still try to understand nature. Nothing would change

@evelynR1312 4 года назад

Prove God ISNT a fact Prove spontaneous generation, which you believe is how the first cell originated Prove Christians are rarely scientists Don’t just write a response, site sources so that you’re arguments are valid (provided the source is credible and the study hasn’t been redacted)

@samstandard4715 4 года назад

Its very easy to prove god isn't a fact. No one has ever captured definitive evidence that he is real, and belief in god itself is different across all cultures. Not only is there no one single definition for god, but there is also no proof of any supernatural being existing in the first place. The entire religion itself is based off of an ancient roman cult. No one can prove that any history surrounding the religion is true or false, and there is no way of knowing if its basis is true or false either.

@evelynR1312 4 года назад

Sam Standard we can look at the ancient documents referencing God and determine their authenticity. The Bible is known to have accurate descriptions of Egypt, Assyria, and numerous other empires. There are also details in the Bible that would never have been there if it were made up, such as women being the first to discover Christ had risen (in ancient cultures this would have received severe backlash).

@samstandard4715 4 года назад

just because it has accurate accounts of different locations doesn’t mean that it’s not a work of fiction. Probably, the accuracy of the documents settings are purely to make it seem authentic

@evelynR1312 4 года назад

Sam Standard the level of deception that would be required to pull off a stunt like that would be immense. The Bible wasn’t written all at one time but is instead an accumulation of letters (specifically Paul), poems (specifically David’s Psalms), laws (Numbers, Deuteronomy), and historical narratives (the gospels, genesis, exodus, the prophets), and so on.

@issouamine217 10 лет назад

let the debats begin :p

@gino14 11 лет назад

Most scientists really don't bother with the distinction, since the definition of Species in the first place has become somewhat subjective. "A group of organisms having many characteristics in common" - Yourscience Dictionary At what point does a population "microevolve" to the point where they stop "having many characteristics in common?" I could ask two different scientists, and they'd probably give me different answers, because "many characteristics in common" is hyper subjective.

@atheistslayer8486 10 лет назад

Stalactites do not take millions of years! Lead-zinc mine at Mt Isa Late 1987 at level 5 workings in the lead-zinc mine at Mt Isa, in north-western Queensland, Australia. At that time, the mine itself was only about 55 years old, which therefore is the absolute maximum age for all these stalactites. See more on Creation.com

@chilli0n 8 лет назад

Any changes of kinds going on? Anyone?

@mrburke4194 8 лет назад

In the 1970s, a group of Italian Wall Lizards were migrated to a foreign island. In the next approximately thirty years, they've exhibited observable change; for instance, although they were initially carnivorous, their stomachs adapted to digest grass and various other plants, the leading food source of said island. Not to mention, their heads have became much longer and thinner.

@chilli0n 8 лет назад

Ye, that is pretty neat. Altering body parts/digestive system to adapt is not unheard of at all and seems to happen over short periods of time. Observable changes like this is evidence that mutations have to happen for the lizard to survive, but the mutations themself where already in the lizards DNA, it only had to be turned "on". But it`s still a Lizard. My problem is the change of kinds, according to darvins beliefs. A change of kind had to happen pretty often to get so many distinct creature kinds. But there is no to little evidence for it. Im having a hard with this issue, researched alot but dont find anything that convince. No matter how you breed a dog its never going to turn into a cat..and even if you get it to look like a rat, its still a dog. Anyting that can shine a light on this, is appreciated.

@CoreyB88 7 лет назад

I'll answer your question when you can give me a scientific descriptor of exactly what a "kind" is. That means specifications on exactly how something is classified into the category of "kind." Until that happens, there's no point in talking about it because you can just alter what you mean by "kind" until any evidence I provide doesn't meet your criteria.

@chilli0n 7 лет назад

Ok, to get a new kind, not just a new species, there has to be significant changes in an animal so distinct that it can not be in that FAMILY any more..look at the example below: The lion belongs to the following groups: Kingdom Animalia: (includes all animals) Phylum Chordata: (includes all vertebrate animals, as well as some other more primitive ones) Class Mammalia: (includes all mammals) Order Carnivora: (includes carnivorous mammals, from bears to raccoons to harbor seals) Family Felidae: (includes all cats) Genus: Panthera (includes the great roaring cats: lions, tigers, jaguars, and leopards) Species: leo (lions!) So the evidence may be the "micro" evolution of one particular kind until the "macro" evolution took place where it is no longer in that family anymore. If that makes sense.

@CoreyB88 7 лет назад

chilli0n The best example I can think of is the evolution of whales from a land-dwelling, pig-like ancestor. We have the complete sequence of fossils of every major stage of this transition, showing how the family went from terrestrial, to semiaquatic, to fully aquatic, then becoming more and more adapted to their aquatic lifestyle. We don't have any examples that we've observed because we frankly haven't been watching long enough. We've seen speciation events in the past few centuries, but anything more profound than that takes too much time.

@DestinyLabMusic 3 дня назад

I have a very good friend who has been an archeologist for over 30 years and another friend who is a cosmologist and one thing they both have told me is that behind the scenes Darwinian evolution is dead. They say that most scientists no longer believe in molecule to man evolution but don’t talk about it publicly because so many jobs and egos and a lot of money control the narrative and they need to gather more data to come up with a replacement for the evolution theory. Turns out that our world is much more mysterious than we thought and our feeble minds and egos always want to convince ourselves that we have got it all figured out but history shows that the only thing that evolves and changes over time is science!

@Uenbg 10 лет назад

as a reminder: Machines are always designed (and made). A design always requires a designer. And you can't design if you're not intelligent. This is the normal usage of the english language, but there are those out there who are trying to change the normal use of language in order to spread confusion and teach false logic. You must attempt to resist and hold on to the normal simple usage of language. My playlist "Can your educational system always be trusted?" may be of assistance there.

@zee-kh6vm 4 года назад

Couldn't have said it better than me

@patrickallen1330 6 лет назад

HOLY CRAP THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU GOT MY GR 11 BIO AVERAGE FROM AN 80 TO AN 93 GOOD LORD YOUR THE BEST

@moknows4996 9 лет назад

Great vid, nice format, clear, concise and dumb-downed just enough for even the non-evolving creationist deniers to understand!

@ahmackalak7553 3 года назад

hearing about lonesome george ;-;

@Uenbg 10 лет назад

best to use the following searchterms on google (you'll get immediate pictures): Smithsonian Jesuits Sun worship with the last one you'll have to click the images section and for me the following pictures are interesting (from left to right): 1st line, the 3rd 3rd line, the last (the pope!) 4th line, the last (Catholics probably) 6th line, 5th (in the middle, has got an all-seeing eye that the freemasons and illuminati love so much+egyptian ankh, see info in my 1st playlist about the cross)

@squintgoob 10 лет назад

There are problems with the horse evolution model. there have been fossils of both found in the same layer and the size of them doesn't mean it grew to modern size. there is big size differences in modern horses today. DNA is actually an amazingly complex system; how can it have arrived by natural processes? and then how did the system evolve that was able to interpret it in time to replicate it to pass it on before it died?

@Judicial78 10 лет назад

"DNA is actually an amazingly complex system; how can it have arrived by natural processes?" It's called Chemical Evolution, aka Abiogenesis. The chemistry is explainable.

@jonatanmendoza6768 11 лет назад

Anyone disappointed with with the 2013 exam opposite of what I prepared for

@WarriorOfWriters 11 лет назад

yep and there are; the appendix, wisdom teeth. Whales have leg bones they don't use, ostriches and emus have wings but can't fly

@impeet 7 лет назад

Thank you for the video. Since learning about both sides of the origins debate it seems that there is a distinction between microevolution and macroevolution. Microevolution, or the variations within a species, is observable and incontrovertible while macroevolution, or the changing of one species to another appears problematic to the theory of evolution. For example, fossil evidence from the Cambrian explosion reveals basically unchanged forms of animals in comparison to what is observed today. I recently read a quote from a leading evolutionist, Jeffrey Schwartz (professor of anthropology from U.Pitt) who said that "the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed." It seems, in this time of scientific enlightenment, that examples of trans-speciation would be numerous but what we're left with are artistic renderings of creatures morphing into modern day forms that have nothing to do with science. Further, DNA commonality may be better attributed to a common designer than common descent. Homologies as well. Finally, genetic mutations are always detrimental to an organism or, far less common, benign. Even the term "junk DNA" is suspect in that many of these have been shown to perform useful functions much like what were thought to be vestigial organs such as the appendix. I enjoy your videos and thank you for sharing your expertise. On this one though, I differ in opinion and believe that evolution is a faith-based belief system propped up by sentimental commitments based outside of objective science. Creationism and intelligent design are also belief systems but, it seems the evidences are pointing in their direction.

@EdwinLuciano 7 лет назад

Microevolution: what makes reading Charles Darwin different from reading Richard Dawkins. Macroevolution: what makes reading those two authors different from reading Chaucer or Beowulf. In fact, you cannot read the latter in the original Old English unless you've learned that language. The process that explains why Darwin is different from Dawkins is the same one that explains the difference between Dawkins and Beowulf: small changes over long periods of time. If you met a human from a million years ago, chances are you could not interbreed. If you met an Englishman from a thousand years ago, chances are you would not understand a word he said. The difference is only in scale. Little changes add up. It's how a single fertilized egg cell, over time, becomes the ten trillion cells that make up Peter Dominici. How a river flowing makes a Grand Canyon.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Peter, the problem with your assertion is that we have directly observed MACRO evolution. In real time, both in the lab and in the wild, we have directly observed the thing you say is impossible.

@impeet 7 лет назад

This is, largely, untrue. There is a paucity of organic life that may even qualify as evidences of transpeciation. If present life arose from simpler life, one would expect to read about an abundance of transitional examples in the fossil record. They simply don't exist. Darwin, himself predicted much of his theory on this presumption. One of the foremost proponents of evolution, the late paleontologist, Dr. Stephen Gould (Harvard U.) understood the lack of evidence for macroevolution by admitting: “Everybody knows the fossil record doesn’t provide much evidence for gradualism [i.e., tiny, successive changes over time leading to major changes, including speciation]; it is full of gaps and discontinuities. The fossil record shows one thing...most species don’t change.” James Tour (Rice U.) in one of the most respected synthetic chemists in the world. Synthetic chemistry is one of the sciences at the heart of proposing models for macroevolution among other things and even he admits to being perplexed at how anyone can propose a mechanism for such changes: "I simply do not understand, chemically, how macroevolution could have happened. Does anyone understand the chemical details behind macroevolution? If so, I would like to sit with that person and be taught, so I invite them to meet with me." In order for macroevolution to be even plausible, a reasonable model would need to exist at the molecular and chemical level. It doesn't. It's easy to make statements and create a "half-ape, half-man" based on a few bones. That's often sufficient to fool the masses, but in this age of contemporary science, it's becoming more science fiction than fact. It's got so many holes as to be an implausible explanation for the complex life we see everywhere.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

Why is it creationist always lie about transitional fossils? Darwin pointed out the lack of fossil (transitional or otherwise) but that was over 160 years ago. Since then we have found tens of thousands of transitional fossils from our direct line alone. So many, in fact, that our line is nearly complete. There is no missing link. Those fossils exist and we can show them to you. Worse still, even if we had no fossils at all, evolution would still be confirmed by multiple lines of evidence outside the fossil record. DNA alone confirms evolution and common descent.

@scottevanmacfar 7 лет назад

And like I said in my first post. We have DIRECT OBSERVATION OF MACRO EVOLUTION. It's not a debate anymore. We filmed it. We can watch it again, in multiple species. It happens every day. Macro evolution.

@TheMickeymental 8 лет назад

What is evolution-biology and how does it differ from just plain old everyday biology?

@mrburke4194 8 лет назад

No, no, it's just a specific branch of biology.

@benakres 11 лет назад

Its nothing but that, have you ever heard of Neanderthals. They also shared a common ancestor with humans, only more recently. They were a separate species to humans but they were part of the same genus. We think (based on the fossil record) that their extinction only occuerd around 30000 years ago. There are other species too who were around during human history, if you want to find them search for a timeline of the Hominid genus.

@MCHRQRD 11 лет назад

No discussion just condescension. Engage the material or don't start a conversation.

@noahkiser 11 лет назад

Thumbs up if you touched or looked at your ear at 6:45!

@SurrealStrawberry 11 лет назад

Well it's pretty much common sense if you think about it. Evolution still happens today (such as bacteria with immunity to antibiotics becoming selected for these traits and reproducing, which causes antibiotic-resistant bacteria), so why would we think that the evidence for evolution is a lie? Natural selection is so obviously rational and mutations DO occur, so why would evolution not be possible?

@WarriorOfWriters 11 лет назад

various reasons; problems in reproduction in the populations, sterility, introduction of ferrels into an ecosystem, thorough predators, cancers like that decimating the tasmanian devil population, viruses, the increase in population of predators, the decrease of population in prey

@xiiixiiih.16 Год назад

What if a snail or a slug is a greatwail on land before it medimorphicly transforms for the ocean

@Paradigm2012Shift 4 года назад

The examples in your presentation of the turtles, horses, etc are of "microevolution" / speciation / adaptation. You failed to show any examples of "macroevolution".

@torotanaka3788 4 года назад

Macroevolution (speciation) is a directly observed fact.

@EmileKleinhans 2 года назад

@@torotanaka3788 Observed by whom and what did they observe?

@jurgensamoilov9030 10 лет назад

not saying every video is false but some are

@magranera 6 лет назад

Could the similar bone structure maybe be a common creator? All Dali paintings look like Dali paintings.

@hmgrraarrpffrzz9763 6 лет назад

Considering that there exists no single rational reason why we should believe in a Creator, no, similar bone structure does not hint towards a common creator.

@magranera 6 лет назад

Hm Grraarrpffrzz Even Darwin admitted that the human eye had to be made by a creator. You seem to only know what the textbooks conveniently decided to tell you. You might want to read the Origin of Species yourself. You will find that by now Darwin himself disproved his tired old theory. It's been over 150 years and zero transitional Species have been found. Therefore in his own words his theory is false!!!

@wossaaaat 6 лет назад

Sorry Flat Truth.. at what point did Darwin admit this?

@magranera 6 лет назад

woss Where would one go to seek the words of Darwin?🤔 Have you read the origin of species?

@wossaaaat 6 лет назад

Well, I know in chapter 6 he says: "To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree." But I know you can't be referring to that, because you've implied that you have read the book, so presumably you'd know that he then goes on to explain in some detail exactly how the eye could develop completely naturally and without the need of a creator. So I was wondering if there was somewhere else he claimed that it 'had to be made by a creator'? Perhaps in something written long before Origin of Species, and before he realised that indeed it didn't need a creator?