Do evos handle better? I was racing one in traffic 200km+ and he pass me on a curve while we doing 240 250 huh. I drive an m4 btw. He did seem heavily modified
I mean I'm pretty sure whatever country you live in the they handle a lot better than ones in the USA. I depends on the once you raced for handling. If you raced an Evo 4 and any generations up they have AYC which basically controls left and right torque. If you raced an Evo 7 and any generation up they had both AYC and ACD which in combo with AYC gives the Evo even split torque for the front and rear wheels (basically AYC and ACD give the Evo torque vectoring without calling it torque vectoring I guess). This helps it's handling abilities really well. This is excluding the Evos 1, 2, 3, and 10. (in each country the gens and ayc/acd differentiates).
Most of these evo and and even 32-34 gtr guys tune for big HP numbers. You can see the car doesnt even have pull till about 5500-6500rpm. Useless power curve unless you have a sequential trans. Guarantee you a evo built for response with 100 hp less will do a much better job.
@@BNR_248 fr, theres too much obsession with big turbos. Yea you get fat hp numbers, but only for a split second. Thats why you see those cars briefly start to catch up and then the power goes kapoot when they shift and end up 10 feet back
4g63ts don't have the best top-end power, and their gears are short because it's a rally car so dudes that race these with transmissions built for Evos are gonna have to shift more. I feel like this is why the dude was redlining a bit and still falling behind; shifting more often as well as poor top-end power. Even with a large turbo to assist in top-end power it still takes a while to spool so the dude is still gonna fall behind you know. AND ALSO it's AWD so there would be lower top-speeds because 50/50 torque split (ACD) because it's an Evo 9.
