Тёмный
No video :(

Ex-chief justice Davide: ‘Absolute divorce is absolutely prohibited under the Constitution’ 

Rappler
Подписаться 2,2 млн
Просмотров 30 тыс.
50% 1

Former chief justice Hilario Davide explains why he believes that “absolute divorce is absolutely prohibited under the 1987 Constitution,” as he speaks in a forum at the University of the Philippines College of Law on Wednesday, July 10.
Watch more on the divorce bill: www.rappler.co...
Subscribe: bit.ly/Rappler...
More videos on Rappler: www.rappler.co...
Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. You can help power our investigative fund by donating to our crowdfunding: donate.rappler...

Опубликовано:

 

10 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 300   
@pepitovergarasilvestre7864
@pepitovergarasilvestre7864 Месяц назад
Thank you so much Chief Justice Hilario Davide for sharing your wisdom and guidance on the issue of Absolute Divorce. God bless you and your family! God bless us all. Amen
@user-iu8ex6eu9m
@user-iu8ex6eu9m Месяц назад
Bravo Justice Davide for a comprehensive & compact argument ags divorce based on divine law & constitution. Simple & enlightening.
@fevaamparo2749
@fevaamparo2749 Месяц назад
❤️❤️. Happy to see and hear from you Hon. Chief Justice Davide ❤️. Our Cebuano pride. Hoping to hear more from you regarding important issues in our country. Godbless sir❤️
@anthonystaana7079
@anthonystaana7079 Месяц назад
If divorce is prohibited by the Constitution then why annulment is allowed.? Kalokohan Pati ba naman sa marriage may social classification pa din. Annulment pang mayaman lang. Pano naman yung mga mahihirap na walang pang annull sa kasal.?
@jnleyson
@jnleyson 29 дней назад
@@anthonystaana7079 kasi po iba sa annulment nililinaw lang na invalid o mag defect yung marriage kaya NULL po ito. Huehue
@user-js5od6vv8q
@user-js5od6vv8q 24 дня назад
Annulment means the wedding did not really happen therefore null, divorce on the other hand means that the man and woman are formerly married but no longer after divorce, the annulment means no marriage has pushed through in the first place therefore when a marriage between a man and a woman was annuled that means they were never married in the first place.
@norgesta
@norgesta 16 дней назад
@@jnleysonsige ilagay natin example ikaw. Kasal ikaw may mga anak ngayon naging drug addict,lasingero si mister and binubogbog ikaw asawa kasama na rin mga anak nyo. Gusto mo pa? Masyado ikaw matalino. Ang divorce hindi din magyayari sa mga magulang mo yan. Kasi love nila ang isat isa paano yung hindi na? To make it simple divorce must be pass and be legal. The masses needs the law.
@jnleyson
@jnleyson 16 дней назад
@@norgesta lol. May legal separation po. Alangan naman magpagulpe ka hanggang kamatayan. Pero kahit ganun, di pa din excuse na sumakabilang bahay ka kasi di ka naman pinilit magpakasal sa asawa mo. Hehe
@norgesta
@norgesta 16 дней назад
@@jnleyson who say sumakabilang bahay? This is for the voice of woman who are maltreated by their spouses and children too. Hindi mo alam yung worst of this experience. Sa pagpalagay natin perfect ang marriage ng magulang mo. I wont disclosed in a society o sa campus nyo hindi mawala ang may pamilya na ganyan. This is not for you who have perfect family 10/10. But this is for the broken family that gets the beating. Bakit ka magpa divorce kong masaya at respected k ng spouse mo? Masyadong mahaba na. Sana hindi mangyari sayo o sa pamilya mo na may asawa na binubigbog.
@kitarendain3411
@kitarendain3411 Месяц назад
Magkaroon nlng kaya nga campaign.... let us not vote politicians who are hypocrites... No to senators opposing the divorce bill
@briwmi.c0h115
@briwmi.c0h115 Месяц назад
Sana maranasan mo rin mg karumal dumal na marriage par amalaman mo.amg.pakiramdam.ng walang divorce 😂
@Phoenix-ni2bc
@Phoenix-ni2bc Месяц назад
Divorce is for 2 consenting adults who want and need it. If it's not for you because of your religion or belief, then why would you prevent others from having it?
@HonoratoInfante
@HonoratoInfante Месяц назад
Nonsense! hyprocrytical comment!you cannot deside others body!
@turquoise806
@turquoise806 Месяц назад
Our current laws allow for married people to legally separate. We already have it. Instead, making the process of legal separation a lot easier and affordable should be the focus. There is absolution no need for a divorce law.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
Eh di mag file kau ng legal separation or divorce. Marriage is not just a contract na pag ayaw na pareho ay ayaw na. You may not had grasp what marriage is in the first place. If you do not have the decision to commit, do not commit in the 1st place. Otherwise, sa hwes ka na lng magpakasal.
@feidzmortine1803
@feidzmortine1803 Месяц назад
No need in our country....there is a better way that's annulment...no to divorce..
@jericoeugenio4635
@jericoeugenio4635 Месяц назад
#YesToDivorce❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@carolinaflores5421
@carolinaflores5421 Месяц назад
If you have a happy marriage then divorce is not for you. Do not deprived others of freedom from sufferings, those who are not as lucky as you. God also do not want His children to suffer anymore that’s why divorce will be approved in this country. How can a toxic marriage become sacred? If your husband is cheating on you, beating you and your children, or is not providing even food on the table, how can your marriage be sacred????
@jnleyson
@jnleyson Месяц назад
Why not improve the power of legal separation? Divorce aims nothing but remarriage. Marriage is only for those who know the meaning of LIFETIME COMMITMENT. How about initiating a movement for contractual partnership? I think differentiating Marriage (LIFETIME) and Contract Based Partnership would be a better option for anybody who is in line with yoyr stand
@LiwaySaGu
@LiwaySaGu Месяц назад
@@jnleysonwhy should the victim not have an opportunity to remarry? should she be a victim forever because her husband is evil?
@elcaps564
@elcaps564 Месяц назад
Why do you talk of marriage as if the person you “marry” was something drawn out if a box or a spinning wheel? Choose well before even getting married or dont get married at all!
@elcaps564
@elcaps564 Месяц назад
@@LiwaySaGuif the husband is evil, then the marriage might have been null and void. IT NEVER EXISTED. Thats what annulment is. Its 2 crazies thinking they’re getting married but they are not.
@user-td9hb6jv5y
@user-td9hb6jv5y Месяц назад
​@@elcaps564masasabi mo lang yan kac happy married ka
@Classy-Fi
@Classy-Fi Месяц назад
You will not understand Divorce if your married life is successful. It's like giving your complete thoughts on something that you haven't experienced yet.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
That is why you married in the 1st place - to commit to work it out. Eh di sa hwes ka magpakasal.
@CarlDuca
@CarlDuca Месяц назад
They understand divorce as unconstitutional. They are experts of our constitution.
@brownleroy1
@brownleroy1 Месяц назад
@@CarlDuca hence the need to amend the constitution
@brownleroy1
@brownleroy1 Месяц назад
⁠@@beautifullycreatablestupid response. There’s no difference between marriage sa hawed or simbahan.
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
​@@beautifullycreatableobob walang pinag kaiba ang church at civil wedding shunga 😂
@ArtchelBoganotan
@ArtchelBoganotan Месяц назад
The best chief justice in the Philippines
@HonoratoInfante
@HonoratoInfante Месяц назад
what justice? has it erradicate corruption in government! it is only meant to rich and not to poor people!
@mr.kalim_B
@mr.kalim_B Месяц назад
Divorce as a Right 1. Individual Autonomy and Freedom: • Divorce can be seen as a manifestation of an individual’s right to personal autonomy and freedom. This perspective argues that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including the decision to end a marriage. 2. Protection from Harm: • In cases of abuse, neglect, or irreparable breakdown of a marriage, divorce can be seen as a right to protect individuals from harm and to ensure their well-being. This aligns with human rights principles that protect individuals from suffering and uphold their dignity. 3. Equality: • Ensuring the right to divorce can promote gender equality by allowing both men and women to leave marriages that are harmful or no longer serve their interests. This is particularly significant in contexts where women might be more vulnerable within marital relationships. Divorce as a Privilege 1. Cultural and Religious Beliefs: • In some cultures and religious traditions, marriage is viewed as a sacred and indissoluble institution. In these contexts, the ability to divorce might be restricted, and when allowed, it may be seen more as a privilege granted under specific circumstances rather than a fundamental right. 2. Legal Restrictions: • In some jurisdictions, legal frameworks might impose strict conditions on divorce, treating it as a privilege that must be justified and granted by the state. This can include requirements such as proving fault, undergoing counseling, or fulfilling separation periods. Philippine Context In the Philippines, divorce is currently not available under the general civil law (with the exception of Muslims governed by the Code of Muslim Personal Laws). The options available are legal separation, annulment, and nullity of marriage, each with specific legal requirements and processes. If Congress were to pass a divorce law, the debate would likely include discussions on whether divorce should be treated as a right accessible to all individuals under certain conditions, or as a privilege subject to specific legal and moral standards. Ultimately, whether divorce is seen as a right or a privilege can influence how laws are framed and implemented, impacting individuals’ ability to leave marriages that no longer serve their needs or well-being.
@user-ct5eu3yd4v
@user-ct5eu3yd4v Месяц назад
Sa tingin ko.divorce is not the solution. Totoo Yung teleserye ni Kim Chu na Linlang. Madami gusto Ng Divorce Kasi na Linlang or nanlilinlang.kawawa mga faithful na asawa.kawawa mga anak na biktima na magulang na malikot Ang isip. Real love from God vs Love of money from the devil. A righteous love vs deceitful love. A righteous love vs lust of the eyes. In fairness to those who tell victim of love. Dpat higpitan batas Ng pangangalunya/pakiki apid.pbigatin parusa. Protection against women & children mas lagyan pa ruling. KC if baba gumagawa Ng kalokohan paano di unfair na. Dapat magbuo Ang government Ng commission for moral recovery focus on family KC kunting problema lang Hiwalayan na gusto iba.pero di iniisip mga anak. If asawa na may basbas si God dk nag success.paano sa pangalawa?sure ba? Or sa pangatlo ulit?
@jnleyson
@jnleyson 29 дней назад
@@mr.kalim_B it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL PO. hehe
@mal5539
@mal5539 24 дня назад
@@jnleyson It hasn’t been ruled by the SC yet, so I don’t think it’s proper to already declare it as unconstitutional. Let’s keep in mind that only the Court can interpret the law. In this context, it is still a forum discussion wherein different honorable persons are sharing their respective stances on the Divorce Bill. Let’s refrain from preempting the Supreme Court’s decision and avoid stating that Divorce is unconstitutional, doing so only confuses people and propagates the spread of misinformation.
@renzrelucio1395
@renzrelucio1395 18 дней назад
@@mal5539 There is nothing to debate on the very spirit of the letters of Constitutional provision stating that marriage is "INVIOLABLE". It expresses what it is and what it should be as a permanent union that is never to broken, regardless of reasons.
@mal5539
@mal5539 17 дней назад
@@renzrelucio1395 That’s YOUR opinion based on a verba legis or literal interpretation of the provision. However, it could also be interpreted differently by considering the INTENT OF THE FRAMERS of the Constitution. AGAIN, we are not part of the Supreme Court, so we cannot rule on the constitutionality of Divorce. Furthermore, discussions such as this would not occur if the constitutionality of the Divorce Bill were not open to debate.
@rede5176
@rede5176 Месяц назад
Thank you, Chief Justice Hilario Davide. May God continue to save, protect and bless all the marriages and our relationships with our families. 😇😇😇🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤
@princessserenity1715
@princessserenity1715 Месяц назад
gusto nyo lang kumita ng pera sa annulment, maging patas kayo sa batas sa mahirap at sa mayaman , marami ng bansa may divorce , bakit sa Pilipinas ipinagkakait nyo Ang divorce. wag nyo hawakan sa leeg Ang mga Pilipino na mamili kung sino Ang gusto nila makasama habang Buhay na di Sila lolokohin at tunay Silang mamahalin. selfish kayo Kasi maganda Ang naging marriage life. pero paano na Yung mga tao na napinta sa mga asawang di Matino pag iisip ,na nanloloko , palayain nyo Sila na lumigaya muli ,
@marybana8076
@marybana8076 Месяц назад
put God in the center of your marriage and there is no divorce.
@masamutia7889
@masamutia7889 Месяц назад
Thank you Chief Justice Davide, may the lawmakers be enlightened ..God Bless You Sir.
@LiwaySaGu
@LiwaySaGu Месяц назад
I am not for divorce, I am for the AVAILABILITY of divorce. God has the power to bind and unbind, to create and destroy. Make divorce available for all the souls who are bound to a dire or evil situation or person. Free them from pain and let them avail a better path to live their lives in peace and happiness.
@elcaps564
@elcaps564 Месяц назад
Emphasis on discernment of marriage is important and help those whk are in troubled abusive marriages BUT dont get into a lifetime institution with a bad person. Society today makes light of sex and relationships as if it were a sport, and then after all the roller coaster ride of “courtship”, if you even call it that, you get married to a bad person, the blinders are gone, the smoke out,’you can see the monster in your bed. Dont destroy marriage, dont get married to a monster!
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
Good words. I am in a happy marriage since late 1996 by the way.
@NanetteCuauhtli-bb9gi
@NanetteCuauhtli-bb9gi Месяц назад
IT IS TIME TO REVISE THE CONSTITUTION. MOVE ON. ANG DAMING IBA IBA ANG KINAKASAMA, HIWALAY DAHIL WALANG DIVORCE. ANONG KLASENG BUHAY YAN? DIVORCE IS THE LAST RESORT FOR COUPLE WHO HAS ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIPS.
@timawa22
@timawa22 Месяц назад
Marriage is sacred to our constitution, kaya dapat kilatisin mo maigi papakasalan mo, kaya nga iba live in muna, Yung iba naka tatlo o dalawa anak na Bago nagpapakasal. Ganun Ang diskarte.
@PapaFuzzyGaming
@PapaFuzzyGaming Месяц назад
Yeah, since he wants to throw God and everything I guess he missed apart for God granted divorces this dudes, is a idiot
@annromo9230
@annromo9230 Месяц назад
Wrong.divorce is not the solution but human behavior has to change.
@celfedealeligay402
@celfedealeligay402 Месяц назад
S mata ng Diös kabit kabit ay kasalanan at ang kasal ay d dapat maghiwalay,paano wla n love respito s isat isa at nagkakasakitan n,ano ang dapat gawin? Panghahawakan prin b ang kapirasong papel dahil lng s kasal? Sna bigyan din ng pangalawang pagkakataon ang mga nkaranas ng trauma. Yes divorce bill plz.
@arleneestal4661
@arleneestal4661 Месяц назад
Kahit walang divorce sobrang dami ding hiwalay sa asawa at may kinakasama ng iba mas mabuti pa bigyan nila ng kalayaan lalo na kung matagal ng hiwalay ang mag asawa kawawa naman yung isa kung ngpundar sya tapos kasali pa sa pundat nya yung asawa nyang matagal na clang hiwalay napa ka unfair nun
@valaguilar1307
@valaguilar1307 Месяц назад
Divorce is important in a civil society as it provides a legal means to dissolve marriages that are irreparably broken, ensuring individual rights and freedoms. It allows individuals to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships, promotes personal well-being, and upholds the principles of personal autonomy and equality. By enabling the legal end of a marriage, divorce helps maintain social stability and allows people to rebuild their lives, contributing to the overall health of the society.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
It is not important, it destroys the foundation of the community, it risks the security of women and it shaken's a child's development.
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
​@@beautifullycreatablelol
@genelyndepaolo7096
@genelyndepaolo7096 Месяц назад
A 1985 study tracked 1,000 families with children aged 6 to 18 for six years and found that children living in intact married families exhibited the least delinquency, while children with stepfathers were more likely to demonstrate the most disruptive behaviors. In a British longitudinal study of males aged 8 to 32, David P. Farrington, professor of criminology at Cambridge University, found that the divorce of parents before a child reached age 10 is a major predictor of adolescent delinquency and adult criminality. A recent U.S. longitudinal study which tracked over 6,400 boys over a period of 20 years (well into their adult years) found that children without biological fathers in the home are roughly three times more likely to commit a crime that leads to incarceration than are children from intact families Excerpt from " Effects of Divorce in America" by Patrick F. Fagan and Robert Rector
@Mark-jn7qd
@Mark-jn7qd Месяц назад
girl 1985 study. Rule of thumb for research is at most 10 year difference from discussing the issue at hand. Ang dami na nangyari, different generations mean different appreciation of information, nurtururing, care, living, expenses, etc. nkklk
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
​@@Mark-jn7qd then give a more recent study that would counter that
@Mark-jn7qd
@Mark-jn7qd Месяц назад
@@beautifullycreatable I'm not supposed to counter a study that's almost 40 years old. That's comparing how technology affects a person without internet and accessible phonelines with a study of a world that already has 5g and starlink. We really are in an education crisis haha
@Mark-jn7qd
@Mark-jn7qd Месяц назад
@@beautifullycreatable but since you asked for it here you go: Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003), "Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives," explores various factors influencing how children adjust to divorce. Here is a summary focusing on the potential positive influences or effects on children: Resilience Perspective: The study emphasizes that many children show resilience in the face of divorce, adapting well to changes in family structure and dynamics. Reduced Exposure to Conflict: Divorce can remove children from high-conflict environments, reducing emotional distress and allowing them to thrive in more stable and supportive settings. Improved Parent-Child Relationships: Post-divorce, parents may prioritize their children's well-being more effectively, leading to improved relationships and stronger emotional bonds. Development of Coping Skills: Going through divorce can foster the development of coping skills and emotional maturity in children, preparing them to handle adversity later in life. Individualized Attention: In some cases, children may receive more individualized attention from parents post-divorce, which can positively impact their emotional and psychological development. Overall, while divorce can be challenging for children, the study suggests that under certain circumstances, it can lead to positive outcomes such as improved family relationships, reduced stress, and opportunities for personal growth and resilience. These factors contribute to a nuanced understanding of the effects of divorce on children's well-being.
@elcaps564
@elcaps564 Месяц назад
@@Mark-jn7qdyoud be not so wise to trust the “advancements” of this world as more superior than before. A tablet kid vs a 40 year ago child? Today, is worse i hope is the answer? Then just because its new, it does not mean its better. Now is even worse, and destroying marriages will destroy what’s already being destroyed by the direction our society is going to.
@AnnetteSanchez-iy6hj
@AnnetteSanchez-iy6hj Месяц назад
Thank you ex chief justice Hilario Davide.God bless you.
@gemmabienGo4100
@gemmabienGo4100 Месяц назад
Thanks po for courageously upholding God's command and defending moral law.
@chesyllogan541
@chesyllogan541 Месяц назад
Yessssssssss to divorce. Stop being so hypocrite
@jlb1397
@jlb1397 Месяц назад
Hypocrite of what??
@i_am_elle_gee6917
@i_am_elle_gee6917 Месяц назад
If it's in the Constitution, why use the Biblical verses as basis? Not everyone in the Philippines is Catholic, and there are plenty of them who are hypocrites!
@yvonnemoris2653
@yvonnemoris2653 Месяц назад
😢😢
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
If you are not Catholic, why argue? Our Constitution is based on the principles of the Bible. If you are not Catholic, I don't think you understamd what marriage is.
@jericoeugenio4635
@jericoeugenio4635 Месяц назад
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
@brownleroy1
@brownleroy1 Месяц назад
@@beautifullycreatableyou are very wrong
@brownleroy1
@brownleroy1 Месяц назад
@@jericoeugenio4635there’s more money to be made in annulment
@glnbrook1286
@glnbrook1286 Месяц назад
Kung maayos ang pag sasama nyo good po sa inyong lahat .Pero huwag po ninyo kami idamay na matagal ng hiwalay at may kanya kanya ng landas at gustong magkadivorce na sa Pilipinas. Mag botohan nalang kaya ang sambayanang Pilipino ng yes or no sa Divorce para fair. Yessss to Divorce.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
Thank you Justice Davide❤
@miguellimzon9317
@miguellimzon9317 Месяц назад
Unfortunately not all Filipinos are devoted and will find ways to circumvent the laws of the constitution. It's a sad reality that we can't avoid. Even some of our celebrities and politicians aren't exactly role models. 🙄
@Maine_Course
@Maine_Course Месяц назад
SELFISH REASON!
@JustCassually
@JustCassually Месяц назад
Look, people, it's not that hard to understand. This is NOT about God or Religion, this is about BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS!! There are some marriages that just don't work, some of them are abusive. Denying Filipinos the right to get out of such abusive relations and effectively imprisoning them to that kind of life is MORALLY wrong! Pilipinas nalang po ang wala pang Divorce, tayo at yung Holy See(Vatican)!! The Philippines is a secular country, it is imbedded in our constitution itself! So why are we imposing Roman Catholic values to the whole of the country that also have other religions!!? This is Hypocrisy at its Most Shameless!! Shame on You!
@anasalazar2928
@anasalazar2928 Месяц назад
Agree!
@IesuRexGloriae
@IesuRexGloriae Месяц назад
Salamat po Justice Davide. I have been praying that divorce bill will not be put into law. May the Holy Family preserved the Filipino families. Pray for the conversion of the hearts of those who push this evil bill especially wicked Lagman.
@jenjaxskye
@jenjaxskye Месяц назад
“So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” ‭‭✝️ Matthew‬ ‭19‬:‭6‬ ‭ God is good. All praise and glory to God. 🙏🏼
@yuridelossantos569
@yuridelossantos569 Месяц назад
The bible also says, even the leaves will not fall if God will not allow it. If couples separate then God allows it. It is not the intention of God for a spouse(wife) to suffer under the cruelty of the spouse(husband). Even Judas who became one with Christ at first was separated by God from his son in the end.
@jenjaxskye
@jenjaxskye Месяц назад
@@yuridelossantos569 kindly state the bible verse
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
Philippines is not a theocracy. And not all Philippinos are following the teachings of the bible. Why force them under the slogans of a certain holy book?
@yuridelossantos569
@yuridelossantos569 Месяц назад
@@wernerschneider4460 you need to be specific, what ur saying is very broad.
@falconrcr8230
@falconrcr8230 Месяц назад
Praise the Lord!
@yuridelossantos569
@yuridelossantos569 Месяц назад
The consequences of absolute divorce are totally different from the consequences of what is absolutely prohibited under the constitution. Thus, absolute divorce is not absolutely prohibited under the constitution.
@seethesunshines
@seethesunshines Месяц назад
Amen. ❤ A big Salute to my favorite Chief Justice! ❤️
@enriquetacornista7604
@enriquetacornista7604 Месяц назад
We speak of divorce as if it enables healing but its extremely important that we keep in mind the suffering of the children.
@SpeakOut_with_ReyCMutia_2014
@SpeakOut_with_ReyCMutia_2014 Месяц назад
simply put....WE NEED A NEW CONSTITUTION without RELIGIOUS COLORATION.... this country has various religions and therefore the constitution must accommodate that....
@ThePilgrim_Redeemed
@ThePilgrim_Redeemed Месяц назад
Praise God for Justice Davide
@DramaQueen-pz8jq
@DramaQueen-pz8jq Месяц назад
Yes to divorce.
@jericoeugenio4635
@jericoeugenio4635 Месяц назад
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
@reynalynortiz4014
@reynalynortiz4014 Месяц назад
Practicing Catholic? Have you read the Bible? This just proves that marriage is not just a mere union but it's a sacred union created by God, an essential foundation of the society that's why the state should protect it. And as a Catholic you should understand that, do more research sir. And it doesn't mean na if you're a Catholic and you go against one of its beliefs means that the Catholic Church should change. Our beliefs should change. There's more depth in the Church, try to explore it sir.
@jericoeugenio4635
@jericoeugenio4635 Месяц назад
#YESTODIVORCE
@noelazunega4087
@noelazunega4087 12 дней назад
Thank SC Justice Davide for upholding God's law
@jhordzsilva
@jhordzsilva Месяц назад
Divorce is a Human Rights
@gladyssadang670
@gladyssadang670 Месяц назад
Thank you Chief Justice Hilario Davide for reiterating the composition of our Constitution and enlightening our lawmakers of the Supreme Divine Law. May God bless you and your family for upholding to the Catholic faith.🙏❤️🙏
@ballephel7712
@ballephel7712 Месяц назад
Praise the Lord. Hallelluia!
@HendrickAlbina
@HendrickAlbina Месяц назад
Mismong nag frame ng Constitution na natin yan ah.
@uokay7933
@uokay7933 Месяц назад
no wonder why this government is so weak
@HendrickAlbina
@HendrickAlbina Месяц назад
@@uokay7933 so your only remedy is to weaken the Filipino family? What a slippery slope.
@uokay7933
@uokay7933 Месяц назад
@@HendrickAlbina remember we are the only nation left along with the Vatican city-state to not allow divorce... We are not special... We live in the country with the worst child abuses, drug and alcohol abuses, youth pregnancy, corruption, murder incidents, etc... whatever happened to your Catholic version of "family values"
@HendrickAlbina
@HendrickAlbina Месяц назад
@@uokay7933 that bandwagon mentality does not change the fact that divorce is not a fix.
@k3myst21
@k3myst21 Месяц назад
Divorce is a tool that people with unhappy and abusive marriage can use to another chance at life.
@jhongamboa8915
@jhongamboa8915 Месяц назад
Protect the meaning of MARRIAGE!
@user-rg1wq1pc4i
@user-rg1wq1pc4i Месяц назад
Thank you, Ex chief justice Davide for your defence of married! I was amazed how the snake done this to those supported the bill for divorce.
@empressmarga
@empressmarga Месяц назад
Thank you for acknowledging the Holy Bible, Our Divine Law...
@franklingaitera1409
@franklingaitera1409 Месяц назад
A clash of Titans between former Associate Justice of the SC Conchita Carpio Morales and former SC CJ Hilario Davide
@marianpanelo7188
@marianpanelo7188 Месяц назад
hurray for former Associate Justice SC Conchita Carpio Morales
@lolitodocallos1223
@lolitodocallos1223 26 дней назад
​@@marianpanelo7188but she is not part of the constitutional commission who drafted the 1986 constitution. I would rather believe the one who was a member of that commission and a former Chief Justice.
@mariomedina5955
@mariomedina5955 Месяц назад
Divorce therefore is a prelude to commiting adultery😉
@georgehitchens8566
@georgehitchens8566 Месяц назад
ADULTERY HAPENS EVERYTIME WITH OR WITOUT DIVORCE...
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
Adultery happens all the time. It's not illegal by law. And it's often done by people who go to church every few days.
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
sa kweba kaba nakatira ? wala ka pa mundo wala pang divorce marami ng adultery 😅
@cielasantos7795
@cielasantos7795 Месяц назад
Thank u po
@eduardtobias7368
@eduardtobias7368 Месяц назад
It shows that Roman Catholic was an instrument in our constitution no wonder we are in chaos
@jmfineart2263
@jmfineart2263 Месяц назад
Thank you, Justice Davide! ❤ Great help to more souls!
@evelitaolegario3922
@evelitaolegario3922 Месяц назад
Yeeesssss! No to DIVORCE!!!
@MarkCDiaz
@MarkCDiaz Месяц назад
hindi ka na naawa sa battered wife
@rosemi719
@rosemi719 Месяц назад
​@@MarkCDiazfile a criminal case sa asawa nya why divorce 😂 we have existing laws 😂
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
​@@rosemi719file a criminal case and then ano ang sunod ?
@annromo9230
@annromo9230 Месяц назад
Thank you so much ex Chief Justice Hilario Davide for following God's commandment and explain to using God'Law
@nonitocedro2572
@nonitocedro2572 Месяц назад
His is just a point view, no amount of weight as Chief Justice can be used as sole authority to judge the pain of suffering in induring an abusive marriage, let the involved parties have peaceful lives each of their separate life when reconcillation is definitely impossible...no one is forcing you to continue or discontinue your marriage, be free but don't infrenge our liberty and the right to have a happy life...even alone for heaven's sake.
@yvonnemoris2653
@yvonnemoris2653 Месяц назад
thank you,
@MariaFe1976
@MariaFe1976 20 дней назад
wla kang paki sa buhay ng iba kung anung ggwin nila wag tayo epokrito..
@luzmaderazo2954
@luzmaderazo2954 Месяц назад
Thank you for defending the sanctity of marriage Chief Justice Davide.
@mayaochattor8774
@mayaochattor8774 Месяц назад
Godbless , you are the true justice davide who carry out the truth ,God forbid immoral laws in the philippines
@sweetmoon4422
@sweetmoon4422 22 дня назад
Never can't be broken eh broken na nga allowed nyo lang ang annulment kac may pera kayo pag annulment pwede na pakasal sa iba. Mas gusto nya pa yata yon madami kumakabit kaysa sa normal na pamilya kaya nalaki population ng pinas dahil wla divorce kung may divorce nabigay sa asawa ang karapatan at takot na mag anak ulit ang lalaki asawa kac wla na sya pag buhay sa pagalawa asawa nya yon ang totoo .mga babaero lang ang d allowed sa divorce kac takot na makuha ng asawa nila ang salary nila.kung d nyo allowed ang divorce free nyo ang annulment yon lang
@ramonaquino4577
@ramonaquino4577 Месяц назад
I'm for Absolute divorce!!!
@aramgines9462
@aramgines9462 Месяц назад
Davide should also read the mateo, 19:9 that jesus used the, word "except". Meaning divorce is permitted on the ground of sexual immorality or fornication. So, there is an exeption. meaning not absolute to ban divorce but there is an exemption. And also sirach 26 :25 divorce is allowed.
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
It is nonsense not to allow people to re-marry after they separated for good. They simply live and have children with others without being married then. I know a good number of cases personally. And "divine law" has no place in a society. Philippines is not a theocracy ruled by the friars. When somebody wants to follow "divine law", then decide not to separate and not to remarry. As simple as that.
@analizaregondola5437
@analizaregondola5437 16 дней назад
DIVORSE is legal matters Like annulment of marriage. Daanin na lang kaya sa botohan ang pagpasa ng DIvorse bill.
@rosemi719
@rosemi719 Месяц назад
Thank you Justice Davide
@evelynalipater1840
@evelynalipater1840 17 дней назад
kung di pwde ang divorce bakit may annulment kalokohan..
@msmayah
@msmayah 12 дней назад
DAHIL MAS MAGANDA MAY PERA BUSINESS
@JacksonGab
@JacksonGab Месяц назад
YES NO TO DIVORCE!!!
@msmayah
@msmayah 12 дней назад
annulment for business , kung my divorce and Pinas pano na ang mga CRoCs pano MAGKAKAPERA, kung may divorce E DI WALA NG MGA KABIT AT MGA BATANG ANAK NG KABIT AT ANG MGA SINGLE MOM NA KABIT ??????
@anthonym.3608
@anthonym.3608 Месяц назад
You cannot teach an old dog new tricks. This old folks are still living 50 years ago. Let them be. But for us who will shape the future, we must adopt to change! Legal laws are man made so it can be change by man. If you want a solid argument then it should be based by nature itself.
@lolitodocallos1223
@lolitodocallos1223 26 дней назад
yes legal laws can be changed. But you need to change first the constitution bcoz like what Former Chief Justice Davide said, constitution cant be changed just by simple legislation. 🤦🤦
@user-nh6pd7kj6u
@user-nh6pd7kj6u Месяц назад
I am for Divorce. Woman need happiness too. We must be free.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
If u want to be feee, file for annullment or legal separation. Me anak or mga anak k ba? If wala, that is a ground for annulment. If meron, kasiyahan at kabutohan ba yan ng mga anak mo? Hindi lang ung happiness nila, but also their well being. Hindi ibig sabihin na masaya ka eh, mabuti na para sayo. Ung mga nangangaliwa, masaya din naman. Marriage is not everyday happiness. In the 1st place, it is a commitment.
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
​@@beautifullycreatable di ko ma gets ang logic mo 😂
@jhongamboa8915
@jhongamboa8915 Месяц назад
Thank youu ........,Remember: Dont marry someone if you are only happy and not be committed to a marriage contract. Period. You should always remember you only have one game on your console that is marriage. Logic Dont marry if you are not ready to that logic
@rogerybanez3290
@rogerybanez3290 Месяц назад
Para mawala na Ang pang eresponsible na parents, para mawala na Ang pag aboso Ng mga Asawa,, para mawala na Ang mga adict at lasingero at walang trabahu na husband ,, we vote for divorce bill.
@Magus86
@Magus86 Месяц назад
Stop using the words sacred, sacrosanct and divine when you don't know the scripture fully!!!
@jessicarecanel
@jessicarecanel Месяц назад
yes to divorce ❤❤❤
@jasonclementcentro1870
@jasonclementcentro1870 Месяц назад
Justice Hilario Davide napaka matapobre nyo po.. divorce is for everyone.. annulment and legal separation is only for the rich and powerful like you
@CharinaGagbo-nj8ln
@CharinaGagbo-nj8ln 23 дня назад
Ayaw niyo Ng absolute divorce sa pilipinas pero meron annulment , 😮😮 ayaw niyong I support Ang absolute divorce Kasi libre sa mga walang pera Annulment agree kayo Kasi abot million Ang halaga ay di wow .
@coop2011r
@coop2011r 3 дня назад
Jesus, not the Catholic Church nor any Pope, created the Divorce Law. No Law Maker on earth has the authority to amend a law. Marriage is not for everyone and nowhere are we commanded to marry. If you choose to get married, you are choosing to enter into a covenant with God and vowing to be faithful to that covenant. This decision therefore should not be taken lightly. God says “it’s better to not make a vow then to make a vow and not keep it.” Eccl 5:5.Since marriage is God’s covenant, man does not decide the terms of the marriage covenant - God does, and God is very specific about those terms. God tells us the duration of the marriage relationship is “till death do us part”. The Apostle Paul says “A married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage Rom 7:2.
@jenrybeacon
@jenrybeacon Месяц назад
in Mal 2:6, God said, " I hate divorce."
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
Sorry, but there are enough people who legally think: "I don't care about what God is said to have said about certain topics."
@AvageeEspinosa
@AvageeEspinosa Месяц назад
Pag simcard registration and patayan Ang bilis Ang divorce lutong luto na kung nd ka abused emotionally and happy marriage ka, divorce is not for you but for others is a must, approved divorce should expedite ASAP!🇵🇭🙏🌈❤️‍🩹
@Elda-uy1hk
@Elda-uy1hk Месяц назад
Divorce is not the image and identity of Philippines
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
so ano image at identity ng philippines ?
@KarlWarrenVillegas
@KarlWarrenVillegas Месяц назад
I totally agree CJ Davide
@daviddee7175
@daviddee7175 Месяц назад
Divorce will only open an unbearable & filthy can of worms. Meron na tayong annulment at separation of spouses in effect sa bansa natin, bakit pa ginigiit ang divorce?
@glnbrook1286
@glnbrook1286 Месяц назад
Dahil napakamahal ng annulment pang mayaman lang ang may kaya nyan,Bkit kayo matatakot sa Dovorce kung mahal naman kayo ng mga partner nyo hindi naman kayo iiwanan nyan ,at kung mag kasundo naman kayo sa tahanan nyo hindi Kyo mag hihiwalay. YESSS to divorce para yung mga naghiway na may kanya kanya ng landas at pamilya eh maging legal na .
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi Месяц назад
sa kweba ka ba nakatira ? bukod sa matagal mahal ang annulment na hindi kaya ng ibang pinoy 😅 wala ka cgurong idea kung magkano no ? may iba na de deny pa 😅 at ang legal separation is non sense 😅
@mondray4137
@mondray4137 24 дня назад
Mayaman ka Kasi kaya gusto mo Ang annulment., separate walang maitutulong Yan baka Sayo Meron sa iba walang bisa
@redfern3876
@redfern3876 Месяц назад
Davide is pro israel. He firs in israel thanbin the Philippines. How can a lawyer be so religious standing up for the bible and not on the social and legal issue?
@jimmyisit5365
@jimmyisit5365 29 дней назад
Dapat ipagbawal na rin annulment ganun din naman un e. Divorce at annulment pareho lang na paghihiwalayin ang mag asawa under the law. Ang kaibahan lang ay pangmayaman ung annulment samantalang ung divorce ay para sa lahat. Dapat tingnan nu naman kung fair kau, mga ipokrito.
@phecube
@phecube Месяц назад
magkamatayan nalang sa galit at sama ng luob ang dalawang tao na ayaw nang magsama? madamay na buong pamilya, mga anak, tao sa paligid para ipagpilitan ang pagsasama ng dalawang taong ayaw na?
@jnleyson
@jnleyson 29 дней назад
@@phecube may legal separation po
@MariaLopez-pk9kx
@MariaLopez-pk9kx Месяц назад
chief justice davide, thank you for your explanation. we hope maintindihan ng mga pro divorce yang explanation ninyo. #SALUTE
@evelynalipater1840
@evelynalipater1840 17 дней назад
di lahat ay catholic sa Philippines..kung ayaw nyo ng divorce di huwag kayo...Freedom country ba ang Philippines kung Catholic lang ang susundin..di nmn yan sila Saints at wla sa Bibliya ang religion na catholic
@user-df1em5ci6z
@user-df1em5ci6z Месяц назад
Thank you chief justice Davide for defending the Filipino families. NO TO DIVORCE BILL. GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY.🙏
@msmayah
@msmayah 12 дней назад
IKAW LNG BA ANG TAO SA PINAS ?
@user-df1em5ci6z
@user-df1em5ci6z 12 дней назад
@@msmayah sa tingin mo ikaw lang din.
@gemarcusyana8917
@gemarcusyana8917 Месяц назад
but now, marriage is becoming a commercial buisness. God also,said..to separate ourself from immorality..and not even eating in the table with them..Therefore,immorality and adultery is ground of divorce
@TobiUchiha-hz1nu
@TobiUchiha-hz1nu 28 дней назад
Our law makers are the law breakers nothing new! 😅
@TechSavant360
@TechSavant360 Месяц назад
Dating Punong Mahistrado Hilario Davide Jr. binigyang-diin ang kahalagahan ng batas sa diborsyo para protektahan ang mga nasa mapang-abusong kasal. Ayon sa kanya, dapat may legal na opsyon para sa mga nasa distressing na sitwasyon ng pag-aasawa.
@linabuga-ay5137
@linabuga-ay5137 Месяц назад
Yes.fanily values must be preserved.kawawa ang mga bata.
@rommeljedpoli6570
@rommeljedpoli6570 29 дней назад
Huwag kasing mag asawa agad agad kung hindi ka pa sigurado. Hindi laro ang pagbuo ng pamilya.
@EsarvetProducts-jr5yh
@EsarvetProducts-jr5yh 29 дней назад
pakataw pid ning usa bisaya man untang dako.
@teddygonzalez8098
@teddygonzalez8098 Месяц назад
Divorce is a legal matter. Do not involve verses from the Bible as a basis because not everyone in the Philippines is Catholic.The Philippines is the only country where divorce is illegal. Divorce is the best way for couples to move on from a failed marriage. I like and respect Chief Justice Davide, but in this case, I disagree. There is too much emphasis on religion as the basis of his argument. Separation of church and state. I'm a Catholic, but I don't believe it's their business to interfere or dictate what's written in our laws.
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
That us what the title said. Mas marunong ka pa pala sa nag frame ng constitution. Kasama ka rin nong nag frame sila? Ano po ang legal name mo, baka andon ung name mo sa constitution 😊
@beautifullycreatable
@beautifullycreatable Месяц назад
You had forgotten Vatican. Legal laws are based from moral laws. Kung hindi ka Katoliko, I don't think you understand.
@wernerschneider4460
@wernerschneider4460 Месяц назад
Religion MUST NOT have any base in ANY legal argument.
@teddygonzalez8098
@teddygonzalez8098 Месяц назад
@beautifullycreatable Maybe you're not smart when you were a student. What has Vatican has anything to do with the laws in the Philippines? Even in Italy, divorce was legalized in 1974.
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi
@ANNAANNA-ln5qi 29 дней назад
​@@beautifullycreatablelol maraming katolik countries na may divorce 😂
@jonelgeronimo6763
@jonelgeronimo6763 Месяц назад
This is what I hate the most when I hear that our universal rights are being argued based on religion!! Because this is a Divisions. All Religions can and May argue that they have different traditions and customs that may be in favor or anti to a certain topic. If a kiosk happens because we couldn't find common grounds. Who would judge the issue? Is it the judge that is anti or pro Divorce?? Or maybe we bring the issue to the international criminal court of justice since we cant seems to have a fair trial in The Philippines because if the double standards?? What if I don't believe in religion but I believe in God. Can I choose a natural judge to hear my case??
@jimboymerida7147
@jimboymerida7147 Месяц назад
Very good but times are changing
@danilomanginga154
@danilomanginga154 Месяц назад
Gusto nila annulment kc pang mayaman wawa ang mga mahirap bkit di payagan wala sila alam s paano nag hiram yung mga nag hiwalay
@vicentemaquinad8283
@vicentemaquinad8283 27 дней назад
Leave Marriage to symbol after symbol-minded People. The Bible and the Flag.
@JessTookslineRealtor
@JessTookslineRealtor Месяц назад
What we need is an alternative solution to absolute divorce. 1. Strengthen Support Systems - the state should create and focus on strengthening support systems for families and couples, such as counseling services, financial assistance, and other programs aimed at preventing domestic violence. 2. Reform Annulment and Legal Separation - make the process for legal separation and annulment more accessible and affordable which could provide a balanced solution without introducing absolute divorce. Conclusion: While the challenges of marital discord and abuse are real and need to be addressed, the introduction of an absolute divorce law may not be the most effective solution for the Philippines. Several factors, like cultural, social, and economic factors, suggest that maintaining the current system, with potential reforms to improve access to existing legal remedies, better serve the interests of Filipino families and society.
@AninaSabry
@AninaSabry Месяц назад
pano naman sa mga mag asawang hnd na masaya hnd na kaya i patch up may history na ng abuse??? ipag pipilitan pa rin ba?? kaya yan talamak ang may mga kabit kasi mahal ang annulment at walang divorce yan ba ang gusto nyo???
@josiediaz1351
@josiediaz1351 Месяц назад
Mukhang kayo yata ang pari ngayon. Paano yung mga naghihirap na kababayan natin magtitiis na lang!
Далее
Gli occhiali da sole non mi hanno coperto! 😎
00:13
7 Verses Every Catholic Should Know | Dr. John Bergsma
51:03
Storycon | Grounds for divorce too liberal - Pimentel
16:20