The Kardashians were just children when Darden faced off against their father in court, but he has no problems with what they've done with themselves as grownups.
Everyone seems to ignore the photograph of Nicole 'seemingly' at the police station. She must have been making a report. Why was this photo not used as evidence? Why is this photo not ever seen? Why is this photograph nowhere to be found other than this video? Not even on google images.
Nicole was a drug addict. 95% of the time they argued was bc O was upset at her bringing other druggies and other guys around thier kids. It don't justify for murder but you would be 1 lying individual to say majority of men don't get mad at woman for stuff like that
Tony Starks Sure, dude .?? More nonsense from you, I see. OK, I'll respond by saying... patio farts, green-legged-chickens and shoe wires. LOL Have a good life
It is a shame that those kids are thinking anything about the actual murders has anything to do with actors playing out roles maybe they were never intended to play...and those kids are thinking, "Oh my God, maybe I was wrong in what I think about my family"? Those kids have no clue to this day. Goddamn, hypocrisy beyond belief, AND someone in Hollywood just made hundreds of more millions because Kardashian kids believe O.J. is still best uncle ever. One or two may think without trying to upset the moneycart.
SIMPLE TIMELINE PROBLEM ISSUES: Here's the timeline per testimony. 9:00 p.m. Browns leave the restuarant 9:31 p.m. Ron Goldman gets off and waits at bar. 9:37 p.m. Call from Nicole pretending to be her mother to ask about glasses. 9:40 p.m. Nicole calls as herself to ask Ron to bring glasses over. 9:50 p.m. Ron rushes home to take shower and change and rush over to Nicole's. 10:00 p.m. 3 men seen with Nicole in front of her condo. 10:15 pm. Ron arrives at Nicole's; Nicole is attacked and drugged, sparking dog to start barking in a "plaintive wail" 10:16 p.m. Ron Goldman returns home to get glasses he forgot to bring. 9:35 p.m. Ron Goldman arrives back at Bundy. 9:40 p.m. Kato hears three loud bangs on his wall 9:50 p.m. Jill Shively sees someone in a Bronco with similar plates to OJ's who looks like Macus Allen driving erratically. 9:52 p.m. Kato seen in yard with flash light while limo driver on the phone. 9:53 p.m. Limo driver sees dark figure enter house, turn on lights. 9:54 p.m. Limo driver calls OJ who answers and says he just got out of shower. 9:55 p.m. Kato lets limo driver into the yard and starts loading up car. 9:57 p.m. OJ Simpson shows up outside and loads a suspicious bag into the trunk. 11:10 p.m. OJ leaves for airport. 11:45 p.m. OJ's leaves on flight to Chicago. That's the timeline by testimony. OJ has the presumption of innocence. This timeline has a problem though. One is that if the killers used an OJ look-a-like who deliberately used the main streets and drove erratically to attract attention to create false witnesses of him being in the area and leaving the crime scene after the murders, then Shively confirms the murders did not take place until after 9:35 p.m. which was established by other witnesses. OJ would not have used the main street to return home but used the alley way as he usually used. Thus Shively thinking she saw OJ at 10:50 p.m. actually confirms the murders had just taken place. This also explains why there is no murder weapon in this case. The plan to rush to Rockingham and plant the murder weapon fell through since the murders took place too late for that. Plus Jill Shively has a PHOTOGRAPHIC memory. If so, she remembered the exact license plate which was not identical to OJ's but had two letters switched! It would have been dangerous for the conspiracy if the decoy Bronco had the EXACT license plate since if it was reported it would link back to OJ and that would cause a conflict if there were two Broncos with the same exact license plates. But having a similar license plate, particularly the last 4 numbers would be enough to convince a jury it was OJ's car. Of course, that car was caught in traffic say for 1-2 minutes. By 10:52 p.m. Kato was already in the yard investigating the bangs on the wall. There is now way OJ could have been at Bundy and San Vincente at 10:50 p.m. and gotten to Rockinghim by 10:54 p.m. to bang on Kato's wall at 10:40 p.m. So all Jill Shively did was confirm a look-a-like OJ and Bronco were part of this conspiracy. And why not? If OJ was supposed to do this, it's only logical they would use a Bronco at the murder scene in case there were actually witnesses. But this backfired. To distract from the public figuring out this was a conspiracy, Shively had to be dismissed as a witness. They offered her $5000 for her story which gave the DA and excuse to dismiss her as a witness. The timeline works if OJ was being framed, which he was. It doesn't work for OJ to do all of this. Plus there is no way the Browns could leave the restaurant at 9 p.m. and be home in just 37 minutes to call about the glasses. that's why Juditha was excused from testimony and the lied and made a "stiipulation" that she called at 9:37 p.m. when, in fact, Nicole is the one who called claiming to be her mother. The Browns said they arrived around 11 p.m. at first, then tried to change their story after that. But that LIE was legal. If the public knew Nicole deliberately set Ron up to come over by having her mother leave those glasses then it would draw suspicion for a conspiracy, which it was, of course. Ron arriving at Nicole's was orchestrated. The killers needed a DOUBLE MURDER to get special circumstances for the death penalty.
Albertanator OJ is innocent, he didn't have a bleeding wound on his way to Chicago. So we know JUST FROM THAT that he is innocent. Now you know or if not you need someone to explain it to you. But the easiest way to look at this is academically. That means you take the place of someone who could make billions if you framed OJ for a double homicide to create this big court case. Say you would make billions selling tabloids. How could you do it? One way would be to drug OJ at his home so he would not have an alibi during the time of the murders. That's fundamental. BUT... if you thought a DNA case would work, that is, his own blood at the crime scene identifying him as the killer to distract the public, you'd have to do two things: 1) You'd have to carry out the murders by knife and 2) You'd have to cut OJ on his hand, since a cut on the hand is the only location on the body that would leave a blood trail. Of course, since OJ would have already been drugged at home to leave him without an alibili, it would be a simple matter to just cut him on the hand. When he woke up he'd wake up in a bloody situation, that is, with blood drops all over his house and a bleeding hand that he didn't remember how he injured himself. When he went to the airport, he'd be tending that bleeding wound, maybe he would be wearing a band-aiid but a deep wound like that would still be bleeding. People would ask him how he got hurt and he'd either lie and say he cut himself golfing or cooking or tell the truth and claim "I don't know. I just woke up bleeding." Either way no one would believe him once the blood evidence showed up at Bundy. What went wrong is that whoever was supposed to make a deep cut on OJ's hand only gave him a paper cut, so OJ left for Chicago not bleeding at all. It's just that simple. So it doesn't really matter if OJ did it or not. It is only important that the POSSIBILITY exists based on the specific evidence. Since OJ has the legal benefit of the "presumption of innocence" you have to rule out a conspiracy. Which we can't because it actually happened.
Charlie Smith OMG? I suppose he didn't do the armed robery in. Vegas either??? Oh I know he was framed. for that too , use some sense OJ Simpson is a double murdered and a Armed Robber
TheRonnie63 Don't confuse the two. I'm not saying OJ didn't have issues with women. His father was gay. He was abusive of women and he even did drugs. But he was very focused on business and he knew his image and reputation was all important in getting more money and endorsements. That right there tells you he wouldn't have tried to kill his wife himself and think he could get away with it. As far as the robbery in Vegas goes, he was trying to recover HIS OWN PROPERTY. He wasn't a common criminal trying to rob a convenience store. It was bad judgment, wrong, illegal, whatever, and he's paying for it big time. But don't try to characterize this as a normal robbery by some thug. He was recovering stolen property. So the two crimes don't relate to each other. But prejudice people like you think they are related. That's the way it goes. Some people in the world are smart and some people are very smarter. Anyway, even if OJ robbed a bank, he didn't murder Ron and Nicole, the government did. That's just reality.
off topic but when they showed the family photo I cant help but notice Khloe really looks nothing like her father. Am i the only one who thinks that there's no resemblance between the two? It's just strange that the other 3 of his kids look so much like him. He seemed to have strong genes. I understand she could have taken more of Kris' side but still, i see no likeness at all between Khloe and Robert. Those that do see a resemblance...tell me where?
+upoutmyfaceb0y Yeah, they say the same thing about animals, and their owners. Your thinking too hard! If she is, so what! It doesn't make her or OJ a murder.
Tony Starks couldnt you just answer the question or ignore it, instead of giving your ignorant comment? I didn't say anything about her or Oj being a murderer, Troll.
+upoutmyfaceb0y I've read somewhere that Robert knew that Khloe is not his daughter, but he accepted that fact. Oj had relationship with Kris and also, he said that he has a "love kid" with other woman. Seeing this photo of Kardashian sisters, it is obvious that Khloe is Oj's kid.