Explaining the Tree of Life | BBC Earth 

ADVAITA 😁😁😁MONISM

So am i supposed to kill that freakin mosquito or nah

And created by God

​@@fahadhussain66😅

No, because it's bs.

What?

@@MrGreen-fi5sg you heard me

True lol

What's MVP?

+MiguelPMPM most valuable player

+Agun Pratama oh, then, I agree, it is important to what we are now

@Vimal Sehgal fool

im english

The bbc has a service called bbciplayer you could use a vpn to watch on there.

It's lies.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

truth.

God has sent His Son Jesus, so we might know Him, the one Who has made us, the truth, the life. He is the way out. God bless

@@rafaelbolf5176 How can we prove that?

There is one and only one organism that has continuously lived on Planet Earth for 3.7+/4.1+?? billion years. Cyanobacteria using photosynthesis was producing oxygen and food 3.7 to probably 4.1 billion years ago. Photosynthesis is probably the most complicated process in nature. Photosynthesis existed on Earth about as early as life was possible on Earth as Earth was still cooling from a molten state 4.1+ billion years ago. Cyanobacteria was a single cell organism using photosynthesis 3.7+ billion years ago and is TODAY a single cell organism using photosynthesis to produce oxygen and food. So what does the ONE and only existing single cell organism say about evolution as the mechanism for creation of new species? It is not true and cyanobacteria is proof that evolution as the mechanism to create new species is false.

@@mdb1239 bro you not understanding evolutionary biology doesn't prove evolution false

@@unwono Yes it does. Photosynthesis (oxygen) production evidence in Earth's oldest rocks PROVES that evolution is false. It frankly SCREAMS that there must must must be a CREATOR. Scientists have been studying photosynthesis for over 100 years and they still don't know exactly how it works (that's how complicated it is).

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

@@alrichs8146 can tell your not all their can't we now

@Bad Boys Boogie Correct.

@@tommygarrosh2941 ??

@Bad Boys Boogie 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂ The reason for bad incest effect is due to mutations accumulating.

It makes sense. Its not really "evolution" that atheists believe is how we all got here. Camels and moose are related.

@@Diamondraw4Real I don't think you understand what the atheists deem to be evolution. It comes down to convergent and divergent evolution.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

@@alrichs8146 Cannibalism is the consumption of your own species.

Yes, plus the obliquity of Earth's axis--created seasons, which along with lunar tides, both affected evolution dramatically.

Me too!

It's only normal to do that

Pokoirl YaSe But why?

That, my friend, is what we call ANTHROPOCENTRISM

Big Smoke Yay learnt a new word today, thx

+Alvin Yao (alviny02) Me too. Learnt

Haha XD

Funny my first thought would be more complaints coming from the science end. People get very touchy with phylogeny.

Nah , u want them to come dont ya

Carlos Oliveira Not really. I have no time for people who deny basic facts.

W-James if you say so

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

Try this: www.newscientist.com/article/dn17987-how-life-evolved-10-steps-to-the-first-cells/

Chemistry and entropy and physical laws

Science doesn’t have that answer....yet.

Exactly the same way crystals form ... learn chemistry!!

It's called physics.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

Men don't cry monkey worshipper.

What do you mean? Atleast they can explain it unlike some people who can't explain how god created everything

The need to believe there is a "purpose" is a human egoism. The need to feel somehow we are more important than any other lifeform.

He is only giving here the outline. All these things have been studued in great detail.

If you reject science you should not be using the internet.

An unfounded complaint disguised as intellectualism and said by a believer or denier disguised as a thoughtful person.

Kinda, but it's a 5 minute video. Researching in-depth and looking at the evidence humanity has been able to collect blurs the line of faith. Even so, it's not a final statement, sciences changes and that's the beauty of it.

This has nothing to do with faith and everything to do with observation and research.

@@ianbeddowes5362 It's a theory. This ain't the truth.

@@harveygitarista1600 i wonder perhaps if you feel the same way about the theory of oxygen? maybe you should stop breathing, it's never been proven after all.

@@harveygitarista1600 it takes alot of a faith to believe a talking snake tricked two naked people in a garden

fk god.

God is Good!!Hosanna to the King of Kings!

@@thewordkeeper7417 Nah cnt fk god 666 worthship

Laith Anayi no, god did actually create us

Hike Gamer yeah but before saying that why don’t you actually do some research

@Dragorca Say what? If it was a fact it wouldn't be called a theory. It is a theory because it is neither observable or testable. What experiments and tests using the scientific method?

@@nahshon9998 then clearly you don’t know what a theory is in scientific terms. Just sure ignorance/lack of understanding on your part.

@@cutlasssupreme6984 Drago here said that a theory are facts. What do you say?

@@nahshon9998 Drago is 100% correct. A “theory” used in scientific terms is the explanation of observed facts. For example, Germ Theory, Kinetic Theory of Matter, Theory of Gravity. For you to disagree with that is because you either haven’t bothered to research it or turn a blind eye to it. I mean, this has long been established as such.

@@cutlasssupreme6984 Ok a theory is an explanation of observed evidence. It isn't a fact. A fact is proven to be true. Did you guys go to public schools? Notice it isn't Germ fact, or gravity fact. I have researched Darwinism very much thank you. Microbe to man evolution is a theory. Not one step in that process was observed or tested. Nor can it be repeated. Not only that but we cannot produce life in a lab. Do you know what life consists of? What are the basic ingredients for what is necessary for life?

RNA came first, so it may be that DNA can not exist without RNA.

they didnt happened "for whatever reason" they happened because of natural selection. yes it makes perfect sense. watching 5 minute video on tree of life if you dont know basic biology wont do you any good

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

@@spatrk6634 I'm not the one saying that... it's what the narrator says in this video: "for whatever reason" .. which is really absurd! I can see you feel strongly about the concept, that's perfectly fine; but it's not factual, it's just a concept, and that is a fact. I'm just stating the obvious from this video, so don't be hatin.

@@therealsheikh its not a concept. your god is a concept not a fact. this is basic biology. and evolution is foundation of it i missed when narrator said "for whatever reason" but documentaries are not scientific literature, so im not surprised that you are jumping on the opportunity to discredit something that disproves that you were specialy and magicaly created

@@spatrk6634 first of all, how do you know I believe in God? I never said anything about any God per se. Tells a lot about your mentality. And just FYI, any concept with missing information is not factual, you need to educate yourself first before you jump to conclusions.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

In science class, learning that the bible is bullshit.

If all life shares a common ancestor, all life is inbred and everything that eats is a cambial. If all life does not share a common ancestor, the "evolution tree of life" is a lie. Take your pick.

@@alrichs8146 I choose option A.

@@TempleGuitars Interesting, what convinced you you're related to a chicken? The babies of chickens will 100% of the time be chickens and have been as long as humans have lived on the earth. The same for monkeys, goats, pigs, spiders, apple trees etc.

@@alrichs8146 We get it- you don't understand how incremental evolution works over millions of years. Dogs didn't exist before they evolved through selective breeding. Humans are still born with tails with surprising regularity. Humans have lost the ability to make their own vitamin c in the body, but gained larger brains. Your lack of education is showing.

​@@TempleGuitars When evolutionist's don't know that the appendix helps the immune system they use it as a vestigial structure to prove their theory. So go ahead and blame my lack of education for your lack of evidence as you learn how dinosaurs farted themselves to extinction.

***** if you honestly believe that you would not have replied to my comment. So since you believe in him repent and have your sins forgiven and be baptized Mark 16:16. Have a wonderful day

Pedro Lopez another believer wonderful who is being stubborn I'll pray for you sir

***** your talking about him but yet you say he don't exist. Your not good with pretending that he don't exist. Repent my friend before it's to late and you lose your soul over trying to convince yourself that he don't exist. Mark 16:16

Pedro Lopez are you trying to convince yourself that he doesn't exist, by rehearsing that lie? Just because you refuse to exercise your God given faith doesn't mean he is not real it just make you stubborn. Roman 12:3

itsasin1969 so when a judge sentence a criminal to death for senseless murder, he is deem as just and a hero, when Christ sentence sinners to eternal death, not a eternal burning hell, for their sins, which he has long pleaded with them to give up and has warn to lead them to eternal death, he is deem as cruel and so much more horrendous names! Sir your faith is a joke, you have read Gods word but did not let it transform you, nor did you seek to understand his words.

@@zahirmurji believe in Jesus Christ. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 3:36 KJV

@@jermaineknight jesus failed you guys😂

@@daveschwartz7394 ???

@@misterauctor7353 I mean god failed you guys 😂

You better do. Because you know, it's a scientific fact. :P

+Lame Schwa definitely not a fact, and I don't have a religion. just saying its not all facts

+Gerard Williams haha you're clueless about the definition of a fact... There are countless cases of direct evidence that evolution happened...- unless Satan planted them XD

+eskocz I definitely know what a fact is so don't flatter yourself, because if you read it correctly I said it's not ALL facts. as I said I don't have a religion so who know what "Satan" did or didn't do I don't care. Nobody on this planet knows with 100% certainty what happened, so everyone should stop pretending that they do.

Gerard Williams Yes, evolution is a fact. Just read a few books on the subject or something. I'm not going to waste my time trying to convince you in the comment section. If you sincerely want to find out the truth, you will reach the same conclusion eventually.

to answer your questions (and more) i recommend this video series: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AXQP_R-yiuw.html

Water percolated down into newly formed rock under the seafloor, where it reacted with minerals such as olivine, producing a warm alkaline fluid rich in hydrogen, sulphides and other chemicals - a process called serpentinisation. Unlike today’s seas, the early ocean was acidic and rich in dissolved iron. When upwelling hydrothermal fluids reacted with this primordial seawater, they produced carbonate rocks riddled with tiny pores and a “foam” of iron-sulphur bubbles. Inside the iron-sulphur bubbles, hydrogen reacted with carbon dioxide, forming simple organic molecules such as methane, formate and acetate. Some of these reactions were catalysed by the iron-sulphur minerals. Similar iron-sulphur catalysts are still found at the heart of many proteins today. The electrochemical gradient between the alkaline vent fluid and the acidic seawater leads to the spontaneous formation of acetyl phosphate and pyrophospate, which act just like adenosine triphosphate or ATP, the chemical that powers living cells. These molecules drove the formation of amino acids - the building blocks of proteins - and nucleotides, the building blocks for RNA and DNA. Thermal currents and diffusion within the vent pores concentrated larger molecules like nucleotides, driving the formation of RNA and DNA - and providing an ideal setting for their evolution into the world of DNA and proteins. Evolution got under way, with sets of molecules capable of producing more of themselves starting to dominate. The evolution of an enzyme called pyrophosphatase, which catalyses the production of pyrophosphate, allowed the protocells to extract more energy from the gradient between the alkaline vent fluid and the acidic ocean. This ancient enzyme is still found in many bacteria and archaea, the first two branches on the tree of life. Some protocells started using ATP as well as acetyl phosphate and pyrophosphate. The production of ATP using energy from the electrochemical gradient is perfected with the evolution of the enzyme ATP synthase, found within all life today. Protocells further from the main vent axis, where the natural electrochemical gradient is weaker, started to generate their own gradient by pumping protons across their membranes, using the energy released when carbon dioxide reacts with hydrogen. This reaction yields only a small amount of energy, not enough to make ATP. By repeating the reaction and storing the energy in the form of an electrochemical gradient, however, protocells “saved up” enough energy for ATP production. Once protocells could generate their own electrochemical gradient, they were no longer tied to the vents. Cells left the vents on two separate occasions, with one exodus giving rise to bacteria and the other to archaea.

So is gravity.....Don't confuse hypothesis with theory. The theory of evolution is damn near factual.

smaller less complex molecules. most probable never became anything some just kept growing and doing strange shit that worked some how.

If it's any consolation, life has been mostly wiped out many times before (five times I think) and always bounced back. 99% of all the species that have ever existed are extinct.

Plz what is moblieorganisms at 1:04

none what?

yes. lots between what?

Plants came from a different type of bacteria, he was just talking about the animal side.

IF YOU BELEIVE THIS STUFF YOU TOOK A BIGGER LEAP OF FAITH THAN ANY OF THEM

Why would it be a bigger leap of faith than thinking the earth is only 40.000 or so years old, when that idea has been outdated since the time of Isaac Newton? Hell the theory of evolution has been widely accepted in the scientific community for centuries!

its British... they use billion to be equivalent to a million million but pretty sure its only coloqiualy i dont know english is weird. like when you say "twelve hundred" instead of "thousand and two hundred"

And you can't explain or prove anything about god created everything 😂

Nobody created us lol

@@daveschwartz7394 who created your mobile phone?

@@faizusultan8849 lol human? Because Mobile phones aren't living things and also who created your god?

@@daveschwartz7394 it's beyond your imagination if I describ him you won't understand just like ur eye sight is limited ... But there is someone who seen beyond boundaries

@@faizusultan8849 you can just admit that you don't know lol

yes god create us using evolution i assure you that most of people watching this video are not atheist

Stfu

There is no God. Get used to the idea. The idea of God is a blasphemy against nature.

As a Christian I believe in evolution

I believe that God created life by natural selection

God don't exist then how lol

@@daveschwartz7394 God only exist the way you think he exist?

@@shaffieali862 I don't even think he exist😂

@@daveschwartz7394 Or ok

@@shaffieali862 🤔

There is. And it doesn't.

@@Molluskenkoenig well said without a singe fact!

@@nahshon9998 observable example of speciation/macroevolution: the Ensatina salamander. The fossil record lines up perfectly with every discovery in genetic we ever made. You are wrong.

@@Molluskenkoenig What did the Ensatina salamander become or what new body feature did it add to itself? And how can the fossil record Dna support macroevolution if Dna can only last a few thousand years? And who told you that the fossil record supports Darwinism? It isn't paleontologists. Stephen J. Gould, the most famous of paleontologists of the last hundred years wrote. "The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism: 1. Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless. 2. Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and "fully formed." The Panda's Thumb 1980 p.182" So what do you think is the best fossil evidence for large scale change? Not a salamander evolving into a salamander.

​@@nahshon9998 "What did the Ensatina salamander become or what new body feature did it add to itself?" One species splitt in two. That is the defintion of macroevolution. Evolution does not add "new body features. It aónly changes, what is already there. "And how can the fossil record Dna support macroevolution if Dna can only last a few thousand years?" I said the fossil record LINES UP with what genetics told us. That does not mean, that we find DNA in fossils. It means that both scientific fields paleontology and genetics come to the same conclusions. "Stephen J. Gould, the most famous of paleontologists of the last hundred years wrote...." I know what he wrote. But he wrote more, did you know? He also wrote, WHY the fossil record looks like that. Because fossilisation is very rare and we do not find every fossil. But every fossil we find, closes a gap in the record. Gould never became a creationist. He remained an evolutionist. And you know why? Because he did not fall for quote mining, like you did. "So what do you think is the best fossil evidence for large scale change?" One of hundreds of examples: Panderichthys, Tiktaalik, Ichthyostega, Gerobatrachus, Seymouria, Therapsiden, Cynognathus, Yanoconodon.

Blackout Hhh I don’t see any facts

You guys said God created all.of us but there's no fact about it because it's bs

Of course if you apply it to something that isn't alive it sounds stupid.

@@matteomastrodomenico1231 You missed the point, Just by discovering the RECIPE of Burger doesn't prove that there is no CHEF.

​@@subhanyushasamore6446, So apparently bad chefs exist too, hm? Evolution is random. Otherwise, why would we have these defective mutations, like down syndrome or other mental disorders? Or even the cyclop mutation where offspring only has one eye and doesn't live long after that? It's not so intelligent after all.

Burgers doesn't reproduce, mutate, suffer from natural selection, move by themselves or anything related to Biological evolution.

Evolution is for low educated like philippine and Africa

I don't think you know what "fact" means.

"the scientific fact is that life comes only from preexisting life" that's not a scientific fact, that idea was debunked decades ago.

ru-vid.com/group/PLXJ4dsU0oGMLnubJLPuw0dzD0AvAHAotW

Uranium-thorium dating with more studies in Paleontology, geology and genetics.

Shush u dusty shmuck

Get out of here with that nonsense.

Grow up.

😇

There is no evidence supporting the existence of god.

@@FreedomAnderson You could say anything. I am living proof that God exist. I am made perfect in God's eyes. I have aheart that is functioning to keep me alive. A brain that think and know right from wrong. When I eat a system to remove waste. Plus Jesus is real because I prayed and He visited me and made a successful path for me and my family. If you dont believe its up to you. I am singing God is alive and real.

Your existence is not evidence of god anymore than presents are evidence of Santa. Your heart and brain functions can be explained scientifically through evolution. Is my disability perfect in god's eyes? There are over 4,000 religions and everyone says the same about their own deity.

The Jesus mythology people talk about is nothing more than a completion of Zorastorism, Mithras and other mythologies that were around hundreds even thousands of yrs earlier.

@@FreedomAnderson Evidence?

I think you're the who should checked out

The universe doesn't seem to be directed by anyone, though.

Nah, plenty of religious people do too.

It's a matter of understanding how evolution works. You don't even know the difference between the terms "ape", "monkey", and "chimpanzee", so what makes you right about your statement?

How can a figment of your imagination create anything?