Wow, I absolutely loved this video! As someone who has studied Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types, it was fascinating to hear an excerpt from his book on the Extraverted Sensation Type. The way it presents a portrait of realism really resonated with me. Thanks for sharing this valuable content! Keep up the great work!
It's torture listening to this AI read 😂 as much as I value the info and your attempt to save time and effort 👌🏻.. the highs and lows of tone and pitch and cadence are causing me to have to correct this AI read in real time to accept what the writing intends to convey. Your voice is so much better real and unautomated!😊 💙
congratulations LiJo for completing the serie ,Well displayed, well put, i really enjoyed it, you are amazing👏👏👏. if you are willing to put more excerpt from Carll Jung Books, i would like to learn about the concept of the shadow, i feel confused about it hearning it defined by other readers in multipule interpretations. (ofc this is just my Fi wanting things sorry ^^')
Ah finally, the last cognitive function...that happens to be my blindspot...great. I'm the "RlyOverBored" guy btw, just in a different account to analyze Se. With Se, the "what is the data?" according to your 5 concrete senses 24/7 is basically the summary of this function. You see this, it's "X label", you hear that, it's "X label" period. This is as straightforward as it gets, you can already leave! Everything else is irrelevant. But it's not really fun that way if you're an intuitive like me (or not a "pure sensor") trying to draw patterns of this function. Keywords: tangible, awareness, report, relevance, *transaction* variables, observation, experience. I didn't talk about experience directly since the other keywords already imply experience but with Se, I have to be direct here. "Experience is your best teacher" is as Se as it goes. Tangible - Making sure the data can be used in the physical form in some shape or form of your 5 senses and an object. Awareness - Needs, I repeat needs to be able to react accordingly to each situation, hence the whole "Not thinking before you act" trope because it senses "opportunity". Report - Just go on the news, articles, blogs to get your "updates or trends". Or better yet, "Click on that like button, it's really helps the algorithm. And also subscribe to stay updated and receive notifications about my posts." Relevance - The data has to be deemed "useful" or "worthwhile" by having direct sensory output with the right "currency" (if indirect, "it's confusing"). The reason Se users are focused now is because you can do something right now, you can't do anything later nor can you fix the past (that's obsolete), so why bother. The function itself focuses on events in a case by case basis (Ni users as well when trying to find a pattern since they are interconnected). So this means that once the case has been fully evaluated, the *transactions* get cleared "automatically" and you move on into the next one like filling out questions or clearing a level/puzzle for example. What's hilarious about this is if someone is so Se focused, you can blatantly commit an extremely predictable pattern 10 times, and they still won't figure out the pattern the 11th time because the history/memory of the 10 times you did it before gets erased since they evaluate data on an individual case by case basis. Therefore, the data "resets to 1 instance" each time you do it, rather than tracking 11 instances as per Si that tracks information. However, if any other of the instances was deemed relevant SOMEHOW, then it would notice the pattern. Se-Ni axis is focused more on a trajectory based system than the Si-Ne axis tracking based system, so it's like they really are playing a new level every single day, hour or minutes being reactive and using gut instincts (again, only when focusing on Se). It's untraceable for dear life, Se then feels "intuitive" due to lack or poor explanations and interpretations of patterns, and I see why Ni doms usually never give the definition of Ni and give an analogy of it instead because everything has "too many Se variations/variables to factor" for them to explain, I'll get into a bit later. It's like Shaquille O'Neal (ESFP), former dominant NBA Center shooting free throws...so inconsistent! I have done this blatant predictable pattern with one of my Se dom relative when I tried to create an intentional easy slogan for her when addressing Se, gave a definition and said it a million times and she kept forgetting a million times even when explaining a million times. It's both hilarious and frustrating, when I finally learned this "case by case" style of observation because Se doesn't really want to store anything if it really has to unlike Si! The function itself wants to use something right now and move on. So when Carl Jung says Se (function itself) doesn't reflect, it does not at all (that's why Ni is here for). Also, Se maximum data interpretation code is like 010101 honestly. You need a little Si to filter it in a readable manner (aka information). Variables and observation - I'm putting this together as you'll see why. In order to observe the sensory properly, you need the right variables to look at so you can "quickly" scan, evaluate, troubleshoot to "react and adjust" effectively to each situation at hand. With Se, quick reaction, instant gratification and relevance are important variables because NOW is what we want and do. Technology does a great job with this. An example of this category is the classic cheesy RU-vid recommendation system. It collects data of the current videos you have been watching lately. Then it "recommends" similar videos or videos about the field you have been watching to feed more of that dopamine because RU-vid just wants to be "updated with what you're currently watching to satisfy its viewers at each moment". Now this get ugly when unregulated, and this is why binge watching is a thing. What's annoying is that you can watch 1000 videos straight about basketball, but if you watched 10 videos straight about cooking lately, you'll get more cooking videos recommended! Like RU-vid, I didn't ask you but sure, take advantage of my consumption rate and trend as I dive in and binge. It messes up my whole homepage and then some youtubers you watched 1 month or 2 months ago no longer gets recommended as much. So in that case, I'll take advantage of their very cheese system and create a bunch of burner accounts to organize by category of what I want to specifically receive on that specific channel (because Se will never do it for you) and thankfully have "unrecommended content" intentionally to not get out of nowhere content. The channel I have here only contains 16 personalities and psychology. If I want basketball, I go to my "basketball channel". I do have a burner account for anything just in case (boredom) so I can maximize Se as much as I can to not get blindsided with all that Si filter. PS: I'm actually thankful I have Se blindspot. Sure I get over stimulated quickly but I use it at low risk, or when there are no other options. I don't need to "soak in" experience myself unnecessarily to properly describe things if someone else already did it and explains it with detail or use Ne simulations. Se has a pattern of "doing useless experiences for the sake of doing them" as well.
Having Se Blindspot, sometime Se is really annoying, but it's necessary. It's just not my power. Omg, i hope in this world, we don't have to deal with Se anymore. It's frustrating. Se, Fe is the most annoying part for me. But maybe what's right is that Se save me though from Ti hero.
liJo: I know not which video to stick this on, but I'll just go for this latest one you made. I'm not sure how old you are, since you may not have a lot of experience with what I'll describe, but let's see if you can clarify this some for me. Anybody else, feel free to chime in. I rather often post on youtube, but no matter the genre where I post, and no matter how funny my posts are, virtually everybody ignores me. The only thing I can figure, is that youtube despite all the heavy use of comments, draws virtually nothing but people interested in entertainment, and NOT in brainy things, or worse yet, using your mind, which shows you just may be a cut above in that way. Tell me, have you experienced that sort of thing very regularly yourself, outside of this place? I see people regularly make some of the most awful jokes, or people put no thought whatsoever into what they write, and they get likes and I don't. I don't mind that much, but the discrepancy has to have a reason for it, because it's that bad. This isn't such a big mystery for me, because I've seen this in real life too, but I would hope when people can't see or hear me, it might largely evaporate, and it just isn't the case. I have to wonder, that like a vibe we can give off (I most strongly see this vibe on your videos) in real life, it even persists in print, even just in one lousy sentence. Your thoughts?
@@Itsmesmileyface Thanks you for the reply and like. If nobody did anything to my post in a week, I either would've forgot about it entirely, or just wrote something like "It's really pitiful you can mention a problem like I did, and then you see the same thing manifest all over again with that post", but at least you have officially destroyed that possibility. I agree with your points about God. What would you say is the dominant religion in SE Asia? I don't think it's a very strong Christian territory.
Hey there. I would say my audience is more intellectual and less entertainment driven. I can only say that because outside of some sketches, my videos aren't particularly entertaining and over the years, the right people have come along side me. Your first 100 subscribers are the hardest. I uploaded for about a year to an audience of 5-10 people, and then after a year, people began to trickle in, and then those old videos gained some traction too. I think people like brainy, brainy can be cool. However brainy has to be relevant to people outside of just you. So when thinking about a brainy topic, say - is this relevant to more people outside of me? Are they already curious about this? If they are... thats the formula!
I wasn't talking about being what in youtube terms is a content creator (although you are one). I'm talking about just making comments like this one, compared to other comments others will make. Probably about 95% of my comments aren't original, but playing off somebody else (mostly writing replies instead), such that what I write is VERY pertinent, only maybe even the majority of the time, they just don't want to get that deep (but they never say that). Thanks for the reply and trying to help. I was rather sure you'd experienced this sort of thing, but it sounds an awful lot like you haven't (that is apart from content creating), which to me means my reason as to why it continues to happen isn't for the reason I revealed earlier. I only emphasized entertainment earlier not only because it is an entertainment site, but also to show very much of my entertainment posts meet with the same results. I conducted a little social experiment with a website that talked about entertainment, and I went in completely apart from my usual serious tone, to instead go quite comical, including posting pics of some episode we were all familiar with, and completely rewriting the scripts in an easy-to-follow manner, which at least I found funny. One guy decided to have an issue with me, and he got to talking to me through DM. He said he was amazed at my serious side, and some of the things I wrote while in DM he thought were brilliant, and he was surprised I didn't let that side of me out in the forums. I didn't tell him it was an experiment, but just said that I decided since it was an entertainment site, I would go wholly that way. I think I did succeed in getting as good a response from the others, if not better, than I expected. In sort of a vague way, it does tend to show my entertaining side brings at least 'some' sort of response. Again, not a content creator, but when faced with what I'm facing, you really have to ask yourself if it's really worth the bother. Thanks. BTW, I think that experiment I mentioned revealed something else I didn't intend, but which is pretty fundamental anyway. At least with that one guy, I think he was rather flabbergasted that I had a brain side to me, because people assume that if everything they've seen you do is comedy, you must be an idiot.
