They're all too busy ragging on [circle all that apply]: The choppy animation "Ringmaster" pointlessly inflating the length of the video How Prince of Persia should've won... ...At least if the fighter was the actual Prince of Persia instead of an ordinary adventurer with no time dagger
@@bkitbkitangbkit__ not according to standard death battle rules. It has to be part of their standard arsenal. Something they normally have on them. Link gets the Triforce in every game but it isn't part of his arsenal. Goku could teleport awayand get the dragonballs to wish his opponent dead but doesn't for the same reason.
It's also a sin that the Prince didn't even used his dagger Would have been op and he would kill Ezio pretty ez but eh At least the animation saves it all
@@Guarrow Its kind of hard to reach for the dagger in your back pocket when you think you have a guy beat and then he suddenly stabs you in the throat.
@@ajanthony1356 What about Alexios/Kassandra for the Sands of Time Prince? I say either Alexios/Kassandra because they have the ability time stop as well. Depending on Death Battle allowing those abilities or not.
@@musicgreninja5875 Been a while since I played the Thief games, but Garrett doesn't really fight. He hides and ambushes. If you're in an open fight, you've already screwed up
Turner Marius U know death battle don’t do their research properly sometimes. They’re just fan service for example Captain Marvel vs Android 18, 18 is not a absorbing Android she never did on DBZ.
Every single PoP game has stealth segments. I suck at them but they're there. Especially prominent in Two Thrones when stealth kills are your only safe way through a room.
interesting fact...the prince they picked has NO dagger of time (and he is no prince)...also he has NO LIFEBAR...so essentially he could NEVER DIE/LOOSE
He also had a princess with magical powers to help keep him alive anytime he did fall or what is considered to be knocked unconscious. But these are the main reasons I feel that the votes were so heavily skewed anybody that play the 2008 game would not vote for that Prince to win I'm sorry
@@nathanalexandre9043 what part is false he was a thief that robbed the palace before running in tuna with a valley where he ended up getting roped into helping a princess
@Troll Theory I probably did misinterpret that since I only saw the original post being strictly in the game. Found it more irritating that you couldn't get a game over than anything else
@@scholaryperson No, but the version they are showing here is from the game with Elika. Also, the enemies from that one are probably the most dangerous any version of the Prince has actually fought, overall.
Least it isn't Saitama Vs Kenshiro bad. They didn't even bother to try and get a model made up that looked similar to Kenshiro in that one. It's so bad that it isn't even in the Deathbattle channel's lineup, nor is it even in the upload list despite episodes from before and after it being there. Probably one of the worst ones they've done. This has a little bit of jank, sure, but the Saitama v Kenshiro one was... yeesh... Only exists on Roosterteeth now, but it ain't worth a watch unless you are morbidly curious.
You do realize that _repeating_ crossbows have been a thing a for a long time prior to Ezio's time right? It's not so farfetched that Ezio would have one.
Actually in the first and third games its Prince recounting the story, so he says that "No, that isn't how it went" and in the second game the Sands of time have become a part of you. So you being dead doesn't exactly drag you out of the horrific time limbo you're stuck in.
So since the vote wins, Prince does a reverse time, blocks the srab to his throat from one hidden danger, fight continues. Enzio will still win it just takes longer and you get to watch the Prince die more than once. Each time being worse and harder to counter than the last until all out of sand, and by that point Enzio is really hangry.
SuperMandibleclaw It makes the video seem longer than it really is because people complain ab the video being too short also, some of us have never heard about some of these characters so it gives us a little info on what they're about.
It kills me that the Prince didn't get more votes. I understand why.. The AC games are far more popular. And this was a REALLY good fight, and I liked how they ended it. Just too bad my guy didn't win.
I mean, Prince would definitely win in an actual Death Battle. But Death Battle X is all about votes and, being honest, who cares about powers when popularity is a thing, ammirite?
Which is weird since prince of Persia and assassins creed were both developed by the same company as a matter of fact there was gonna be a prince of Persia assassins but that soon became assassins creed
@@Mandrilled not true? I get that PoP has the raw power and physique than ezio hands down. But ezio is fsar smarter (he has a inhuman iq) and battle experience (hes dubbed the best assassin for a reason,also he was in full on battlw field's and never got hit). The other factor ezio had was was who each fought. PoP-was bascically only monster's or low ranked human. Ezio-humans,humans,humans. Ezio only fought humans so he knows how to read their movements,his iq lets him make a plan and change it instantly and constantly. Also ezio has fought other assassins and very trained men. While PoP never had to fight any human near ezio so he'd underestimate him,even if he didn't he wouldn't be able to keep up.
@@alucardsghost4544 bro, the prince has literally beaten the hell out of humans in hand to hand combat, and also managed to expel the minions of two different gods. the closest thing in the AC universe is the apple of eden, which is outclassed by the relics in the PoP universe
@@Mandrilled again regular humans. And those 2 minions were pretty stupid while ezio has a iq of over 1000 becauae of the apple of eden. And ezio has decades of experience on combat of HUMANS he kniw how to read them and how to defeat them in seconds.
@@KainZeuxis not even a spinoff, the first AC was supposed to be a PoP title and they scrapped the PoP title and turned what they had into a completely seperate title. Basically, AC is the spiritual successor.
He does, even from fatal wounds during a fight. Also the voting system was fixed cause they used the Reboot Prince instead of Sands of Time Prince, everyone hates Reboot Prince.
Against a hidden blade he never saw coming? I don't play the Prince of Persia games myself, but I think once you're choking on your own blood, it's hard to think rationally about that.
Yeah i wish we could of seen a proper death battle of this because i feel the prince would win, ezio would pull out some fancy assassination move nearly kill him, he'll reverse time and counter him and beat him
@@GMokemoD I don't know, im just describing what he sounds like lol, not that I have a problem with it. Then again it is money im saying that he's excited about plus the money that he would save with honey, so I would get excited too.
The OG Sands of Time prince is unstoppable, especially the forgotten sands since he could make tornadoes, fire trails, he can even shoot himself as a mini meteor
Was originally going to be a prince of Persia sequel, but gameplay and story were so different, it became it's own game Same thing happened with Devil May Cry but to Resident Evil
@@talaeladar Well Devil May Cry was originally going to be a Resident Evil sequel where umbrella opened portals to hell (kinda like the premise of the new doom games) but the creators thought it was to different of a pace and story, it just became it's own game. Basically RE series almost became like Doom instead of the horror gem it is
Would a battle royal among all assassins from the Assassin's Creed series be possible? I think that I would like to see this as an actual death battle. I haven't played much of the Assassin's Creed series so I don't know who would win.
Kassandra but that's because she is a literal demigod. As for the human assassins it would be Ezio. He had the longest service and largest arsenal and network. The others started much later and had fewer mentors to hone their skills.
@@halfasiandude no id say Edward just for the simple fact of guns making up a large part of his arsenal, it'd come down to him and ezio, but if we're talking wide open field fight, Edward, and as for Jacob or Evie having more modern guns, Jacob would die thinking he could take Connor head on, and Evie would die trying to sneak up on Altair
@@liampope3326 A pretty accurate outcome indeed edward, ezio, altair and connor are the only ones which have a chance to win I want to say arno, but even though he is really stealthy and an amazing swordsman, he just isn't that strong. Off topic a little, but his smoke bombs are OP, and he "Eagle vision" (more like eagle pulse) is one of the opiest in game You can instantly see EVERYTHING without skill upgrades, and in coop, you can see other people's perspective with a skill (i think)
Wow, the first new DBX with a very clear cut winner. The first time I guessed wrong but AC is more popular than Prince of Persia, so it's understandable.
I have played all the early Prince of Persia games and only sat out the PS3 version. Had this been the Prince with the Time Dagger Ezio may not have won. But in terms of skills Ezio is just a little bit better trained and I am a fan of both.
@@Bowen_Windcalibur it was a composite version of all The Princes. So it doesn't matter which version, that's why they even have clips from Sands of Time and Warrior Within.
Your right, somehow that fixes a large amount of the jank in the animation, if they would have done it that speed to begin with i would have had much less to complain about.
@@bigbadbob7070 "a bit"? Anyone who's played games other than those made by ubisoft will tell you that AC has had more misses than hits. And both origins and especially odyssey are some of the worst of ubisoft on display: large, empty worlds with more padding than content.
@@SuperMandibleclaw i didagree. Boring, hackneyed, tedious, uninspired maybe. But definitely not good. Dark souls is good. Witcher is good. Doom 2016 is good. Wolfenstein the new colossus is good. Shadow of the colossus is good. Silent hill up to and arguably including 4 is good. Maybe these games lack the traits you like, but for starters they are complete packages, have proper pacing, DO spmething interesting or innovate rather than iterate. Asscreed snoreigins and plodyssey copy and water down mechanics found in better games. They steal, for example, the immersive mode from rdr2 which is not a game I like, but it worked to be as immersive as it could. They steal the stamina management from dark souls and use the most basic rpg mechanics. Oh yeah and the nemesis system from the middle-earth games. And they have the audacity to demand money on top of the 60$ entry point and BESIDE that actively keep you away from finishing them off too fast to be tempted by the premium store by level gating. So tell me, what part of those two games am I supposed to be entrenched by? Yeah they have accurate architecture but so does every other asscreed game so it's nothing new for the series, and 2 was actually immersive, if deeply flawed and black flag was actually FUN. So no, they are NOT good. Maybe you like them, but unless I am thinking of the entirely wrong game (they all blend together mostly) i doubt you can convince me that I have reason to not dislike them.
@@SuperMandibleclaw , speaking as a long time AC fan that owns every game, I can tell you that Origins and Odyssey are extremely weak games that are little more than Ubisoft trying to copy other games to take advantage of current trends. Assassin's Creed is losing all the originality and uniqueness that made it such a great series in the first place. AC lost its footing from the death of Desmond and is slipping harder and harder with each new game that reeks of desperation in trying to attract players beyond its original demographic, which ruins it for those that enjoyed the original style.
Mystic Midgit This version of The Prince? You would have lost all of your money. Ezio can do everything this Prince can do but better. He was only able to control time with The Princesses help and needed to be saved by her that whole game.
@@sancholoaded2388 Not necessarily. The Apple's been countered before. In the first game even. Al Mualim tried to use the Apple on Altair and it failed to do anything to him because he was too focused on his purpose to desire anything of the Apple. I would make the argument that the SoT Prince could probably also boast such a will. Ezio basically has to kill the Prince before the dagger is drawn or risk having to kill him as many times as the Prince can rewind. And once you take feats into account (breaking huge slabs of stone with a single sword strike for instance) it's not looking in Ezio's favor.
@@se7enist Wait what? I thought Altair was able to survive the mind control because he's a descendant of The Old Prime Race that made the apple or something...
I'm going to assume Blake is going to win the next DBX for the sake of popularity, but Inuyasha has been around for a lot longer so who knows? My vote is going towards Inuyasha though.
@@lifenane1624 yeah, but polls has his limits when its a very balanced battle but this is clear, dbx dont need to look the polls of rat kids the apple of eden its hard to get for ezio, and hes not the original owner the prince, has always his weapons since the first minute and fights against monsters its reality vs fantasy fantasy always win
This makes me wonder how a fight between the original PS2 trilogy Prince would fare with his time powers against an Assassin with his eagle visin and Piece of Eden powers.
He isn't really a time manipulator, should've gone with another fitting description. But when i saw 70/30 i laughed😂 great fight animation nonetheless Edit: holy crap thanks for the likes💖😘
Pretty dumb. Prince didnt use his most effective ability. These fan voted battles are kinda lame. The researched death battle would have had Prince win.
Dude, what's frustrating is that this prince doesn't actually have time powers. That's the other guy. They literally used clips from the Sands of Time games and then used a different version of the Prince for the battle.
DBX: Where, "No rules, no research, only bloodshed," means over half the runtime is ads and character descriptions. Don't get me wrong, the fights are enjoyable. But I watch Death Battle for the character analysis and DBX for the snappy fights (like that Sakuya Izayoi Touhou fight). If I don't know the characters for DBX that's on me to research and get into new fandoms.
These are advertisements first, everything else second. DBX is just a commercial with a gimmick. The fight is their CG gecko. Completely secondary, but maybe it'll sell something.
Dude, just use the slider. if it bothers you enough to make a comment, it's be easier if you just clicked 3:15 on the video. it's literally one click to skip everything you don't like. Not even a 'wait 5 seconds before clicking', just load the page and click.
@@Nowolf Why do you assume anyone ISN'T doing that? Why are you getting your nipples all chapped over the fact we accurately described the show as an ad first, fight second? Sit down.
Prince: I can use dagger of time as an advantage against ANYTHING. DEATH BATTLE: Nah ain't gonna use that in the video. Just gonna use it for explanation and after that just a normal battle. No dagger of time involved. Real fans of both characters : Uhh.... What was that? A battle or a joke?
Blake vs Inuyasha sounds interesting, but one-sided. I wonder how few Tetsusaiga techniques he'd have to pull out before he breaks through the comparatively pitiful defensive abilities of a RWBY character? Blake isn't tricky enough to overcome the sheer power of Inuyasha's giant metal banana sword.
The Prince is hard to put into a death battle situation as he's either going to be unstoppable or get stomped. There isn't a whole lot of middle ground.
No matter how the battle goes down the kill would always be the same. Ezio will stab or cut the prince just like in this video but the prince would use the dagger as he is bleeding out and rewind to before the attack and then dodge/ counter and get the killing blow on ezio
I think the main question would be could the apple counter the sand of time? Cause I would think if it cant then PoP would probably win with that alone but I would definitely think that Ezio is the much better fighter, PoP could play with time till he figured out a weakness or an opportunity for the kill, unless again, the apple could counter it.
@@SabreAran the prince has no penchant for stealth and the Apple basically a nuke. If he comes after Ezio in a straight fight he's gonna get his head exploded and be unable to move to activate the sands. But even barring the Apple I think Ezio wins this. You can't sands of time your way out of an instant death move like a hidden blade to the brain and that's exactly what Ezios built his entire life around. I'd give the win to Ezio in about 75% of scenarios.
Death Battle Suggestions: 1. Aya Brea (Parasite Eve) VS Jill Valentine (Resident Evil) in 3D. 2. Mitochondria Eve (Parasite Eve) VS Alexia Ashford (Resident Evil) in 3D.
Yeah, but it does help for people who aren't familiar with a certain character. Like, I've heard of the Prince of Persia, but I had no idea who he was. Now, I know
SLENDERNER also controlling time doesn’t help if you’re throat has been slit and you’re too focused on trying to breath than grabbing your dagger and reversing time, also I think Ezio might have just disarmed him of that dagger before he killed him so he couldn’t do it anyway.
Keiji Johnson yeah but you know deathbattle, (even though this is DBX it’s still the same people) they like to amalgamate all of the versions of a character to boost their chances of winning a battle.
@@shard7549 If Prince can use time travel when he is impaled through the gut, sliced in half, he can surely use it even if he got slit in the neck. What made him lose in this DBX is the fact that Prince of Persia is not as famous as Assassin's Creed.
@@Yagon-ue7xm Perhaps, but it made Ezio look like a fool! Ezio was one of the most skilled and experienced assassins to ever exist, so it just feels wrong
They're trying to prevent the new intro style from making people say, "Hey, you said 'no research'!" To that end, they're conspicuously getting all their facts wrong.
It's a character wtih one confirmed kill under her belt and fights mostly on a team. It's rare blake or any of them fight without help. Inuyasha on the other hand had had solo battles plenty of times I don't see how blake could win. Oh yeah....this is a popularity contest...ugh.
First Yang got in Death Battle. Then Ruby got in DBX. Then Weiss got in Death Battle. Now Blake is in DBX. All of team RWBY got either in Death Battle or DBX now.
I mean they had Ruby defeat Ragna on a previous DBX so yeah... (Ofc Blake would lose in a researched fight but this is a popularity contest so anything is possible).
This Is Company Battle Of Ubisoft's Adventurous, Wall Crawling, Roof Jumping Heroes And Ezio Is Part Of Trunks' Time Patrol And Blake Belladonna And Donald Duck Are Next Targets To Saved Their Lives Cast Ezio Auditore Da Firenze: Michael Fassbender The Prince (Prince Of Persia): Jake Gyllenhaal Doctor Ivo "Eggman" Robotnik: Mike Pollock/Kotaro Nakamura Ganondorf Dragmire: Len Carlson/Takashi Nagasako Hizashi Yamada/Present Mic: Dave Trosko/Hiroyuki Yoshino Dracula: Graham McTavish Koji Koda/Anivoice: Greg Ayres/Takuma Nagatsuka Kyoka Jiro/Earphone Jack: Trina Nishimura/Kei Shindo
My Own Storyline Of DBX! (Trunks Witnessed Half-Dog Demon Slashed The Faunus Huntress Into Pieces Via Time Scroll) Trunks: "Oh No, We Have A "RWBY" Problem." (Trunks Look At The Future Warrior) Trunks: "Remember Don't Let The Half-Dog Demon Win, You Got It." (Future Warrior Agrees And Trunks Gives The Future Warrior A Time Scroll Before Sent Into The Past) Aftermath (The Future Warrior, Returned After Making Blake's Victory Happened And Inuyasha's Death, By Showing Blake Murdered Inuyasha By Ripping His Upper Half) Trunks: "Whew, We Did It, We Stopped The Half-Dog Demon." Ezio: "Good Job." (And Then, Blake Approaches To Meet With Trunks) Blake: "So... You Guys Saved My Life, Right." Trunks: "Yep, We're Glad We Did." Ezio: "Excuse Me, There Was The Intruder." (The Intruder Turns Out To Be Kagome Higurashi) Trunks: "Miss Kagome, I'm Sorry Because Your Future Husband Is Murdered And The Half-Dog Demon Is Dead." Kagome: "He Died, Because Blake's Savior Killed Him, He Died Because Of You." Trunks: "Ringmaster Was Responsible For Making Inuyasha's Death." Kagome: "He Was My Pet, My Dog I've Ever Encountered And You Murdered Him By Sending This Future Warrior To Killed My Future Husband." Trunks: "I'm Gonna Say He's Right Behind You." Kagome: "What?!" (Kagome Got Stabbed And Killed By The Future Warrior) Ezio: "Mission Accomplished, We Saved Blake And More Importantly, We Saved The Cat Faunus, We Saved RWBY Day Again." Trunks: "For Now." ("THE END." For My Own Storyline Of DBX)
I’m as big an Ezio fan as the kids who voted for him. BUT..... as someone who has religiously played both games, he would get destroyed by the Prince because of that broken ass dagger (which isn’t used?) in little to no time.
Not exactly, he gives a much briefer explanation of characters, for those unfamiliar with them, than the version on a regular Deathbattle and he gives no analysis of skill or strength at all.
Poor Inuyasha, DBX is basically Dragon Ball where ultra attack can be charged with people's support, so he'll die despite being stronger, just as Prince did...
I wouldn't say Prince is that much stronger than Ezio. Their pretty even. The only thing prince has over him is the dagger of time but you even it out and give Ezio the Apple of Eden. Personally I feel like the apple is better. The dagger needs recharges and cant be used at will and all it does is rewind time. But the apple can be used at will and completely controls all senses over whoever you use it on.
Also don't feel bad. Nobody takes DBX seriously. It's based on fanbase and who has the most fanboys. The only reason I watched this one is because I really liked the matchup. But I wouldn't get that upset over it. More than likely in a Death Battle they'd give it to Prince anyways.
Oh, don't misunderstand me guys, it's not like I'm upset, Ijust think voting arena should be built either around similar strenght with no-voting powercomparison (and comparing acrobatics and crap Prince tookon static blocks he's clearly physically superior) or comparable fanbase on voting poll system (as Inuyasha or Prince of Persia are clearly smaller communities). Like, offer us some balance, it's hard to feel suspense if you know the game is basiczlly rigged.
Hiccup and Toothless VS Hiro and Baymax for Death Battle, please, I'm begging you Edit: also, is the next DBX just to cover up for the lack of Sun Wukong VS Kim Wu (RWBY VS Killer Instinct) that you announced ages ago AND STILL HAVEN'T MADE!?!?!?!?
Remnant Elementor over two or three years ago, there's two videos of about it on a channel called RWBY Shitposter, unfortunately it never got completed, just type in the RU-vid search bar "Sun Wukong vs Kim Wu DBX" and it should come up
Prince: Oh? You approach me? Instead of hiding in some hay, you come right to me? Ezio: I cannot assassinate you without getting closer. Prince: HO! HO! Become as close as you like. Prince: MUDA! MUDA! MUDA! MUDA! Ezio: ORA! ORA! ORA! ORA! ORA!
The Vigilante Yeah, Red Hood has a lot of potential matchups such as Winter Soldier or Punisher. I wouldn't mind any of the 3 Marvel characters to fight Jason
Yes. As a fan of Sands of Time trilogy, it bothers me. Those two guys are completely different characters, one is an actual prince while the other is a nameless adventurer.
