And she just also thinks every single thing he wrote is about her. But she doesn't understand any of it anyways because she's not smart like she wants to pretend to be
Her long drawn out way of speaking and constant head bobbing is so disturbingly narcissistic. She loves herself more than anyone else ever could, or will ever now.
Ezra: complains about father calling her stupid and saying she wouldn't amount to anything.. Me: But she is stupid...and she DIDN'T amount to anything! 🤷♂️ Dad's a genius!
I wonder if her complaint was even true...she seems to recycle bad stories. She also claimed to her friend that Jason called her a retard and her life was going nowhere.
Yea for someone who claims to honor Chris McCandless, she should know he did not write Into the Wild. Jon Krakauer did. And we all fell in love with Chris while reading that book, (including Jon K, I’m pretty sure) but those of us who are mature also realized he was reckless, impulsive, unprepared and immaturely romantic… and that’s why he ended up dead in a bus in the middle of Denali. And we got over our crush. But I guess some of us aren’t that mature.
This is almost verbatim what I said to my boyfriend when commenting about her choice of names. I love how the defense thinks this is cute and endearing behavior when in reality most people are thinking she must be emotionally unstable and have struggles with her identity to change her name and gender identity without any real effort put into outside og anesthetics. But yeah, the jury totally would think it's cute and endearing to change your name so in such a flippant attitude. Like, no. Most people see that as a red flag
This is so hard to watch and listen to her trying to read and interpret his writings. I cannot imagine how his family endured this shit show. Especially when one of the first things she says he felt a lonely outsider and onset depression when going home for the holidays and such. You already took him from this life, now you’re going to take jabs at their memories with him that was potentially just “putting on a happy face.” A whole new level of disgust. Plus the ease in reminiscing with him is scary. Anyways thank you so much for such amazing coverage and the work that’s been put in to this great channel!
The fact that she can touch his books and talk about him and never shed a tear over what she did to him is beyond disgusting. I feel so bad for Alex, his family and his friends.
@@Raven24444I’m obsessed with all things crime. Only two cases have affected me so badly. The first was about two boys convicted and sentenced to life in prison for killing one of the boys’ family even though they had airtight alibis. The second is this one. Especially seeing Alex getting into the car with her. My heart aches for the trauma and fear he went through. To be left there to bleed to death by this spawn of Satan. And his poor family. I just can’t comprehend any of this. May Allah never inflict the pain of losing a child on us. 😢
Me too. They both have this weird poise...with a slice of fake that neither can really hide. It's almost like they have a vague idea how a human being acts and talks, they've practiced in a mirror over and over, and they do their best to simulate it, but it's just slightly off.
Yeah i had the same thought. They both have the intelligence of a naive teenager, at least Ezra was still a teenager so what's Jodie's excuse? They both are simpering and have delusional self-victimization. Nothing scarier than stupid people who genuinely think they are smarter than everyone else.
Yep. Revisiting this case I saw an updated picture of Ezra the other day with bleached blonde hair, and I actually thought it was an old photo of Jodi. They’d get along great.
Correction: SHE did not read philosophy. 😂 She thinks “into the wild” was a Novel. What I’m sure the jury saw for all this talk of metaphorical cannibalism- is that despite her trying to say Alex metaphorically wanted to consume her, the fit is far more appropriate that it was she wanting to consume Alex.
Some observations: -She poses as this educated intellectual, yet she can barely read. -Funny how Alex's journal entry clearly says he's using cannibalism as a metaphor, but in the 'secret conversations' he is obsessed with literal cannibalism. -Also funny how different all the players are in Ezra's perspective from what everyone else says. -If Alex was this horrible, violent, selfish you'd think there would be other former partners and friends that would have also testified to this...not just the known liar and murderer. -Everyone insulted her, every male abused her and told her she was stupid, retarded, or put her down. This all sounds very much in her own head. -The attorney likes to jump around a lot chronologically. Seems to me she is trying to confuse the jury, and hide cause and effect, or lack of cause and effect. -The attorney is also clearly taking things out of context. -It's also interesting how all of Ezra's conquests romantically, poetically fit her, like in some sort of bad movie. All these guys are so different, yet they all have 'so much in common' and 'fit' Ezra, or at least the Ezra she decided to be to each of them. -Other people have pointed this out, how the attorney tried to 'edit' what Alex wrote to change the meaning. The jury won't be fooled by this...they get they entire document, not just the edited bits. -The essay 'Words' looks like a first draft. That says a lot to me. -Attorney: Read the paragraph starting with 'And So...' Ezra: You mean starting with 'Pity me'? Attorney: no -Ezra correcting her attorney on the questions to ask, while on the stand, was odd. A: Did there come a time when you spent the night at Alex's E: YES!!! A: When did you first sleep over Alex's E: Late October A: Could it have been early October? E: yes E: Did you mean the beginning of November? A: Yes E: yes -Ezra is supposed to be talking about a guy that abused her and she ultimately had to kill him to stop him from killing her, yet she smiles when talking about good times. Amber Heard did that too...those are cues to the audience as to the emotions in her fictional story. Real people that have been abused don't do that. -Alex wrote about misery and the dark side of life before, during, and after meeting Ezra. Clearly it's what interested him, and not so very strange for a Philosophy student or degree holder. -It makes me uncomfortable that Alex's murderer is the one to be able to interpret his writings. -Ezra is basically reading from Jodi Arias' playbook. Blaming a docile and easily-manipulated male for dominating her. Being very sexually experienced but blaming the non-experienced male for their sexual escapades. Calling the straight-laced victim an abuser and pedophile. Using fake amnesia and multiple fake explanations to describe the murder. Claiming self-defense when the victim was almost certainly ambushed. Bringing weapons but claiming it wasn't pre-meditated. -She doodled in his journal? How rude. -Isn't 'quod' Latin not French? The attorney lies when she says 'I don't know what language that is'. -Sounds to me Alex's 'love and so as you will' was about Ezra leaving Jason...that love is about following your heart. -They really fast forwarded past the slit wrist thing. This is a different story explaining it that we've already heard, and the 'he took me aside' thing makes no sense. That she took or sent Jason, a person Alex (in her story) would have not wanted there at his moment of weakness, is weird. -This was hard to watch. I don't see how this first section helped her at all.
The more they read Alex's journals, the more you like him. And the less you like her. Even the very edited version they shared only damned her more. They showed him being manipulated, used, and discarded once she was done. It was the nail in the coffin.
let's not compare amber heard, who was proven to be telling the truth about everything (and is only believed to be a liar at this point by the willfully ignorant) to this woman who is a blatant liar in every sense of the term. it denegrates your point when you do that.
@@SloppyxJoe Lol funny how you call people that watched the trial and saw Amber Heard caught in lie after lie 'willfully ignorant'. That includes the entire jury of course.
Listening to her testify I’m comforted by the fact she was convicted and sentenced to life for Alex’s murder. Her lawyer should have told her that constantly smiling while testifying wasn’t endearing to the jury.
Hearing about nerd sex wasn't endearing, either. Here's my question. How was he reading passages out of these books during sex, when she said he liked it in the dark?
i'm sorry but this chick has that completely 100% WRONG on what the author is talking about in this essay. She thinks he's literally talking about eating another person. That is so far from the meaning of what this essay is portraying. It is NOT about a "MEAL IN A SENSE" AS SHE SAID. Oh my goodness, it's her immaturity and inexperience to have the knowledge and wisdom of what it really means. It's more about deep, whole love and loving a person completely, flaws and all. As she gets older and experiences that type of love, she may get it then. But this is NOT about eating people, period!
It's not immaturity. She was playing a part...the enraptured student fascinated with Alex's ideas...in order to manipulate him and get what she wanted. Now she is continuing to play a role...the intelligent strong woman abused by this creepy abusive dude. I'd guess she's done this over and over...creating a new persona to match and attract her next prey.
@@whims6278 Yes, 100%. You saying that makes me think of her having some of the symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder. The common symptoms (as per the Mayo Clinic) that I think we can agree she had were: -Fear of Abandonment -Pattern of unstable relationships with periods of intense idealization followed by feeling like their partner is cruel, indifferent, or evil. -Shifting self-identity and self-image (so around a kind person she acts kind, around a philosophical intellectual she acts the same, etc.) -Periods of stress-related paranoia and loss of contact with reality -Impulsive and risky behavior (like cheating, unsafe sex, reckless driving, sabotaging personal success) -Suicidal threats in response to feelings of abandonment (real or imagined)...Jason going to California, Jason going to Guard duties, the Monday DnD sessions) -Wide mood swings of intense happiness, irritability, or anxiety -Inappropriate intense anger, sometimes leading to physical violence
1:16:48 Alex: " I do not understand 【 his (Ezra's) mode of 'loving' 】 but still I hope to be understanding. " ... The beauty of Alex's curious, insightful, compassionate mind only highlights further the Havoc Ezra wrought. R.I.P. 🕊
Why are they dissecting Alex’s writings and philosophies ? Why is the victim on trial now? Nothing he wrote or believed in would ever be justification for his brutal murder . The defense is really making me sick and they disgraced their profession 😖
His writings come across as dark and dangerous. He was a philosopher tho so I hope the jury understands this. I also don’t know why she is reading his journals out loud but they couldn’t read Ezra’s journals out loud
Disagree with it all you want but the defense is doing exactly what it is supposed to do; provide the best legal defense it possibly can with the confines of the law. The court (judicial system) has deemed this evidence admissible. Remember, justice is blind.
@@jennyobrien849 Ezra's journals were written in a self-serving way....she concocted them after she was caught cheating to ty and show Jason that she was such a poor thing. So I wouldn't be surprised if the prosecution wanted the journals out.
shes not even dissecting them right. It clearly says one thing - and she interprets it in a completely different way that contradicts whats clearly there.
I am truly enjoying your channel and you deserve much more people subscribing than you have already, hopefully it will happen in 2023 🙏🙏🙏 Great Job 👏👏👏
This is all so crazy, I remember Ezra from my visits to Racie's coffee-house. Despite her being under-age, she was at The Joynt ( a bar) quite often too around that time. Alex was a lovely, thoughtful fellow and it's still shocking years later. This has been surreal to say the least.
He was going around behind his friends back having "entanglements" with this individual. Clearly he didn't deserve what happened to him, but let's be honest, he was a total creep. He was not thoughtful nor lovely.
@@MericaMotherFucker She was a predator and he was an easy mark, even before the murder. I do feel bad for him, and for his friends and family that lost him to that monster.
1:58 So “Into the Wild”, the book that inspired her to change her last name to McCandless, was described by Ezra as a “novel” (fiction). It’s actually a NONFICTION book written by well-known writer Jon Krakauer who has never published a single fiction book in his lengthy career. In fact “Into the Wild” was adapted into a very successful movie that earned Academy Awards, Golden Globes, and other awards. I suppose it’s no surprise that the defendant doesn’t know the difference between fact and fiction. IMO she was trying to change her world by making superficial changes to herself and adopting “philosophies” which she didn’t understand and/or feel in her heart. When things didn’t work out the way she wanted them to, she lost her bearings and acted out against someone to whom she ascribed blame: Jason, Alex and John Hanson (and probably her family in the past). I’m sure none of those young men were perfect but she takes absolutely no responsibility for ANY of her actions. It’s absolutely mind-blowing 🤯🤯🤯
She probably didn't even read the book anyways and only saw the movie but always wants to pretend she's smarter than she is so or course she'd say that. She didn't even know who wrote it. And she probably doesn't know that novel meant fiction
Classic narcissist. Both of the men she's describing here were total strangers until she approached them and began flirting, yet she frames it up as they "caught" her. Also notice that at no time did she say that she discussed the abortion with Jason. She said she "told" him about it. Imagine why he might've become frigid and sexually uninterested in her afterward.
Any philosophy majors out there must be going crazy watching this! The two books that Alex allegedly read out loud during sex (which I find literally unbelievable) are about the writer’s relationship to God (“Fear and Trembling” by Kierkegaard) and and the writer’s struggle with his doubts about the existence of God (“Hoping Against Hope: Confessions of a Postmodern Pilgram” by John Caputo). Defense counsel is cherry picking a few lines out of two lengthy and very deep analyses of complex philosophies, and presenting them to the jury completely out of context. The books document the respective writers’ INTERNAL struggles and are full of METAPHORS that defense counsel is trying to argue are LITERAL between Alex and the defendant. It’s a total distortion of the works of two renowned philosophers. And an insult to the intelligence of the jurors. Note: I was a sociology major who became an attorney so any philosophers out there please feel free to correct me if I’m misspeaking!
I majored in philosophy and have NO idea how he got a degree. Low standards in Eau Claire, I guess, but they don't expect to export grads to real cities.
I would LOVE to discuss this with you over a coffee or beer if we were neighbors because I can tell that I would become fascinated with the conviction you have in your assessments. I'm no philosopher, by the way - just a normal "problem thinker."
@@migbham1 I literally just saw your message and I’m so sorry for the delayed response. I’m generally horrible at checking any notifications I receive and RU-vid is no exception. Please know that your comment absolutely made my day! I watch a lot of trials but there was something about Ezra and her defense counsel that really disturbed me and has stayed with me to this day. I very much appreciate your response to my somewhat convoluted comment 🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@swedishgrrl7287 I don't think your comment sounds convoluted at all, it is spot on. I found it unbelievable and ludicrous that he was reading them out loud during sex as well.
I've just started watching her here...and I'm weirded out already. She seems to be enjoying the attention way too much. She's acting like this is an interview on Oprah, not a trial for murder. Bizarre.
@@Gobble_de_Goop Was she tested? As a person who once dated a woman with undiagnosed BPD (she was diagnosed later) Ezra's actions are spookily similar, so I wouldn't be surprised.
@Ocrilat BPD is all the red flags in the world. "I hate you/don't leave me" is the cycle of hell. They'll love bomb you then shit on you in the next breath. Then if you dare break up with them or reject then, they'll plan absolute life ruination. These are the women who accuse good men of abuse when they feel rejection. I tell my male friends to avoid women with BPD, no matter how nice they seem it's not worth the roller-coaster.
Be interesting to have a conversation with this (I think) very capable attorney as to why she thought it was a good idea to go through this teenage/hipster pseudo-philosophical kitsch in front of a jury of likely pretty normal, everyday adults.
Defense counsel was digging deep to counter the testimony of witnesses who knew Alex well (like his mother and the philosophy minor student with whom he spent time) that he was a peaceful, loving person who wouldn’t hurt a fly. The superficial spin on Alex’s use of various complex philosophies to understand his life in his essays could be expected of an uneducated and self-centered 19-year-old narcissist but I would bet my right arm that Ms Vishey (sp?) knew EXACTLY what she was doing. She may be incredibly annoying but she’s a well-educated, experienced and successful attorney. If you look closely she has Ezra stop reading the other parts of the essay that give more context to the passages read by Ezra, or she blocks them out on the screen. I really hope the prosecution’s cross examination points that out. Both defense attorneys know that their client is guilty and they’re both getting as creative as possible to try to influence just one person in the jury that will buy their bullsh*t. It only takes one. Thank God all twelve saw through it.
They did a number of things that struck me as odd. I get the augments of the other commenters here, but this whole thing is so odd and artificial. They had to have rehearsed this. The attorneys had to know how strange she acts and sounds. If she was going to claim self defense, and smear her victim with falsehoods, then Ezra had to testify. So she had to say something. But this so clearly doesn't work...maybe they had nothing else?
Defence was trying to present the victim as a Nihilist into cannibalism. It was trying to paint Alex as someone with dark thoughts that underpinned his way of life.
@@Ocrilat I'm so glad you made that comment. I know exactly what you mean. I kept shaking my head thinking this has got to be performance art, it can't be real. What do you do with someone that out of touch.
@@lucydayLucida I'm not sure where this come from though. She seemed to love being the center of attention during direct, to the point that it was creepy. Was this her illness? Her self-confidence in being able to manipulate the jury? Or was it that she was well-prepped by her attorneys, and when she was not really prepared for the cross? I also noticed that while she was posing as an intelligent, educated philosopher...her lack of intelligence was pretty apparent. She could barely read Alex's journals, stumbled on fairly easy words, got flustered easily, and accidentally admitted to some damaging things (like she purposefully lied that the attack happened in the park). Her attempts to pretend to not remember things that damaged her story, and worse making up new lies that contradicted statements she made previously in court, were probably insurmountable. So why did she testify? Well, she had no choice. Her only possible defense was self-defense, and with self-defense she had to tell her side of the story. And this went to trial because, with no death penalty in Wisconsin the prosecution had nothing to offer her to plead guilty.
i have adhd and doodle for that reason because it helps me to focus and pay attention better if i have my hands busy......i wouldn't have believed it if she'd said that was the reason she was doing it, but good grief. that would've been a better reason than claiming it was because she's traumatized due to the case. some people who actually have been through the sort of thing she said she survived (like myself) probably DO need that kind of distraction; the fact she just over and over again abuses what it means to be a survivor, especially when she was abused growing up, will forever make me furious. she KNOWS what she's doing by saying these things and doesn't care!!
Puede , pero ella es la única asesina. Esa es la gran diferencia. Y bastante violenta. 16 cuchilladas en la cabeza demuestran un gran nivel de agresividad. No quieres trabajar, no quieres estudiar. De qué vas a vivir?
Note on this self-aggrandizing moppet narcissist - she says she renamed herself because his philosophies are in line with "who [she] is" not "what I aspire to be". It's NOT a subtle difference, but so telling. She is a fantasist, the 'eternal heroine' of her imaginary world.
It's striking that so many people describe Alex as very intelligent and a deep thinker, but it's obvious that Ezra struggles to grasp concepts, stumbles over and appears not to understand words and would not be the intellectual equal of a supposedly gifted philosopher or even a 30-something coffee bar poseur/medic. I cant help feeling if they had all been required to do manual labour 12 hours a day, there would have been less time to devote to all the navel gazing, obsessing and "lovemaking" and things could have ended very differently
I am painfully embarrassed by how much misinterpretation (intentional or strategic) is going on in her testimony when it comes to what Alex wrote and what they supposedly understood Kierkegaard to be saying in that novel. Did she seriously go in there thinking she could lie in her summary of it, reading out a few lines and completely misconstruing their meaning to fit her narrative of Alex being a dark, cannibalism obsessed dude whose favourite books included that about literal human sacrifice, and whose lifestyle was defined by selfishness and disregard for life? Did nobody on her team think to do a little googling to fact check her interpretations and definitions of things? She paints such skewed picture of nihilism and existentialism, it makes me sad. I really hope that people who hear this trial aren't put off of the idea of looking into philosophy and reading some of these works.
Isn't she just a little darling? So smiley and cutesy and earnest. She MUST be innocent. Of course this is the person that identifies as a female heterosexual. Maybe the one that identifies as a male homosexual is not so effervescent and is the one that killed Alex? Maybe there's a third person who hasn't "come out" yet? By the way, if she is "fluid" how does she keep herself from oozing out of her clothes and puddling up on the floor? She looks like a Monica, by the way.
The defense is way over reaching if they are trying to imply he was a cannibal based on these writings😂 Most likely cause they know she is 100% guilty and they have no defense unless they twist his quotes/philosophies! Anyone with half a brain knows they are not literal!
“Love and do as you will” sounds more like he was resigned to the fact that she would just keep stringing both men along without ever fully committing to one, not so much him announcing that he would “take what he wants” lol they’re trying so hard to demonize her VICTIM they look so bad
@@kinseyclay exactly! Like “I love you but that doesn’t mean I can force you to love me back. You’re going to do what you want and I have to let you, loving you while I do that” not whatever narrative they were trying to push lol
That’s exactly what I was thinking. He knew she was with Jason and John. Just because his words are deep and long it doesn’t mean he was a bad person he was a philosopher. His journals shouldn’t be used against him. He is the victim here. They didn’t read Ezra’s journals out loud. It make me mad Alex seems deep and possibly troubled but a gentle soul
11:19 You can tell she is OBSESSED with this man!!! She is so crazy! Almost as if she doesn't care he's dead or sad about it, because she killed him! Typical abuser "If I can't have you, NO ONE CAN"!
I thought she was so traumatized that she couldn't do anything but doodle and breath to get thru this trial so far but on the stand she shows absolutely no signs of anxiety. Shes comfortable and loving it. I would be beyond anxious being a witness on the stand in any way, but I've never used anxiety for an excuse for any behavior, she sure talks like hers is sooooo much worse than most people. Yet she has no issues being on the stand for murder. Shes just a disgusting person who molds herself to both fit other people and also make herself a victim of everyone and a survivor on order to get attention. Her narcissism is hard to hide
Also I wanted somebody to point out the fact that while she was talking to the detective and while she was testifying on the stand there was literally no conversation or interaction between her and Alex that led to the stabbing. 1 minute they're driving around and talking and the next minute she's uncomfortable and getting anxious and stabbing him no words were said the entire time? It just sounded extremely unbelievable
In my opinion he points one needs to keep in mind when watching Ezra on the stand is : Ezra has no problem lying despite video evidence. At best, Ezra is borderline personality which is not a mental disorder and as the term narcissist is flung around today when one simply doesn't like another, this person reeks of actual narcissism. It's shamful that this judge allowed these two to play scholars and psycologist as they were not capable of analyzing Alex's works. Lastly, the Jodi Arias School of Psychopaths has a long list of graduates.
It wasn’t Jason’s baby!!! Or she was, idk, she’s twisted ! Hard to figure it out!! She said something to Jason. Or maybe he suspected!! “The only date that I could schedule was October 6th. It was my birthday” Jodi Jr. liar. Manipulative. No real emotions. Crocodile tears with those ridiculous getups!!
Yeah it was at least a possibility it wasn't his kid. She would have kept it if she knew it was his because then she could have locked him in. She was afraid she'd end up with a baby, on her own, and have lost Jason if he ever had paternity checked and found it wasn't his. She is absolutely the type who would have had the baby to lock him in if she was sure it was his. She says it like he wanted the abortion yet she never talked with him about it.
@@tracievendetta1908 I'm sure it was earlier. And even if if wasn't Alex I mean she slept with any man who showed any kind of interest, these ones were found out because they were friends of Jason and people they were around, I wouldn't be surprised to know there were others
To a certain extent I think Alex was romanticizing his feelings of aloneness. I don’t mean to say he didn’t feel alone, only that he was young and had developed this identity of “philosopher, writer and artist” and the idea of being a tortured artist (aside from fact that being tortured can produce great art) was and is attractive to himself, many women and other people. In that way I think he was romanticizing his writings and somehow with hindsight had he seen how the defendant twisted everything he said/wrote, he would’ve put it all in a very different context. He did not want to die.
56:01 If he is truly talking about her in this, this is not talking about her in a good way! This makes her sound so bad😂 If anything it is helping the prosecutor's case😅
I get the feeling that she misunderstood his cannibalism metaphors so much that she could plausibly have eaten some of him when she killed him. She sounds so obsessed with him and sounds like she was projecting the whole “cannibalism to keep someone with you” thing
He took the stand still saying that they manipulated and raped her. Even though he saw the texts of her begging them for sex! 😳🤯😵 Ignorance truly is bliss.
Right? Utterly twisting and warping them. However, he was vindicated later, when the prosecution provided the context and let his own words speak for himself, without her lewd interpretation. And when the prosecutor provided proof of particular pieces were written before Ezra met him, even though she was claiming those pieces were written about her. Obviously, they were not. It's really gross. But it gives a LOT of insight onto her personality, her mind, and who she is. Very self centered, self serving, and twisted. She claimed that "Love and do as you will" is about her, and how profoundly obsessed Alex was with her and that he used that phrase constantly, "interwoven" with the majority of his communications with her, that he would often just text that to her. Either included it at the beginning or end of a text message, or just text that phrase to her by itself. Later, the prosecutor had a stack of papers of all their text messages printed out. From the time they mer to the end. And he asked Ezra to go through them and circle that phrase wherever it was found in those text messages. Not a single one was found. Not one time did he ever text it to her. Is she knowingly lying, or is she so warped that she actually believes what she says? She lies about things that are so obvious and that can be easily proven. Like claiming to have grabbed the knife by the blade, and her hand showing no evidence of that. And only later changing that version after it was explained and shown that, OF COURSE, grabbing a knife blade with your hand would cause serious significant wounds to the hand.
At this point, I'm struggling ....... Why am i watching this I say??? I have to because i want to know the ending. But i can't let myself skip to the end so I'll just have to yawn and smirk to myself through these bits.
Defense 101: no crime has been committed here. Rule 102: it’s the victims fault. Why is it that every time I see Ezra’s female attorney I hear: 🎶you gotta pay the troll toll if you want this baby boys soul🎶
It's so bizarre to see how people that are guilty of such terrible crimes mold their behavior in a way in which they think will be favorable to the jury. In reality, they always come off looking crazy as fuck. The way she behaves gives off the impression that she remembers fondly these memories of Alex. She laughs and smiles while recalling them. However, the situation doesn't match at all regardless of whether you believe her claims about Alex or not.
This is beside the point . But addressing her gender issues ….. we ALL are masculine and feminine. Being female isn’t loving all things girly. And being masculine isn’t loving all things manly . We all have boyish and feminine tendencies. It’s part of being human
She is insufferable Why is she allowed to interpret his journals and essays? Also her constant "YES" omg... Ezra YES Im going to ask a question YES About a journal YES
3:50 She is smiling/smirking almost the entire time. She is loving the attention on her and she's so traumatized and such a victim😂... in a situation SHE CAUSED. Imagine the trauma her family and his family and friends went through with this case! She truly thought she was a victim and was going to get away with this😮 Something I've noticed is some of the most normal or sweet looking people are usually the most EVIL! I've definitely learned in my 31 years of life that people are rarely as they seem!! R.I.P ALEX ❤❤❤
No es revelador que es ella quien se acerca en primer lugar a sus futuras "víctimas"? Es un comportamiento depredador. Siempre está cazando. Buscando la mejor opción, afectiva económica.
I am horrified for Alex's grandmother. She has been fervently watching and trying to understand why her clearly brilliant and kind grandson was murdered, seated directly behind prosecution every day. None of this is necessary. "This is for her....feelings." NOBODY CARES.
*EVERYTHING* she claims Alex *told* her wasn't written down or told in the presence of *anyone* else. How convenient that she knows all his innermost thoughts and feelings and philosophical beliefs with such precision!
Oh god. She just compared herself to Alex by saying her philosophies were "in the sunshine" and his were more like "rainy day", and it's clearly rehearsed or something she coined and used in the past.
She portrays herself as Little Miss Sunshine, yet she brought darkness and grief to an entire community; an entire family. It is appalling that the defense decided to put Alex on trial. Of course, the jury obviously didn't approve. People like Ezra rarely change; she will be the same person in 50 years that she is now.
