@@shamudude2017 the maps are already large at top tier, to the point where planes take full fuel and still land to refuel, and are forced to conserve fuel at early stages of the game
@@FROST_ZFTIf you can't learn to not use full afterburner for the entire match, then that's on you. EC maps are badly designed, but normal maps are too small for 10v10, or 12v12.
Could we get a cooperative Training room/test fly mode? It would be such a fun way to quickly chill with your friends between games without creating a whole custom game.
My grandma’s favorite plane to build when she was working on the production line was the F-111. Def sure this would put a smile on her face if she was still with us.
Us aussies had the F 111 in service for years, i remember as a kid seeing them doing flyovers the brisbane river during river fire, such a beautiful plane but was outdated so we upgraded to the latest F/A18 Super Hornet, F111 still one of my favourite planes 💙
@@arron4749 The Soyuz R-79V-300 is a powerful engine but it is not at all the strongest engine on a plane or even the strongest fighter jet engine. If we are talking about fighter jet engines the F135 is 41,000 lbf (182 kN) with afterburner
Excellent episode. 👍 The new Flanders map is gorgeous, and I absolutely love the concept of maps having variations that represent different eras depending on the vehicles players are using. I'd love to see this feature expanded to existing maps, and not just ground, but air and naval, too. 🤞 I'm also really stoked the F-111 Aardvark is finally being added to War Thunder. I hope the F model will eventually be added as a standard vehicle, and it'd be great if the RAAF's C or G model was added. Perhaps as a premium or event vehicle? Lastly... VARK! VARK! VARK! 😋
No because this'll could easily be abused : take for example an IS-2 going in reverse, this is extremely hard to kill, now take the same IS-2 but this time it decides to stand on the capture point which makes it invincible thank so to infinite FPE. An alternative though would be to make it so you can reload a FPE on a capture point only once in a match, this would prevent much of the abuse but then this makes adding this pretty pointless
@@Stormyy6310that’s a really rare occurance. It’s just really annoying if you are doing well in your tank, but then run out of fpe, for example when you keep getting your engine blown up by a plane
Q: Think it would be fun too see how the Sav 12.20.48 was made if that is possible, find it interesting how they managed to fit an autoloader capable of fireing 120mm shells in only 1.2s.
@@Pioneer_DE It would be great if they added a strategic bomber spawn at 8-10k meters. The payload of strategic bombers would mean they could actually impact the outcome of the match, so it would be important to climb and intercept them/protect your own bombers. It would be immersive and shake up the stale meta, so it will probably never happen.
I love war thunder, and while playing when it's a night setting, I noticed how accurate it is and how it'd be cool to see the milky way in winter maps, or places based on places with low light pollution in real life.
Q: Will the Puma receive spikes as upgrade, like how the BMP-1 receives the BMP-1P upgrade? The Bundeswehr also upgraded it's Pumas to the S1 Variant, which use the Spikes.
In a recent devblog for the KF41 in the comments (or somewhere else) they've mentioned AFAIK that they'd rather just add another variant that has Spikes instead of pushing the current one even higher
Q: would you ever add the b58 hustler or make the vark a nuclear bomber for gr rb and when you have the nuke the cockpit curtains are closed it would be a cool addition
Thanks for caring about the immersion as a pure ww2 player fighting on maps with modern airports and wind turbines makes me feel sick and impacts my enjoyment of the game!
@@aito_nomos He is right tho maps and missions are dogshit ww2 maps with modern vehicle or opposite. Or in air sim where your targets are russian tanks while you are flying russian planes or nato vehicles while flying nato planes (a10 striking abrams and defending friendly t80bvm good logic)
Add-on armour like tracks,sandbags or cement was frown upon during WW2. Claiming they added a lot of extra strain on the suspension and transmission without adding any relevant protection.
They could do it... they can do many things but they don't want to do it because "too few players" Such as Balancing old helicopter PVP battles They could do multicrew combat for simulator battles... but probably won't lol
Hello Gaijin, this is a suggestion, I think it could be really cool to get a free tech tree vehicle for every 20 or 50 levels you gain on your player account.
Please!! Let him go!!! He can't breath!!!!! But can you make adjustments to the nation choices for matchmaking? Maybe each ranks has it's own matchups? Like, in each rank nations that worked together in that time frame would be put together? Maybe for each rank a nation has a list of possible allies?
Does that mean the Aardvark now has the heaviest head-on burst? Last I remember, the Phantom claimed 1st with 4 Vulcans Edit: The God of Strike munitions has come!! RAISE HELL! PRAISE DALE! AARDVARK KING!
Am i the only one who thinks the new map looks like the giant’s shadow map from battlefield 1? I’m not mad because it was a gorgeous map and i love to see it in war thunder, but with the blimp and railway station it seems almost the same map, anyway i think it will be an amazing map to play
Just curious: the crashed C-5 Galaxy on Flanders bares a suspicious resemblance to the Dover C-5 crash. Any connection between the two, like perhaps using that crash as the model? Important safety tip: if you shut down an engine and need more power, grab ALL THE THROTTLES. It's not going to hurt the dead engine and you avoid STUPIDLY leaving a good engine at idle thrust! - 42 days without my F9F-8 Cougar!
Q how would you read the RWR from the cockpits of planes that don't have an instrument to read it (discluding hud). one aircraft I can bring to mind is the A5C
I know it was never used on the F111A but could we get the GBU 28, it would be pure comedy to get a bunker buster bomb to go strait through a tank. It would just be another piece of equipment for the greatest tank buster of all time
at 2:50 you say "its maximum load is half a hundred 750lb bombs." Which is what we were all expecting considering that in the dev server, you could carry 50x750lb bombs. Funny how on release now, the outer pylons can only carry 3x750lb each meaning the max payload is only 38x750 bombs. I get that this loadout is not practical in the slightest but why would they do this when the F111A most certainly could carry the 50x750lb loadout?
