When an F1 car gets past every car and in P1, it will simply pull away and open up a huge gap. Handling, roadholding, cornering, acceleration... everything is superior.
@@AppleLauda_destroyer99942 F1 cars’ V6 Turbo hybrid engines are a Lot powerful then the V10s they used in the early 2000, and very fuel efficient as well, it’s just the sound that sucks... that F1 car is From 2018 so it has a V6
Did anyone just happen to see the Bugatti get airborne and leave the track? Video was very jumpy but it must have been wrecked and no mention on the video?? Hello?
Back in the late 60s F1 cars running Nurburgring used to get airborne over the same hill crests. Edited to add: Here's a link to the 1967 F1 race. Skip to 4 minutes 34s for flying cars. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZaYZQi8wtQA.html&frags=pl%2Cwn
Jeffrey Bozeman Seriously I very much doubt your perspective, breaking under 5G (not the wireless type, pun intended), with way quicker cornering ability, coupled with the immense downforce that keeps an F1 car glued to the asphalt plus ultra precise handling characteristics barring engine or other mechanical failure a top-flight F1 car and a decent F1 driver it’s game over in under six minutes.Top speed isn’t it everything in Formula One, slower cars have regularly beaten faster cars in F1. We’re your argument to hold water, the amount of engineering research and development that is poured in to each car every season would be rendered an utter waste if these comparatively lumbering giants were really capable of anything that is shown in this virtual race. Respectfully yours.....E.W.
@@jeffreybozeman6245 The F1 car running a stock setup is at minimum 1 minute 30 seconds faster than the other cars. It's way lighter and has way more downforce, it should have smoked the others. Also, there's no such thing as an AWD F1 car from before 2000.
Espectacular video. Al final el fórmula 1 Ferrari demostró que es un pura sangre. Al principio pensé que el Mercedes iba a estar en la lucha hasta el final.
A Chiron is moving at 10 football fields per second over 200mph,say what!!Someone got that wrong.Its fast yet it doesn't travel at the speed of lightning.
Surprising how good the Mercedes-Benz Vision GT is, a track competitive supercar; $1.5 million is the cost, only 5 made. The Ferrari F80 is at least $2.2 million, Bugatti Chiron $3 million. The total basic expenditure of a Formula 1 car is about $15.52 million.
An average car driver is completely stunned in a plaid model s sedan ...but I cannot imagine a 15 million dollar F-1 ability to accelerate or corner and Their drivers are half crazy to get behind that wheel and race each other a foot away from their opponents at 200mph!!!!
The F1 Ferrari is designed for the track. Suspension, engine, gears, tires, traction and lots of down force to keep it on the track, unlike the blue Bugatti that took flight 0:58! The F1 could theoretically drive upside down!
What a rush of sight and sound. Just imagine the responsibility to drive one of those cars knowing how expensive they are but still be an aggressive driver
The Mer's driver is so cool, real cool. He was just actually defeated at: 7:45, perfect turn of Ferrari!. This clip is really awesome. Thanks for sharing.
Fantastic graphics, complete with wheel lockup smoke. I love it. Overall, great fun to watch, but totally unrealistic. Here is why: 1. Even though it's not designed to be a track car, a Bugatti Chiron would not crash like that just because it's on the track. Personally, I think it would even smoke a Vision GT around the Nurburgring. There are many straight spots on the Ring where the Chiron will be able to utilize its phenomenal straight line speed and leave the Vision GT for dead. Once the Chiron is in front, it will keep incrementally building the gap until the Vision GT is just a speck in the Chiron's rear view mirrors. 2. There is no way a 600bhp Mercedes Vision GT can beat a 1200bhp hybrid Ferrari F80 Hypercar around the track. Even the current Ferrari LaFerrari would trash a Vision GT without breaking a sweat. And the Ferrari F80 is a car that supposed to be much more powerful and faster than the Ferrari LaFerrari! 3. No road car, no matter how good or how fast, can overtake a Formula 1 car in a race 4:54 , 6:21 4. It's impossible for a 1385kg 600bhp Mercedes Vision GT to keep up with a 650kg 930bhp Ferrari SF71H in a straight line 2:50 , 3:10 , 5:58 5. Why wasn't the Ferrari SF71H overtaking that Vision GT? There are so many instances where the Formula 1 car should have shot past that Vision GT 2:25 , 2:36 , 2:47 , 3:06 , 3:21 , 4:45 , 5:23 , 5:56 , 7:30 , Realistic results of this race should have been: 1. Ferrari SF71H (by more than half a lap from the nearest car) 2. Ferrari F80 3. Bugatti Chiron 4. Bugatti Veyron Supersport WRE 5. Mercedes-AMG Vision GT
ᗩᑎ丅ᕼᗝᑎƳ ᑭᗩᖇᎥᔕ The current 2018 *Ferrari SF71H Formula 1* can reach *340km/h* as measured at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya race track. Since the Nurburgring ( ~where the race in this video game is being held~ ) has an even longer straight than Catalunya, the Ferrari SF71H Formula 1 car would reach even higher speeds than the 340km/h they currently reach on the shorter Catalunya main straight.
I look at the replies and of course its rigged. Of course none of the others can touch the F1, its built for this circuit. winning here has nothing to do with top speed, as top speed is only reached momentarily. Its a matter of agility, grip on the road, lightness and acceleration. In the corners the much heavier cars cant follow the F1, the G-force forces them down in speed. Mercedes probably paid a lot to get this much attention. When first the F1 took off it showed the reality of things The driver of the Ferrari F80 was very poor, he was all over the place. So Chillout, I totally agree with your list. If it had been for real the ferrari F1 had taken off from the start and the others had never seen its tail light again.
amazing how fast the F1 car is, even with a driver incapable of driving on the fast line of the track .. its painful to watch, missing one turn after another, LOL
Knew it was a video game because the F1 should've been half way or more around the track far ahead. In terms of grip, torque, power and overall speed, the F1 car is light years ahead....
As an F1 fan I'm bothered by the lack of aggression from the f1 car. There were at least 20 instances where the f1 car should have taken the lead, or was too passive and lost a place.
Bet that impact hurt. Sideways in to the fence. Hope he was ok. Not nearly enough down force. Go back and look at it frame by frame. He was, I'm guessing, about 4 feet off the ground. Got real expensive real quick.
1.5 литр мотор Ф1 укатал супер монстров) а все потому, что аэродинамика + сцепление + эффективность силовой установки. И это на софт резине. А если супер софт? и нормально дубасить по апексам, а не ехать в развалочку? короче феррарри уделала всех. Для сравнения надо супер карт ставить)
@@user-dl1ul6ju3r сам ты дятел! К твоему сведению,все супер кары проходят,в том числе и виртуальную обкатку,не считая массу тестов и измерений в реале!
Bello.. non credevo si fosse arrivati ad una definizione così fedele alla realtà.. un altro pelino, e sarà impossibile accorgersi che non è una gara vera!
Me estay weviando? ?? Es un juego??? El F1 me llamo la atención ya que su motor suena mas a un Indy que a un F1 de 14.000 RPM...pero el meche...espectacular.. y el flapper de frenado del Ferrari igual nunca lo vi antes
Mas os Bugattis no geral não tem aerodinamica proveniente pra pista, são carros de altissima performace mas que são projetados pra circular mas ruas, eles não tem a mesma preparação aerodinamica da linha GT (GT2, GT2 RS, GT3, GT3 RS) da Porsche que são carros com toda uma preparação pra pista, tanto que se tu colocar um Chiron pra correr num circuito ele toma benga de GT3 RS cujo motor dele não tem nem metade dos 1500CV gerados pelo motor do Chiron
Yea, c'mon, in real life the F1 racecar would eat all those other cars before turn7! And if you dont believe that then racecar spelled backwards isn't racecar, is it? Told ya!
