@@elimlinrr6898 being fabulous?? That's the byproduct of the personality traits. Being pragmatic is one of the best personality traits. So "being fabulous is pragmatic" is an incorrect sentence.
The fact that Pragg managed to pull a draw in a 4 vs 3 pawn rook endgame against the current world no. 2 while Kasparov had lost while he was the world no.1 is crazy!!!
@@plendafuture7451 your argument is completely flawed . This means the opponent also does have access to modern tech which makes the game even tougher .
I like seeing them play to the end. There is something poetic about seeing the two Kings face to face , and the two players having a conversation as equals, when all the dust settles.
The endgame with the commentry is really interesting.I lost so many games being down a pawn,Only because I am impatient and can't play those waiting moves with rook.I always find ways to exchange the rook and lose the pawn endgame.
A simpler solution could be to go in the end game with two extra pawns, to avoid all this. Ofcourse its not entirely in our control to do that. But still an alternate method you can say, for agressive players who dont like those waiting moves
Caruana such a Chad. Instead of repeating moves with the king guarding the pawn into a known draw by repetition he just say F the pawn and moved away from it to end the draw quicker.
This video is pasted with a chess digital board. What software is used to make this digital board? Its score bar is on the right side of the board, and the score bar is relatively thick.
The digital board is made with the paper recordings of both players of the game, after they’re finished playing I believe. The score board is rather odd though.
Played an extremely sharp game but it made it boring. Usually caruana from what ive seen is the battle tactician but pragg wouldnt allow that. The kid is an amazing player. India always produces some of the worlds best players. WGM included. For those of you that dont know, Pragg's sister is also amazing.
Why fabi lost the math i mean let him self draw? if fabi move the soldier along with the king upto opposite edge he got new pan in exchange right? Why didn't he do it.
Each player keeps a score sheet where he records all the moves of the game, by both players. From this list of moves, the game between the two players can later be reconstructed/replayed in full, thus it serves as a historical document, but more importantly, with both players keeping track of the development of the game, it prevents claims of cheating, or conflicts over what the position is. At the end of the game both players must turn in to the hosting authority a copy of their signed/certified score sheet, making the record official. Think of what would happen if both players were not recording the moves and someone accidentally knocks over the board-these things can happen; not all games have video with thousands of observers and tight security around the board. Can each player remember all the moves? Do they both agree what the moves were? What if an unscrupulous player had a losing position and knocked the board over himself, and claimed it was an accident, and then disagreed, on purpose, about the position of the pieces? If there is no record, then how can the organizer / judge decide what is the right position? And if only one player recorded the moves, what keeps him honest but the other player independently recording the moves too? Of course, in the modern age with computer chess that auto-records and annotates the game and a bewildering number of alternative lines, many games don’t feature players using pen and paper, including lots of blitz or bullet games. Nevertheless the score sheet is an important part of chess and chess history.
