Faces of Earth - Building the Planet 

I do find it interesting, just not years of textbooks and papers interesting

It's documentaries like this that probably made Arthur C. Clarke start writing science fiction... no... wait... 2001 was a documentary....

thank you

respond if you're alive

@@tannor754 Look up Mud Fossil University by Roger Spurr. Very far-fetched stuff...until it's not. Keep an open, non-biased mind and do NOT avoid intellect...happy hunting!

0

@@rconn4501 Roger Spurr is a one man quack. He is the epitome of NOT keeping an "open, non-biased mind and while not avoiding intellect"

the information presented in this is, to my knowledge, the scientific consensus. If you're in disagreement with the present information, what is your theory on how life began? (please do not quote a theological reason, fairy tales have no place in a documentary unless it is specifically about that fairy-tale). My issue with this documentary is the subtle propaganda in favour of the oil and gas industry.

There is light at the end of the tunnel. Careful what you see, may be a train. Behold I give you Mudfossil University(Roger Spurr) is the name. You will never look at a rock the same! You keep drinking the koolaide, well, you may keep drinking it. But this guy will take out all the sugar, if you take a look. Besides, they say sugar will kill ya. It really does not take long for minerals to transition, hell we are talking a few years, not millions. If something is repeated long enough it becomes truth. Even if it makes no sense. I personally become very uneasy if shit don't fit. It's a gift called discernment. We all have, just some, more than others, you should ask for more, it will be given! Good hunting.

@@paulmatherly8934 I literally just posted about Roger and MFU on here lol. Nice to see he's gaining traction! 💪🏾😎🤙🏾

@@rconn4501 yes sir, isn't just the mind blowing revelation we been looking for since??? What I find out standing, is that giants were such common knowledge, there wasn't a big need to elaborate. Only sick individuals who learned dark technology would carve up flesh to barricade walls, build pyramids,ect. ect. ect. All of which is prophesied announcing His glory, glory!

@@paulmatherly8934 Sure.

Look up Mud Fossil University by Roger Spurr. Very far-fetched stuff...until it's not. Keep an open, non-biased mind and do NOT avoid intellect...happy hunting!

Earth is certainly not unique in the universe but as far as we know yes it’s a wonder

no credentials nothing .. learn what exactly

I think you would actually have to go to the moon to do that.

It's happening at a fast rate. The central banks of the world were too greedy, their wealth came from the working people and a high price will be paid. We are losing our beautiful Earth. There is much information out there yet. I suggest people stop watching the msm news, as like everything else is, they are also owned by the central banks & their friends, Big Businesses. People think all that is going on is for our own good, it isn't.

Looks like millions of years to form oil has finally failed as proven by science. So search for oil which takes less than 2 months to form under cold pressure changes perspective?

Superior analytics, hat’s off to you!

plowshares

American (there's your first clue) GeoSCIENCES (there's your second clue) Institute (aren't insane assylums called institutes?) can't even fact check their own scripts? Oh, well, 90% of this was cartoons pushing a fantasy storyline so forgive them Bruner, for they know not what they do.... literally....

As long as everybody’s nitpicking, radar uses pulse-modulated EM waves. Radio implies the modulation of the carrier wave to convey speech music or data. Lidar is Light Detection and Ranging, which uses a very high frequency radar, the visible band of EM spectrum (approx 4-8 x 10 E 14 Hz.)

What petrified wood of the grand canyon?

Wal Thornhill and Thunderbolts Project Electric Universe theory

Look up Mud Fossil University by Roger Spurr. Very far-fetched stuff...until it's not. Keep an open, non-biased mind and do NOT avoid intellect...happy hunting!

Shifting of the magnetic poles more desperately needed

@@rconn4501 why are you suggesting people to look up a fraudster? His assertions have already been disproven to him, and he knows it. He's only popular because people have the cart before the horse, as in, imagination before facts. Who doesn't want to believe in people giants roaming the Earth who died out and were preserved in fossilized form. Pareidolia at its finest doesn't make it true.

Afwknbtdhgfae😅

@Raileigh Greene ...Not so much relevant here. If it's a scientific documentary on a subject you don't know much about, you might make the assumption that it's accurate (or at least accurate to a reasonably high confidence level if the documentary represents reputable sources and/or conveys logical ideas) until you come across new information that challenges that assumption, whereupon you re-evaluate all available information and their sources. This is pretty much how humans process reality. We make assumptions and evaluations based on available information and then we re-assess when new information is available. What you're basically saying is that if you knew nothing about colours and someone showed you the color yellow and told you "this color is called blue" before saying "nah, I was lying", that somehow your initial acceptance of the first statement (before hearing the second) constitutes some meaningful form of belief. Re-evaluation/processing of available information while accepting available information as reality (or at least depending on your perception of the reliability of the information), does not constitute belief. Nor does it have any other relevance than to your own intrinsic sense of reality (and your skills at critical analysis). At most, processing new information might change your underlying belief in the nature of reality. And of course, you do have to take into account the speaker's interpretation of the information they're trying to convey, but when it comes to belief in ideas and ideology like you seem to be talking about, you should probably find an American news program to post your comment on.

The only difference between sonar waves, radio waves and light waves is the frequency they are all energy waves across the same frequency spectrum including microwave and x-ray frequencies.

astrolover 65: Correct, I was about to make the same comment. Radar do uses RADIO waves, and the SONAR, sound waves. Thanks also for your opportune comment.!!! But all are energy waves.

@@13minutestomidnight Great comment.!! Totally agree with you, Sir.!!!

@@bryandepaepe5984 I think you mean ... "across DIFFERENT frequencies aspect"... Right.??

Could get top dollar for it, cut up into floor tiles!! 👍😲

Igen, természetessen ezt az ellemzőt már vissza fele is lehet forgatni az időben. Valószínü hogy a képzelet idő tartalma egyesülhet a párhúzamos időbeosztással?

I see the same thing in the pronunciatio of Mojave in American G. I. It is MO and JAVE. All armed services have a presence there. Marines have 29 Palms. Navy have Naval Weapons Test Center. Air Force has Edward's Air Force Base. I served for almost year in the Army at Fort Irwin. I learned it was sacred ground because it was where General Patton trained the Third Armored before going after Rommel in North Africa.

Well, Cowboy Geologist here I sit literally trying to figure out how I say Nevada. From Long Island NY with some of my extreme accent lost living upstate, I still say Nev-AHHHH-da. I think it’s the similar if not same as Nev-ODD-a. Lol. I must be very bored & this documentary pushed me over the edge. Lol

@@Lora_M_NY lol. Just put "Ad" or "Add" in the middle. When I lived it Turkey (the country), it drove everybody crazy the British would say Tuckey, like we say the end of Kentucky. LoL

@@cowboygeologist7772 Lol I LOVE accents! I’m a little sad I’ve lost my LawwwwnG GiLanD, NY accent..... probably for the best 😄

Im going to school for Geology! Do you have any tips? Such as where to begin in finding work out of college in that field? Im in Texas btw!

+bobpeckham oh yeah and radar uses sound ??????? lol

+bobpeckham The red light is really green, so go.

bobpeckham -- That is the true language of science. "Truth" is a philosophical construct, not a scientific concept.

Yes, after years of watching science documentaries, one line that I've heard time and again is: "John Smith had a revolutionary idea. Initially his fellow scientists refused to believe it. It contradicted established ideas." But then John Smith's ideas were proven true, and some of the ideas that were believed to be "true", were found to be false. Almost every "revolutionary" discovery involves the refutation of ideas that were scientifically "true". Happens all the time. So I agree with you: They should say, "Here's the evidence for what we think is true." That would be more honest.

Those "crazy ideas" aren't unsupported. If the people proposing them did not believe them to be true, then they wouldn't be proposing them. This is why we have the scientific method; so ideas can be confirmed through rigorous testing. Even still, a new scientific model will be heavily ridiculed until it is independently verified. When the scientific community claims something to be true, they didn't just pull it out thin air, it's been supported by rigorous and documented experimentation that builds on thousands of years of proven methods. By your logic, the new ideas that fly in the face of the status quo are no more true than the ones they replace, and therefore, we can never really know anything to be true. Not to get to philosophical, but I challenge you prove that your name is Kevin Byrne. I guarantee that you will not be able to convince me beyond saying "here's the evidence supporting that I think my name is Kevin Byrne." Just like a scientific consensus, it does not matter how many people think that's your name, or that your birth certificate says that's your name. none of that proves anything, it is simply the best evidence available to support your claim that your name is Kevin Byrne (or whatever your real name is).

Kenneth, the geological timeline of billions of years is intentional disinfo - the fake biblical timeline of 6,000 years is also intentional disinfo - the historical timeline of thousands of years is more intentional disinfo - the timeline for CO2 in ice cores is more lies, the timeline from carbon dating, the timeline from tree rings, the timeline from Egyptology, etc. The true origins of our Earth, the true timeline for our Earth and the true timeline for our human history are all much shorter than we've been told. Throw their lies into the rubbish where they belong so you can see the true timeline which they do NOT want the public to know.

please, smart guy, enlighten us, won't you. (can you? -lol)

@@WhirledPublishing u keep commenting they're wrong (I realise 3 years ago and a ton of new info is available), so what theory of the earth formation do u see as possible?

@Neil Rusling It doesn't matter that all the cataclysms and all the geological formations are shockingly recent? It doesn't matter when and how the Himalayas, Andes, Rockies, Aleutians, Alps and TransAntarctic Mountains were formed? It doesn't matter that dozens of supervolcanoes erupted in North America as thousands of smaller volcanoes erupted across five continents all on the same night and that all this was shockingly recent? It doesn't matter when or why all this happened? It doesn't matter when or why the Siberian and Deccan Traps were formed? It doesn't matter when and how the Grand Canyon was formed? It doesn't matter when or how our oceans were formed? It doesn't matter when or how the Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea, the Arabian Sea or the Ross Sea were formed? Since all of this is documented in historic records - by our ancestors - while the public is told "millions and billions of years ago", you think none of this is relevant to your daily life? You think ignorance of our Earth will surely not impact you as thousands of people are killed by landslides, sinkholes, floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tornadoes, lightning and numerous other "natural" disasters every day?

@@WhirledPublishing Thank you, sir, for pointing it out! Your information is treasure and your insight is great. I also hate the millions and billions years of fairy tale disguised in science.

Look up Mud Fossil University by Roger Spurr. Very far-fetched stuff...until it's not. Keep an open, non-biased mind and do NOT avoid intellect...happy hunting!

The plane Nasa are using is a 40 year old military plane. Rip nasa

Karen Jones Would you marry me?

That’s not what they want… profit rules

They used to "in theory" and "we think this because" - now they are so confident they leave those important statements out. Kind of sad, really.

united ... maybe the lava gives them a clue.. you know,,, that stuff that comes out of the inside ???... OR maybe the rocks that come from old mountains..Or sound echos ??? i guess when you Study" something ??? Some people do learn something from their studies... AND some people think some god made everything,,, and there isn't any science

@@jamesmueller8701 they stated Earth has an iron core, why? Because "that stuff that flows out of the inside" is made of iron? No... because they can receive echoes from the earth's core? Lol, as if some crazy math equation could determine uranium from iron by the sound of an echo through thousands of miles of rock..

@@jamesmueller8701 scientific method requires that the findings be verified... By stating something like the composition of the core, which can't be verified scientifically, they may as well claim God made it...lol

@@unitedspacepirates9075 - Maybe because its that magic magnetic field that keeps us all alive only happens with an iron core?

We're not too stupid, unfortunately a minority of us are too greedy to allow for the distribution of resources and power (which includes education, and decisions on how we treat the earth).

It's like a B- movie that no one with intelligence is willing to suffer through

@@WhirledPublishing I speed-scrolled to the Jackson Pollack patio stones.

Eh no it was estimated by radiometic dating techniques.

That costs money, I'm sure if you paid for it, they'd gladly do it.

@@donnieboughton1730 Seriously? I didn't know they have to pay for that. Thanks for letting me know.

Banished?..

@South Florida Horticulture www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencefocus.com/space/do-all-planets-have-magnetic-fields/amp/

@South Florida Horticulture I'm at work and dont have time to find the actual probe data associated with each planet. This is a widely publish topic and you should have no problem confirming this with minimal effort.

Mudfossil University

yeh but we still dont have a better OS than XP running on that sweet XPS lappy :D

Look up Mud Fossil University by Roger Spurr. Very far-fetched stuff...until it's not. Keep an open, non-biased mind and do NOT avoid intellect...happy hunting!

@@rconn4501 Nice one :)

@@Mossyz. why ty...

@@rconn4501 im going to look it up on youtube .:)

Moon Hitsearth Much less than the amounts of fish killed by one volcanic eruption with VEI larger than 4.

chriss790 I'm well aware of the eruptions, and I'm sure you are right about the fish. You're talking about the under sea volcanic eruptions, right?

Moon Hitsearth Not just that dude. Volcanic ash? Acidification of waters with volcanic gases escaping through fissures during eruption? Even watching Dante's Peak with Pierce Brosnan can give you an idea of that. Don't need a geology degree for it, although it helps (like in my case).

chriss790 No I hear you. I've just recently come to realize the sizes of the underwater monsters. Like this so called Pacific blob that is warming the Gulf of Alaska. You can actually see the size of this hole in our weather satellite images. I've seen it many times. I imagine the gases coming out of that beast are killing some fish, like the salmon. I watched a video the other day, of some drone footage of an underwater eruption around Taiwan. I know there is a huge monster under the Bay of Bengal. The weather is very revealing.

Moon Hitsearth Yup. Virtually anywhere along the ring of fire things like that are possible. So I wouldn't hate on oil exploration too much. Especially since academia have become far more environmentally conscious than 10-50 years ago and things are getting far more difficult for the explorers. I know I'd much prefer to have a reliable supply of power at my house in the UK rather than rely on a dodgy solar panel in a country that gets 30% less sunshine than those who can use it proficiently.

Simple answer: Elsewhere Slightly longer answer: By some process either biotic or abiotic (or a mixture of both) most of the non-carbon components of the coal precursor material get removed as chemical changes occur, and physical forces are applied. The actual chemistry involved is similar to how charcoal is produced. Wood is heated in an anoxic environment, preventing the carbon from burning away, but still removing many of the non-carbon elements. For a more precise answer: I would look at the literature. I'm sure volumes have been published on the chemistry of coal formation.

@@Paramecium914 goddamnit preach on, brotha. Biscuits ain't for jam.

It's 4.54 billion years old.

did you see it happen ?

Did you see your own birth? Guess you can't prove you were born then.

@@JohnSSSSS Posting an ignorant response will only gain you disrespect.

@@radzewicz I'm replying to QNFee, not you.

Quit drinking the kool aide! Mudfossil University, let your mind at ease, there is and are answers to your heartfelt questions. A simple reason its' uneasy is cuz it don't make sense. Discernment screams out loud. Peace comes with steady structure that fits together. Roger Spurr is his name. He does not have all the answers, but he has found a giant piece of th puzzle. Good hunting.

@@paulmatherly8934 you the kool-aide drinker! try taking any intro to earth science

Coldwelth Simms- The ozone was needed for life to exist and survive. So yes life made the ozone. Since planet earth is roughly 13 Billion years old, this did not happen quickly but then neither did life on planet earth. Don't forget life does not mean human life, it simply means life. First life happened around 4.5 Billion years ago in the form of Hydrothermal. Due to this, oceans stared to form along with plant life from microorganisms. The rest is history. The oceans clean 70% of our air and the forests and plant life clean the other 30%.

Mainstream geologist have been going backward - though layers and layers of their own lies - for centuries.

agreed.

true

Moron.

The American Geosciences Institute doesn't realize they're a mouthpiece that's luring the public to believe in lies and lunacy. The geological timeline of billions of years is intentional disinfo - the fake biblical timeline of 6,000 years is also intentional disinfo. The parasitic billionaires that control our world get their science reports from the most brilliant minds in the world while the public gets their science reports from the unintelligent C average fake science gods that graduated from low level institutions - which is roughly equivalent of accepting to accepting science reports from the smart kid in sixth grade. Psychologists have uploaded the IQ's of geologists and dozens of other fake experts so those that enjoy getting their history of the Earth from a fake science god with an IQ of 85 - or one with an IQ of 115 - won't have an issue with their preposterous nonsense - but the rest of us feel like we're listening to a fantasy novel written by an 11 year old.

Planet Earth doesn't care about our IQ's. If we, the humanity, can't adapt, to the changes. some other more "clever" species will be topdogs after us.

Plate tectonics pushed the layers into wrinkles

Mudfossil University

salt domes are a well-studied but not well understood phenomenon. I think over the years water eventually works its way into the deposit and causes the salt to "squeeze" upward like "water bubbles" of salt.

Jesse G THAN

Jesse G that is why they call it "Earth".

That's ridiculous It's the most completed.. y bother....a dust bunny get a grip.

And we’re less than fleas

Why would our continued raping of the planet (which was discussed) make you believe this doc wasn’t already great

So, you think sharing utter non-sensical theoretical buffoonery is of benefit to mankind?

It’s possible! Probability is another question

Jock, you mean God did not make the Earth in 7 days? And there is no Santa Claus? Regarding Earths center. I think the closest answer to being correct but still wrong, would be whatever Mercury is made out of. According to the theory that mercury had once been much larger but after an impact only its planetary core still remains. It was exciting to discover how the planetoid Pluto is still geologically active. And even though Pluto had been demoted, our solar system is better defined by it's great number of planetoids compared to handful of planets. And when one thinks of Star trek life in the future. It will unfold all within the border of our Oort cloud as humans colonize a dizzying number of kuiper belt planetoids. Once space X comes up with gravity plates human body needs to survive off-planet.🙃

@@CONCERTMANchicago I may be mistaken but I believe evidence shows that the inner core is solid because of the pressure

@@leonstrand329, earthquake waves propagating through the core also back up your theory debating solid vs. Molten.

See... I was disappointed. The whole premise of this was about a spy plane scoping out who has what minerals. Remote sensing satellites (yeah, I know - I'm laughing too) are supposed to be able to image deep within the earth with just a few watts of power. But the HAARP with a jigawatt of pulsed energy supposedly could see to the chewy caramel center, so either they can't image and don't know, or have known for years and are just pissing down our legs with Disney cartoons.

You come from a country that sent men to walk on the moon 50 years ago. And now America's schools produce people like you. Thanks for the laughs!

I agree

Came here to say this exact thing. They ought to be working on ways to improve renewable energy. The oil and coal won't last forever no matter how much they want it to.

Haters of humankind stand the fruitless cause of the dismantling of the oil industry, which is the main source of energy upon the planet. Removing the power of a nation while the other never would comply is tantamount to disarming a nation from protection against enemy nations and opportunist allies. This infiltration of these plans from other nations and more than -75 years of Marxist indoctrination to brainwash people to believe our energy, financial and power are our enemies is pure espionage, treason and an act of war against the people of the United States of America.

@@michaelpotocnik1575 Oil and coal has had their day - not just for the USA, but for humankind. This is not about nations, it's about keeping the planet habitable and keeping us healthy and safe. I'd like to hear your power struggle convo after resource wars and climate refugees are problems for every country. Clean energy's got to be scaled up so we can finally let go of dirty fuels - as a species.

You’re so naive. Geology has the funds it has because of the search for natural resources. It’s not nice but it’s the way it is. Oil companies are still in business because of all of us.

You would need a strong floor to support it and a strong back to move it.😁 I have some slices, it is beautiful when polished.

Fossilized tree

I have a polished stone like that..its really beautiful and expensive lol

The origin of Earth and the history of Earth that they presented is all lies - straight from the minds of the insane.

@@WhirledPublishing I was always happier insane anyway. It's the false sense of clarity and knowledge that other views blindly push that is true insanity.

break

When you consider that our galaxy alone has hundreds of billions (by our estimation) of Earth-like planets, it was a matter of time before one of them finally had all the right conditions going for life. We are extremely lucky to witness it, and might not the be the only ones. Specially if you consider the other hundreds of billions of galaxies across the universe.

Yeah, but when I was a teacher of 12 - 14 year-old kids, I'd have loved to have this video. Would have cut out the petroleum industry advertizement that is the last third of the video, but the visuals really do help kids who are struggling to imagine how tectonics works.

Funded by Big Oil.

Pole flip? You mean magnetic flip? Has nothing to do with geology, or energy.

no it's like the Black Death but more enjoyable

@@harshwilly 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😭

Why do you have a problem with applied geoscience? I note you use plastic and metal, you probably drive, fly, heat and cool your home and use electric lights.

You were born 200 years too late.

agreed. BBC still the undisputed champion of docs.

good points and thanks for the tip on vanished! BBC does have differing styles and approaches some quite annoying and a little too much presenter-up-front with little snippets of fact in between. same can be said for NOVA in its somewhat overly sensationalized stylistic approach to narration but HUGE props free content. I guess both sides are thinking of their audiences and I feel ya gotta pump the gas a little for US based viewers. With the UK approach I find I can digest and memorise due to their use of tangible metaphors, visual diagrams and detailed descriptions as to why each thing might occur. Guess who gives a fuck if we're learning! Gunna check that Vanished doc now.

LOL, you're looking at a fucking computer (or TV), genius. How about instead of complaining about the quality of the internet-based geology documentary, you go look at some rocks?

Instead of expecting others to spoon-feed to you the truth about the history of our world - which you get from geologists with IQ's of 85 to 115 - how about you develop your intellect so you can do your own decades of research, which includes compiling thousands of independent sources from across the world, translating from over a dozen languages, going to back to the time before Ptolemy ... How about reading the captain's logs from the sailing ships going back hundreds of years and reading the diaries of the explorers, studying the illustrations and paintings of the landscapes across the world going back 600 years, studying the early photographs of the landscapes across the world going back nearly 200 years, studying the geological anomalies and cataclysms all across the world, monitoring glacial melt all across the world for nearly 20 years and tracking the ice shelves and glaciers back 600 years ... How about studying bathymetric charts going back several decades and studying hundreds of topographic maps from across the world, going back 600 years, how about studying dozens and dozens of maps of the tectonic plates, fault zones, rifts, mountain ranges, calderas and craters, valleys, rivers, islands, continents, oceans, seas, etc., while also monitoring landslides all across the world, sinkholes all across the world, colossal fissures opening up across the world and the rapid meltdown of the Arctic and Antarctic ice, while also monitoring sea temperatures all across the world and studying the history and the physics of the colossal tsunami waves that have decimated our world... How about studying the most violent cataclysms of all times which includes the Siberian Traps, the Deccan Traps, the Eltanin Tsunami waves, the Nuuanu landslide and tsunami waves - along with the 70 or so other landslides off the Polynesian Islands, while also studying the devastation of the volcanoes, their landslides, their pyroclastic flows, their ash fall, the sedimentary layers that piled up in minutes ... this includes the supervolcanoes of Yellowstone, Wah Wah Springs and the other supervolcanoes that the public knows next to nothing about ... after you do all that - along with studying Chemistry for decades and Physics for decades, and studying geological anomalies and cataclysms all across the world for decades, you'll begin to realize everything we've been taught is intentional disinfo propped up by the 1% that controls science research. Each and every eruption of the supervolcanoes are found in the historic documents - the exact date of the Eltanin Tsunami waves is in the historic documents, along with the exact date of the Nuuanu landslide, the exact date of the Yellowstone eruption, the exact date of the Wah Wah Springs eruption, when and how the ocean trenches were formed, when and how the archipelago islands were formed, the exact date the Grand Canyon was formed, etc. The public is lied to about all this - by unintelligent fake science gods that graduated from low level institutions with a C average ... meanwhile, billionaires get their science reports from the most brilliant minds in the world with IQ's of 160 to 200 ... If you think the discrepancy of 100 IQ points isn't intentional, keep in mind that while the 1% parade around in their $10,000 suits, the fact that children are starving to death is irrelevant to them, the fact that children are living in squalor and suffering from malnutrition is insignificant to them. If you think the 1% cares about truth and justice, if you think the public isn't intentionally spoon-fed - and forced to regurgitate - lies and lunacy, then you have an adolescent mind.

Horizon has gone down hill recently, it used to be good 20 30 years ago

agreed! couldnt help but notice the last 3rd being devoted to finding oil and natural gas. scientists all worked for exxonmobil etc. perhaps they funded the docs? still slightly concerning.

Dell hewey no need to "study" renewable resources , for the technology has been available for a very long time now, just that they ( energy companies , financial interests, and those that benefit the most from keeping our brother man,under the status quo ) have not been able to effectively put a meter on it , because well as in the case for hydrogen , anybody can generate commercial quantities of it . As far as ur "study" comment goes, it sounds to me that somebody (I'll be nice and not mention ,imply,or otherwise suggest a name) is beholden to research grants , that might be at risk of being terminated ,for even hinting at going off the reservation ,and going against the "narrative". We don't need more time,manpower and wasted resources spent mudding up the waters, we need actual people actually doing and producing results for the benefit of mankind , no matter what the human cost , ie how many of them are killed or vanished , in the process , they can't kill us all unless you guys , the researcher class shift gears from researching to actual production , without drawing too much unwanted attention , (much easier to do preinternet days)

Since our world is controlled by the fake paper dollars that are controlled by the parasitic hybrid fake billionaires, the unintelligent geologists that have no conscience have helped to create a world that will soon be destroyed - maybe a few humans will survive and carry on.

Very unlikely, the power of the world is not who runs “ democratic governments “. It’s who actually controls the military, JFK was exploring nuclear power according to a well known man, colonel Prouty, this alone would be good reason for jfk to be killed, imagine if every country could desalinate water and have cheaper power to produce their own economy’s, this would take away the power of shipping, coal and oil magnates, who have always been controlled by Kings and their privy councils, study the hostmen of Newcastle upon Tyne, s ame monopoly type as oil today, and only one King opposed them, King James the 6th of Scotland, 1st of England, it was puritans, Catholics and Anglicans, and Presbyterians who killed his Son Charles the first, ? To say nuclear is more dangerous is just an assumption, 94,000 coal miners died in England in 70 years, perhaps nuclear plants should never have been built in earthquake zones?? Go and study the work of John Mackay the creation guy and his RU-vid channel, see how coal can form in days, and all the dangerous gases it releases, while we’ve all be fooled by the same people who did all this, they now have monopolies on the new technology???