In my 60s, and waltz is also my governor. Every time I think about it I get a gag reflex. My sister calls him Governor Welch. He has managed to turn a multi billion dollar surplus into business destroying programs and more money for the education unions. But still managed to give back a few pennies on the dollar to the actual taxpayer. Not being a Democrat and not having any ability to stop him and his party I did not realize what a socialist he is. Having served in the military in the 80s I knew that whatever he did in the military would not bother any Democrat. So I see it as being pointless to even care or talk about it. But one thing I have learned since Trump was first elected that the Democrats are the true war mongers.
A postage stamp is now .73 cents. Let that sink in. A government agency that has long ago lost its usefulness is being propped up by Kamala Harris. So Kamala when you go for price controls why don't you start with Government agencies????
I was a UH-1 Huey crewchief in the Army. I got to log flight time on a CH-47 Chinook. That didn't make me a Chinook crewchief, nor did that give me the right to claim being one. That would be embellishing my career with something I did not earn. This is what Walz did. He lied. He has no honor. He has no business being anywhere near the White House. Then there's the DUI...nuff said.
I love hearing all these people say Kamala is going to do this and that. 😂 Then why isn't she already, she's in power. Plus Biden is going to do anything to help her win. So he would help with her policies now. It's all BS false promises.
It's true about walz. He had people standing on the front step of their house watching cars and walking people. It was weird as can be. Our church went to the sheriff and asked if we held services and would put the pastor in the clink. He said they had Enuf to do then worry about a church. Locals didn't bother listening to walz. A jerk of the first class.
@@chrissullivan4496 he was eligible to retire. If he retired after 21 years this would not be an issue. And if he did not have the option his superiors would have not let him leave. And what is the national guard doing going overseas to begin with? And he got an honorable discharge. What’s the problem?
@@jaredgarrison333 I don’t want to get into it with you anymore you’re not going to convince me. What you can do is convince yourself at those tattoos will make you smarter person. Now go take a hid off your Vape pen. Snowflake
When they say he bailed his team, it doesn’t mean he just didn’t go and they were down 1. No, somebody has to fill that slot and by the sounds of it rather short notice. So he risks another persons life, takes time from their family, and then takes credit. It affects morale, cohesion, and leadership. There’s many reasons to not deploy, some valid and some not. If he would just say hey you know it was time for me to retire and that tasking made me think that, then I could care less. It’s the devious and nefarious lying for power while someone else foots the bill.
People can spin this military deployment story all they want But if he in fact worked with, trained,encouraged many National guard troops (for several decades according to him)Why on Gods green earth would he also be there with them during an actual deployment????,,Where did his honour,sense of duty ,and teamwork suddenly disappear too???What soldier would Ever want that confusing,bizarre decision on his record??What possible truthful reason could their be other than some form of cowardice???
Not just a sergeant , a Command Sergeant Majors, what a coward. I am a 23 year retired First Sergeant and never missed a deployment. There is a blessing in all this, our tax dollars are only paying him E-8 retired pay, instead of E-9.
Hey Clay… 21 year retired veteran who spent time in combat here. It’s how he’s lied about his retired rank and how he’s embellished his service for political clout that makes him a PX Ranger. (Note… that’s not a good thing) I was in that deployment he avoided. He knew. There are plenty of reasons why he’s a terrible candidate… this is just icing on the cake. But any military organization showing him love is pathetic.
@@jaredgarrison333 … he had to go around the chain of command to get his retirement approved. His contract was for 6 years… of which he cut out with 2 years remaining. He accepted the promotion under certain conditions. Once those conditions got too real… he bailed.
@@PepeCabreraKC honorable discharge, no punishments, served 24,years when the majority don’t serve one day. GTFOH with that bull shit. Your candidate is getting his a$$ kicked and desperation has set it. Run a better campaign. My dad and three uncles and who served in the navy and Air Force respectively and all received an honorable discharge have zero problem with what walz did.
Who high fives their 60yr old wife? She always has the look on her face that you see on your mother in law every holiday when you walk through the door
@@petehoward8494 walz served 24 years and got an honorable discharge. Was it outlawed by his superiors to go home and accept retirement? What the hell are we arguing about? I’ll be damned if someone who served 0 days will criticize someone who gave 24 years of his life. And only criticize because the candidate he is backing is getting his a$$ kicked and doing all he can to to give away an election.
Trump is not qualified either and he failed guilty on 34 counts and Trump froze during COVID telling people to inject themselves with bleach and he’s old as hell 😂
34 misdemeanor charges that Bragg finagled into felonies is more correct. Falsification of business records is often charged as a misdemeanor but can be bumped up to a Class E felony under New York state law if committed in conjunction with another crime. As Bragg noted in his Tuesday news conference, the Manhattan district attorney’s office routinely brings felony charges of the falsification of business records in connection with another alleged crime. In this case, Bragg stated that the underlying crimes that the false business records aimed to conceal included violations of state and federal election laws and further illegal false statements related to business and tax law. The bleach thing was taken out of context. Here's what was said: Trump spoke about the role he thought disinfectants could play in tackling an infection caused by the virus during a now infamous April 23 briefing. But he didn’t say people should drink bleach. His comments came after William Bryan, the undersecretary for science and technology at the Department of Homeland Security, presented a study that found sun exposure and cleaning agents like bleach can kill the virus when it lingers on surfaces. Trump remarked on the effectiveness of those methods and wondered if they could help address infections in the human body. Here are his full comments: "A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposedly we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. (To Bryan) And I think you said you’re going to test that, too. Sounds interesting, right?"
