Falcon Heavy Launch and Landing - Nikon P1000 

Bajki kosmiczne są wciągające. Toż to FAKE. Rakiety w próżni nie działają, do tego Ziemia jest faktycznie płaska z Firmamentem. Niebo i Ziemia mają tylko 6151 lat. I to wszystko nawet zgodnie z BIBLIĄ Katolicką.

dubarthur...cuz its fake

Yeah and all those people are in on it, the kids too. Nice try troll

lucky haskins you are an idiot!

mca....The kids are not in on anything....cgi fakery by Red...nothing new

Man ain't that right! And I love that they were right !

Great camera work

@@BunderaKZT Tom Mueller, you ignorant.

@@BunderaKZT Musk is not even a Engineer lol

T. No hes not an Engineer but he knows alot and has a degree in physics, And knows alot about electrical engineering. So His engineers didint come up with this rocket by themselves while he was sitting on the couch. Like hes smart

Thank you

Agreed! This is amazing

11 minutes*

By analyzing past data of course. SpaceX has experienced multiple failures to make it perfect until now... NASA wont dare to waste their money like Elon Musk

@@Nightdreaux22647 They tried to reuse the shuttle and were somewhat successful. Two LOC and a what? At best 8 month turnaround in the peak? It's not like they didn't try. And the boosters were fished out of the water but rarely reused if I recall right.

Something the size of the statue of liberty, coming in faster than sound, guiding itself completely autonomously, firing engines at exactly the right instant to stop on a dime and hit the center of a bullseye. It would be like taking a rifle and shooting something the size of a quarter 10 miles away.

@@StormsparkPegasus and with that thought, you made their achievement 20% cooler

Could it be the best amateur footage of any space-related event? If not, I'd appreciate a link! :-)

AdmiralOddSock oh ofc that vid by Destin was awesome !!! There’s also one that i found similar to him, it’s in Binaural Audio too but it’s a night launch from far away, can’t get enough of the sound, frickin awesome ✨

Is it also this guy speaking? If so, then he's even more awsome. Holding such a high zoom factor steady and in focus and informs the other people about the interesting milestones 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

I filmed the entire NBA Finals last year on my phone. It's the best amateur footage and you need to watch it because, little known fact, it wasn't filmed by 200 professional cameras simultaneously. There's only 2 amateur videos and mine is the best.

What is a space denier xD what the fuck

это было так же сложно, как высадка на Луне.

1 к 33, интересный расклад. Каждый 34-й, сомневается в увиденном. И правильно делает! А что вижу я? Я вижу огромную многоступенчатую ракету, которую можно напичкать разделяющимися ядерными боеголовками, для уничтожения целой страны. Ракета многоразовая, ступени вертаются на стартовую площадку, и после дозаправки, готовы уносить очередную порцию груза ядерных бомб. Речь идет об уничтожении всего человечества. Ядерные боеголовки, уже на орбите, у тебя над головой. Ракеты вылетают каждые два часа.

​ lucky haskins , чувак! Ты не видишь, что ли? Это компьютерная графика! Сам то ты видел эти приземления этих ракет?

@@user-eb4qk9lx3m да уж, у тебя крыша поехала капитально. Жаль тебя

@Lukasz because this guy is fucked in the head

Great. Wish I could have been there. I have a p1000.

epic scene

Reds Rhetoric What was your vantage point exactly How far from landing sites? Must be a good distance has booms not heard until after landings. I read they don’t land synchronized because of possible radar interference from each other.

7:50 ufo

That was exceptional! Well done. I live a few miles away and I still haven’t made it over there to see it in person. I’ve lived here on the space coast since the 60’s and seen all the space programs. I even worked there for almost 9 years. I have a video in my library of the space shuttle returning from space and landing at the slf. I started shooting from miles up way before the sonic booms hit. I need to copy them off my 8mm vhs to digital. Again, Great video!

I was thinking the same the thing.

The earth is flat? Are they crazy? It’s a hollow pyramid!

There is no hope for humanity. But there are things like that, outstanding people. So amazing that it's worth it being alive!

You mean Obama didn’t bring you hope 🤔

What exactly does humanity have to do with this?

Seriously! Get this man a job at NASA tracking the rockets

its a Nikon ;)

@@JimMcBeam Being a Nikon doesn't have jack shit to do with the fact that he films this steadily on a tripod

@@user-ei8xl9dx2g yes it is, Nikon has best auto stabilisation

@@JimMcBeam Auto stabilisation only works when the camera is moving in a lateral or vertical direction, on a tripod it is merely rotating hence not needing the auto stabilisation. In this model it's only five stops stabilisation so compared to any telelens from Nikon that amount would be laughable.

On a grape

He is also ready to fly a TR-3B.

The cameraman is a robot bud

@@lucaschanoine4563 🦧🦧🦧

@@lucaschanoine4563 idiotttttt

Von Braun would be chill to see this.

Complete farce

@James M yep, better know your english, even if it's a french word. the actual farce has been to make disposable engines for like, the past 50 years. when it was all paid by your dosh. That's a farce, a fucking joke. even though the Shuttle fixed this partly. For a while.

More than the landing the absolute impressive feat is the stability when it fires for the braking! There are massive force in play and this Big tower stay absolutely vertical omg! I think it was the hardest problem to resolve

u couldnt be more right, right there is what made spaceX different than nasa & what made spaceX rich reuseable booster

Maybe time to change husband if he can't aim;)

Already been on it 😬

I would be willing to bet that he isn't a Jew! Lol.

(P.S.).. For anybody wondering... I think he is probably 'intact', and the flow is diverted because of that. The fix for the problem is for the male to uncover the tip when necessary. When that is done the flow is much more controllable. It might be hard to believe, but some males have never realized that, and they can be quite embarrassed if it is explained to them. .. A medical doctor I spoke to cautions that there may be cases where the tip cannot be uncovered, and male hygiene would be extremely difficult. In those cases, the male should be encouraged to visit a doctor. .. (you're welcome)

Jajajaja 🥒🎯

And each of those "rods" is *14-stories tall*. That's what impresses me the most.

Mike Churvis ....also approximately 22 metric tonnes.....

I would more say his engineering team is for sure!

Fake should have flaps like dart pin

james- it would be amazing. if it were possible

richard Bull....total fake...100% easily proven...

@@luckyhaskins69?

Richard Bull...Millons of human beings are aware that this kind of nonsense is fake...Many cling to the deception because they can not handle the truth....Pause the vid at 927 and notice the rocket is in front of the power line....CGI fakery, as Red is known to do

@@luckyhaskins69 you're on drugs lol Get off drugs and get with the real world son.

Richard Bull space x means space hoax.

They will sey the people who watching are actor. And CGI

@@NOOBMASTER-rx7bs They already have, lol. Put the comments on Newest First and scroll down until you see a lovely thread started by "B Evans". He thinks this footage is CGI and all the people watching are actors who are "in on it". I'm not even joking, lol.

lol

The only way I can agree with flat earthers is those tools you use to make sure something is level. If the Earth on a micro level is flat but in a macro level is not. We are so small that the earth is flat in perspective to us. And since we are so small, these tools help us measure perceived “flatness”

I think we must stop giving them a podium

Probably the best footage ive seen, really great. WOW

@Requiem4aDr3Am Assertions without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. People tell me my footage of the ISS is fake even though I took it myself.

@Requiem4aDr3Am I have looked in to the claims about the space station. I agree to disagree with you on those points. You are trying to convince the wrong guy. I have received radio signals directly from the space station including receiving data and images directly using an antenna I built myself. I did not comment here to debate a science denier. I came here to complement Red on his awesome footage.

Literally read your comment just as it happened!

8th notes + 8th dotted

Left: 3/4, Right 8/9

Sweet observation dude! 👏🏻

Followed by the sonic booms.. it was just 👌

True, it is very staggering

Mafs

Well..that makes the camerawork even more praiseworthy

good work

Dhana Jon ...just English to work on now.......

@@jarradmoore6939 jokes are not your strong suit.

Yes me too Kim. Because it really looks like sci-fi but it's the new reality of today. If I haven't heard about that long process followed by the SpaceX companie and haven't heard about the previous launch on serious sources, it's clear that I would look at this as a fake news. Incredible what humanity has achieved... again.

Haha me too, I never get emotional but when I watch space stuffs I surprise myself having wet eyes.

I've shown this video to several people. Every time I have to hold myself together and I can't talk for a minute or two.

me too!

and frauduelnt

Flat Earthers

Guys who believe, its cgi

Landing was one of the coolest things ive ever seen well done to everyone

+UNENSLAVER 1. That is why you fail.

@Jeanette loveridge Says the nutjob who thinks rocket launches are fake. You don't get to make accusations about credulity. Try doing the *bare minimum* of work in proving they're fake and then maybe you'll have earned the right to say something meaningful. Your right to free speech includes the right to embarrass yourself and shame your offspring in perpetuity. Good job, lady.

Hahahahaha had me laughing out loud

Yeah I used to think the launches were cool. I get excited for the landings now.

👍

Coolbreeze Productions same.

ciejedi- the other half are me, trying to talk sense into a bunch of fools

Respect from America to the Russian People.

@@PeterRabbit70 Man that's pretty cold, he was reaching out to us and you just had to ruin the mood. VazGen, ignore @peter rabbit he's just projecting his insecurity, we love you.

@@TongueTacos33 Don't think he meant anything negative by it bud.

Yes. But a massive campaign by the ass-licking websites to discredit Musk as much as possible. Well guys, we have OUR world where real things happen he?

@@nielsnielsen9013 You're right my bad.

A great comment full of cheerful emotions! Good for you and for us all!

In a very short period of time you're going to have the BFR.

@@Jason_Family_Man too soon

@@Jason_Family_Man Well, the first and second stages of the Saturn V certainly dropped into the ocean. The third stages either entered solar orbit or were impacted in to the Moon. You can clearly see the Falcon heavy first stages landing. It's second stages usually eventually burn up in the atmosphere, after deploying their payloads.

@@Jason_Family_Man Well, Astrophysics is not something in which one is indoctrinated, but rather educated. I got my Master's, in Astrophysics, in 1994. My thesis project involved the contribution of Wigner crystallization to the cooling of white dwarf stars. However, Astrophysics actually has nothing whatsoever to do with Astronautical Engineering, or orbital mechanics. I worked as an astronautical engineer at JSC during the Space Shuttle days, so I know something about that as well. You say you want proof that there are artificial satellites orbiting the Earth. What proof would you accept beyond the evidence of your own eyes? There are numerous satellite tracking websites and apps you can download. Here's one; www.n2yo.com . Put in any satellite you've ever heard of, like the space station or Falcon upper stages, and it will tell you when it will be visible in your sky. Get yourself a good pair of binoculars or small telescope and you will be able to see them. Of course, you won't.

@@Jason_Family_Man Well now, you just told me that you knew a great deal about Astrophysics. So, how can it be imaginary? And why are you shouting? And, like I said, the last thing you would do would be to go to a satellite tracker and actually, you know, *look* at a satellite. Like Galileo's opponents who would never look through his telescope. Of course satellites are visible from the ground, through a telescope. Actually, if the light is right, you can often see them with the naked eye, as points of light. I've seen them myself, both ways. The space station in particular is always visible, but you will hide in your room rather than look at it. Here are a few examples: www.space.com/40-spotting-spaceships-earth.html . Don't come back and say they're fake, you can't have it both ways, there are none and they are all fake. They exist and they're very real. Heliocentrism was scientifically proved by Johannes Kepler using the observations of Tycho Brahe. Every observation since has merely confirmed it. In particular, navigating satellites through interplanetary space, the math on which would be completely different under geocentrism. I would urge you to read a book on Astronomy, but, of course, that is the last thing you will want to do.

Nikon P1000,known for extreme zoom ,look it up there are people zooming on the moon ;)

Maybe you should watch some star trek reruns fucking geek squad....

Love the way you put it..."looking in the wrong places." ..nice.

Yep, it's great to see what cold war-era ballistic missile technology is capable of.

couple of hundreds of thousands of years ago the person who invent the first tool had no idea it would lead to this.

I know what you mean, but after watching thousands of take offs and landings, I can never get enough of it. It will never be mundane to me. I love and respect aviation (and aerospace) so much I will never get used to a 100 ton machine effortlessly soar through the air. One of humanity's best achievements. Likewise, I'll never get used to watching rockets launch and autonomously land, it's simply too incredible.

I sure do not hope so. As if planes aren’t noisy and polluting enough.

Don't be daft we'll all be dead long before then.

of course... it will looks like airplane in the air port

Trackman2007 I drove 1000 miles to the Saturn V center to watch this launch, and you’re not alone. I cried watching this thing go up and come back down. The sounds, the power, and the absolutely incredible engineering behind this feat just overwhelmed me. What a time to be alive.

@@misterwalkway2189 What can i say man.. Fantastic!!! We are on the right track.

@@misterwalkway2189 I have spent couple of years to learn AI from scratch, partially to be on the cutting edge of science with all the great people involved into it.

Science fiction normally becomes science fact. Normally*

Not real buddy. Don't let them fool you

@@j.d.leslie8458 don't let WHO fool him?? this is literally a fucking video taken from an amateur with a camera... how much more evidence do you flat earther's need?? Man.... you guys are delusional.

@@j.d.leslie8458 none of it is real- the world is flat, the moon is made of green cheese and dinosaurs live in the hollow earth

@@stephengibbs8342 You believe in the moon? Psss, noob. :P

It's fucking fake dude, nothing right now can do that , noway

@@masajhn peasant

@@masajhn Yes, it's fake. There are several tells. (1) Everyone is anonymous, i.e. nobody identifies themselves and so we have no verifiable witnesses. (2) The purpose of a rocket landing is to decelerate the vehicle and the process should pretty much mirror a rocket blast-off. A real rocket blast-off accelerates the vehicle and produces a distinct exhaust trail which is noticeably absent from all these fake landing videos. So, don't be fooled--they are Photoshopped.

@@masajhn It's fake. There are several tells. (1) Everyone is anonymous, i.e. nobody identifies themselves and so we have no verifiable witnesses. (2) The purpose of a rocket landing is to decelerate the vehicle and the process should pretty much mirror a rocket blast-off. A real rocket blast-off accelerates the vehicle and produces a distinct exhaust trail which is noticeably absent from all these fake landing videos. So, don't be fooled--they are Photoshopped.

@@masajhn and how did they ever land on the moon in 69. This world is sick!

Two boosters fighting with air simultaneously. Very cool scene.

It's the supersonic boom, pressure of instantaneous vacuum created due to rockets falling faster than speed of sound

@iONiT your comment would've been impressive, if only it didn't fry the brain of every reasonable human being who read it.

Yes. The future is now!

Don't you think that's very interesting how this person did Upton Soho take off and landing

@@josephwilliams6993 Upton Soho?

the better to (edit: attempt to) convince the flat-earthers

@@frankzaffuto3670 You will never convince flat earthers. Those who aren't just running a con are completely deluded. You could take them in to space and, upon return, they would just claim to have been drugged and hypnotized and defy you to "prove" they had ever left the earth.

i still remember the first launch of F.H i saw it live. I can still remember how my heart was beating and how much i was smiling while witnessing the liftoff and landing of both thrusters. I've never smiled so hard in my life before.

"We're live at the designated landing site of the aliens from the galactic federa.... Oh... OH, HERE THEY COME! The galactic federation ships are touching down right here, right now."

Hillary clinton is a piece of shit

Yes I always tear up , dont Know why

Every time I watch it, from different angles, from different cameras - I tear up. Never thought I would see anything that well orchestrated in my life time. Thanks to Elon we still have a very bright future in space I think

p900 is better

@@jeremiah1st Your reason behind that statement?

Not bad for a point and shoot camera.

@@SixOThree while you're technically correct, I believe they classify it as a a "megazoom" camera. TBH I don't know how much is automatic on this camera. I've held one, though : it's bigger than a 5D mk3 with a 24-70 L zoom, and pretty much the same weight.

@@fourtwozero at least on this video, you see the rockets more clearly on the P900. I don't know why that is. Maybe they are closer at the end ? Different settings ?

Mojack cause it is Sci Fi cgi fakery

@@tzef73 maybe if you weren't in your basement all day, you'd actually be able to see what's actually happening in reality

@@tzef73 Sad to see another person not realizing yet that their whole pathetic life has been CGI fakery

Bad Cornflakes what’s the infatuation with basements with you fucken idiots?

This might become a funny conversation, it's hard to say at the moment but I'm gonna put this here for good measure

@UpsideDown Unfortunately, we will not be great under a Biden administration.

@UpsideDown And it won't matter because PRESIDENT Trump will get his 2nd term. The election corruption is far too great. If you deny this, then you must be blinded by the FAKE News, who now admit the obvious irregularities and corruption but go to route of proving it in court. Fortunately, we only require a preponderance of the evidence (51%) to win...not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Of course, the FAKE News are too stupid to understand this.

Hurray for the US. You almost got it right.

nah, just a Russian who said that the US will need a trampoline. :'D

@@evpeiris5727 or a russian flat-earther :D:D:D

But this rocket clealry doesnt move straight forward to the heaven or galaxy it just rotates below airplane atitude... o_o

Jack Jack you a flat earther?

@@YantoJones Nah im human beeing.