Falsely Accused Man Brings Accountability to Corrupt Prosecutor! 

So they falsely accuse him, ruin his career, knew it was all nonsense, and expected things to go well for them?

He got treated similarly to Johnny Depp. Everyone assumes he was an abuser because he was accused. He fought to prove his innocence and he lost a lot of employment opportunities because of the time spent in court and his reputation being destroyed by false accusations.

The most immediate danger to any given citizen, is their own governvent.

Qualified Immunity needs to be destroyed. It's not enough just to sue the state for losses, and maybe they get fired. The actual people must be held accountable for their abuse of power and put in jail.

He lost parts in at least three movies because of those accusations.

I have learned about false accusations and our justice system: 1. Innocent people are in prison and guilty people are out. 2. True friends will come out if they know you're are innocent. 3. People need to hold law enforcement accountable always especially prosecutors. That is all

I don't remember the Amendment to the Constitution mentions it but it's illegal to charge someone twice for the same "crime". The brat that started all of this should be in orange onesies for several years.

He's got nothing to lose. He's going on rampage now. Shouldn't have lied about him. Hope justice comes his way. And that karma comes her way.

I know a guy who's in lockup for this accusation right now. He was my DM for our weekly D&D session. The big arrest happened out of the blue. The order of events was >Divorced his wife who was selling drugs and taking the savings just for funsies and because she needed manicures instead of caring for the 2 kids >Daughter fights divorce court to stay with dad >Son is almost at age of recognizance, so he's left to his own devices >Dude met, married, and enjoys honeymoon with his new wife >Daughter actually approved of this wife >Wife dies 2 years later from cirrhosis >Dude buries his wife >Literally a month later he's arrested while picking up his daughter from school >It's PDF file charges We think it's the ex-wife. I have no proof, but. You can see where I'm coming from.

Even convictions aren't a guarantee today. I've known people who took plea deals just because they didn't have the money to fight charges and/or would rather take 5 years probation than risk 20 yrs in prison. Plea deals should be illegal since they are a form of legal coercion.

Remember when concrete evidence was required for a conviction Good times

Never let these rogue prosecutors off the hook for their lies. They've gotten away with far too much.

It's time the Justice system was held accountable

This is why I demand businesses only fire people upon conviction. and yes, that means forcing employers to make alleged victims work with alleged perpetrators, because until its confirmed, they should stop, first one to create problems is removed without pay, and if the alleged victim cant confirm in court that it was done, the victim is fired.

"Friends. Those companions you speak of. The ones who are there during the brighter, unimportant times. But when the darker, painful times come, they will not be there. They are not your ally. " Rena Ryuugu

NO ONE Sues like Gascon no one Boos like Gascon no one gets epically Owned and Exposed like Gascon!

Or as TFM would say, "LA based actor did a thing."

It wasn't even an accusation by "victim", someone else saw underage yandere's fantasy online and that got his career destroyed.

Good luck in this corrupt system.

Those kinds of "friends" are called fair weather friends.

Calling out false accusations is what they got Trump on in NY.

since sharing pedo stuff is illegal then it is illegal to be given proof of such accusations when you make them to the court of public opinion. That means that as a bystander you either have to trust them all or none of them. Given how often I hear of such false accusations I opt to believe none of them. As the criminal justice system destroys their reputation then that translates to them as well. This is why censorship is bad and why I think it helps shield people who commit crimes.

Dude has lost everything and the prosecutor was the one putting themselves in his crosshairs.

Oh and Gascon is sitting on the Marilyn Manson case the LA Sheriff’s office sent in their findings TWO YEARS ago. If this isn’t a violation of a right to a speedy trial, I’m not sure what is. I think YTbr Colonel Kurtz has covered it. The delay suggests they are supporting his ex’s civil case, by not allowing the crim trial, they can keep evidence out of the civil trial.

Lies do make things worse, even if you think they can help people. Truth always beats the lies, no matter how professional liars are.

"PDF file" I love the way speech regulation on YT has never worked. Censorship through bans does work unfortunately, but as long as you keep up with the vocabulary, you're fine. Same problem with political correctness in general. The new term just replaces the old term and means exactly the same. So, what have you won banning the original speech?

This is the reason it wasn't easy for people to report struggle snuggle cases: because not every person is trustworthy.

Pointing out his credentials is a good idea because you know those locusts would absolutely try to dismiss the lawsuit by claiming "he never had a promising career, we didn't ruin his life".

The punishment is the process. The da is always aware

False accusations are so common these days that I default to that assumption. Probably were in the past, but it is easier to prove innocence these days than back then.

Should have added the LAPD to the lawsuit since they arrested him with no investigation.

I would just say. Stay tuned. The Day of Reckoning will come. The Record will be straight. - Papa John 2019

We've reached the point in this banana republic that I hope he wins or, absent that, that he is successful in whatever other action he deems appropriate.

I wish Gatt the best of luck in this lawsuit.

Here’s an idea: every time a case goes to trial and can be clearly proven false, the police and legal personnel who failed to investigate should be at risk of being imprisoned. After all, gross negligence is a crime in almost every other profession where people can be hurt as a result. Why not the legal system?

By not dismissing with prejudice means the false accuser gets off scott free.

It sucks that being gay or single won't save you from false accusations. But at least he's fighting back. Go full scorched earth!

He can sue for $44 mil, but there are normally caps on how much you can go after the government for so good luck getting enough out of them to actually deter the gov. The DA might be a different story though.

"Oops, sorry. Let's just forget anything happened." Yeah, they did the same thing after covid...

"Serial Pdf file" 😂

I hope Gyatt wins this lawsuit. The laws really need to change where anyone who abuses their authority isn't just fired, but are trialed, sentenced and jailed by the very same system they are SUPPOSED to represent.

[Clovvn-vvorld! Prosecutors or District attorneys are letting actual violin-t criminal-types free after repeated misdemeanors and felonies! But non-violin-t, fraudulently accvsed are treated with extreme prejudice to the fullest extent as they can justify! Convictions on caucasian men are what these lawyers plan to pave their careers with, for their future nominations as judges and/or political aspirations! Judges go along with it and are plainly in collusion for their own gains too! It's a corrupt system in the West and the Law works best for the wealthy; not to those that can't navigate legalese and tricks, or even afford better representation! Smh🤦🏻‍♂️☕]

Well, here is the thing, even since the 1990s I've been pointing out that the entire Judicial branch of law enforcement has had too much power and it had been reducing the power of the police for it's own gain. Among other things The Judicial Branch has people in it who are generally appointed by people like mayors or governors as opposed to elected, and as such their qualifications become far less likely than their agenda. For decades we've been playing a game with the left wing infiltrating that branch of law enforcement and using elected officials to subvert it. A lot of the stuff in making cops look terrible is because the power the cops should have to use common sense is taken away and given to Judicial, which leads to them doing things "by the book" in ways that covers them but makes them look worse, leading to more power for Judicial. Likewise Judicial generally has more of a say about how anything is presented to the media or the people at large than the actual police do. To give a well documented one that will make leftists freak out with rage on some levels. The reason why police officers have cameras is not police accountability like they claim. It's because it let's Judicial effectively use the cops as walking surveillance drones. Oh sure if a cop actually does something wrong they can go "bad cop, no doughnut" or whatever, and once in a while one might do something wrong that makes it look justified. The real reason though is the prosecutors and such can go through the footage with a fine toothed comb and find everything they can throw at someone, including things the cop might not notice, as well as document everything a cop might let go, but the prosecutor can now use. This is how some guy can say be arrested for a shoplifting accusation, have the cop accused of mis handling it, or have the basic charges thrown out, but all the associated charges for putting on a clown show during arrest can be used on the person, and those misdemeanors and felonies add up. All the prosecutors care about is convictions +1. Remember in our system two wrongs don't make a right, so basically if someone accuses you of something falsely, you don't become innocent of everything you might have done in the course of outrage over it. Even if the cop doesn't care, someone could say get 10 years from like 20 different cases of disturbing the peace stemming from them cursing at the cop, even if they were right, just because of the way they did it in public. It's happened more than a few times, and those cameras mean that even if you did convince the cop or something, it doesn't matter, because people seem to always forget, one of what ultimately happens is actually up to the cops. At any rate, the central case here DOES seem like a clown show, but yeah, this is simply because a prosecutor got unusually cocky and flagrant and happened to go after someone with the resources and contacts to use their screw ups. That doesn't happen often, that's why these kinds of problems persist. I will also say one of the big problems with our legal system to begin with, is that it was written to be used in conjunction with common sense. Our laws in many cases for example refer literally to the standards of "a reasonable person" and so on. Lawyers and such have argued that they need to define those things through precedent which oftentimes breaks the point of them being subjective, as the law can't be applied if it doesn't say "what is reasonable" because that prevents them from abusing the system if it becomes subjective and someone can just call an insane legal argument insane based on the reasonable people in the jury, or a judge not being a moron who wants to play semantics games for someone's benefit. Our legal system also was based on concepts like "prima facia" cases and evidence, something forgotten 99% of the time nowadays when it comes to how we apply the "beyond a reasonable doubt". Prima Facia just means somethings truth is self evident, thus the gymnastics don't matter because something happened or occurred and that is the legal issue itself, not the reasons why. An example where this applies still in our system is things like taxes (amazing how that is). So to give a basic example, Primia Facia would simply be you owe money to Uncle Sam, Uncle Sam does not have that money, and you owed it to him. Thus anything in between those two things does not matter for the purposes of the case, the crime is true in of itself regardless of whatever the reasons are those taxes are not paid, you owed it, what you owed did not get paid, and thus you are guilty. This is supposed to apply to far more things than it's used for, but it's been eroded by lawyers that exist to create and manipulate gray areas in between. We also have a concept called "Mala In Se" which is something being "evil in of itself". This is why someone should not be able to make arguments in California defending the rights of Pedos, because Pedophilia is supposed to be "evil in of itself" and thus beyond being defined as anything else or defended... but well, look at what happened when they were allowed to erode that. Our legal system is actually perhaps one of the best and most reasonable ones to ever exist... if you revert it away from what Lawyers were allowed to do to it, and that's both private lawyers and state ones. At any rate the reason why I did this rant, even though people won't read it, is that as the system was intended to work, the prosecutor was supposed to say be made to bring a case like that before the judge who would look at the nature of the pedo complaint who would look at it situationally and being a reasonable person tell them to "fuck off" and of course the reasonable person telling them that would be why they likely wouldn't do it to begin with. The celebrity flirting a bit with a teenager for their birthday is just a cool thing given the distance involved and the likelthood adults were well aware of it. Sure you can make technical arguments about it, which is why your supposed to have the reasonable person there both on the bench and the jury who is capable of just telling those who want to bring that case that they are freaking morons and not even give it the time of day. Too often we play games with the letter of the law, and ignore entire associated documents explaining the intent beyond this because they aren't part of the law itself, thus you see the law applied in ways directly contrary to the intent laid out by those who made the law. Hence the truth of "to make the law work, kill all the lawyers". I mean I agree with a need to legal representation within a complex system, but I don't think it should be the kind of "living system" it is now, or at least to the extent now where it's allowed to become a self parody when they are allowed to just rule against common sense and reasonable thinking being involved, or defining concepts "not being specific enough" when them not being specific is the point, the idea was that it prevented people from being able to play semantics games away from the intent.

And if he succeeds so is it only taxpayers that gets punished probably, the false accuser should be the main responsible to compensate 🙄

He should really add defamation to the suit

Does he have any chance of getting any money though? What has mostly wronged him was the court of the public opinion.

Social media sucks.

Its says a lot that we're only talking about a civil suit for the bad actors. False criminal accusations are a *crime*. Fabricated evidence is a *crime*. An attorney knowingly prosecuting a false case is a tort unless/until they commit perjury, unfortunately. No wonder they dropped the charges. But using the process as punishment against this guy should still hit them in the wallet at least. The victim deserves the ability to take these people to discovery. Criminal charges should be on the table here, and not just for the person who made it up in the first place. I would be very interested in how the police believed they had "probable cause", with similar scrutiny for signing off on the warrant. I would be similarly interested in what the DA knew, and when. A warrant based on fake information should by itself merit discovery on these people.

Bro needs to go for a higher amount

I honestly hope there is indy groups that would hire folk like Gatt and Depp.

This seems like it would help a holly wood career

It's a rite of passage

What peopole have a hard time understanding is that not all minors are heaven sent angels. They know exactly how much power they have, and have no problem ruin somebody by making up stories. It also hurts minors with actual molesters.

in one way, hes an actor soo i would not be surprize. but in the other way, his boss was probably on epstein list and probably had a name like berg or stein or smith.

Am I crazy or does this infringe on free speech? Even if the case was true?

If they are threatening to charge him again, wouldn’t that be double jeopardy? Sounds like the judge should get prison.

I keep saying the same thing. Unless this loophole to prosecute false accusers is permanently closed, people will keep pulling this dirty trick as a petty way to drag someone over the coals. Even though the law has measures against false accusations, the sanctions are a lot less severe than actually being convicted for the accused crime. Some people are willing to pay the fine or serve time for making false accusations, cause the damage to their target was already done, and the fine/prison time is a small price to pay to stroke their pride. This is exactly why narcissists are still willing to fabricate such heinous accusations, cause they know it's a small price to pay for the long term emotional (and sometimes physical) torment they inflict.

Can you say defimation?

to be fair, if his follow up to GOT was a bit part on Black Adam, his career wasn't going anywhere anyway

Cant like the video. Says resource exhausted

People need to be held accountable for false claims. Even an accusation will destroy a man's life.

Oh yes it is soooo good to hear good news. So rare these days. Thanks Raging Golden Eagle.

There should never have been qualified immunity in the first place. Only specific powers and authority for each part of law enforcement so they can do their jobs (like arresting someone for a crime not being kidnapping).

With the growing trend of this happening to actors and such, I suspect people in the deep woke crap are starting to really get into doing it to their rivals for roles in shows/movies and business rivals to get rid of them.

really?