0:55 (No Card) 1:32 (No Card) 2:13 (No Call) 5:02 (Offside Mistake) 6:05 (Dive Gets Free Kick For Chelsea) + No Card. 8:12 (No Card) 9:20 (No Penalty) 10:21 (No Card) Funny Enough No Chelsea Fan Wants To Talk About The 1st Leg.
At 6:05 it's a SPA not a dive, Fair free kick. 9:20 it's very doubtious, i would not give a penalty 10:21 i didn't see the contact, It could be simulated.
Out of everything you wrote only 2 of those were a potential goal scoring calls. Chelsea had 6 abd all 6 calls should've been a penalty. Neither did the players who made those 6 penalties got booked or a yellow card. One of those should've been a red card
i’m glad a highlight of this match was finally uploaded, i swear 2 years ago there was conveniently no videos showing how chelsea robbed us in the first leg. hopefully barca hater stfu now🤫
@@danielhavsaliev7749 5:00 No offside with Eto'o running one on one against Čech. 9:12 Clear penalty against Henry. 10:20 Forgiven second yellow card to Ballard.
@@edsongarcia314 clear penalty?? please zoom it in. He slipped because of the pitch. Zoom in and you'll see. Ballack red card? hahahahha. Please this is football... u want them to give card for any body blocking? No robbery here , compare it to what happened in 2nd leg, its a joke
never mind there was no defense, leg 1 didn't have many crucial, controversial mistakes. The world is not blind, everyone knows the second leg IS THE MOST SHAMEFUL AND DISGUSTING MATCH, WHICH WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED IN FOOTBALL HISTORY AND A DISGRACE THAT WILL BE REMEMBERED EVERY SEASON. the 1st leg of the world did not overreact like the 2nd leg because in the 2nd leg there were 4 penalties and not one was given, in the 1st leg the referee did not apologize for anything meaning he felt right and carried out his duties well but in the 2nd leg the referee who led the match apologized afterwards because he admitted making many fatal mistakes. It's not strange because there was a 2001-2018 Barca scandal in the Spanish prosecutor's office
5:00 primer error, no hay fuera de juego, E'to no estaba adelantado 8:05 amarilla perdonada 9:15 penal no pitado a Henry por agarrón 10:21 roja perdonada por golpe en la cara a Iniesta
5:00 and 8:05 were not game changing decisions, 9:15 wasn't enough for Henry to fall like that and 10:21 no proof Ballack knew Iniesta was there and was unintentional. now watch 2nd leg.
@@godzilla400 in 5:00 not changing game? Are you kidding? Eto'o wasn't in offside and he was running and ready to kick. Cmon man, it was a game changing decision
@@godzilla400 el fuera de juego de Eto'o fue un error, pero se pitó antes de chutar, no cambió nada, no fue que anuló algún gol. La amarilla perdonada por falta a Iniesta, tampoco cambiaba nada, es igual a la que le perdonan a Alves en el 6:06 . Si hubo claro penal a Henry. No es ni por asomo roja a Ballack por esa acción, no hay golpe. En resúmen, partido donde debió ganar el Barcelona 1 a 0, sin más. No justifica nada la vuelta y el atraco enorme que le hicieron al Chelsea en Stamford Bridge.
@@rashmirekha2054if ur talking about 2 leg, Bayern’s “goal”, it was offside clearly, the referee didn’t whistle on time, even if they scored it was going to be denied either way because it was OFFSIDE
In the 2nd leg Anelka dive no card For him he gets a free kick and Abbidal gets a red card??? Drogba dives no cards. Mallouda dive no card, and gets a free kick? Ballack handball. And much more. The truth is the referee was horrible 4 both teams in both 1st and 2nd leg. Only unbiased fans now the truth
Drogba and Mallouda was faulted idiot also MAlouda was in the penalty area and the reff gave tothem freekick from outside of the penalty area !! don t be rude just because you support Barca !!
@@buszyguy So Chelsea being robbed more justifies Barcelona being robbed in the first leg? That doesn't make any sense. Just accept both teams were screwed over. Plus when did Eto'o dive?
if we compare the mistakes from the first and second leg and class every wrong penalty call and offside calls as a goal Chelsea would literally have won 6-2 lmao
For those who said Barca robbed the game you didn’t watch the first leg any more many aggressive tackles and only one yellow card Ineista get punched on his face by ballack and he didn’t get a red card and he already had yellow card .unfair offside for Samuel Eto and didn’t gave penalty for Henry .in the second leg the referee gave a red card for Abidal and he didn’t even touch Anelka a hand ball by ballack in the penalty area and no penalty . I’m not saying that the referee was good but he was bad for both sides
@@rizkyhidayah1370 nope you are biased there was also a handball chelsea player did but no one noticed 2nd leg was more horrible but 1st leg would have 2-3 player sent off and 1 pen
If anyone’s thinks the two legs were both EQUALLY poorly reffed, I have no words for you. Sadly delusion has taken over. Chelsea remained robbed for the ACTUAL, non-controversial penalties not awarded.
2 non offsides that would’ve became goals easily, 2 penalties for Barca, and for Chelsea 2 or 3 pens, Diver drogba is just a baby diver who dived for pens in that semi 😂😂😂😂
5 penalties and 2 red cards for Chelsea in 2nd leg And those offsides given wouldn't have been goals let alone easy barca missed so many sitters and cech was stopping everything coming to him
@@devrishi66 where did you count 5 even Chelsea fans say 3 pens LOOOL and If the first leg was fair it would’ve been 4-0 in the first leg no way are they coming back from that Lol vardrid fanboy let’s talk about Ronald’s offside goals now
@@6kfcs928 without Ronaldo's offside goal we would've won anyways 😂 Also the ref was consistently poor to both team in that match In this Chelsea vs Barca tie he took all wrong decisions against Chelsea Drogba was fouled inside the box twice Malouda once And two handballs one from pique And one at the end And out of the 5 pens 2 red cards were obvious so barca 2 men down
@@6kfcs928 and there are way more games barca robbed and came out as a winning team out of nowhere Remember 2011 el clasico in ucl semi Pepe didn't even touch dani alves And jordi alba david villa pedro everyone was diving here and there on the field Talking of the bayern vs real game bayern players never ever made a call why would the referee even think twice After the introduction of var barca is a joker club while we are 2 times ucl 3 times la liga winner 😂
@@devrishi66 it’s the same thing with Barca even if the 3 pens were awarded we would’ve still win if our pens and offside goals were awarded + Ronaldo scored 2 offside goals which would’ve made you tied not a winner
I’m sorry, but to the people saying “funny how Chelsea fans ignore this leg”, please, shut up. Just to let you know I’m a arsenal fan, so usually I like Chelsea suffering. So I’ll be the judge of this. Shall we? 0:53 foul was given. If you’re asking if it’s a red, I don’t see it. Maybe a yellow if you squint, but ultimately I think it’s a talking to. Good call 1:30 this is the first questionable moment. No whistle can be heard as far as I’m aware of. This is a yellow. He wasn’t trying to harm the goalie, but you still can’t say it’s incidental. He’s clearly trying to force the GK to drop the ball. But I also don’t think it’s a straight red. If he’s were to straight up run full speed into the GK then that would have been different. 1:40 no foul. The advantage was given. And this is certainly not a yellow. You see this all the time 2:05 foul. If you can even call it that. While it looks suspicious, if you slow it down in the replay the defender seems to get the ball. Then again, he may have pushed him. Hard to tell. I probably would have called it, then ask my linemen if he thinks it’s worth of a booking. 3:20. Foul, and a yellow card. Ref got this one right. It wasn’t a clear goal scoring opportunity, but it was one where fouling would stop their flow. Good call. 5:00. No offside. But I can see where the ref sees this. you see a frame or two where he genuinely looks offside. It’s not the right decision though. So let’s say he’s allowed to play on. Petr chech is charging at him, and it’s a difficult angle. I can’t say for certain that he scores this. So no updated score 8:05. Yellow,same as the other one. Not exactly going for the ball, but not a clear goal scoring opportunity. Chelsea is still at 11 men. 9:10. Penalty. 1-0 nothing Barca. He pulls him by the shirt. If you’re asking for a card, if this happens anywhere else it’s not even a talking too, so no, it’s not even a yellow. 10:30. No foul. By slowing down the footage, if there was contact, I don’t see it very well. Even then I don’t see it as a card. He’s trying to put his arm out like that to shepherd iniesta away from the pass, like a defender would. And there is no way he makes that free kick. Okay, so it’s 1-0 Barca going into the second leg. If we count the 3 pens, it would have been….. 3-2 Chelsea. Any way you slice it, Chelsea got screwed over by bad officiating. No, I don’t think corruption was involved. But my point is that you can’t just ignore the 2nd leg. Understand that, I love Barca. If arsenal isn’t in the champions league, I’m always rooting for Catalonia. So don’t say I’m biased.
3 pens? hey Cristiano, I'm sure you included Pique's handball as one of those pens. But why are you ignore Abidal's unfair red card that happened before that? and 5:00 is clearly onside cris. etoo's left shoulder was ahead of Alex's left foot. if judgment was correct, iniesta could dash in the box and get a huge chance by etoo's pass.
Are you dumb? All those 3 pens happened after Abidal was sent off because of "contact" with Anelka. And right before that Drogba kicked Pique to stomach and should got second yellow.... + Ballack should have 2 yellows from the first leg. And in those days when Barcelona were ahead, they just didnt give you ball, so it would look very differently... so stfu
Most ridiculous comment I've read. Absolutely no one is "ignoring the 2nd leg". Just because the second leg is screwed so os the first leg. Just admit that both teams are disadvantaged, and yes, only a few people knows the first leg so more people should talk about it. We won't shut up
Na minha opinião,o barca nao foi roubado no primeiro jogo,acho que o impedimento do camisa 9 ( barca ) é normal...é algo que acontece ate hj 😅 O lance do henry é simples! ELE ESTAVA DESIQUILIBRADO e so jogou.. No jogo de volta,ouve dois lances que CLARAMENTE NAO FORAM PÊNALTIS! Um,o jogador do chelsea se jogou e no outro o Drogba foi desarmado ( ele ate cai em CIMA do zagueiro do barca ) ,os possíveis " toques de mao ",..acho que o lance do pique foi normal ( bola na mao,nao mao na bola ampliando espaco ) e o outro foi " d'baixo do braço " tanto ate que pega na axila do jogador... Resumindo,nenhum dos lances foi penalti e o resultado de 1 á 1 foi " justo " entre muitas aspas.. As duas equipes foram prejudicadas pela ARBITRAGEM! NAO PELOS JOGADORES OU CLUBES😊😊
After watching both legs I would say there was a dogshit referee work. But Barca allegations for buying off refs tents me to think Barca bought the second leg, still, that Alaba red car wasn't really it. Some faults aclamed for Chelsea seem like dives to me. If we talk proportionately, I would say Barca got more benefits from this.
Barca got more benefits by having their key player sent off while half of Chelsea's squad escaped getting a red card? The second leg would have been a lot different if Barca went into it with 1-2 goal advantage. This match also shows you a lot about Drogba. He was screaming loudly in the second leg but I bet he didn't mind these blind favours for Chelsea. The allegations against Barca were for la liga only and they were just allegations. Using past tense because they found no proof of Barca fixing matches and have cleared them of all charges.
@@radekmatyas7069 "few not given yellow cards" Blue half of Chelsea's first squad would have gotten reds. But guess who did instead for no reason at all? Abidal.
@@radekmatyas7069yes because they have something called the butterfly effect if Barcelona won this game by 3-0 the next game would have been very very different
Oh pero yo visto un mano a mano de que drogba le iba anotar a victor baldez la hubiese sombreado lo a tirado de frente que tonto oh iba ser 1-0 a favor como visitante on
never mind there was no defense, leg 1 didn't have many crucial, controversial mistakes. The world is not blind, everyone knows the second leg IS THE MOST SHAMEFUL AND DISGUSTING MATCH, WHICH WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED IN FOOTBALL HISTORY AND A DISGRACE THAT WILL BE REMEMBERED EVERY SEASON. the 1st leg of the world did not overreact like the 2nd leg because in the 2nd leg there were 4 penalties and not one was given, in the 1st leg the referee did not apologize for anything meaning he felt right and carried out his duties well but in the 2nd leg the referee who led the match apologized afterwards because he admitted making many fatal mistakes. It's not strange because there was a 2001-2018 Barca scandal in the Spanish prosecutor's office
Leg 1: The best fair play match in football History Leg 2 : most controversial match in football History & the referee gets a penalty Hahahaha so funny.
Dear Barça fans please stop judging this game based on 2020s football. Football was rough and there was no VAR back then. Most of these "fouls" you say, there are many instances like those in other games in which they were not a foul or was too small a contact for the referee to notice. Also, the fact that you even bring up the first leg in response to the atrocity that is the second leg, means even you yourself agree that there was everything wrong with the second leg. You just want to get aggressive and make others believe it was in retaliation to a few refereeing mistakes in the first leg, which is a joke in itself really.
Pique handball shouldn’t count his arm was already up Anelka hits the ball with the outside of his foot too hit piques arm . 2020 rules that’s a pen , back then no . Drogbas 1on1s he dived nobody stepped on his foot nobody pulled on his shirt enough for him to be dragged down like that. Abidal red card because anelka dived he didn’t even get touched , only real bad call was Etos handball not being given last min . It was called in 2022 WC final Montiel
@@TM-bk3rl Lol, what? Pique hand is clearly out and stops the ball, absolute penalty. Abidal pulled Drogba's shirt from behind to stop him getting away from him, an unfair foul move = penalty. 3 definite penalties.
9:15 vaya piscinazo de henry y sin amarilla, y ni hablar de jugadas que no sale o como pique y dani alves siguieron jugando cuando debieron de haber visto como 5 amarillas cada uno, y la vuelta ya ni hablar, hasta en el partido de ida le robaron al chelsea
4:56 y 6:06 Solo estas dos jugadas ya son dos amarilla perdonadas a Alves, incluso si solo sacas una Alves ya se habría quedado si jugar la vuelta por acumulación de tarjetas
Cara, eu tô procurando até agora o favorecimento pro Chelsea... Não tem absolutamente NADA... Esse choro sobre "1° jogo" é só delírio de torcedor do Barcelona pra justificar aquele assalto no Stamford Bridge Chelsea era pra ter 3 Liga dos Campeões contando com essa, não perderia pro Manchester United
@@SportGamingComputing totally serious that's a dive. There is no pulling and force to make him fall that way, plus Henry already started the movement of falling before
Barcelona já Abriria 2x0 com pênalti Não marcado e chance clara mal anulada,o tanto de cartões que os jogadores do Chelsea deviam tomar não está Escrito,ou seja Barça ia fazer no Mínimo 3x0 Aí
Si este partido hubieran pitado el gol y hubieran expulsado a Ballack, el partido en stamford nunca hubiera existido. El barça hubiera jugado más tranquilo
The only thing that could be controversial is the Henry penalty call .. but if you watch carefully he is already slipping in the turn and then he knows he can’t get the ball anyway .. other than that, there are fouls yes .. but nothing as blatant and obvious as the second leg .. not even close .. am not a Chelsea supporter here but I don’t see how anyone can compare this against the second leg massacre !
You really have the nerves to compare this match to that disaster of a second leg. That was not even a football match at all, we still watch matches with controversies like this one even till now. But the second leg? That was a strange one, once in a blue moon.
We should all know by now how the English love crying fowl when they're done dirty but just love completely glossing over the injustices and atrocities they have committed themselves, throughout history.. in every aspect of life, not just football.
Funny how chelshit fans pretended like only their rubbish team suffered from bad refereeing until this moment by hiding their faces from this 1st leg story..As if chelshit can win against Manu at the Final back then😂
Lololol and it’s funny how Varcalona fans think this game is actually comparable to the 2nd leg 😂😂 1 debatable Henry missed call which he slips and seems to be already going down, compared to 4 clear penalties. Oh but please come back and respond with “but Chelsea should’ve had 5 red cards 🥴”
A recap for blind Barcelona fans who are seeking refuge here in the first leg: In this game, there was one bad offside call and one pretty clear penalty that wasn’t called for Barcelona. In the second leg, there were FOUR CLEAR PENALTIES that weren’t called for Chelsea.
If they had called it in the first leg so as the second leg would have changed a lot right?, man consider if barca won as 3 -1 this could affect the formation they would have changed in second leg and so many would have changed right? Idk i am not sure though
@@bro8970 if the refree had not messed up the first leg, things would have been totally different. You score or concede one goal, the whole strategy and game plan of both teams changes. But these blind haters dont understand these technicalities.
@@bro8970 also you should watch a video by a channel named "zio legend" he has a video that explains why it wasnt a robbery.Also, ballack should've had a red card in the first leg so he would miss the second one and dont get the handball in the second leg
not to mention chelsea escaped a red card. Had barcelona score the chances denied to them , The second leg would have been very different and chelsea would have had to change their tactical approach. Use your brain.
There was one clear penalty and a couple false offside calls If barca won 3-1 in the first leg EVERYTHING would’ve changed in the second leg the tactics, if chelsea had gotten a red card one less player would have been there, you just can’t compare the robberies Second leg was definitley robbed and chelsea deserved way better but can’t be compared with the first one even if less fault calls were made
9:15 is only possible foul I see which refree didn't mention. Every other foul has either yellow card or freekick. Barka fans are barking alot. Watch 2nd leg. Refree is running away from Chelsea players 100 times. And that's why Chelsea was robbed UCL that year.
What's the first fuss about this leg? Every foul on barca player was awarded .. only claim they can make is when Henry went down in penalty box apart from that every foul commited was penalized... Whereas second leg was daylight robery.. there were clear penalties for handball atleast that were not awarded
@@riseedit108red cards? The only one I saw that that could have been a red was the inniesta slide tackle. Even then it looks more like a yellow. In the second leg it was 3 pens that weren’t given. If not 5. Talk all you want, but the ref in let one did his job well. The one in the 2nd leg was absolutely terrible. This is coming from a arsenal fan.
I like how Barcelona fans use this as an excuse, the only actual foul they didnt call for was maybe Henry getting pulled but he was felling already when he got pulled, but comparing that to 4 penalties and 3 possible red cards not conceived is just ridiculous in any way you see it
😂😂😂😂😂😂 yeah lie lie just continue saying lies penalty for barcelona red card for ballack eto was not offside barcelona should won 3-0 in this match continue lie vardrid fan or cowboy london chelsea fan
yes you are right barca should win 3-0 in this match eto wasnt offside ballack should red card penalty for henry from 0-0 to 3-0 in the away match chelsea desrved 4 penalties but abidal didnt deserve a red card he didnt touch anelka if abidal @@BernMile5
Na minha opinião,o barca nao foi roubado no primeiro jogo,acho que o impedimento do camisa 9 ( barca ) é normal...é algo que acontece ate hj 😅 O lance do henry é simples! ELE ESTAVA DESIQUILIBRADO e so jogou.. No jogo de volta,ouve dois lances que CLARAMENTE NAO FORAM PÊNALTIS! Um,o jogador do chelsea se jogou e no outro o Drogba foi desarmado ( ele ate cai em CIMA do zagueiro do barca ) ,os possíveis " toques de mao ",..acho que o lance do pique foi normal ( bola na mao,nao mao na bola ampliando espaco ) e o outro foi " d'baixo do braço " tanto ate que pega na axila do jogador... Resumindo,nenhum dos lances foi penalti e o resultado de 1 á 1 foi " justo " entre muitas aspas.. As duas equipes foram prejudicadas pela ARBITRAGEM! NAO PELOS JOGADORES OU CLUBES😊😊
