Federalism: Legislative Relations between Centre and States [Justice J.S.Verma 2nd Memorial Lecture] 

I think he is the only judge (I've seen) who speaks without seeing any note. and we can see his confidence on his memory

Hon ret justice shri Nariman sir No words to express about his knowledge in constitution,not only indian but also different countries of world,plus point he supports his lecture by the aid of hindu spiritualism .

When I heard sir i feel i am hearing Dr B R Ambedkar because of sir knowledge and physical appearance. I never see and hear anyone except some who deliver a wonderful speech without a note.

Great lecture sir.

An extra ordinarily gifted personality a store house of knowledge a continuous uncommon thirst for knowledge let me convey my crores of PRONAMS to your this unending devotion

He is too good to be true in respect of the knowledge, memory and interpretation. Listening to him sets a fire within. Hope and pray that Advocacy that he professed returns to Courts of today and the Court craft is reduced.

Great man, may God bless him with health and happiness

The interruptions caused by Ad breaks really need to be looked into sir. Please ensure that it is continuous for better understanding.

A great lecture, Sir. I was revising my studies of the subject of Interpretation of the Statutes and in particular of the Constitution of India.

What a knowledgeable man 🙏

He always talks about Greeks and federalism

This is like a gospel for student of law on me. Thank you Justice Nariman.

India federalism is not a political one. It is an administrative one. The Constitution has adopted human rights from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,1948. When India became a unitary state even before the Constitution was adopted as a unitary one, there is no place for any political federalism. S.3 of the J&K Constitution adopted in 1956 made all provisions of the Constitution and laws made by Parliament pursuant thereto applicable to J&K proprio vigore.

Hello sir, you mentioned that Australian constitution doesn't have concurrent list, but we have actually borrowed concurrent list from Australian constitution only right? Pls clarify sir