Fenix A320 Updated! Let's take it out on a DEMANDING short flight! | Real Airbus Pilot 

yep, I got back about half of what I lost with the previous version: That's a good sign that we'll see even more!

same

same

Hello guys, unfortunately for me it’s not enough, I can’t use this beauty anymore on airports like KBOS or CYUL… 😢it’s perfect on Cruz but departures and arrivals on « demanding » airports it’s not as smooth as pmdg for exemple…

@@A330Driver yes, previous version was pretty bad regarding performance

He didn't call anyone that! He expressed his frustration after a series of basic mistakes made by other pilots. The pilots connect with VATSIM without any preparation. There are tons of materials on official VATSIM's websites that you need to kindly read and understand. If you don't want to, connect to mutiplayer, not VATSIM.

this guy is honestly the most arrogant aviation / sim youtuber atm. i fully agree, wrong way to go.

@@DiamondAviator I feel like, unfortunately most of this community is like that… Everything MUST be deadass realistic and following every real life procedure…They don’t get, that there are still people learning!

He didn't say anything wrong, just that he felt like it was one of those noob days. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Let's not forget that Vatsim is a network that is intended to simulate real airspace. As realistic as possible. If someone is not determined enough to read the rules and devote some time to learning, they can always fly in multiplayer mode or use one of the Atc programs, and not necessarily fly on Vatsim. For such people, I recommend, for example, the upcoming Beyond Atc.

@@imgroot7035 its not just about that particular sequence. its a certain attitude and vibe in his videos.

Danke :D

XD

THS is not required in the A320

The PITCH TRIM / MCDU / CG DISAGREE caution is raised when one of the three Trim setting are more than 1.3 degrees of the other. These are the physical Trim and Trim Wheel position, the computed THS from the INIT B weights after engine start (as it uses CG and not ZFWCG), and the PERF TAKE OFF THS field. I couldn't find any info for when it's not set, I assume it should autotrim according to the INIT B data. It is just a method for double checking data. Anyways the UPx.x (DNx.x) should be check against the ECAM F/CTL trim value +x.x (-x.x) and the markings on the trim wheel.

Would recommend turning that off via the sim settings. Just set the cockpit interaction mode to legacy. Also if you’re comfortable I would hide the tooltips and turn off all assistance options. They just clutter your screen and make the sim feel like a game. 🍻

He have chosen the intersection that is why EFB calculated it. And he did recheck the take-off shift and expliciltly mentioned it stays the same for B12 - 1200m.

Depend 3rd party airports… same at LFBO

@@kdbninerseventwo3328I tried at LFBO and when I ask for pushback it askes me nose left or Right not north or south

I feel you

I’m literally waking up every morning checking the chanel

Give 'em the time it needs, the wait will be worth it!

They ran out of money to develop them. Thus they do the A319/321 first to fund the development.

Simply push the sidestick to its limits quickly and back.

​@@Quotenwagnerianer What does that do? Fix the problem?

@@AntoniosSpiliotopoulos It resets the protection logic that prevents you from reingaging the AP.

Are TCAS RA’s with live traffic causing your AP disconnects or is it something else?

@@Danimalpm1 I don’t fly online and was away when happened I do some more flights see how it gies

yes

@@A330Drivercan you elaborate……

MSFS in general is. We tried on the 737 as well, but it just wasn't possible to get it right.

"Flare-nix" - I laughed harder than I should have :D

Mmm..I dont think its too much floaty..I think the floatiness comes from the papi-glidesope mismatch making you high most of the times and the fact that it requires too much backstick pressure when flaring to arrest the descent rate. So you either end up pulling too much and floating, or pulling up too little and slamming on the ground.

@@valet2972 I disagree. I have no problems with my FBW Neo landings and I do approach airports with displaced and also correct ILS glideslopes. Fenix is slacking with this, and I do hope they fix this because it really is an amazing add-on.

@@tax54321 I feel like the FBW doesn’t really feel heavy upon flaring, It doesn’t float too much but It settles down too easily in my opinion. The fenix does have the issue of requiring too much backpressure to flare which makes it float or slam in my opinion

That’s also a problem with the sim and ground effect

VATSIM is..... VATSIM. It's not the real world and anybody who believes it is just shows they have no clue of real aviation. Of course the controllers are hobbyists and as such they make a damn good job. I mean honestly, I would probably have rage-quitted hearing all those n00bs in this videos. Probably after throwing out some pretty strong insults. So my respect to those who can handle this! There's good reasons why I'm no longer controlling on VATSIM anymore and let my ratings expire. As a pilot though I have to agree with you. Sometimes it's a bit troublesome to "tolerate" what's going on as you said it. So many times where I would have smashed my head into the table if it wasn't for the fact I parked my mic there and didn't want to destroy any electronics :D

I love VATSIM but while the Controllers need to jump through a LOT of hoops to do what they do, anyone can log on as a 'pilot' and create absolute carnage. I would like it to have at least some basic standard to reach prior to being allowed to participate - it's just disrespectful to all the controllers who have worked so hard to qualify. New and inexperienced and imperfect but trying hard is ok - it's the folks who log on without a single clue (and without a care that they have no clue) who need to be weeded out.

@@AndyWhite it’s a fair point but what do you do limit vatsim access to people who pass a course ? The issue boils down to vatsim being a genuine effort to provide some function that in the RL is extremely tightly regulated, operated by very professional people, all whom have spent years training, within a international regulatory system grown over decades. This doesn’t include the xxxx billions of pounds spent on infrastructure. If any one part screws up people could/would die and it would fall apart in 30 seconds. Vatsim is a well intentioned GAME put on by well meaning people in a completely unregulated consequence free GAME. Any comparison to realife is completely false. I’m sure there are professional ATC people on vatsim just like RL pilots. I’m not bashing vatsim or telling people to or not use it, just it’s bound to be a total shit show at times for obvious reasons

@@gwalker3092 I think maybe my point is not clear - I'm not suggesting that VATSIM is or need be more akin to real life - what I'm saying is that controllers on Vatsim need to do a lot of study and examination in order to do their hobby (so actually there is some parallel with the real world here) whereas pilots on Vatsim don't need to do anything at all. I don't think there should be equal requirements for both but addressing the balance even a little would help to set a minimum standard and make life better for all, the new pilots included.

@@AndyWhiteI always wanted be a pilot but couldn’t due to being born with visual impairments in both eyes with no remedy. However, I loved aviation so much from small child I spent every hour thinking, studying, watching learning etc. I’m a little over zealous on certain things due to this and working for CAA for 7 years although I was never an ATC, but technical. I don’t mention this very often but i take it all too serious and ofc this subject jars with me due to my history. Msfs/xp whatever are GAMEs nothing else and I suppose should be treated as such. However the more people enjoy aviation the better 😊 however they do it. Personally, I just carnt deal with vatsim due to all its issues it’s just annoying. Let’s hope beyond ATC works 😂 AI putting people out of jobs a whole subject to argue about in its own right.

Sounds like a super toxic environment to work in - no small jokes allowed because some random flight attendant will loose his/her sh*t because of that... You probably hate Ted Lasso series as well.

It's a trade off. If you don't have an high end PC, don't bother leaving MSFS on the ultra settings and then expect add-on aircraft to miraculously run smooth like the default airplanes. Before Frame-Gen, I also had to lower my settings to fly the PMDG, FBW and Fenix. It's not much of a cut anyway, unless you really have an old computer..

@@tax54321 That's the point I don't have to lower my settings at all for PMDG, FBW A32NX, 787-9. It's only the Fenix which has it's own app doing the calculation. It's a poorly optimised addon and for £50 it's lousy work.

@@tax54321 Stop defending this garbage. PMDG, FBW and 787 at Inibuild KLAX 60+ fps while even in an mid sized airport Fenix shits the bed with CPU Main thread limited. If the simulation is all it offers then i will use the better addon; Toliss A320 which is way better anyway in terms of simulation.

@@Anand-cx8po I don't know what to tell you man, the fenix is the least resource heavy FPS-wise for me. I suggest you reach out to them or check their FAQ on FPS improvement.

@@tax54321 What's there to reach out? Being Mainthread limited is information enough. You may enjoy potato graphics and no addons but I don't use MSFS for that reason. If simulation is all i want then X Plane is what i will be flying for the A320. Atleast you have 260 circuit breakers👍🏻