Filing ATF Forms eForms for new SBR Rules 

Mark you nailed it. Yes, I've even had law enforcement from a 3 letter agency, who was about to retire, say "we can use it to charge you with intent if we want to."

Yeah, we are dumbfounded. There has to be a better way to do this.

I know a few guys that submitted their eforms back in late feb and already got back their approvals. I think the atf opened up a whole separate wing for the braced rule forms because some of these approvals are coming back insanely fast.

@@SecurityAllStar The better way is to support our Constitution and not play both sides of the fence.

​@@elitetilesetting1909 I submitted 2 on 2/21 and 1 on 3/14. I haven't heard a thing on any of them yet.

@@metallicknight2 you should be getting an approval at least one of them any day now. I submitted 4/1 braced 80% lower went straight into pending research and on 4/19 was validated and submitted got my cover/Cleo copy. I thought I was going to stay in pending research for months like other people but surprisingly only took 19days.

At some point, soon, we collectively have to say "NO."

Foolish advice: I’m sure you don’t have a drivers license, don’t pay taxes, drive 100 mph everywhere and carry guns on airplanes. Why am I sure? It’s because you “don’t comply with tyrants”. Good luck.

If you have a brace you have already complied

@@SecurityAllStar I submitted my amnesty registration on March 16 and I got my approval back on April 26. I’m actually quite shocked how fast that was for the ATF. Sad that I have to consider that fast.

​@@tedbaxter5234ATF is illegitimate and a malicious agency, we don't listen to any shit they say

So many are being rejected. I think the whole system is broken.

I think a lot of people have done it for the same reasons.

Register away - the reason we are all being taxed to death is because we are agreeing to be taxed to death.

Well, you can always be charged with intent regardless of what the law says; right? We now have Duddlepuck, (ATF director) in videos stating in front of Congress that if you simply remove the braces and don't have them with the gun that you are in compliance. Now, this comes from the head of an agency that has flip flopped on this issue 4 or 5 times in the last decade. I personally would take the safest options available. Did you see the other video we did on this? I think it may help further.

I'm sorry, I do not think I understand the question. Can you rephrase it?

@@SecurityAllStar do I need to get my city and state and name engraved on my lower for my SBR or are the factory serial numbers and name is good enough?

uh no lol who told you that lmao@@PeterFalconer-zm7oe

If i am understanding, you are fine. Nothing else needed.

@@SecurityAllStar thank you for your time.

It is for each one.

Haha, man, I love this comment. Which one will be first. The next Revolutionary, the ware with China or the financial meltdown and the zombies attack? Lot of crap we are looking at.

Please share an updated link with us showing that? Everything we have read says something different.

This is false

Good news is that this has been overturned and remanded to the lower court and is on appeal.

Yep, they really got this one screwed up. I believe the lawsuits may roll a lot of this back.

@@SecurityAllStar My take on all of this is that any one that complies with this rulz change is part of the problem! WE need a total/majority noncompliance with all of this! If we roll over for them they WILL NOT STOP! Next will be the bans/and THE DOOR TO DOOR CONFISCATION. Remember waco and ruby ridge! Remember nazi/germany!

There is a reason why - change it and dont!