Final Oscar Predictions 2024 | The Acting Categories! 

Good point. I think if Killers Of The Flower Moon is winning anything, it’s definitely Best Actress.

@@samuelbarber6177AS IT SHOULD

couldn’t of worded it any better!!! them winning the sag was already a good sign that halle and michelle would win and now lily!!

But her role is just a supporting role.

Very good point and I will just add that they all lost sag and the ones who won sag also won the Oscar. Another important point is that their competitors were not in a traditionally Oscar friendly films in terms of winning leading actress (arthouse, indie, weird, slow). It's hard to win your first for that kind of roles and films let alone your second or third. Lily is a borderline supporting and yes quiet performance but it's still more traditional than Bella Baxter and Killers is a classic Oscar huge film.

Me, too!

Seems you nailed it!

She act piopic molly kyle good and searisly The academy treat her role as a best acting not as a long acting. So if she win that becase she make best acting to pipic role not becase she act long time in screen And her charachter is mean role even if she act it as supporting role And all film about indian wife Abut her Even if haspend was long in screen So she in race becase of that

​@@marrmart7690 what???

Gladstone was just playing her boring pokerface self in the movie and Emma stone was hamming to the hilt.

Viola Davis was a lead in Fences but she still won the Oscar.

What about Patricia Neal (HUD, with a screen time of just under 22 minutes (lowest ever screen time to win either lead category)), Louise Fletcher (ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST; lowest by percentage at 16% and 45 seconds longer than Patricia Neal), Nicole Kidman (THE HOURS), and Frances McDormand (FARGO)? ALL of these performances are less than 30 minutes of screen time, and ALL of them won LEAD actress. Lily Glastone's screen time was around 57 minutes.

I hope not!

@@mattcampbell7669 I hope so!

@@tonyg76 Well I don't!

@@mattcampbell7669, well, you're an idiot!

Sandra huller has alot of fans

Lilly supporting but the story about her orginally and in the film Leanordoo de caprioo he is leading role becse the script focus about criminal more than the victim. But academy if give lilly gladston the oscar not becase of time of her role They will give her oscar for her strong perfoemance and acting

Plus if she wins it will be a historic win!

The Truth! Lily Gladstone is the story of the year and the Academy likes to script these things. Emma Stone already won and they like to award new blood.@@mattcampbell7669

@@mattcampbell7669 Who cares? She should not win because IMO her performance is overrated and Emmas' was best of the year.

@@tonyg76 IMO?

When I saw KOFTM I wanted Lily to win. Then I saw PT and now want Emma. To me Emma’s performance was better

Sandra was wonderful in Anatomy of a Fall (and I speak French ) (she’s a German actress) but it is a two woman race at this point Lily versus Emma. And it is too close to call…. Could go either way and I’ll be happy with either outcome. Think Emma’s performance deserves it more. Felt like a stronger Oscar winning role to me but I’m pulling for Lily as she was amazing in KOTFM and will be the first Native American winner. Her performance certainly deserves it too. In fact after seeing that movie I said there’s our Best Actress winner… lily (who I had never heard of before)….. but then I saw Poor things… Emma already has an Oscar but to me she deserves Oscar number 2 After I saw PT a few days ago I said to myself, Emma will win this. And deserves to….. Hated the movie by the way but her performance was beyond exceptional. It was mesmerizing to watch her…..

The race should be between Emma stone and Sandra huller

Loved Sandra Huller’s performance. Loved the film. My favorite of 2023.

Lily will win.

Agree! But it’s the Oscar’s. So American. Foreigners are often invited to the party but rarely they get a piece of the cake( except the brits)

​@@alinesodre334 Tienes razón muy americano ....cuántos actores nunca ganaron mereciéndolo con creces!! Eje: Richard Barton...se lo.robaron muchas veces !!!

Paul jiamatii he is the best... Best acting Sillian marphy best role. If the academy give marphy wining becase he make famous film and pipic charchtar But paul jiamatii was amazing His body and voice and tragedy and comedy acting so strong Bradly cooper he has weak script

@@marrmart7690 i had an aneurysm reading that

Giamatti is far ahead of Cillian, just based on the merit of performances… And also he’s more overdue than Cillian, because he has been robbed of an Oscar win before and he has a better filmography than Cillian… That’s where the narrative comes from…

Paul Giamatti is a cut above the rest. “Holdovers” was his command performance! All nominees gave fine performances and deserved the nominations. But Giamatti’s performance was a superb master class! 🏆

Im sticking to my intuition that Bradley will get the Academy Award for his incredible performance as Leonard Bernstein .

Hopefully Lily will instead!

@@mattcampbell7669 she's in the wrong category.

It doesn't matter. Lily was put in the category the nominating committee felt she belonged in. She has won multiple awards this season and will win the Oscar for Best Actress.@@nafischowdhury7375

@@nafischowdhury7375 Then I suppose they put Carey Mulligan in the wrong category to then huh?

Emma stone if she lose oscar for poor thing and she win oscar for lala land That mean she win for wrong role She must win for poor thing not for lala land Her body acting for teaching in acting school

I have not seen it yet , on my list

It looks similar to Edward Scissor hands . And that was a true original genius performance by Johhny Depp .

*cough* Sandra *cough* Hüller

Lily will stop her easily.

@@slickwill9000 both sandra and emma should be frontrunners in my opinion.

But they are not! The front runner is Lily Gladstone--she chews the scenery with her performance. You can't take your eyes off of her--she's magnetic.@@nafischowdhury7375

Both Emma and Sandra deserve the award. Two very different roles. Comedy doesn't usually get acknowledged. It was a fun movie. I loved both her and Mark Ruffalo. Such a cad! Sandra was perfection. Two very different arguably great performances.

The good in lilly gladstone She act her role sooo good If she leading or supporting. If she supporting she will sweep and davine lose And instead battle of stones In leading We will watch the battle of gladstone and joy randolf And lilly win

Emma Stone's performance looks like she is acting and is too showy and weird for Oscar voters. Reminds me of Edward Scissor Hands. This is Lily Gladstone's year and her performance fits the narrative that the show will be built around this year--History!

She was outstanding in that movie….. agree I never knew this amazing German actress before…. Never heard of her until this year

….but she’s not going to win. She’s a very close third behind Emma and Lily…

I hope not!

He was truly phenomenal in Oppenheimer He deserves the academy award.

@@ajordan1976 i have to see it

Yeah, Murphy’s film is the front runner for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Supporting Actor and other technicals, not to mention being the centre of all that, I don’t really see Murphy not taking home that award. Especially since he’s playing a real person unlike Giamatti.

@@samuelbarber6177 Being in a BP front runner or contender doesn't necessarily make you a front runner for Best Actor, but yeah Murphy is holding together a big time project that was a major event too.

@@samuelbarber6177Giamatti is playing a real person. He’s playing Paul Giamatti :)

Paul jiamatii same lilly gladston win two awards So he is in race...need cmpaign before show

THE performance of 2023 is Sandra Huller in AOAF… If Murphy wins, it’s only because it’s an Oscar-baity biopic role, not the best of the category…

The Oscars haven't happened yet. Emma and Lili could split the votes, and Sandra could end up winning.

@@kirkreid743in the multiverse maybe not here

@@kirkreid743 That would be awesome 😌

Or Lily Gladstone could still win!

No Lily Gladstone will win. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Boring aff although most likely to happen ngl. I would personally much rather smt exciting like Cillian Murphy (lead), Margot Robbie (lead), Ryan Gosling (supporting), Lily Gladstone (supporting)... but not that it matters

@@Kituchxy Margot Robbie hasn't won a single award at any of the major awards ceremonies and neither has Ryan Gosling.

@@mattcampbell7669 Ik right... what a shame, they're way too good for this world😔😔💔

Because not all of us fall for the same overacting Emma Stone role that she plays in every movie? How can you seriously consider Emma babbling like a toddler and then a child and then a teen and then an adult as a serious acting role? People like you are going to make a big deal of it when she loses when she never should have been this close to winning in the first place.

@@ElRataAlaadaI totally agree with you. I love Emma stone and I think she’s a great actress. But I feel like people are overreacting a bit with her performance lol

Glen glose and her fans Iam one of her fans Was sooo confidant of her wining Becase she win golden and critics and sag Before bafta So when she lose bafta she remmber olivia win golden globe in comedy If bafta was before sag or critics she will not be confidant enouph

But many people argued that Tar was Cate Blanchett's best performance of her career and she was more deserving of the Oscar than Michelle Yeoh. And it shouldn't matter whether Yeoh's movie was leading in terms of nominations or whatever. Kate Winslet lost for Titanic even though the movie won big at the Oscars that year. I've always been a huge fan of Yeoh but she had never struck me as a really great actress the way Cate has. And I'm Asian so I'm not being biased at all! Even though I was rooting for Yeoh to win because of her narrative as the underdog, deep down I knew that Cate was better. Emma is a good actress but is she as good as say Cate or Meryl? Nope. Not by a mile. Did she deserve to win for Lala Land imo? Nope. I do like her but I do feel that she's slightly overrated. If she hadn't won for Lala Land, I would be more than happy for her to win for this one, but I just think that it's a bit too soon for her to be inducted into the list of two-time Oscar winners. But that's just my two cents.

I agree. I think Emma will win. And she deserves to win it for this performance. I was pulling for Lily up until a few days ago when I saw Poor Things. I did not like the movie but wow was Emma outstanding in it. A strong enthralling mesmerizing performance. Now I’ve switched. I want Emma to win Best Actress. So much so that I’ll be upset if she doesn’t win….. she lost the SAGS but they are not always predictive of Oscar wins The supporting categories are givens Da’Vine and RDJ I would love to see two “upsets” in the leading actor categories. Paul G. The Holdovers and Emma S. Poor Things Hope they both win!

So make a prediction… will it be Emma or Sandra?

flawless, eloquent and captivating? I have gotten little from Lilys' campaign. She is pandering to voters mainly.

I'm guessing you are NOT a member of the Academy. Gladstone's articulate, sincere, substantive actions and reflections on issues and shared professional challenges seem to be resonating with her colleagues @@tonyg76

Obviously you're not a SAG member. @@tonyg76

I agree if lilly in supporting Davine joy randolf will not sweep

Davine will sweep.@@marrmart7690

Viola Davis was a lead in Fences but she still won the Oscar.

@@encheknizam got the Oscar for Supporting... Lily's is more a supporting role than lead. If she wins lead- it will be more for narrative than lead. Women seem to win lead often for second or third characters... the only time I can think of a man winning who wasn't #1/lead was Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs.

Actors and Actresses don't get to pick which category they are nominated in. The producers of their movies submit their performances to the nominating committee that makes the decision. Randolph was brilliant in her performance.

Three compititors Lilly emma sandra Emma as a wining of seasion Emma and lilly got all the award and sandra not So will surprise if she win

Anthony Hopkins himself spoked about this, never thought he could win it. Due to COVID, he couldn't travel. At 83, he received it. His performance in "The Father" is insane. I couldn't sleep after watching; it hit deep

@@shifananizam1837 I agree, and that's my point, the academy rewarded the superior performance, and didn't cater for any of these identity narratives that people keep mentioning everytime Gladstone's perfomance is discussed. If she wins, it'll be because her perfomance was deemed the superior one among the other nominees.

I always wonder this about last year, everybody said Brendan won because of narrative. What if they were just more impressed with what he did compared to Austin? I wonder how much these things matter, compared to what the pundits make it out to be.

Gaga was out of comption

@@marrmart7690 she was fading- had a lot of early support and Glenn surged late- Olivia's support remained steady... Emma was early favorite, Lily's surging and Sandra's remaining steady- maybe not enough to catch them, but- would be interesting. Same thing happened the 2 Bette Davis years- All About Eve and Baby Jane- she and Gloria Swanson, then later she and Katharine Hepburn split the vote and Judy Holiday and Ann Bancroft held the middle and won.

I hope paul jiamatii win😍

The big ass surprises would be Giamatti over Murphy and Stone over Gladstone

Yes

I would add should win Paul Giamatti. Will win Cillian Murphy Yes agree should win Lily Gladstone but will win Emma Stone but it also sounds right to me to switch that…. Should win Emma, will win Lily. Best Actress is a tough call…. It could go either way. I was in the Lily camp up until a few days ago when I saw poor things (a movie I hated)…. Now I’m in the Emma camp. Want her to win and I feel she should win…. Emma’s performance was stronger than lily’s. IMHO

If she win after sacheen littlefeather take oscar as native amrican on behalf of marlon brando they will make history

Right?! Emma and Lily will be happy, and their fans will finally calm down.

I’m in favor of anything involving Isabella Rossellini.

I see what you did there. I remember the shock on her mother's face when she had to announce that Katherine Hepburn AND Barbra Streisand had won.

screen time does not decide lead or supporting. these best actress winners, patricia neal had 21 minutes, louise fletcher had 22 minutes, nichole kidman had 23 minutes, and frances mcdormand has 26 minutes of screen time. lily had 57 minutes.

@minavamp2811 screen time is absolutely a factor, but obviously there's category fraud all the time. But it's not just screen time- it's impact. For me, Stone and Huller had a much bigger impact in the film and after. I won't be upset if Gladstone wins but I agree with Brian- she was good. In my opinion, Huller and Stone were great. I love subtle performances, I think Davine deserves to win. I just think Gladstone's performance, which is partially tied into what and how much she was given, is less deserving of a Best Actress Oscar than Stone's or Huller's. I understand if you disagree, this is my opinion and opinions will differ!

@@rebeccag8589Molly Burkhart was the female lead. She was married to the male lead. She was the one who had all the money in her family (essentially making her the de facto matriarch). She’s the main character who is impacted by all of the things that De Niro and DiCaprio’s characters do. She is absolutely a lead in that movie.

@superfox5707 The largest female role in a film does not make that role a lead role. Being married to a lead role doesn't make you the lead. Being passively impacted by actions in a film doesn't make you the lead. She had half the screen time as her husband, around the same as De Niro, who went supporting everywhere. I'm definitely not alone in thinking this, haha. By your reasoning, Kuan last year should have been lead for EEAAO. But even if, for argument's sake, we call it a lead performance, because voters often don't care in any of the categories, I still feel that Huller and Stone just gave stronger performances. I liked Gladstone's performance! But I didn't love it. And again, if you talk to people or read comments sections anywhere, I'm not alone here. As I shared in another comment though, at the end of the day, this is my opinion, obviously. It's subjective. We can agree to disagree. I certainly won't be upset if Gladstone wins.

@@minavamp2811 57 minutes in a 3 hour and 27 minute movie.

lot of Emma Stone fans here but honestly my interest in Oscars is going down every year. It is evident that awards are being patronized. I mean you can still go with a controversial victory and some favoritism but patronizing of a prestigious awards ceremony like Oscars represented by knowledge and experience and expertise of Academy of Motion Pictures' Arts and Sciences is really disappointing. Anybody who saw Joaquin Phoenix is Beau is Afraid or Glenn Howerton would say they deserved the nominations. Remember they were much tougher roles. In particular Phoenix's. Phoenix had to really stretch his character's paranoia and not just display emotion but physical distress and anxiety and that too in a movie which extends almost 3 hrs. Anybody else would have turned the role a caricature. How was he not nominated. Howerton really played a corporate character who shows conviction in variety of situations. This was a role which required sharpness. For a younger actor to play a more mature role and display the character's traits in a variety of situations is an accomplishment. Remember when you are the "hero" of the movie like the dominating character who is the achiever or the likeable character the role is always easier unless you are playing a really odd or idiosyncratic character. Both Phoenix and Howerton were not playing very heroic or dominating or powerful characters. They were acting against the narrative. For them to be ignored is a huge disappointment. I would be only interested in Best Picture and Best Director. But no matter what happens Anatomy of a Fall takes the award for the Top Movie of the year.

Agree!!

The academy has a record of putting actors in the wrong category. In 1974 ten yr old Tatum O'Neal who was in most every scene in Paper Moon and carried the film was put in the supporting category. She won but wouldn't have if the best actress category.

ه Gladstone her original story Colly kyle the hero of the real story so they put her in leading role Scorssissy foucus in white haspend more than wifes The leading criminal not victim

Viola Davis was a lead in Fences but she still won the Oscar.

Nobody is talking about it because we don't decide which category she is nominated in. Producers of movies submit performances and the Oscar Voting Committee makes the decision. What we think as viewers doesn't matter. The voters felt Lily Gladstone gave a leading performance.

He is the best Hope he win same prenden fraser I hope watch prenden give him the oscar trophy But prenden act in oppinhimer

And Emma stone should be the winner for poor things

@@nickxyx2879 Because Lily is native american? Bs reason. It should be because she gave the best performance, IMO she did not.

Who will win Stone/Gladstone too close to call Murphy Randolph Downey Jr

Emma is great in Poor Things Lily was only good in KOTFM Emma deserves an Oscar for PT she didn’t deserve it for La La

Wrong, why do you think that Lily Gladstone is a she-in because she has a cultural edge. If anything, her being Native American is a detriment considering the history and present Hollywood when it comes to people of color. Have you seen the way Native Americans have been depicted in movies?--negative stereotypes galore! Only two women of color have ever won the Oscar for Best Actress--shameful! Lily Gladstone deserves and will win because of her brilliant performance. Emma Stone's performance was too showy, and weird, and looked like she was acting--all turn-offs for Oscar voters.

Emma stone when she win for lala land was in bad year Natally bortman was bad in jacki kinidy role and myreel streep make silly role So she win for ramance film And she lose in favirite in supporting role And olivia colman win for leading role category When emma stone was leading in the favirite and olivia colman was supporting.

But I think due to how native americans have been treated historically that first native american winner is a stronger narrative than first asian winner. So there is that.

You are not thinking realistically. Lily Gladstone just won the SAG Award which is a precursor for an Oscar win. The narrative is in her favor. Love Emma Stone, but her performance is too showy and weird for Oscar voters--overacting and looks like she is acting. It's basically Edward Scissor Hands 2024.

I used to be in Lily camp Now in Emma camp

Emma Stone should win.

Emma stone deserve it

Emma stone deserve it

Cate blanchet support lilly gladstone for her role becase she make realistic story same tar She make with her convrsation in youtube Emma stone same mesheal yuo two make fantsy and siance fiction Maybe academy dont want give fantsy role the oscar in leading role again

​@@marrmart7690Only basis of performance, Emma is far better irrespective of fantasy or narrative. But sag lass makes that possible hard

100% agree I’m rooting for Emma It was the stronger performance

I was Lily camp Now Emma camp Saw PT two days ago Hated movie Loved Emma’s role She deserves to win!!

A sublime mesmerizing performance by Emma

I agree many comidian performance win in the past He make film in 70 s And in that time many win Paul make tragedy and comedy in same time And if he win after lose sag academy will make big surprise for audiance Even if i dont surprise becase he still in race

After losing the SAG I’d love to see him win the Oscar !

@@Erin.56 I just have this wierd feeling he’s going to win and gagggg the whole internet like Jamie lee

@@fredamurphy7827 Jamie lee at least won at SAG as well, so there was momentum there. Paul needed SAG to stay in the race and even when everyone thought it'd go to him they got behind Murphy. Would be the first time in at least 20 years someone won with just a globe and a CCA and his performance is not THAT special, nor is the narrative all that strong.

@@HermitForHire if Paul doesn’t win they are definitely going to give him the honorary Oscar for next gov ball

Becase robert downy j Make serieas role When rian gosling make barbi. Kind of film make him lose And robert denero was amazing but he make his role comedy So rdj sweep becase he make kind of film for adult and make his role searies role

Be thankful, for the sake of Ryan's sanity and future work, that he's not winning for Ken. He's not going to want people to define him by that role for the rest of his career.

It definitely doesn't help her.