Fiona Harvey's Lawyer Demands Evidence From Richard Gadd in £135m Netflix Lawsuit

Подписаться 1,3 млн

Просмотров 38 тыс.

50% 1

The lawyer representing the woman who claims she's the 'real-life Martha' from the Netflix series Baby Reindeer says the writer and comedian Richard Gadd will be asked to give evidence if her case goes to court.
The attorney representing 'real life Martha' has demanded the release of thousands of texts and emails in a £135m Baby Reindeer lawsuit against Netflix.
Broadcast on 19/06/24
Stream Good Morning Britain live, every weekday from 6am on the ITVX 📲 daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1NbomQa
Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!
The Good Morning Britain RU-vid channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.
Join Susanna Reid, Ed Balls, Kate Garraway, Richard Madeley, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am until 9 every weekday!
ITVX: daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Website: bit.ly/1GsZuha
RU-vid: bit.ly/1Ecy0g1
Facebook: on. 1HEDRMb
Twitter: bit.ly/1xdLqU3
www.itv.com
#GMB #babyreindeer #martha #fionaharvey #richardgadd #netflix

Опубликовано:

18 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 63

@whadis404 6 дней назад

I don’t believe for a minute that “she’s afraid for her life every day” BS!!!

@dominikmuller5021 6 дней назад

Have you read the comments on any of these videos. People do believe she's a criminal and all around horrible person. Some messages she received are in the law suit. It's not funny at all.

@jenelphaba7558 7 дней назад

But Gadd never said it was her. She assumes it is her.

@RitchieRosson 7 дней назад

But he said everytjhing else and then linked to her via social media messages she had said and he made her scottish and look like her etc.

@patrick3178 8 дней назад

4:33 "The reason why she came out is because she is shattered." "This is not true, please. I need to respect my privacy," But as soon as Piers said he has the real Martha on uncensored, she was on facebook every second every day posting about it. She wrote who is going to watch me on Piers show etc that is a far cry of please leave me alone and a shattered woman.

@eli1985 7 дней назад

Even if only half of this story is true, she deserves: nothing! She is dangerous, she could ruin other people's life over and over again. She outed herself and is enjoys her "fame". Now she knows how it feels to be stalked and having to hide away in your own house. Roth, the ultimate American "ambulance chaser".

@whadis404 6 дней назад

Absolutely true She’s been told to hide away She has to prove this has affected her badly She was going to do an appearance before she was told to hide The newspaper TOLD her she had death threats .. she said that in the Piers Morgan interview

@jenniferbaebler6946 7 дней назад

I am sorry but weather she did this or not i can't believe Netflix made this without talking to her ...

@mat-ym8gi 6 дней назад

Ethics

@Jericho642 8 дней назад

Go watch the final credits; it CLEARLY says some parts of the story were changed.

@castlerock58 7 дней назад

That is irrelevant. They said it was a true story and gave sworn testimony that it was true before parliament. That is contempt of parliament.

@RitchieRosson 7 дней назад

Why say that at the end?! But it's true at the beginning.

@wenwatkins3216 8 дней назад

This lawsuit could be seen as another way to continue stalking and harassing Richard Gadd?

@LaPetiteBoulin 8 дней назад

I think that is exactly what she is doing.

@castlerock58 7 дней назад

Only halfwits would see it that way if they lied about her.

@JoeOsi1372 7 дней назад

And money Making 😂😂😂😂

@jamescontactyelena День назад

Well, good for her

@vinniechan 7 дней назад

What evidence? The show never pointed to anyone specific

@pmd1933 8 дней назад

That woman needs to go away. She needs to prove she is the person the story is about her.

@paddyj7690 7 дней назад

I keep saying that. Her saying she never did any of it is not helping her case. She first has to prove Martha is based on her. Also, if Gadd just doesn't produce any evidence, then the case is over, as it's clearly not Harvey they're portraying.

@yeyewandeoyeleye3727 7 дней назад

She should make her own movie of her side of the story? Might sell

@deadeyes4626 8 дней назад

Money hungry🧠🪦🔔🔚

@mat-ym8gi 6 дней назад

Gadd

@nowsheenanwar291 8 дней назад

The show said it was true but Richard did say that people shohld not to go out of their way to find out who the people are Who told her to go and have an interview with piers in the first place She went out of her own free will I have seen the show, I never had thought of fiona Harvey, I only knew of this name after the interview Doing this case alone is technically still stalking as well They better have 4400 emails, they better have all these voicemails, seriously !!!!

@Jericho642 8 дней назад

Every thing she has done since the show came out simply proves that she has some mental challenges. She has done nothing to dispel any of the story

@ezachbellingham9867 8 дней назад

At first I laughed when I learned the real martha was about to sue Netflix and gadd over baby reindeer but then I read articles stating that she actually might have a case bc Netflix presented the show as a "true story" when they should've said it's just "based" on true events. Anyway If that woman actually wins the case it would literally cause so much hurt and a lot of SA victims will be scared to come forward from now on

@katiefletcher2709 8 дней назад

Can they please have another episode with all of this extra drama?

@olajumokeejibunu4260 7 дней назад

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@irisdanagher 8 дней назад

The definition of true story is to mean much of the actual story and events remain intact in the script. The writer may make significant adaptations (creating composite characters, truncating or shifting the timeline, changing names, locations, ages, gender, etc.) but the core of the story remains the same.

@paddyj7690 7 дней назад

Correct.

@pagliacci2942 7 дней назад

Is that not the definition of "based on a true story"?

@paddyj7690 7 дней назад

@@pagliacci2942 I'd say so. Which the show was

@pagliacci2942 7 дней назад

@@paddyj7690 But, crucially it DIDN'T say "based on" a true story.

@paddyj7690 7 дней назад

@@pagliacci2942 It does though. It says it's a story based on true events and certain characters or events may have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes. It's not that hard to find it, and anybody watching the show has seen it.

@Littlewings1211 8 дней назад

"We dispute everything about the show...." 2 minutes earlier: "I can spend 2 seconds on Google, put in the language used in the show - things like 'hanging curtains', the term 'Baby Reindeer' - and it will come up with Fiona Harvey." So you're disputing everything about the show but some of it you can actually prove independently was 100% true?

@TheCarlScharnberg 5 дней назад

No. He's disputing what can be seen as defamatory. Not that she actually was in contact with him.

@whadis404 6 дней назад

She’s definitely a stalker just No a convicted one … yet! I wish Laura Wray would have pressed charges

@mat-ym8gi 6 дней назад

There was no law until 2013. So ....

@beckscald3855 8 дней назад

Netflix should have put the disclaimer at the beginning rather than the end. The problem is she outed herself and only rumours circulated. However, they used her likeness, accent etc. On the basis of they didn't hide the identity enough. On that basis she could win.

@jonathanstone.. 8 дней назад

One email less of e-mail or a minute less in voice messages her laser thinks she didn't do anything. Lots of stalkers don't get prosecuted but should, so don't know if the person who said she was misinformed or clipped

@mat-ym8gi 6 дней назад

Texts isn't stalking. Behave

@kirangera4072 День назад

Creepy lawyer defending creepy cluent

@siobhanmclaughlin1887 8 дней назад

Pierce five off! It is a true story... didn't anyone see him writing at the end..this is a true story. His true story?

@ohenhen4844 День назад

I hope she gets 130 million from Netflix, She can use some of it for therapy. She has an obsessive personality. i know people like that. Not dangerous, just mis understood. She is not a stalker. Just annoying.

@rowanchisholm1603 8 дней назад

I might be being dumb here but how can a US layer in a US caught over see a legal case between 2 British Citizens who live in the UK. Particularly when the alleged chrimes were committed in the UK

@gillianlillis1984 8 дней назад

Chrimes 😂

@Melon-by5bs 8 дней назад

Because Netflix is an American company based in the US. The lawyer is not suing a British Citizen, they are suing Netflix. The mention of Gadd in the title is saying they want him to give evidence. He's not the defendant in the case.

@adamcraig1468 8 дней назад

Netflix HQ is in america

@judithmorganjudyteen 8 дней назад

Netflix is American

@phoenixkali 7 дней назад

The British lawyers would laugh her out the office!

@siobhanmclaughlin1887 8 дней назад

Pierce took her out.

@RitchieRosson 7 дней назад

So much doesn't add up. I think more questions need to be asked of Gadd.

@YousufIGhouri 8 дней назад

£135 not bad

@siobhanmclaughlin1887 8 дней назад

Why you so interested Piece?

@secreteobsession3584 7 дней назад

Then green book true events and true stories of movies need to be sued then as they added men dating men where there no info stating that and portraying that he was Into men. Brave heart events weren't true