First of Its Kind 3x Lensed Supernova Confirms the Hubble Tension

Подписаться 1,4 млн

Просмотров 17 тыс.

50% 1

Get a Wonderful Person Tee: teespring.com/...
More cool designs are on Amazon: amzn.to/3QFIrFX
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: paypal.me/whatd...
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about a triple lensed supernova observed by James Webb Space Telescope that confirms the Hubble Tension once again
Links:
arxiv.org/abs/...
iopscience.iop...
esawebb.org/im...
Cosmic Microwave Background video: • Is Cosmic Microwave Ba...
Cepheid variables: • We've Reached a Point ...
#jwst #hubble #snh0pe
0:00 Triple lensed supernova from JWST
0:55 What's Hubble constant, Hubble tension and why it matters
4:05 Potential first explanations
5:30 Another distance candle was needed
7:10 New method: gravitational lenses
8:10 New discovery - 3x type 1A supernova - SN H0pe
10:00 Discoveries and Conclusions
Support this channel on Patreon to help me make this a full time job:
/ whatdamath
Bitcoin/Ethereum to spare? Donate them here to help this channel grow!
bc1qnkl3nk0zt7w0xzrgur9pnkcduj7a3xxllcn7d4
or ETH: 0x60f088B10b03115405d313f964BeA93eF0Bd3DbF
Space Engine is available for free here: spaceengine.org
Enjoy and please subscribe.
Twitter: / whatdamath
Facebook: / whatdamath
Twitch: / whatdamath
The hardware used to record these videos:
New Camera: amzn.to/34DUUlv
CPU: amzn.to/2LZFQCJ
Video Card: amzn.to/2M1W26C
Motherboard: amzn.to/2JYGiQQ
RAM: amzn.to/2Mwy2t4
PSU: amzn.to/2LZcrIH
Case: amzn.to/2MwJZz4
Microphone: amzn.to/2t5jTv0
Mixer: amzn.to/2JOL0oF
Recording and Editing: amzn.to/2LX6uvU
Some of the above are affiliate links, meaning I would get a (very small) percentage of the price paid.
Thank you to all Patreon supporters of this channel
Special thanks also goes to all the wonderful supporters of the channel through RU-vid Memberships
Credit:
NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, B. Frye (University of Arizona), R. Windhorst (Arizona State University), S. Cohen (Arizona State University), J. D’Silva (University of Western Australia, Perth), A. Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute), J. Summers (Arizona State University)
Licenses used:
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...

Опубликовано:

9 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 163

@MegaLoveDoctor 3 часа назад

I watch your videos every night. The amount of discoveries you cover is what reminds me of why we should always try to move forward...so many things in this life to learn about

@PGeraghtyrebel Час назад

It still blows my mind that they can deconstruct a gravitational lens to tell where the galaxy behind it is and what shape it is. Not to mention all of the things in between the two galaxies for light to take different paths around. To create the lensed image.

@raybod1775 44 минуты назад

The sun makes an arc like a gravity lens when tilted.

@CordovaMage 2 часа назад

Story time. Being the proper uncle that I am, I once convinced my niece that the reason the 3pt line in basketball was moved back was because they had to offset for the expansion of the universe.

@jimcurtis9052 3 часа назад

Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😊☺️🙂

@BattlewarPenguin 2 часа назад

Imagine being so far away that the light can bend so much it can get you from a total different place from the same source. Truly mindblowing

@George-rk7ts 2 часа назад

Great video, sir. Stay wonderful, Anton.

@marknovak6498 2 часа назад

There was a joke early on about the Hubble Constant when it was first derived. The value seems to be variable, it was nicknamed 'Hubble's variable'.

@Broken_robot1986 Час назад

Variably constant

@kingpiggins292 35 минут назад

@@Broken_robot1986 Oxymoronic terminology detected

@michaelsenn68 Час назад

Y'all, it's simple: as we deploy instruments that can peer further in distance and time, the simulation has to adjust for that. I may or may not be a little high.

@JHe-f9t 29 минут назад

That's why galaxies were only discovered 100 years ago.

@beerandrockets7526 2 часа назад

Thank you, wonderful Anton!

@OliviaDavis-z1k1k 3 часа назад

Every time I watch your videos I find something new and amazing in them. Keep inspiring and surprising us!🏆🚜🚚

@mindurbusiness-b3u Час назад

bot, you guys liked a bot

@dmytrospikin748 17 минут назад

Such discoveries don't come every day, not even every year. Wow... just feeling lucky I've been subscribed. Thank you Anton. You do the BEST JOB IN THE WORLD

@denysvlasenko1865 2 часа назад

Thank you Anton for adding the actual numbers to the content. The use of mostly "huge", "vast" , "very hot", ..., without giving (possibly approximate) values was a drawback.

@kmdidgerdoo 3 часа назад

Why do i so badly want the answer to be 42?

@curtissharpe7084 2 часа назад

Class, pure unadulterated class.

@John-c4r1o 2 часа назад

Everything can be determined in base 42

@Ahov Час назад

44.132

@chrisolivtreez8017 Час назад

Heya! Do you play didgeridoo?! I do 🎉 so fundamental frenquencies, Let's find out the right question! 42 Is also my intuitional answer 2*3*7 😊

@rezadaneshi 3 часа назад

Sorry. By the time I edited my thoughts to include thanking Anton and then comment in the least abrasive way in the way I share it, so to show by example the respect my opinion gives to other opinions while hoping reciprocation and conversation, I realized the condescension in my approach in itself is disrespectful; and now, I have completely forgotten what I was going to say, beside thank you Anton. 🥂

@Jeremy-Ai 3 часа назад

Thank you. You have been noticed as respectful. Lead with respect and appreciation first, all other things fall apart under responsibility afterwards. Jeremy

@DirkaDirka-n9j 2 часа назад

😂

@GeneralSulla 2 часа назад

Good ganja man! 😂

@DarenMiller-qj7bu 2 часа назад

You're welcome.

@siheard4206 Час назад

Great video Anton. As per! But could you or someone answer me this query. So the Type 1a happened at around 3b years after the Big bang, Do we have the data concerning the stars make up? And would it then be possible to actually see a population 1 star nova or even the star itself if we were lucky enough to catch it through gravitational lensing? Or are these Holy Grails of stars much too early and with too short a life span to be captured with such methods? I hope my questions make sense for someone with a much greater knowledge than myself to hopefully give me an answer and maybe some insight into these amazing phenomena of early star formation. Like most things in our stunning cosmos, I find the idea of these pop 1 stars fascinating. Many thanks. Love and good vibes sent to all. X

@benshook4643 2 часа назад

Wonderful content from a wonderful person, thank you Anton

@MyraSeavy 3 часа назад

Awesome stuff! 👏 🎉

@Dvpainter 2 часа назад

If the rate of time slows down the closer you are to mass, like for noticeable effects you'd find getting near a black hole, then wouldn't regions of space that are devoid of matter be expanding faster than regions that are more densely populated with matter/energy?

@HolmesHobbies 51 минуту назад

Interesting postulation! It would make denser areas "sticky" by way of time dilation. Maybe this is how the cosmic web holds together

@timothy8426 2 часа назад

Depends on how much heat is expelled from stars? Heat propulsion like rocketing through space? For every action, there's a reaction? What's put in motion stays in motion until acted upon by force of pressure? Heat is a force of pressure? Cold space is repulsion to heat? Cold repulsion pushing heat energy into mass as renewable heat energy propulsion momentum as perpetual motion momentum plus heat propulsion from cold repulsion momentum?

@PaulaTurner-r8c8c 3 часа назад

Your channel is a place where every video is a true work of art. Thank you for your dedication and passion for creativity!🐂😺😅

@buzzworddujour 3 часа назад

bot

@mindurbusiness-b3u Час назад

@@buzzworddujour and 5 people liked it... also bots perhaps?

@notanemoprog Час назад

@@mindurbusiness-b3u No. I liked it because of the avi

@ralphditchburn1456 2 часа назад

Anton after years of watching you, now you look tired, take a few days to relax, i will still be watching for you.vand can i have permission to use some of this info? For a book?

@nomernomznomz6015 Час назад

Agreed homie looks burned out. Please take care of yourself!!!!

@ralphditchburn1456 Час назад

@nomernomznomz6015 not sure he reads his posts, prob. No time. Cheerio

@raybod1775 42 минуты назад

Need to use sources he uses, some is from Wikipedia.

@davidsault9698 53 минуты назад

I still believe, as I've said before, that the Hubble Tension is caused by the initiation of the fusion process in stars early in the Universe. The CMB is the original expansion and it is fixed at approximately 67 km/s/MPC and any difference from that is due to the expansion of space caused by masses of fusion/space causing objects, stars and galaxies. It will be interesting to see if it is different from that and I wait to see what physicists come up with eventually. (not a physicist)

@andrewbruce-jones6036 24 минуты назад

Looks like we have a primary and a secondary cause for the expansion rate at different times. I have always said that the gravitational reaction between baryonic matter and dark matter causes an attraction in mass, but a particle must be generated causing the Hubble flow in the equal but opposite reaction to the attractive mass part of the interaction.

@oikkuoek 21 минуту назад

How could it be constant? What natural phenomenon would make it constant? There are different types of mass and energy concentrations that react with each other differently. How could this chaos create a constant? When you zoom out, everything seems uniform, but once you zoom in, the nuances start to appear. And furthermore, is it the actual distance that is changing, or does the light change wavelength when traveling through different medium? "We can calculate this!" You can calculate A number that is based on an assumption. That number correlates with other assumptions based on observations founded on assumptions. At this stage, from this point of observation, it appears to be doing this, based on this set of knowledge. What is actually happening, no one has a clue.

@Tight_Conduct 2 часа назад

I really appreciate your statement about this being one of the first types of observations like this, and how we could maybe benefit from more experience. I wouldn't want people to get their H0pes up!

@stevejohnson3357 2 часа назад

The question of accelerating expansion of the universe has been troubling the sleep of astrophysicists for decades. This might have already been disproven but 1 solution floated was that there is just more space as the universe expands and thus more vacuum energy.

@davidsault9698 31 минуту назад

So, of course, the difference in expansion between Andromeda and the Milky Way from the expected expansion would be due to the stars in both galaxies creating space from their nuclear processes.

@MCsCreations 2 часа назад

Interesting. But our model could also be wrong. In this case, the calculations from the CMB would be totally off.

@malachiteofmethuselah9713 2 часа назад

The CMB is not what they tell you it is. It is not ancient. The CMB is like ripples on the surface of the pond, made by interference patterns from everything in the universe.

@MCsCreations 2 часа назад

@malachiteofmethuselah9713 publish a paper about it pointing to any evidence you might have and we can discuss it.

@goktug123123 2 часа назад

Hi Anton, long time follower. I have a suggestion (which might sound nitpicky) I often listen to your videos on my desktop, which has full range reference speakers. Your videos have a really muddy lowend, which sounds super uncomfortable on full range speakers So, maybe you could add a high pass filter around 80-100Hz on your microphone audio, would appreciate it a ton!!!!!!

@rosepurdy6301 17 минут назад

No, you arr wonderful person!! ❤

@drawyrral 3 часа назад

That's super Anton.

@MsCrazylegs80 2 часа назад

It’s because of a plasma gloop soup,it’s stretches out at different angles at different speeds,the splatter of all splatters!.😂

@JamaicaWhiteMan 3 часа назад

The number from the CMB involves much modeling and underlying assumptions. The number from the distance ladder is real data. Always go with the data.

@malachiteofmethuselah9713 2 часа назад

All of cosmology is a series of assumptions.

@denysvlasenko1865 2 часа назад

The H0 value obtained by "direct" measurements (Cepheid/SNs/etc) covers only some ~1Gly around our Galaxy, or ~2% of the size of the observable Universe. IOW: two methods are in fact measuring "average" H0 value over vastly different patches of space, and the value is expected to be the same for both methods only if mass density of the Universe is fairly homogeneous. One of the explanations for the tension is that we (the ~1Gly patch) are in an underdense region, and thus the expansion is a bit faster in it than on average. Now, this is not very plausible in a purely homogeneous FLRW model, so this opens the field for ideas that Universe's expansion is less homogeneous than we thought.

@gweebara 3 часа назад

Yeah... We are finally beginning to understand that space and time stretch at different rates and that we are going to have to deal with the wobbly wibbly nature of the expansion of the universe

@douglaswilkinson5700 2 часа назад

Technically spacetime is not stretching. New spacetime is being created.

@ArthurEKing8472 Час назад

Another option is that the methodology we use to calculate distances between the two might be off. Ergo, out calculations of the Hubble Constant when calculated via different methods may be off, depending on what "Distance Candle" we are using. That would explain why our calculations of the type 1A supernovae all seem to (mostly) agree. I'm sure we'll figure it out eventually. H0pefully.

@Llortnerof Час назад

It's well known that the distance ladder is a potential weak point. But so far any attempts at refinement have just made things "worse".

@ArthurEKing8472 38 минут назад

@@Llortnerof I know! And I personally just find that hilarious. Like there was a study a while back where they were guessing that our movement through, and around, the local group might affect the math... And it did! But made it worse.

@Llortnerof 15 минут назад

@@ArthurEKing8472 I'm still hoping that other new(ish) measurement results in there being 3 distinct values.

@Alondro77 Час назад

If space-time is connected to mass via Higgs Field interactions, resulting in gravity, then varying mass concentrations should alter the expansion rates. Large mass concentrations should slow expansion, while low mass regions would have less of this 'Higgs friction'... this would explain the acceleration, as the Higgs friction would be the 'glue' holding the universe together. As it gets weaker via expansion, the expansion of space time increases. This eliminates the need for dark energy! It ALSO explains why the initial cosmic expansion after the Big Bang was so incredibly, inconceivably fast... there was no mass! Only super-hot energy that had not formed particles yet, thus spacetime was utterly free to expand to its maximum capability. Only when matter began to form did the Higgs interactions begin... and initially the mass concentration was so high that it drastically slowed expansion.

@godblesshamas 2 часа назад

If space is expanding at different rates then "time" is flowing at different rates in those regions too.

@JungleJargon 7 минут назад

The distance to the center of our Sagittarius A black hole is farther away than the most distant galaxy observed by the JWST.

@vgernyc Час назад

What if the Hubble Constant depends on the direction the telescope is pointing? Or perhaps when the big bang happened, massive gravitational waves rippled out affecting the Hubble Constant?

@Masoch1st 2 часа назад

In the lens example at 8:00 it's not just that light took more than one path to get to us, but the light actually can take a full LOOP around a black hole. It literally laps the black hole multiple times.

@edwardmacnab354 Час назад

it's not a black hole

@scottdeller 2 часа назад

Astronomy has Sn Hope, I have Anton Hope!

@osmosisjones4912 3 часа назад

Talking about blowing up Asteriods what a blowing up a hurricane

@celdur4635 38 минут назад

Wait wait wait, if the expansion is accelerating, wouldn't it make sense that it would be expanding slower the farther away you see in space? (further back in time)

@mirandadonovan1272 2 часа назад

I'm no astrophysicist, but if I imagine myself to be at a location in the universe 13 billion light years away from Earth and looking towards Earth then I would be seeing how the portion of the universe that eventually birthed Earth looked 13 billion years ago, and it might appear to be expanding more quickly than it is expanding currently. So the rate of expansion might be correlated to the age of the light being observed, and not to the actual expansion currently. Therefore any light that travels a greater distance due to gravitational detours would show a larger expansion rate of that area of the universe than the actual current one. This would mean that even though the universe may have expanded at a rate that slowed over time, it would appear to expand at different rates in different areas dependent on the point of observation. For example a very fast rate at first, and slowing over time, just like the debris of any explosion.

@edwardmacnab354 Час назад

i'm pretty sure they would have taken that into consideration

@dt4676 2 часа назад

Soooo are we learning more than ever before now? Sure feels like it

@stevenkarnisky411 2 часа назад

The rate of acceleration can only increase when energy is applied to the object being accelerated. Where is this energy coming from? Thank you, Anton, for the confusion.

@Neidzwiedz1 42 минуты назад

Dark energy; that’s astrophysics jargon for we have absolutely no idea!

@marknovak6498 2 часа назад

Have they sodered the Novak Phase boost that accelerated the expansion of the universe by almost 10% shortly after the Cormic Background reaction became visible. I just came up with it. Just figured someone would suggest it. Just having fun ;)

@agathoklesmartinios8414 Час назад

So, if I am understanding this correctly, this discovery shows that the rate of expansion is changing over time, rather than across space? For clarification, if a measurement is made at 5 billion light-years away, and then another measurement is made 5 billion light-years in a completely different direction, those two measurements will be the same? Since both are 5 billion light-years away, the events that were measured are from the same time but different locations. Or would the two measurements differ, despite being the same distance away (and thus the same age), indicating that the rate of expansion differs in different locations, rather than different times?

@NeonVisual Час назад

Why do we call the telescope James Webb, but not call the other one Edwin Hubble? Jim and Edwin sound like a band.

@Harvey_Pekar 3 часа назад

"VAR!" - Edwin Hubble

@martinhofmann4249 47 минут назад

So no accelerated acceleration. Yay! More time for science :)

@flinch622 Час назад

As I heard it many years ago... there just might have been qc flaws in the telescope: maybe it got deployed on blind faith in specs?

@terryendicott2939 42 минуты назад

Hope was the last thing to leave Pandora's box.

@yodbod 2 часа назад

If the cosmos is infinite and our Universe is surrounded by other Universes and black holes ,then our Universe will experience different gravitational influences from multiple directions .

@ricardodelzealandia6290 3 часа назад

Anton is clearly an AI. Sometimes it gets his eyes in the wrong spot.

@JungleJargon 9 минут назад

Distance isn’t the same everywhere in the universe. Things are not as far away as what they seem because gravity isn’t the same everywhere.

@rezadaneshi 3 часа назад

Thank you Anton, could it be mass's density meaning time dilation on different regions effecting their local expansion rate?

@blengi Час назад

extrapolate back and the hubble constant was probably zero at some point around inflation

@JungleJargon 5 минут назад

The reason we can’t see into the black hole of our galaxy is because it’s more red shifted than the most redshifted galaxy detected by the JWST.

@MichaelPiz Час назад

Why are those three sites in that image points and not smears like the rest of the light in that lensing?

@bibi_999 3 часа назад

I'm a total crank but what if redshift isn't indicative of recessional velocity & the universe is actually homeostatic and eternal? Experiments in particle physics seem to show that time doesn't seem to matter that much at a fundamental level.

@rationalgazer 3 часа назад

The madness continues.

@marsdroid1 3 часа назад

you dropped off my algo ...now my brain hurts again haha thx crazy facts !!! wtf is going on out there ! 😃

@mrpocock Час назад

So would we not expect the mass density to affect local expansion? More gravitation slowing expansion?

@HolmesHobbies 45 минут назад

More mass, slower time

@notanemoprog Час назад

What if the actual value of the Hubble constant is such that it makes the age of Universe as young as six thousand years old

@PhilW222 2 часа назад

I don’t think we understand the cosmic background microwave radiation, that’s the one that seems to be out of sync and I’ve personally never completely bought into the current explanation of the very early universe. I wish I was clever enough to have an alternative that fits the facts.

@JohnDunne001 3 часа назад

When will there be no more mysteries of the universe!!

@chrisanderson2368 3 часа назад

What would Anton talk about?

@JohnDunne001 3 часа назад

@@chrisanderson2368 Indeed - every mystery we reveal leads to 5 more new mysteries so I think we're safe for a while yet!

@chuckjones9159 3 часа назад

Love your vids dude but we still need to be using the word "seems" where expansion of the universe is considered. Other paradigms can be used to explain this even if the modern field refuses to for the most part. The SN1a has issues of its own as does every other rung in the so called ladder. There exist a several paradigms that , if modeled, would give a different explanation of this expansion. These types usually involve a scenario where gravity, vacuum energy, DM and DE are basically all from the same source or different effects of it.

@denysvlasenko1865 2 часа назад

How those "other explanations" explain why CMB even exists?

@dougaltolan3017 2 часа назад

If its been lensed, how can you use brightness to determine distance?

@raybod1775 43 минуты назад

Very smart mathematicians

@eclipseslayer98 2 часа назад

The Hubble Tension is REAL!!! You wouldn't download a universe? Yes eye wood.

@WaterShowsProd Час назад

There were no days 10 billion years ago. Back in the days before there were days?

@_robespierre Час назад

our visible part of the universe is expanding does not mean that the whole universe expands the same rate, doesnt it?

@siheard4206 Час назад

Its mentioned a lot that the expansion of the Universe is speeding up. But in my mind, I then think that ot probably hasnt reached its full speed yet. Like say an explosion happens, it will continue to speed up until it reaches a certain top/maximum speed, at which point it then starts to slow down or decelerate. Maybe the Universe hasnt reached that maximum yet. Does rhat make sense or am I way off the mark with such thinking? I know the BigBang wasnt an explosion of sorts. More like an expansion or inflation. But the idea around it topping out and then slowing down, whatever you want to call it, still holds up. I know they announced this years Noble prize winners yesterday, so I don't mind waiting until next year with such 'grounrd breaking' insights!?! 😂

@jerrodbeck1799 Час назад

Cool 👍🏻

@TheAdeybob 36 минут назад

My comment didn't appear. Was trying to point out that I can't understand why space is accepted to stretch...but not time.

@Dakamaru 33 минуты назад

Everything explains the expansion of the universe...

@htos1av Час назад

The "C" is getting a little variable...I'll show myself out.

@chrisolivtreez8017 Час назад

Are there new mesurement s of the cosmic micrieave background? Or why dint we detect CMB many times again, with more and more details? Why no radio wave background? Is it toobhard to measure hence of interference? And how is CMB related to redshift? Cant light reeshiftvat the point we cant detect/differentiate it from this famous "background" radiation?? Hence , universe's light beyond detection capabilities is kinda ressembling a scrumbled background. Ahhh where can i discuss hypothesis deeply with a research team?! I wannna get involved amd spread bith ways researchers/public. . We have all one or infinite good questions and itvwill be together ee resolve the most advanced mind maps. I alwsyd Imagine a child attitude, wondering thus finding the next clues! Where are youu ? Thx Anton and love to yall

@aurelienyonrac 2 часа назад

Black holes expand and grow. Seen from it's center, a black hole is an baby univers. The gravitational pull of the parent univers appears as an expansion from the perspective of a baby universe. Who understands? Pull on the tip of your sock thatvis on your foot. From the perspective of your foot, gravity is pulling. F4om the perspective of your pingers pinching, gravity is expansion. Simple

@richardtardo5170 7 минут назад

What are we expanding into that surrounds the universe?

@primoroy 3 часа назад

Now I am again confused! Is the expansion of the universe SUBTRACTING 51km/sec from the speed that the Andromeda Galaxy is approching the Milky Way?

@KamielDV2 2 часа назад

Yes, us, in the milkyway, and the andromeda galaxy, are both being pulled towards each other, towards each others gravitational center. However space itself can be understood as expanding everywhere, quite like the surface of a balloon, but in what looks like 3 dimensions. These movements act against each other and on large scales, this means that even something moving at the speed of light towards us in space, would never arrive due to the expansion of the space in between

@princeofexcess 2 часа назад

so it seems like universe is expanding faster now than it used to? Is it even faster than we thought? DId i misunderstand something ?

@denysvlasenko1865 2 часа назад

No, it looks like "locally" (in the volume about 1 Giga light year around us) the expansion is faster than on average in observable Universe.

@princeofexcess Час назад

@@denysvlasenko1865 so the universe is expanding at different rates in different areas and nobody knows why? Is this the claim

@196cupcake Час назад

Could it be that it accelerates based on amount of space between two objects?

@pattygreen8064 Час назад

now hear me out , the universe isn't expanding its retracting back to the edges of the hole this universe blew in it

@nawhedawhe6905 3 минуты назад

. . Is the expansion slowing .. if it was . faster in the ancient past 10 Bill yrs ago? . . Is it same in all directions & and at same distances ? .

@jannis11 3 часа назад

NICe

@johnh539 2 часа назад

At11min 24 seconds you say "There is something about the Universe we don't Understand" the problem is that what that is ,is well known but because it is not understood it is ignored. Gravity slows time but because we have no maths relating to by how much it is not considered. The Universe all started at the same time but how much time has passed since then depends on the gravitational history of vastly differing mass concentrations throughout the Universe. Or to put it another way different gravities have slowed time differently. so different parts have been around longer since the big bang.

@johnh539 2 часа назад

There is no one age of the universe, there are multitudes of different ages for different gravitational environments. (for us that is 13.8 Billion years).

@slanglabadang 2 часа назад

5$ says its the assumptions about clumpiness

@terryhardaway3285 Час назад

Shalom Anton, Time is not a constant. Physics evolved with time. Each galaxy began as single proto-star, gravatrons are out of phase leftover particles from matter anti-matter annihilation, magnetism defies gravity, stars and galaxies are birthed in their polar jets. Time has slowed down dramatically causing the expansion rate to appear to be speeding up. Ever notice how the cosmic web resembles the pathways of neurons? What do you want to make a bet that the universe is sentient? 42! That's my story and i'm sticking to it. Be well and be Blessed!

@paulh5801 3 часа назад

Maybe, the universe is expanding at the same speed as it always has. Maybe light speed isnt the constant we belive it to be. Due to the lack of mass between galaxies time might move faster which might effect time and the speed of light.

@denysvlasenko1865 2 часа назад

> Maybe light speed isnt the constant we belive it to be. We don't "believe" light speed is constant. In fact, for a long time people were sure that light speed depends on the observer (like speed of sound does). We KNOW (not "believe") light speed is constant because, to our surprise, we measured it to be the same regardless of observer's velocity relative to emitter of light.

@godblesshamas 2 часа назад

@@denysvlasenko1865 If time is variable and depends on the position of the observer then speed can't be a constant. What I KNOW is physics can't defy logic. Time and therefore speed are an illusion.

@dougaltolan3017 2 часа назад

@@denysvlasenko1865light dosent always travel at the speed of light. What we have measured, and found to be constant and independant of observer is the speed of light. Not necessarily the speed that light has travelled to get here.

@Ratzfourtyfour 2 часа назад

This is legit insane sciencing.

@itstruemammanon7448 2 часа назад

i see H2o in that pic

@brainsdemo7270 2 часа назад

ITS BOW SHOCK UNIVERSE IS KIND OF LIKE THE HELIO SPHERE OF A STAR IT IS COMPRESSED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IN BOOK ON DIFFISSION THEOREM I WROTE IN 96.(STANDING ON THE SHORE)

@NeonVisual Час назад

Space is lumpy.

@brucerazor5202 3 часа назад

Click the like button

@XxTheAwokenOnexX 2 часа назад

❤️👍

@Auroral_Anomaly 3 часа назад

Multiple types of dark matter might help with our model, cause why not, we need this at a bare minimum to explain observations.

@CustardCream22 2 часа назад

🥰

@David-z7n5y 3 часа назад

First

@EdT.-xt6yv 2 часа назад

#73😎

@rwdestefano 2 часа назад

Anon, I love you like a brother. But can you PLEASE stop saying "VERY unique" or "EXTREMELY unique." Something is either unique or not. It cannot be very unique. It's like saying "extremely dead."