For mRNA Vaccines, COVID Was Just the Beginning 

it is. the public benifits from the results. now, we do need to do something about the insane prices, but that can be done and still allow the private sector to thrive. we gotta get rid of the idea of getting rich off the sick

@@Austintwo3no one should profit off of things for everyone, and governments subsidizing these companies allows them to influence massive amounts of control with no accountability. When diseases and illness is preventable, profit is literally in the way

@@ArktheLark business have to make money, but being able to Patent n "claim ip rights" n things like that gotta go for things like meds n such

then we wouldn't have half of the good things we already have

@@ArktheLarkwithout profit there will be no innovation.

For what it's worth, I find this lady annoying and tedious. Can't we have more of the wonderful Rose Bear Don't Walk?

​@@施素珊I'd really love to have her back more. I love this presenter too, though. The one I wish they'd get rid of is...I don't actually know their name, the one with curly hair that comes up for ads and feels the need to shout all the time.

Thanks, I'll remember that when you're begging your doctor to cure your cancer but he says, "Nope, sorry you already gave your cure to someone else."

Tell him to leave the hospital asap and get some real help.

Auto-immune disorders still have no cure. There is reserach of course, see SciShow video "A Vaccine That Makes Your Immune System ... Forget?" Someone above posted about how we have some treatment options for animals with autoimmune disorders, but those are 1/month things. Not sure if that would be enough to combat accute swelling.

@@christopherg2347 there is no immune system, so there are no auto-immune disorders. Just because something is declared as a theory does not mean it is legit. Immunology is actually disproved in many ways. For example, the overwhelming majority of people who have ‘antigens’…are perfectly healthy. We learn that when we do actual mass testing. Conversely, commonly people in ICU will have high antibody titers. Immunology is just another bad idea from europe. Disregard it, and check out daoist philosophy, where all these things are understood far better, and more comprehensively, and the health precepts flow out of a nature based philosophy.

He needs to wrap his legs very tightly and then wear tight compression socks daily

Is this page an ad?

Just move to within walking distance of the vet. Or get a license to practice veterinary medicine yourself. Ezpz.

Interesting.

My cat gets solencia for arthritis, but that's a monoclonal antibody. I can't find anything about a mRNA cat arthritis medicine.

I had a vet that visited my home. He had a well stocked van with refrigerators for meds and a portable roll out scale. Very stress free.

Just be aware of injection site carcinomas.

Clinton did that, fortunately when the Uni does the research the company has no editorial control and relationships have to be disclosed.

"In 2019, the pharmaceutical industry spent $83 billion dollars on R&D. Adjusted for inflation, that amount is about 10 times what the industry spent per year in the 1980s" (Congressional Budget Office). Note, the NIH's total budget in the same year was $39.2 billion. There are specific cases where your statement is true, such as novel Cystic Fibrosis treatments costing exorbitant amounts of money while being the initial research was funded by the public/non-profit charities but this is not the case for all new treatments. I.e. certain monoclonal antibody treatments that were created to treat non-life threatening diseases but now it turns out they cure allergies/may be a treatment for COPD. The reason I bring this up is because (a) SciShow doesn't need to get into the weeds of drug funding by govt vs pharmaceuticals in each video (b) or the fact academic research in public universities is often funded by private companies (Novo Nordisk's relation to Denmark's universities) etc etc its complicated!! But because it is misinformation to imply pharmaceutical companies make money off vaccines, which are the most unprofitable health treatment for how effective they are and why vaccines aren't usually funded for known viruses unless there's an outbreak! Vaccines usually require govt intervention to be made at all and we'd all be better off if more nations had reserve facilities to manufacture them. It also doesn't address the very real problem of underfunding for pharmaceuticals by the public -> right now the voters seem to think its alright leaving what research to prioritize in the hands of "Big Pharma". It also doesn't address the extremely predatory thing "Big Pharma" does with extended internationally binding patents on drugs like insulin WHICH IS THE REAL CASH COW! Snappy social media critiques get likes but I hope SciShow can make a well researched video that covers these topics or leaves them out until they can do so. Unless ppl are informed about what is happening in medicine, they will be vulnerable to conspiracy theories and health misinformation = worsening health outcomes for everyone!

Thanks for your service, it will have helped humanity as a whole o7

oh yeah? I did this almost ELEVEN years ago. B)

thank you.

how did the animal trials go? any adverse effects?

Thank you for your service

Why not? Are you willing to fund research for diseases you will even hear about? How ouch are you comfortable with your taxes being raised for the additional cost? You can argue about government spending and priorities and whatnot, but as things stand right now making all medical research public would necessarily mean spending more of your money. I think the video did a good job of explaining that there are benefits to private research. I have no problem with a company taking on the significant risk and expense of developing a new drug and then seeing the return on that investment. That’s how a capitalist economy works, after all. I do think there need to be rational limits on IP rights. More akin to the patent Les which expire after (I think) 25 years, rather than the insane copyright laws that expire (again, I think) 75 years after the death of the original owner, especially when that owner is a corporation with legal rights as a person. In my opinion, the real problem is not that IP rights exist for any given situation, but that they can be and are grossly abused for profit.

@@kenrickman6697a lot of research is publicly funded, patented by corporations, and then sold back to us at extortionate prices. the private market should not exist for healthcare, it creates perverse incentives

@@kenrickman6697except a lot of the money for research comes from government funds because pharmaceutical companies don’t want to invest in a product unless they know how long it will take/if they will actually get a result (unless of course they get that sweet sweet government money, and then still patent it for themselves and charge exorbitant amounts of money to make up for the research cost that they totally definitely paid for all by themselves)

@@kenrickman6697 now try without capitalist apologia

@@twinblessings2125 Who said anything about apologizing for anything or anyone? I am mature enough to recognize that the real world isn’t some fantasy playground full of unicorns and rainbows, and just because some twerp thinks they should get everything for free just the way LKN my and daddy raises them, it doesn’t mean it’s ever going to happen. If you want to survive and thrive, you have to see the world as it is, not as you want it to be. Now, try it again as an adult, whenever you choose to grow up and face reality head on.

First cancer... then hair lost. That order please!

Considering we’re nearing the end of the antibiotic golden age as resistant diseases on the rise, have this new method of fighting them is the new magic bullet.

mRNA is exciting and promising for vaccines, but let’s be honest about their effectiveness for COVID-19. The way we did it only generates antibodies to the spike proteins which change drastically, outpacing vaccine development. A traditional attenuated virus vaccine would’ve granted more broad immune response to other viral proteins.

We have NOT explored the oceans very well if that makes you feel any better 😂

@@emmettturner9452the mRNA based vaccines performed better than the traditional from Novavax and Johnson & Johnson.

Can you expand on what Prions do/what their actions/functions are in the body? This sounds really neat and I'd love to know more!

@@LaviniaDeMortalium Prions are infectious misfolded proteins that have the ability to misfold other proteins. They infect brain tissue and can basically shut down the function of and destroy neurons, causing spongiform encephalopathies, and the diseases they cause are currently impossible to cure. In addition, they're very difficult to destroy using heat or chemicals unlike typical infectious disease vectors like viruses or bacteria, but luckily they're generally only either inherited genetically or they're contracted by eating infected brain tissue. So don't go eating brains!

​@@LaviniaDeMortalium prions attack the brain. It's what causes mad cow disease.

​@@LaviniaDeMortalium and it's also causing wasting disease in deer in America.

@@amandajones661 Prions! There we go, it just clicked! Thank you for that Amanda. I appreciate the memory jog

Not to mention that BionTech got 375 Million Euro from the German State to further their investigation into what became the COVID-19 vaccine. That came after BionTech got 50 and 100 Million EUR in several credits from the European Development Bank starting in 2019. And let's not forget mRNA research was widely shunned by investors for decades, mostly thriving in the world of (state sponsored) academia. The story about "private companies are the ones moving science forward" is not exactly an uncontested position. I'm surprised at the lack of research done by SciShow before casting that assertion.

That's mostly true for large, established companies. Biotech startups aren't like that. As I understand it, 1) VCs/angel investors gamble on startups 2) 90%+ flop, but the survivors make stupid amounts of $$ 3) startup is acquired by established company, and investors/startup guys cash out. As such, there's plenty of room for risk taking. People with rare diseases are still screwed though.

​@@pierrecurie I can concieve that startups that have less to lose and and are less bound by investor interests follow different buisness strategies than larger, long established corporations. However, doesn't the sucess of any burgeoning enterprise still, in the end, rests on their ability to find a sufficiently large market for their product to offset the cost of their operation, and thus become profiitable enough? Even if a startup that hasn't found a market, and is thus not profitable, manages to find enough investments to keep it afloat, surely it won't change the fact that this startup isn't profitable. Why then would investors keep investing in it? Surely startups like this represent the "90%+" that you mentioned, while the rest of startups that do suceed in being acquired by larger corporations do so precisely because they have found enough demand for their product to become profitable. By this analysis, the viability of a buisness enterprise, even a burgeoning one like a startup, still depends on its ability to foster enough demand for its product or service. Endeavours that are expensive to undertake without being suceptible to foster a large enough demand (in other words, endeavours that are risky in the eyes of investors) have very little chance at being financially viable without some kind of subsidies. Yet, just because an endeavour is costly but isn't valuable to a proportionate portion of society doesn't mean that it isn't worth pursuing. The case of research into treatments for rare diseases that you brought up is a typical example. I am by no means well learned on buisness strategies or market economics, but I don't see how, when all is said and done and all things being equal, finantial profitability and return on investment isn't the final arbiter of which buisness enterprises stay in buisness, and which don't.

@@HectaSpyrit Sometimes investors throw money at dumb ideas like moviepass. Uber/Lyft are barely profitable (their revenues are high, but so are their expenditures). It's also important to separate risk and market size. Your initial argument was about risk, not market size.

I'm surprised at the lack of research done by SciShow before casting that assertion, for sure.

​@WromWrom No surprise here, they always lean liberal and tend to follow the biased research studies.

They may as well slap a "brought to you by Pfizer" sponsor and on this, because that's all it is.

@@WromWrom well, they are SciShow not EconShow

How does what you said disprove SciSchow's assertion? Of *course* governments pumped huge amounts of money into the pandemic: it was an active pandemic killing thousands daily They HAD to pump money into risky research, because ANY solution had to come fast to save lives. When there *isn't* an active mass-death event going on, governments ARE much less likely to fund risky research.

EXACTLY!!! This idea that they're more likely to take risks that publicly funded efforts wouldn't is also baseless. They never give concrete examples and just assume that it's the case. Corporations gatekeeping potentially life-saving revolutionary technology should be illegal. Any benefit is outweighed by this alone.

The global body count is currently in the 10's of millions, with no end in sight, and the serious injuries are at least 10 times that many.

Those interested can look up the Bayh-Dole Act to know a bit more. The government funded research isn't always taken for free, but in comparison to the often immense returns it's definitely peanuts.

Bringing a drug to market is also expensive. But yes, the US government should get a taste of the profits since they put up the research money. but that’s not the way America does things.

Not in itself so much perhaps. But in combination with personalized medicine that will become possible when new super computers that can process astromical amounts of data in just seconds can map out every gene in the body, and with the help of AI quickly discover patterns of healthy bodies and chemical and biological patterns for certain diseases. And every human bodies own unique needs will be taken into account, and a perfect combination of different medicines with optimal doses for each person will be given. Every persons own unique biology, age, sex, weight, and such will then be taken into account. This will probably become a revolution in medicine. New diseases will be found, and new cures, and existing cures will be optimized.

@@nattygsbord it's not that deep

@@nathanlevesque7812 Sorry if I came across as dismissive. Biotech is useful for many industries related to food, energy, medicine and building materials. I do not wanna belittle its importance for medicine. But I think that AI and supercomputers and personalized medicine will become a huge revolution that will make all other modern medical advances pale by comparison.

IT security feels like a safe bet on the future job market. Especially with a new cashless society, self-driving cars, and "smart homes" where lamps, refridgerators, toasters, washing machines, dish washers, air conditioning, jalousie windows are all communicating with each other through the internet and can be steered from a smartphone. And if a hacker takes control over all this, then the disaster is total and a persons life is ruined after losing everything. And the military will of course also love IT specialists. Future warfare will have cyber warfare as its own domain in hybride warfare. And electronic warfare have proven its importance in Ukraine, and if you can knock out the enemies ability to communicate with his own drones then you have won a lot.

Yes, then end up developing patents for the most corrupt evil companies in the world. 🎉

She got the gig because the grim reaper was busy that day.

💯

lol what a dumb take

@@Jack_Redview you're the dumb one if you think even for a second greed isn't the main objective.

I think people should not knock "for profit" entities doing research for healthcare, just the fact that a company is doing research will further the knowledge. If you remember back in the 15th century, explorers discover the new world, what was the impetus for them to do this endeavor, riches. They were looking for gold, and a quick route to China so that they can bring spices from the Far East to Europe.

@@Jack_Redview

Can you name me one of the studies you've read? All the early clinical trials using mRNA were disaster pre-2020. What have they changed? Id be interested to see what's changed.

@@mangaasFor brain cancer, I recommend reading up on Richard Scolyer. He’s an australian who’s made impressive work on mRNA vaccines for melanoma, but he had to use this approach last year when he got diagnosed with a grade 4 glioblastoma. He’s still in remission, still means the cancer could come back, but good progress because hardly anybody with that cancer lasts a year. For melanoma, the chance of a personalized vaccine approach reaching to market is by far the greatest with this one. Moderna’s now at phase 3 studies with it. With just the vaccine, survival was around 50%. With the vaccine and immunotherapy, that survival rate reached close to 75%. That’s very impressive with late-stage melanoma. And also in the video, the mention of a pancreatic cancer vaccine is now in phase 2 studies. There are recent news articles about the cancer vaccines mentioned if you want to read more into them, very interesting stuff!

@@mangaas Just looked back and I had a reply but I guess it got deleted? But there’s some more news articles since then showing that mRNA vaccines are successful. Like BBC’s story on Richard Scolyer, Time Magazine’s article on Moderna’s melanoma vaccine, and like what was mentioned in the video the pancreatic cancer vaccine that’s still in studies.

​@@mangaas I think they're talking about 8mins into the video? This would be an amazing breakthrough to have. I mean cancer treatments have already come so far with DRASTICALLY better survival and full remission rates in the past 30years, so this would be the next amazing step. Here's hoping it comes relatively soon coz yeah, side effects completely crash your life with the isolation periods, nausea and then some of the current methods that OP mentioned. (I've seen friends and family go through it over the years 😢 so you have my sympathy, brave warriors! 💗👏)

Chemo side effect are nothing compared to mrna side effects. You can recover from chemo. You can never recover from mrna.

It did.

It does . . .

Thats prbly more true than what this actress female is claiming...

Right, thought there was going to be a negative reveal.

❤ Healing prayers and thoughts for you.

Don't hold your breath. They make much more profit from treating you than curing you.

_reoccurent?_ how many times you had it?

​@@Leester-70 You could have been kind and just kept your inside opinion to yourself. Just because you CAN type something doesn't mean you SHOULD.

@@veryberry39 Was I wrong?

Thank you for all you're doing to help save the lives of all our families. Especially our elderly more vulnerable to flu etc. Much respect and appreciation

Sounds like it might be a good antidepressant too:-) I think the antidepressant I currently take was originally developed to treat TB. Someone noticed that the treated group of patients were practically dancing around the sanitarium. They were still sick with TB but their mild mania led to the drug being tried for depression. I guess you are just feeling good about doing something to help others, but it remanded me of that story.

lmfao!! Do your part? taking experimental concoctions for the sniffles? Gratz!

@@xwarmanglestop being such a negative Nancy. How do you expect these vaccines and their effects to be studied if people don’t volunteer and do their part

This is the most bot comment I have ever seen in my life.

This particular video is loaded with dangerous misinformation.

The Republican party is doing their best to privatize the post office. They don’t want it to be a government entity. There’s a whole lot of profit that could’ve been made if they didn’t exist.

​@@neilkurzman4907not just that, the USPS isn't profitable as it stands. It is a large expenditure in the budget. Hell they still use NG mail trucks.

Pretty sure the same issue applies for Flu and mRNA vaccines. Flu is a tricky one, it mutates by changing the spike proteins on it's outside and it's fast at mutating. mRNA vaccines only have instructions for one type of spike protein unless you combine different ones. Problem is that the spike proteins can be any shape combination so it might be tough to make a vaccine for all previous and future flu strains.

​@@darkelysium2187 Not all past and future flu strains, just all the stains currently in circulation.

@@billberg1264 That probably won't be hard to make a vaccine for all strains in circulation. The issue is future strains where the virus mutates into a new strain to avoid the vaccine.

There is a research project looking into a universal flu vaccine. The flu virus shape is apparently like a piece of brocolli with the different strains sharing the same base 'stem' and differing in the 'leaves' so to speak. They figure that with the cool things that mRNA vaccines can do they will be able to make a vaccine targeting the stem which will work on all strains of the flu.

Yes, they were developing it for use with the flu and other cold viruses when COVID hit. It would have come out by now regardless they just upped the timeline a little bit specifically for COVID. The entire reason it was being developed was so that it went flu goes bonkers next time we could stop it.

You're lucky to be alive, as the millions of dead people can attest to.

You must have drunk a LOT of Kool Aid to believe this tech is good after having gotten injured by it, tsk, tsk... It shouldn't at all be used for healthy people, only its use as bespoke cancer treatment does the cost benefit make sense, considering that you can't know the dose your cells produce, only the dose of instructions you give them, you don't know where in your body the instructions will end up due to the microlipid capsule, and your immune system attacks your own cells for producing the alien (to your body, obvs) proteins, which could now be cells in any of your organs since you don't control where the mRNA ends up

Absolutely agree. I know some people can't take the flu vaccine because they are allergic to eggs.

Yes, but ....... the most used one (about 4.5 billion doses worldwide) was Comirnaty. It uses polyethylene glycol (PEG). A reasonable number of people are allergic to it. Quite a few don't know they are.

Another benefit is vaccinated patients have lower survival rates from covid hospitalization, and heart attacks than unvaccinated patients with or without prior COVID infections.

That's why they do trials. Sometimes they do find that there can be long term side effects for different treatments but the risk is generally quite low. If it was high risk it would have got caught in the trial phase. Then don't forget that the longer that you wait to see if there's a chance of long term side effects, the greater the chance there is that you contract the disease that the vaccine helps to prevent.

To start this off, no, I am not antivax... So don't try to label me as that. With that said -- There are a lot of very bad things that can and have gone wrong from reverse transcribing of the mrna sequences into our DNA (peer reviewed studies have proven this can happen), it can cause a cascade of autoimmune responses throughout the whole body and there is so much that we still don't understand. Remember these same companies and institutions lied saying it would stop the spread of COVID but under oath admitted they never even tested for that end point in their studies. They told us it would stay local in the spot it was injected but autopsies/biopsies/testing has shown the spike protein made by the mRNA vaccines spread systemically throughout your whole body -- brain, eyes, liver, testies, ovaries, heart, and any other organ you may have. mRNA tech has been around for a while and there have been a lot of failed attempts to use it due to too many unknowns and side effects. COVID was basically the government and big pharmas way of strong arming the FDA approval of the tech and making the tax payer literally pay for the machines/processes that make it so big pharma didn't have to make those investments but could 'save they day' and make billions out of the 'goodness or their own hearts'. It's ridiculous. Scishow just lost a heck of a lot of legitimacy with this video in my opinion. Now for the positives -- there are a HUGE amount of uses for mRNA technologies for fighting disease, I'm not saying the technology is bad BUT with all the companies being for profit and literally controlling the studies that are used for their approval the safety oversight isn't there and you're lying to yourself if you say it is. We have been at an elevated level of deaths since the role out of the mRNA shots. COVID infections stopped accounting for the deaths a long time ago. A lot of people are dying that shouldn't be, across all age groups and in all the large countries that mandated the shots. No one wants to acknowledge or talk about it in the media. The numbers come from government websites so they're not made up. Sure they are estimates based on previous years BUT if you look at historical predictions they would be a little over, a little under throughout the years but not multiple percentage points above the predicted average for almost the majority of the years. Not saying it's the shot, but boy do the numbers line up pretty well with booster roll outs even with accounting for COVID waves and COVID deaths. Never underestimate the power of greed.

Never approved for human use, even the inventor said so 4 years ago.... No long-term studies about side-effects and no authorization for human injection. Mrna is very dangerous and should not be taken.

yes since the late 80s already.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10022421/

Comments are full of experts

Small pox vaccine works for it to.

I had hopes that a SciShow audience would be better informed, but, alas, it seems not. (Although, I can't discount any possible brigading going on, too.)

it's very possible youtube is censoring the people that are commenting what I thought I'd be seeing ahahah

People excited about scientific nes? That must be the case because out of the first fifty or so I browsed, one was vaguely critical about some funding questions

@KSCPMark6742 It definitely seems that whoever runs the SciShow channel knew what was likely and has been working quickly. Some of the comments I myself replied to are already gone.

@@scaper8 Glad to see that, youtube comments can be such a cesspool

Sounds like your going to need every chemo allowed also . . .

They have it for cancer, turbo cancer is what it was designed to cause.

in Philippines too. Very convenient. They have a law here to mandate that. Just got mine. I got a indigent certificate in 5 mins in our town hall (barangay hall in local language) even if I am not even voting there lol and they gave me my shots for free

Big animal, less risk and also horses have been traditionally used for so long for this type of thing that we have more data on what to expect from them than many other animals. But they could have used rabbits too

That’s why one horse kick can end us 😅 we empowered the species

I agree, I like her voice.

Just a little slower otherwise I will fall asleep never having the opportunity to enjoy her soothing voice.

@@shaheenbhoola put on 0.75 speed

Her voice is nice indeed but reading stories demands certain "acting" and narration skills. I'm not saying she doesn't have, I do not know, but not everyone is capable of narrating stories. Narrating isn't reading.

@@REMY.C. True.

I caught Covid-19 after two vaccinations (both were Pfizer). I had a third after that, the Astra Zeneca vaccine and was fine while most of my family got infected. *I was given 3 shots because I had a stroke in 2017 and the NHS considers me in the vulnerable category.

Yep and one thing people don't talk about is the more vaccines you get of a certain type, the broader your immune response will be and the less likely variants are to get you. It doesn't matter if it's mRNA or one of the more traditional types of vaccine there is a overall net gain by regular vaccination for different strains.

And herd immunity was supposed to protect him, but morons sabotaged that.

@@darcieclements4880 really good point!

Vitamin D, exercise and sleep are very effective in reducing severity. Lifestyle changes are imperative for a fast recovery.

That was the first thing to pop into my head, too!

Need. Basically it's cheap because we've developed it to work well on the animals in bulk however they may experience some nasty side effects. We did this intentionally because by vaccinating the carriers we dramatically reduce the incidents in humans. As such there's not a huge demand for them in humans so when you do need to use them in a human it can be expensive and still sucks because there's no reason to make those vaccines less terrible when they don't need to be used often. Rabies vaccine is super old school vaccine and not a good time. Also humans are naturally resistant and don't actually get sick for months to years after being infected where most animals are going to get sick in a matter of weeks so you can't really retroactively protect your dog the way you can a person.

They caused them at a much lower level than covid did. It was incredibly rare despite what morons and lying grifters will tell you.

Exactly Congestive heart failure here

YES! same here, I've had worse colds, that covid vaccine kept me from spiraling into the hospital 🎉❤

I got covid in march this year, knocked me clean off my slate for a whole week. I am sure i would have been in a Hospital without the 3 shots i got in the years before (i have at least 2 risk factors. Almost obese and beginning Asthma, getting covid without the shots could have been a death scentence)

@@DJRaffa1000 Yea my best friend is healthy as an ox, he is retired military and still works out daily, and EVEN HE spent 2 or 3 days on a ventilator in the hospital... Said he was really sick and went to urgent care, they saw his blood oxygen was only in the 60s! (Should be up near 99%, dropping even 10% is cause for alarm)... It's a GAMBLE that could cost an entire life, better to be safe and vaxxed, than dead

I had covid twice in 2020, twice in 2021 and I think one time in 2022 and twice in 2023 and once now in 2024. Every time it was like a very mild flu. Never took the vaxx, no point fixing what ain't broke.

@@huldu well yea, you can build natural immunity to any virus. During the pandemic, Covid proliferation was insanely fast. So new strains were practically being airdropped. So yeah, you're probably fine not taking it.

I didn't even know HRIG existed before reading your comment, but Googling it a bit, it seems it's given in conjunction with the vaccine as part of Post-Exposure Prophylaxis. Apparently, altogether, PEP for rabies in the US runs from $1,200 to $6,500, with an average of $3,800.

So you pay, you just have no way of knowing what you’re paying.

@@codename495 Actually most people know how much they pay in taxes

​@@codename495I'd gladly--yes, GLADLY--pay more in taxes if it meant not going into bankruptcy just to get medical care. And that goes for anyone else who needs it, too. Why are your kind willing to do such crazy gymnastics just to justify your selfishness? You're so terrified of some boogeyman "lazy person" that you refuse to see the benefits to yourselves.

So you still pay... and the cost would not be zero... and its American companies... so still need to lick their boots

@@EC-dz4bq But when you are negotiating for a whole country, prices go down.

There’s more and more evidence that shows vaccinated individuals have poor health outcomes, when they do ultimately get infected.

Remember 2021 bodily autonomy right to make your own medical decisions was the first thing to go

There is no STEM shortage

​@RebelRosers no it was 2022 when for ideological and religious reasons the Supreme Court struck down Roe vs Wade leading to the removal of necessary medical care from many women, and their children. That's real loss of bodily and medical autonomy. Consent is still needed for someone to be treated (unless the draft is reintroduced - then you are forced to take vaccines as part of being in the military), if there's social consequences of not receiving treatment, well that's on you for putting yourself above your community.

@@RebelRosers You can have that right, but that right also makes it so other people around you are susceptible to infection more than they would be if you would have gotten a vaccine. Less viral load.

Looks like all the QAnonweirdo bots got deleted.

Yeah if these "confidentially incorrect" people could go ahead and stick to the nut job areas of the internet, that would be great

Yes. ​@@captainkirk4271

​@@captainkirk4271 "higher cancer rates" link them then, show me a paper that links covid vaccines to cancer. It's not even physiologically possible lmao

One of those conspiracy theories is that the vaccine works.

@@wentoneisendon6502 They wouldn't be able to. Studies linking increased cancer rates to vaccines would be too far in its infancy to even draw reasonable conclusions. Any study that claims to do so is just pure conjecture at this point in time

@@petefrolov1842 Good thing we have solid proof it performs its task in reducing the severity of symptoms. Call that theory confirmed

I noticed that as well. And sadly, if you try to tell them that wasn't what she said, they'll just double down.

This video isn't just for a US audience. She didn't say anything explicitly supporting the issues you raised. If you really are a clinical biotechnology researcher thanks for your work.

Out of NASA's push for various space program objective, came great advancements of electronics. Where would modern CPUs be without this technology? Even the CPUs for the current generation of phones have several cores(ie several processor), which was probably unheard of 20 years ago.

Bad bot.

that's misinformation about side-effect profiles. Your comment shows you either have a poor understanding of molecular equivalency of synthetic vs. non-synthetic biomolecules or that you are maliciously spreading misinformation. Private companies biggest threat is not failing to report side-effects, but failing to report lack of any effects at all.

BAA BAA BAA. Plenty of vax sheep.

Thalidomide was science too.

Morons blindly love science, intelligent people question the science, the motive, the incentive, the result, the process, the variables and so much more. 😂

If Embryos can be kept alive inside a petri dish why can't Etopic pregnancies be saved. Using same cells and hormones used to implant in the first place

@@captainkirk4271 that's the jist of what I wrote,but my comment got deleted..........

@@captainkirk4271 my comments don't show up, can you see this?

aka my attention span is shot.

Saying it is, that's for sure. Saying in short is the same amount of syllables.

All your doctors and researchers work for free, with donated materials and power, in buildings that were built for free, on land that was donated by the previous owner? No: You have a healthcare system that was paid for by taxes earned by hardworking citizens, that had no other option allowed by the state.

@lucienve Yes, you are right. But even if I lived under the bridge, I could get the same high level of healthcare as others, which is beautiful. You mentioned taxes. I have a company and am happy to pay taxes so everyone can have free healthcare.