Тёмный

Ford Maverick vs Hyundai Santa Cruz - This is the one I'd buy and why 

Bembli
Подписаться 89 тыс.
Просмотров 155 тыс.
50% 1

Ford is killing it at the moment and it continues with their brand new compact truck, the Ford Maverick. But so is Hyundai with their all new Santa Cruz. In fact, the Santa Cruz is currently the fastest selling new car in the US.
So which one would I buy?
Well in this video I’m going to compare some of the spec and tech of the 2022 Ford Maverick and the 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz but more importantly we’re going to analyze the design of the trucks in front, side and rear view. Last but not least I’m going to let you know which one I would buy based on their very different approach to styling.
Both of these trucks are for you who need something smaller, more fuel efficient and something that won’t break the bank but can still get the job done. These are compact, unibody pickup trucks designed for people with active lifestyles, whatever that means.
So can they still do truck things even though they are unibody and not body on frame trucks?
Well the Maverick has a 1,500-pound payload, 4,000-pound max towing capacity with an optional tow package and an estimated 40mpg with the standard hybrid powertrain.
And here’s the most impressive number - the Ford Maverick starts at just $21,490 which means Ford really wants to get this out to the masses.
So what about the powertrains? The base model comes with a 2.5L inline 4 combined with an electric motor that is FWD only. It puts out 191 hp and can go 500 miles on a single tank.
The other available option comes with 4WD and a turbocharged 2.0 L inline 4 producing 250 hp and 277 lb-ft of torque. This is the version I would go with since I don’t think FWD trucks make sense and 191 hp seems a little weak by today’s standards.
Now prices for the Santa Cruz start a little higher than the Maverick at $23,990 for a front-wheel drive model with a 191-horsepower 2.5L engine and front-wheel drive. An eight-speed automatic transmission is standard on all models. All-wheel drive Santa Cruzes with the same engine start at $25,490.
The FWD Santa Cruz can tow 3,500 pounds while the towing capacity for AWD models rises to 5,000 pounds with a max payload of 1,906 pounds. So only comparing truck-features, these two trucks are pretty close. But that’s not what matters the most to me, more on that in a sec.
Why is it so cheap? Well, they’re built on Crossover SUV platforms and share very similar platforms as those of the Bronco Sport and the Tucson.
These are not heavy duty trucks and I think that’s what’s going to make both of these massive hits. They will bring in new buyers that never really considered a truck before.
★Merchandise use code SKETCH10 at checkout for 10% off your first order: thesketchmonkey.com
★My other channel: / thesketchmonkey
★My online sketch course: analogdesignerpropack.com
★The books, art supplies and equipment I use: www.amazon.com/shop/thesketch...
Thanks for watching! Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE!

Опубликовано:

 

2 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 739   
@postbyte1
@postbyte1 2 года назад
The only thing I take away from all of that is 40 miles per gallon in the city with a compact truck. I don't think you need to say anymore.
@DjeyB55
@DjeyB55 2 года назад
Only thing that sucks is....they ain't making another hybrid until 2023. Bummer. So I got the Santa Cruz. Oh well
@honoredsage4946
@honoredsage4946 Год назад
But you sacrifice awd and towing capacity
@joeneonturbo
@joeneonturbo Год назад
I had Mazda b2200 and a 99 ranger. I hauled enough truck stuff with those two and never towed. Truly ask ur yourself how much TRUCK do u NEED?
@patconzip
@patconzip Год назад
CVT transmission. Don’t need to say any more. 🤮
@themidnighttavern6784
@themidnighttavern6784 Год назад
​@@patconzip Learn the difference between e-cvts and cvts please. Cvts are trash, e-cvts are some of the most reliable transmissions out there. They don't use belts or pulleys like Nissan/Subaru cvts, and that's the thing that causes most issues with cvts long term.
@kdiamond3623
@kdiamond3623 Год назад
I heavily researched both of these vehicles. The Maverick was in the lead for most of the time. Ultimately, I bought the Santa Cruze. We plan to do a lot of traveling and the SC is the more comfortable of the two. Also there was a hefty market adjustment for any Maverick were I got the SC under MSRP with a better warranty. Very happy with my decision. The SC gets a lot of attention where ever we go.
@fineilldoit
@fineilldoit Год назад
I am looking right now and the Maverick is supposed to be cheaper than the Hyundai, but that is not the case with the almost universal price gouging done by Ford dealers. 2023 and 2024 are going to be tough on Ford because they have destroyed their reputation with greedy dealership owners.
@Grim_The_Reaper
@Grim_The_Reaper 2 месяца назад
Bro, I got a SC recently in that light blue color with all the black accents and cross bars on top. Literally everywhere I've been recently I see people staring at it 😂 I had a 20 hear old tuscon that I owned for 10 years that I upgraded from so it's a weird feeling lol
@bandvitromania9642
@bandvitromania9642 2 года назад
The Hyundai is very "heavely" styled meanwhile the Ford is simple and robust. Pretty much two trucks for different type of people
@danb4755
@danb4755 2 года назад
I agree that the Maverick may age better than the Santa Cruz. I really like them both, but I just can't get past the Maverick's interior with its' unusual color palette and cheap-looking materials. I am a Ford fan, but I would choose the Santa Cruz...
@dviaje8
@dviaje8 2 года назад
Very well done video 👏🏽 liked how you did the design comparison and highlighted the differences.
@chucksu
@chucksu 2 года назад
Maverick for the hybrid. The tail light thing happens all the time with vehicles that have hatches. A typical truck doesn't do this, in the off chance you drive with the tail gate removed...
@toronado455
@toronado455 2 года назад
Yeah, or drive with the tailgate down. Must be only non-essential lights on the tailgate I suppose.
@kdrapertrucker
@kdrapertrucker 2 года назад
I'm gonna wait till they make the hybrid AWD. Only major mistake ford made with this was limiting the hybrid to 2wd.
@pieroroccaysj
@pieroroccaysj 2 года назад
The Santa Cruz has a turbo option that bests the Maverick's turbo if you're going to compare apples to apples.
@frankhouck4446
@frankhouck4446 Год назад
It ain’t apples to apples. Hyundai, in their infinite stupidity, decided to pair their turbo with a piece of shit DCT tranny which WILL break down (it’s just a matter of when). So, for anyone with sense, this makes the SC turbo package a non option.
@kenjcm
@kenjcm 2 года назад
That vertical end to the cab leading to the bed is also more functional and allows you to load things over the side easier than the Santa Cruz, Chevy Avalanche, and old Honda Ridgeline more stylized slanted body panels going over the sides of the bed...
@spink5gm
@spink5gm 2 года назад
We just purchased a santacruz here in Canada and it has 281 horsepower and 311 foot pounds of torque with the ultimate trim you get the larger 2.5 liter turbo with the wet 8 speed dual clutch.
@jonahd6978
@jonahd6978 2 года назад
I would go for the Maverick, I actually want the hybrid with the good MPG, just need a truck for some camping and light yard work. 99% of the time it will just be my city driver, I am not a rancher or planning on doing any rock hopping lol
@toronado455
@toronado455 2 года назад
Seems like you are the target buyer for the new Maverick. I wish they offered a vinyl or synthetic leather interior in the hybrid.
@fatterburrito
@fatterburrito 2 года назад
@@toronado455 they do
@kathyzieger6207
@kathyzieger6207 2 года назад
I agree, Ford is a excellent product
@aoh4905
@aoh4905 2 года назад
@@kathyzieger6207 That's why no one outside of NA buys them... "excellent" indeed!
@mountainhobo
@mountainhobo 2 года назад
@@aoh4905 Who gives a flying f#. Truck market is US. Suck on the diesel exhaust pipe for all I care.
@JeffRevell
@JeffRevell 2 года назад
One thing that Hyundai (and Kia) do better than anyone else is warranty. The Santa Cruz has a 10 year/ 100,000 mile drive train warranty as well as a 5 year / 60,000 mile stnadard warranty that covers everything else. Theres also a 7 year warranty on body rust and 5 year 24-hour roadside assistance. Both of them are unlimited mileage. No one else in the industry has warranties like this, which means you wouldn't be paying for repairs while you are still paying for the vehicle. Features and accessories are nice but don't mean a thing if the company doesn't stand behind their product. I have a Kia Sorento and the transmission went out at 95,000 miles. They replaced it at no cost to me.
@gabepencea3909
@gabepencea3909 10 дней назад
Yes ! 5 months to replace the transmission
@iselmon
@iselmon Год назад
The Santa Cruz has an optional turbocharged version of the engine with 281 HP and 311 ft lbs of torque. It also has a higher towing capacity 3500/5000 vs 2000/4000 for the low end/high end models.
@k5rjtxj
@k5rjtxj 2 года назад
I’m a full-sized truck guy but I can’t afford a full-size truck but I ordered a 23 maverick awd as my job requires me to get there in the snow. But this is a very good technical breakdown of the aesthetics of each vehicle!
@ampalxsportlb2061
@ampalxsportlb2061 Год назад
I think they are both great trucks. The Maverick has a nob shifter. The Cruz has a shifter. The Maverick has a traditional bed. The Cruz has a inbed storage. The Ford is traditional outside, but interior unique. The Cruz has traditional interior, but unique outside. It comes down to personal preference, not what anyone else thinks. The best truck is the one you buy!
@Josec805sb
@Josec805sb 2 года назад
I'm so glad I reserved mine! Super excited even tho I may have to wait 4 - 8 months for it. I hope sooner than later but i think it is worth it. I chose a 2.5 hybrid engine alto blue maverick XLT.
@justicecenter
@justicecenter 2 года назад
Santa Cruz 2.5L has normal 8 speed automatic transmission. Santa Cruz 2.5 Turbo has 8 speed Wet Duel Clutch Transmission which also is an automatic. Towing weight is 3500 lbs for the 2.5L and 5000 lbs for the 2.5 turbo.
@c3vzn
@c3vzn 2 года назад
I look at the daring Sonata design from a few years ago that everyone said would age poorly and it still looks good. Such an overused trope in car design, if a car looks good now it’ll look good in the future. Doesn’t matter what supposed trends are followed, good design is good design.
@theRooster722
@theRooster722 2 года назад
The 2011 Sonata looks awful now.
@popsandbangs8858
@popsandbangs8858 2 года назад
@@theRooster722 nah still looks as it’s came out
@katid571
@katid571 2 года назад
@@theRooster722 change the rims and tint the windows and its a complete different beast
@Ka_Gg
@Ka_Gg 2 года назад
Look at the 2015 Sonata. To me it looks fine but that's because it's a very simple Style
@KB-bh9hp
@KB-bh9hp 2 года назад
Not really true, 90s bubble design looked ok for it's time, but looks pretty terrible now. Even the much beloved mk4 supra is pretty ugly if we're being honest.
@danieldelira1417
@danieldelira1417 2 года назад
It would be great if GM brought back the Chevy LUV as a unibody mini truck! Maybe you can do a modernization/electrification of a LUV sometime
@Vin80_
@Vin80_ 2 года назад
Sir I love the way you think.
@ocashflo
@ocashflo 2 года назад
@@Vin80_ don’t you mean you “LUV” the way he thinks!!!!
@marvinmurakami8828
@marvinmurakami8828 2 года назад
It'd be a great idea but they should definitely think of another name for it, maybe the Chevy Tough, Tuv, Tuff.
@Quanter44
@Quanter44 2 года назад
@@marvinmurakami8828 or Chevy Tufluv
@kdrapertrucker
@kdrapertrucker 2 года назад
If chevy brings back the LUV, it will be are badged smart car. Like how they brought the blazer back as a car.
@larrywhite8282
@larrywhite8282 2 года назад
I love my 2.0 awd Maverick. You did a great job in going really in depth like you did. Great review and great video and good choice in which truck you would choose. Thanks 😊.
@berkalper4742
@berkalper4742 2 года назад
I like your videos. just subscribed. I think the maverick could make a great small business vehicle in the city. good bed payload + flat sides for logos + great fuel economy would be good for business on a budget. The Santa Cruz is just cool and new, like you said it's 5 yrs in the future vs 5 yrs in the past styling wise.
@pavementsailor
@pavementsailor 2 года назад
Ordered a Maverick last week. It'll he my 6th or 7th pickup. I had Nissan, Isuzu, Fords (150 - 250 - 350), and Chevy. So from a pretty experienced history of what a pickup can and can't do, I'm very excited for this truck and the fuel mileage. I've driven both the Ranger and Bronco Sport which the Maverick is based on and the Bronco Sport/Maverick feels more comfortable at the drivers position. That on frame interior of the Ranger reduces or squats the seating position more than the Maverick. I think most people buy trucks for what they think they might do with them, not what they actually do with them. Myself included. I ready for an inexpensive higher mpg vehicle that I can take occasionally to the hardware store or throw the kayaks in.
@woof3598
@woof3598 2 года назад
did they say how long before you get it, and did they deal at all ?
@pavementsailor
@pavementsailor 2 года назад
@@woof3598 no build date yet. My guess is they'll be selling at a premium. My build is 26k. I'm sure I'll be paying that.
@justinodonnell3793
@justinodonnell3793 2 года назад
@@woof3598 I ordered one Nov. 9. Was told it would be Feb or March.
@marvinmurakami8828
@marvinmurakami8828 2 года назад
It's about time they brought back the compact truck. They should have done it a few years ago when the Tacoma, Colorado, Frontier, etc. went midsize. The Maverick looks great, Ford is going to sell a ton of these, hope reliability proves to be good. I hope Mitsubishi puts in great effort in a new Mighty Max compact pickup truck. It could possibly bring them out of the doldrums.
@timjohnson1199
@timjohnson1199 2 года назад
Remember the Volkswagen?
@mikeske9777
@mikeske9777 2 года назад
Ford's history on small vehicles is the main reason I would never consider anything that small from Ford. Anything that Ford dd small has had issues going all the way back to the firebomb Pinto
@karlpiepenburg3157
@karlpiepenburg3157 2 года назад
@@mikeske9777 hyundai made crap small vehicles in the 80s. Currently, both Ford snd Hyundai produce decent reliable products
@timjohnson1199
@timjohnson1199 2 года назад
@@mikeske9777 I think I might take a chance. The platform has been around for awhile and, they've learned. The pinto was a very long time ago.
@marvinmurakami8828
@marvinmurakami8828 2 года назад
@@mikeske9777 a small grenade came as standard equipment in the Pinto that went off whenever it got rear ended.
@tomlib6794
@tomlib6794 2 года назад
I can see an aftermarket company designing a cover for the back of the Hyundai to transform it into a suv and protect stuff in the bed
@encoreartz1028
@encoreartz1028 2 года назад
That's what tuscon is
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 года назад
it's called a tonneau cover
@encoreartz1028
@encoreartz1028 2 года назад
@@carlosandleon ohh
@reillyoterry9461
@reillyoterry9461 2 года назад
You obviously missed the point of this vehicle
@TekuTaurus
@TekuTaurus 2 года назад
It already has a roll up hard cover offered from the factory
@navarro543
@navarro543 2 года назад
The ford is blend to my taste, on the other hand the huyndai is futuristic
@zxZethxz
@zxZethxz 2 года назад
That's the main issue why I'm getting the Ford. Things that look futuristic today look dumb and weird tomorrow.
@UkeleDan
@UkeleDan Год назад
@@zxZethxz Especially for bland people....... ;-)
@eddiesidorov8635
@eddiesidorov8635 2 года назад
I am really interested which style will win out and be more popular. I’m a traditional dude so I prefer the Ford, but I understand the appeal of the Santa Cruz, can’t wait to see which one wins out. My guess is Ford bc we all know how the F150 is doing 🤣 but only time will tell.
@williamkerry2626
@williamkerry2626 2 года назад
I’m going to be a tad bit of a pain in the ass, but if you take the Santa Cruz and Subaru Baja and line them up side to side. You are going to find that it’s the same old same old when it comes to Asian design with trucks, tends to age like a fine milk, sours quick. Hopefully I’m wrong, but I’m going to bet that I’m right. If I’m going to buy a truck, gimme a truck
@mikesawyer1336
@mikesawyer1336 2 года назад
That was my thought too. The Maverick will age well.
@heithwatkins
@heithwatkins 2 года назад
The Maverick looks great. But I want a normally aspirated engine that will last. That makes me get the Hyundai. I don't need high horse power in these vehicles. But I won't deal with high maintenance and repair costs on turbos, or hybrid powetrain that will render the vehicle too expensive to repair later on. Not to mention cvt Ford VS 8 speed auto for Hyundai.
@curiosityredpill7030
@curiosityredpill7030 2 года назад
10yr warranty too
@andrewmeilinger6203
@andrewmeilinger6203 2 года назад
NA AWD Santa Cruz can be had OTD under 30K too. Which is very attractive.
@timjohnson1199
@timjohnson1199 2 года назад
That CVT isn't the belted. It's an eCVT that's proven and low maintenance.
@eyevincast5440
@eyevincast5440 2 года назад
Hyundai uses cheap transmissions. But expensive for repairs….Sooooo. In the loooong run my personal opinion Ford is the better option
@KB-bh9hp
@KB-bh9hp 2 года назад
The ecvt is far more durable than your typical automatic, the hybrid system in the maverick also has lasted over 500k on countless Ford taxi's. It's one of the most durable powertrains on sale lol.
@alland.713
@alland.713 2 года назад
great breakdown 👍
@SilverScarletSpider
@SilverScarletSpider 2 года назад
Ford Maverick looks like it's from early 2000's GM. Hyundai Santa Cruz looks like it's from 2025 Hyundai.
@asmc1492
@asmc1492 2 года назад
Agreed
@thomasklein4265
@thomasklein4265 2 года назад
The last new Hyundai I bought literally burnt to the ground after the year I bought it, make all the Ford jokes you want, but I’ve owned four, and they have never let me down As for the the video, the hybrid Ford trounces the base four cylinder Hyundai in mpg, and still provides the same HP, and it’s ditto for the more powerful option, the EcoBoost is more potent that the Santa Cruz upgraded engine.
@lockhamj
@lockhamj 2 года назад
I agree
@bobfuhrwerk2869
@bobfuhrwerk2869 2 года назад
Less is more - the market is flooded with over teched/priced vehicles, it's refreshing to have the option to get a back to basics vehicle without having to buy somthing used 15/20 years old.
@andrewmeilinger6203
@andrewmeilinger6203 2 года назад
Maverick looks like a 4yr old was told to draw a truck
@JN0777
@JN0777 2 года назад
I already have a heavy duty truck, if I were to buy either of these I’d go with the Santa Cruz. Not a big fan of maverick styling especially the massive tail lights. I do think it’s cool that hybrid comes standard though. Also with the turbo version the Hyundai makes more hp and torque than maverick
@AUSCarLover
@AUSCarLover 2 года назад
I love both but I despise the hole beside the screen in Maverick. I don't think they will be even compared if the you're looking for the car that suits your style. Facelift will rid of the hole and put the full screen in I'm pretty sure. They both will sell and they're charming because It's new orientation for the pickup market. Both of them are good on the road too.
@aibada6594
@aibada6594 2 года назад
If not the price, I would go with Santa Fe 2.5T AWD, but the base model Maverick is tempting
@shane.henderson
@shane.henderson 2 года назад
You can get a Santa Cruz with a 2.5 Turbo with 281 HP & 311 F/P Torque. It's super peppy and handles great! Looks wise, if you want something that looks kind of safe and meh you get the ford. If you want something that looks different and has some style you get a Santa Cruz. But that just me.
@ayyveezee2079
@ayyveezee2079 2 года назад
With the DCT!
@UkeleDan
@UkeleDan Год назад
and a unique Baja-style look. Nice and cool with a roof basket or two kayaks on top.
@sharkwaffle1582
@sharkwaffle1582 2 года назад
I know this is * slightly * off topic, but how cool would it be if Ford took the new Maverick, filled it with fancy tech, and brought back the Lincoln Blackwood nameplate? Maybe that could be a redesign video idea
@thegmanpaints
@thegmanpaints 2 года назад
I don’t know if they would choose the Maverick for this, it sees too small and understated for what Lincoln owners are probably looking for nowadays. Back then the two brands were more or less just re-badges on the same vehicles with higher quality materials and engine options. Since Lincoln has undergone is re-design a few years ago, i feel like they would almost have to chop the back off of the new Navigator and give it a little more aggressive styling to carry on the Blackwood name.
@bnjmnwst
@bnjmnwst 2 года назад
This idea reminds me of the Cadillac Cimarron. Remember that abortion? It was a Chevy Cavalier with some Cadillac swag glued onto it. Completely pointless. A Blackwood has to be based on the F-150. It might still be pointless, though.
@ocashflo
@ocashflo 2 года назад
Lincoln could always have a Blackwood trim on any model. But I don’t see a model in that segment for Lincoln.
@sharkwaffle1582
@sharkwaffle1582 2 года назад
Okay y’all are making some good points. If anything, it should probably be based on the Lightning
@marvinmurakami8828
@marvinmurakami8828 2 года назад
The Maverick is way too small for that. Only the F 150 would be suitable for that treatment.
@mitchellkasdin1899
@mitchellkasdin1899 2 года назад
The relief and chamfers are a carryover from architectural design. Look at a six panel interior door. The front mimics the back. Ford balances the design using the styling language throughout the vehicle. It’s structured as you said, subtle and fitting. Form follows function. And it’s a consistent metaphor throughout their truck lineup.I have not much to say about the Hyundai. 🤷‍♂️
@chrisroseborough5256
@chrisroseborough5256 2 года назад
Go drive one..
@bh2155
@bh2155 2 года назад
I don't really care for trucks but If I had to pick oneI would go for the Hyundai. Every one is so amazed at the low price of the Maverick and it is priced well with some decent drivetrain options. However, everyone knows that an inexpensive Ford equals junk. To produce this vehicle at a value price you better believe that there are cost cutting materials everywhere in this vehicle. This truck will probably fall apart in a few years just like so many of Ford's low price cars like the Fiesta, Focus, Escort etc. The only decent vehicles that Ford makes is the 150 and the Mustang.
@encoreartz1028
@encoreartz1028 2 года назад
Santa cruze is just lovely
@gabepencea3909
@gabepencea3909 10 дней назад
Correct just lovely in rest is Tucson with open trunk!
@AverageBud
@AverageBud 2 года назад
I eventually decided on ordering the Ford Maverick for pretty much the same reasons outlined in this video I can't wait to pick it up :)
@jimwortham8634
@jimwortham8634 2 года назад
Thanks for posting no matter which one you like you can't get Maverick
@thesoldiermedic
@thesoldiermedic 2 года назад
I honestly think the maverick is the way to go. It’s design is more simplistic but far more purposeful. Also ford has a much larger and successful history with trucks in general. The powertrains that come in the maverick have already proven themselves quite good in other ford platforms. The maverick seems like it might be the best value in any vehicle. I do think the Santa Cruz looks cool but it almost seems a bit over the top.
@khronin
@khronin 2 года назад
Ford lost me years ago.I love the vehicles when they work--but I had 3 from diffrent time periods--ranging from an SHO to a mustang and ALL had reliability issues and the dealer experience was even worse.I had a 3 month old SHO and the power window failed/broke and the service manager snarkily says "what did you do"--i snarkily said back that " I just pushed the button to open it" what else did you think I did.I wwas a young guy in my 20s and saved and worked and bought that car outright and they wanted a copay and after a battle they fixed that--than rt at the 2nd year with less then 20k miles the oil leaked--that was like a 3 month battle of them not fixing that right.I would get the hyundai simply for the warranty--and the reliability.I bought a 2020 Stinger GT AWD 3.3TT and could have had any car under 60k and my past experience with Ford made me not even consider the mustang--even though I love the car and had the money.
@DK-bk1vq
@DK-bk1vq 2 года назад
@@khronin It's really strange to me that the range of issues people have with cars and their dealer. I've owned more Tauri that should be allowed, a 2010, '12, 14, 16, and now currently a 2018, all Limiteds. The '10 and the '18 were used. I've had no dealer problems thru multiple dealerships, except for the 2020 pandemic scheduling for service. Brakes, oil changes, tires, one alignment, and two cracked windshields. I started doing my own oil, brakes, and spark plugs. Sorry you had such a tough go of it. Just puttin it out there...
@ominousview
@ominousview 2 года назад
@James Calhoun. Agreed. Keep in mind too that the US version of the Santa Cruz doesn't come with Trail mode unlike the Canadian or other markets versions. So going off road here in the US you're hamstrung even more with this smaller truck . take a look at the reviews from Driving Sports TV channel for each. Not sold on Hyundai's HTRAC AWD either, too skewed towards front wheel. I also feel like there's more of a Blindspot with the slanted bed. Not much room in the back seats with the SC either. Get the AWD FM it's a better deal and much more functional for work and play. The design isn't that bad for the FM
@fposmith
@fposmith 2 года назад
And you can lay flat between the tailgate a 4X8 sheet of plywood ! This concept started all the way back in 1957 with the first Ranchero. When GM came out with the El Camino, you had to angle the sheet to get it in the back. It would not lay flat between the wheel wells ! That was something GM never addresses throughout the whole run of The El Camino !
@thomasdoconnor
@thomasdoconnor 2 года назад
Maverick looks better than the ranger
@PR.Impreza
@PR.Impreza 2 года назад
Yes
@nycmaverick
@nycmaverick 2 года назад
I agree
@toronado455
@toronado455 2 года назад
yeah I agree!
@KB-bh9hp
@KB-bh9hp 2 года назад
New ranger will have a more boxy design, and thus, be more attractive and rugged looking.
@mavfan1
@mavfan1 2 года назад
Ugh. The Maverick is a boring design. No soul.
@bonjoe1758
@bonjoe1758 2 года назад
I really like both. I like the front face of the santacruz, very creative. And its fascinating how ford makes a car which looks big and traditional, like the 2000s f150, but is actually small and kind of retro
@Iceypatek
@Iceypatek 2 года назад
the tailgate lights on the Santa Cruz are a cool idea but I wouldn’t want that on a practical truck. I’d say they’re both nice but both are for very different buyers.
@utubestalker.dotcom
@utubestalker.dotcom 2 года назад
10:11 Yep lights in the tail gate is a bad idea because people will be slamming that shut often, which can damage electronics over time. Just sounds like a long term headache to me
@jayforerunner965
@jayforerunner965 2 года назад
Not going to lie, I like the look of the Hyundai Santa Cruz better
@GummyRiches
@GummyRiches 2 года назад
Also made in America not Mexico
@N0mad1600
@N0mad1600 2 года назад
Just wait until you have to haul anything in the bed of that thing... That angle is going to play havoc with strapping anything down.
@chrismills-gg5pt
@chrismills-gg5pt Год назад
@@N0mad1600 Hyundai has never and will never claim the SC is a truck. Its titled as an SUV. They never intended it to be a truck or in the truck class. I purchased the SC for the ride & tech options you don't get in the Maverick. I was looking for a comfortable ride on long hauls and some place I could throw my mower or other objects in that wouldn't fit into my escape.It was never meant to be a work truck. If that is what you are buying it for then you are better off going with a mid or full size truck.It all comes down to what works best for the individual. The maverick didn't give me that. Again personal preference.
@macsterguy
@macsterguy 2 года назад
The price really isn’t that low on the Santa Cruz. I just bought one… 42K but I love it
@enevarez1471
@enevarez1471 2 года назад
Wow that’s pricey.
@Drizztblades
@Drizztblades 2 года назад
This is not base option though 42 is the most expensive Right? That would be the same or similar for the Ford as well
@macsterguy
@macsterguy 2 года назад
@@Drizztblades that was for top end Limited trim
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
Congrats me too
@spink5gm
@spink5gm 2 года назад
Mine was 62k in Canada 😭
@andrewhiserodt2900
@andrewhiserodt2900 2 года назад
Just picked up the Ford Maverick last week. Got the XLT. Its so nice. Only one in my county.
@anthonydayton7998
@anthonydayton7998 2 года назад
The Santa Cruz has a 281 hp turbo engine - the upgrade engine. People should avoid the base Santa Cruz engine - definitely underpowered.
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
Was going to go SEL, but test drove the Limited...there was no turning back.
@danieldeforest3800
@danieldeforest3800 2 года назад
I test drove the SEL and it was a DOG! Ended up buying a Limited... LOVING IT!
@elmermoesch528
@elmermoesch528 2 года назад
Santa Cruz needs hybrid design. The turbo is 285 HP and tows 5,000 lbs. Payload is 100lbs more than Maverick.
@blksn8k
@blksn8k 2 года назад
Actually, the payload rating for the Santa Cruz includes passengers while the 1500 lb rating for the Maverick is for the bed capacity only. Passenger payload rating on the Maverick is separate.
@whynotthinkwhynot-
@whynotthinkwhynot- 2 года назад
I have to write about the Maverick hybrid drivetrain. Yes, FWD trucks are blah, I agree, but I think that the base drivetrain will adequately serve the overwhelming majority of people who are tired of lifting hatches and folding down seats to store small items in CUV’s. I have owned a Ford C-Max which is the same E-CVT, but had a smaller 2.0 engine and output was 186 not 191 hp. No torque figures were ever released, but I am telling you that the acceleration experience was extremely improved compared to my Ford Focus that had the same engine. I would bet that the reason Ford never releases torque for hybrid engines is because they don’t want people to know that it has similar torque compared to the upgraded engine. It’s only something a person who previously owned a hybrid would understand. The combination of the electric motors and planetary gear response was most dramatically different at highway speeds- seriously, I nearly rammed people when I floored the C-Max before I knew how fast it was on the highway. Another point, if anyone reading this buys a hybrid, just because it is de-tuned to run 87 octane doesn’t mean you have to do it. I didn’t get better fuel economy, but the power was increased with 92 octane fuel because timing wasn’t pulled as much. Well worth a couple of dollars per tank IMO- it’s a 12.5:1 comp ratio engine- look it up! More differences, well how about no accessory belt? All your accessories- PS, AC, alternator are either electric or managed, as in the case of the alternator, by the transmission generator. An electric AC means that the compressor will always be running at optimum efficiency rpm, and can run at that optimal rpm stopped in a traffic jam. Most people don’t go off road or even need 4WD. Even those who think that they need it, probably don’t. I drive through fields, farms, and down trails all the time- in a Ford Focus. I learned how to drive in a field in a Chevy Monte Carlo. Cars and car-like vehicles can go places as long as the driver is paying attention to the terrain. Anyway, that base hybrid drivetrain is probably a lot more powerful than you think- that’s what I wanted to say. Arguments between owners will certainly be forthcoming.
@DK-bk1vq
@DK-bk1vq 2 года назад
Damn good job, on the info, @Why Not. Thx
@whynotthinkwhynot-
@whynotthinkwhynot- 2 года назад
@@DK-bk1vq - Owning that CMax was great, My wife killed it running into the front of a Malibu. The Malibu died a worse death, but the CMax was totaled due to the airbags and minor subframe damage. I have always wondered why Lincoln didn’t hot rod the MKZ hybrid version by using cam phasers and allowing the engine to swap from Atkinson to Otto cycle depending on throttle input like Toyota does. Nobody would bat an eye if Lincoln recommended high octane fuel only in an MKZ- Toyota did it in the Prius! I will say that Lincoln did a good job putting a separate electric motor in the Corsair hybrid, as I understand how that one works. I haven’t read up on it in a while because I’m no longer interested in hybrids. I want full EV. My cost per KWh here is so low that charging a Lightning from 0-100% would only cost me $15 estimated. I do think that anyone who gets a Maverick will be happy with it, and it’s a “gateway” vehicle- LOL. There’s a lot of interesting battery tech out there, and regardless of what anti-American patriots think- the best of it is US based. Those people simply aren’t paying attention. Check out Plasma Kinetics and Lytec, and you’ll see what I mean. IF we can get past the red tape 2 tribe BS in Congress to find what’s best for the whole country, we could take over the future of alternative power and lead the world. They won’t do that though, too worried about their own pockets to be real leaders. Happy days in Many ways to you!!
@DK-bk1vq
@DK-bk1vq 2 года назад
@@whynotthinkwhynot- You too, and thx. BTW, you're a walking think-tank. Impressive
@whynotthinkwhynot-
@whynotthinkwhynot- 2 года назад
@@DK-bk1vq - Thanks for the compliments! I had to revisit this comment because I realized I’d misinformed. The company behind new battery tech is Lyten, not Lytec. If we can believe their press, they have developed a functional Li-S battery chemistry removing cobalt, and drastically reducing price. Plasma Kinetics is more interesting, IMO, because of it’s safe storage of H for use in fuel cells. Batteries would still be required, if you understand that tech, so the combination of the 2 would be ideal.
@TheCapn23
@TheCapn23 2 года назад
I really like the understated handsome design of the Maverick. I think it really works for what they're trying to accomplish with the pickup.
@stevennunez6013
@stevennunez6013 2 года назад
It’s really nice to see the Ford comes standard with 120 volt hooks ups so you can add accessories of your own if you choose so it has 6 tie downs in the bed standard you can get more as a option it also has a flat floor in the rear seat like a f150 so you lay things down without worrying about the hump in the center Ford’s hybrid system has also been used for 16 years and is now made in house by Ford also the bed is squared off so you can stack and load things easier theres even plastic guard against the rear window so you can stack things without worrying about the paint the Maverick is what a truck should be made for work small business will love this truck
@bryanspilner7370
@bryanspilner7370 2 года назад
not standard
@woof3598
@woof3598 2 года назад
I keep seeing ads for the Santa crus for years but yet to see one in the show room
@pedrohizzle2835
@pedrohizzle2835 2 года назад
No I’m buying a Ford Maverick with the Hybrid I don’t care about power I want 41 mpg
@strangerdanger1271
@strangerdanger1271 2 года назад
If I want a truck for going off road and having a lot of power I am going to buy a f-150 or ranger. If I want a versatile vehicle that gets excellent fuel mileage at a great price I am buying the Maverick. My parents ordered one to replace their Buick Regal rather than their Silverado. 191 hp is plenty of power to get granny and gramps to the grocery store and they have a bed if they want to swing by home Depot as well.
@scurvychef2
@scurvychef2 2 года назад
wish you discussed more about the functionality and specs more. the body lines were cool but not a big determination in how i make a decision. researched the Maverick a lot, guess i'll just watch some Santa Cruz videos to see more about that one, was hoping to just see how they stacked up more than visual comparison, guess these types of trucks may invoke a consumer such as yourself that is infatuated with design s its a new generation of truck owners with these trucklet options but i still wish to know the hard specs and can skip the design stuff.
@mikegaravani7309
@mikegaravani7309 2 года назад
id have never expected the santa cruz to be selling well. I'd get it over the maverick imo
@GA-wq8xq
@GA-wq8xq 2 года назад
Well someone must!
@UkeleDan
@UkeleDan Год назад
Many someones, actually.
@jeffk412
@jeffk412 2 года назад
You are really stepping up your game! I enjoy your design deep dives and now you are adding more "big picture" discussion as well. Glad to be a subscriber!
@SilverScarletSpider
@SilverScarletSpider 2 года назад
could you do a Honda redsign video where they adopt BMW kidney grills and a Hofmeister kink? when the 2022 Type R spy shot photos came out it totally looked like bmw in the front with the Honda logo in between kidney grills.
@Big.W.
@Big.W. 2 года назад
Why would u wanna put that hitler mustache on Honda’s?
@SALEENS7GTR5
@SALEENS7GTR5 2 года назад
I really like the design of the Santa Fe, but the pricing of the Maverick is almost too hard to beat.
@reygone776
@reygone776 2 года назад
Yes, but if you keep going back and forth to the dealer just to fix something....goodluck with that!
@bondgabebond4907
@bondgabebond4907 2 года назад
You really think you are going to get out of the showroom under $30.,000???? The demand will command the dealer to jack up the price. It always happens.
@artprince9163
@artprince9163 2 года назад
@@bondgabebond4907 not true. I ordered one and they did not jack up the price.
@bondgabebond4907
@bondgabebond4907 2 года назад
@@artprince9163 Congrats. Glad to hear this news. I remember the PT Cruiser was released and some were so anxious to get it they paid $30,000 for a $13,000 car. Amazing. BTW, what is the wait for receiving it?
@donipolotsky7019
@donipolotsky7019 2 года назад
@@bondgabebond4907 maverick xlt, hybrid, with a package of sorts, plus destination and sales tax = just about 30k
@joebrown9621
@joebrown9621 2 года назад
If you're talking about power the Santa Cruz has two engines a base 2.5 Litre and a Turbo 2.5 Litre.. most Korean vehicles they said wouldn't age well are still turning heads to this day.. as u see one u know what it is..
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
I get 3-5 compliments a day on mine. And I don't even drive it much. Would I get the same with the Maverick?
@McGarf
@McGarf 2 года назад
My fam got a Santa Cruz the day it arrived at the dealer. It's nice to drive and I love the styling.
@herbiehusker1889
@herbiehusker1889 2 года назад
It's butt ugly.
@popsandbangs8858
@popsandbangs8858 2 года назад
@@herbiehusker1889 it’s beautiful stop trolling
@herbiehusker1889
@herbiehusker1889 2 года назад
@@popsandbangs8858 you must be blind. That thing is hideous. It makes the Aztek look like a masterpiece. I don't understand why anyone would think the Santa Cruz is a good looking vehicle. It is beyond hideous.
@popsandbangs8858
@popsandbangs8858 2 года назад
@@herbiehusker1889 nothing hideous about sorry and the car already got thousands of likes
@herbiehusker1889
@herbiehusker1889 2 года назад
@@popsandbangs8858 beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I suggest you get glasses.
@SpaceCase100
@SpaceCase100 2 года назад
The bronco front on the maverick would slap
@UkeleDan
@UkeleDan Год назад
Like the Tucson front on the SC.
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 года назад
Santa Cruz ftw. Buyers aren't really looking for a full size bed, just adequate enough and with style.
@GA-wq8xq
@GA-wq8xq 2 года назад
True but an extra six inches is useful
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 года назад
@@GA-wq8xq So is an extra 12 or an entire semi bruh.
@GA-wq8xq
@GA-wq8xq 2 года назад
@@carlosandleon true but 4.5 vs 4 is quite an increase as a percentage. Thanks bruh!
@Meche697
@Meche697 2 года назад
Need to fit bikes
@BeStrong-nf5nc
@BeStrong-nf5nc 2 года назад
I prefer that extra 4.5 feet bed that i can fit my dirtbike in on that maverick
@timjohnson1199
@timjohnson1199 2 года назад
I wish there was a hatch behind the seats for longer stuff.
@joeythedime1838
@joeythedime1838 2 года назад
To me the Santa Cruz gives me flash-backs to the Subaru Baja
@JT-pt5tl
@JT-pt5tl 2 года назад
Interior/exterior Design, interior space and usage, mpg followed by power and aftermarket parts!
@homoerotic85
@homoerotic85 2 года назад
What were you diffusing while recording? I am going to get an Area 51 or Cactus Gray Maverick Lariat Hybrid w/luxury package for only $30k. I originally wanted the turbo AWD but! The hybrid is only one second slower 0-60 it's only 191hp but the electric motor really makes it feel a lot faster than a regular gasoline engine with the same hp. What sold it for me is the amazing 40 mpg! BTW the Maverick looks even better in person, and I was very impressed with the overall feel of quality. Especially when closing the doors, it sounds and feels like a new Lincoln product but with a slightly less insulated sound but still has the vault like click. I love it has heated seats and steering wheel, adaptive stop/go cruise control with lane centering, and the 660 watt B&O stereo sounds amazing! It's crazy what all you get for the money. I love it. The only thing I would like to see is AWD with hybrid, cooled front seats and a larger infotainment screen to get rid of the storage box to the side of screen.
@joeking433
@joeking433 2 года назад
The Maverick Hybrid is said to have a lot of power off the line because you get that electric motor instant torque!
@k.stacey7389
@k.stacey7389 Год назад
The Santa Cruz angle along the bed behind the back windows is a total throwback to the Subaru BRAT. Which is awesome, although this time the back seats are in the cab and not in the bed. Probably can’t get away with that jump seat thing these days.
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
All in all a fantastic break down of both vehicles. Only criticism is your contradiction: Early on you say the Santa Cruz looks like a vehicle that was built 5 years in the future...at the end you say it won't age well? How can it not age well if it looks like it's from the future.
@theRooster722
@theRooster722 2 года назад
Futuristic doesn't mean it looks good now, in retrospect, or even in the future.
@thebravoconnection946
@thebravoconnection946 2 года назад
Would like to see a Maverick Raptor come our soon.
@l.a.raustadt518
@l.a.raustadt518 2 года назад
Really liked your design study deep dig. Hmm light on tailgate, can you take tailgate off if needed?
@lordrichard8184
@lordrichard8184 2 года назад
The Hyundai reminded me of the Honda Ridgeline. They had that same stupid sweep on the back of the truck over the bed. And as generations went on it got smaller and smaller till it finally got removed. If you need to transport something like a mattress that sits a little wider then the bed. You can fit it on top of the maverick and slide it up all the way to the cab to strap it down. On the Hyundai you’d have to have it back a little to account for the sweep thing. And it’s already a super short bed. So you may not want that much of the mattress hanging off.
@cavedog1279
@cavedog1279 2 года назад
I would go for the maverick simply because it doesn't have that moronic slant to the top of the bed. There is absolutely nothing beneficial about it, and anyone that has tried to tie down something on top of a gen 1 honda ridgeline bed knows what an absolute pain it is.
@Big.W.
@Big.W. 2 года назад
The slant tells you it’s just a toy and not a work truck
@johnmoore3504
@johnmoore3504 2 года назад
So the Escape based Mav is now a work truck because the designers only knew how to draw 90 degree corners. Interesting logic.
@plmn93
@plmn93 2 года назад
It's there because it's difficult to make the structure rigid without that. That's why you saw it on the Avalanche and Ridgeline. And it is a major PITA if you use your bed. Honda eventually figured it out, and Ford has too. Hyundai either took the cheap way out or chose form over function.
@N0mad1600
@N0mad1600 2 года назад
@cavedog Somehow I doubt this account is actually Chris Taylor
@kdrapertrucker
@kdrapertrucker 2 года назад
@@johnmoore3504 no, because Ford actually thought about how people use the cargo bed.
@williampark393
@williampark393 2 года назад
Correction on your horse power comment. Santa Cruz has more power than the maverick. You only noted the numbers for the non-turbo Santa Cruz…. The turbo would be 281hp and I believe 311 pt
@adamdodds144
@adamdodds144 2 года назад
Probably has to do with the price. The Turbo Santa Cruz is in the Ford Ranger price range. You could build a Maverick with all the works for slightly more then the starting price of a Santa Cruz turbo. By the time you add all the options to the Santa Cruz you are looking at a 45k truck.
@AlexLepoutre
@AlexLepoutre 2 года назад
@@adamdodds144 Not true. A maxed out Maverick to get close to what you get with the Santa Cruz would cost you around $35k, and that's the same price as the SEL Premium trim of the Santa Cruz, which also comes with the turbo engine.
@Spacebornekiller
@Spacebornekiller 2 года назад
@@AlexLepoutre Ford maverick is 250hp with 277lbft of torque. Hyundai Santa Cruz 281hp with 311lbft of torque. That’s max numbers vs max numbers.
@SuperQdaddy
@SuperQdaddy Год назад
Best bang..hybrid xlt..but prices went up so over 28k for maverick. But they go over 40k with options so ?
@csommer4492
@csommer4492 2 года назад
I'm not close to a hyundai dealership so I ordered the Maverick. I think the Bed on the Santa Cruz is slightly to short for easy mountain bike transportation.
@Shishizurui
@Shishizurui 2 года назад
i saw some ad where it shown a mountain bike in the back diagonally but they had to take the front tire off lol.
@johnmoore3504
@johnmoore3504 2 года назад
The SC bed is 2” shorter so not much difference at all. The Mav just looks bigger due being squared off design wise.
@chrismills-gg5pt
@chrismills-gg5pt Год назад
@@Shishizurui No they didn't. You can get 2 mountain bikes in the back. The front tire goes over the tail gate and they make a cover for the gate.
@patrickmckowen2999
@patrickmckowen2999 2 года назад
good comparison I like the SC exterior more but love the practical clean look/feel of the FM. I am really happy Ford went with the dial shifter, stick shifters are not old tech/obsolete IMHO. I will TD both before my decision but I am leaning heavy towards the FM as the interior is really clicking with me. I do however have a Kona to trade so maybe that is better financially -- but as I get up further in life at 56, you have to go more with what makes you feel better and not just money aspect. Cheers
@decibellone696
@decibellone696 2 года назад
if this is the market for me... it's not I need more bed and, a bigger engine... BUT if it were my market, Santa Cruz wins this for me no question... I actually want this vehicle... just doesn't fit my needs.
@sphong0610
@sphong0610 2 года назад
Nah, the Santa Cruz looks modern in an upscale way while the Maverick looks "traditional" but in a cheap way. Pretty sure the Hyundai will still look better 10-20 years from now. I'm a fan of more square/traditional designs like the G-Wagon or even a Cherokee too but the Maverick is deliberately under-designed so that it won't take away too many sales from the Ranger, F150, etc. while the Santa Cruz, not having any in-house competition, is in full effort mode.
@ronsteitz4535
@ronsteitz4535 2 года назад
Good luck getting either one of these vehicles in 2021. Only taking paper orders at this time.🤔
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
I got lucky
@Shadobanned4life
@Shadobanned4life 2 года назад
Thanks for a great vid ! In my opinion,a unibody vehicle is not really a truck. I am undecided about the front-wheel-drive. Chances are these vehicles will do just fine to carry groceries,birdseed,bicycles and so forth.You've got to figure that most full-size,4WD trucks never leave the pavement or carry more than a very-small load,so these may be a better fit for the average beginning trucker. I do think that these 'trucks' should come in a 2-door with a decent-sized bed. Small truck beds are pretty silly.
@BarefootVlogger
@BarefootVlogger 2 года назад
Funny the debate over what makes a vehicle a truck. I asked a bunch of locals and got a lot of different answers.
@DK-bk1vq
@DK-bk1vq 2 года назад
Í think a small bed on a small truck is fine. The Sport Trac had a small bed with extender and it was very practical and sufficient. I had a F150 that I expected to use for hauling, and rarely put anything back in the bed. The Sport Trac would have been the better option. It's not silly, just depends on your usage.
@joeking433
@joeking433 2 года назад
The Maverick is NOT traditional Ford because it is unibody rather than two parts, cab and bed, on frame. It has a car like ride because of independent suspension instead of a solid rear axle. It's like a Honda Ridgeline in that respect, and there is no other American truck that is like it!
@AnkurSethi108
@AnkurSethi108 2 года назад
Waiting on the fully electric versions!
@dag681
@dag681 2 года назад
The Maverick is just tired looking. In person there is no comparison between the two. In fact, in person, the Hyundai is really amazing and a lot bigger than any of the photos reveal. Even with the stock Santa Cruz motor the truck is quite peppy, more fun to drive and super comfortable
@andrewrawlings2756
@andrewrawlings2756 2 года назад
If there's a reasonably priced Maverick PHEV in a few years, I'll be very interested in buying that.
@TheBstakz
@TheBstakz 2 года назад
Business wise, it makes more sense to go straight all-electric with the Maverick. Ford will have to eat up additional R&D for a plug-in version. Not as easy to adopt the escape plug-in architecture since you'd have to redo all the testing, as well as additional towing and off-road testing
@andrewrawlings2756
@andrewrawlings2756 2 года назад
@@TheBstakz you may be right with the cost of batteries falling so much. I certainly would prefer all-electric from a maintenance perspective. However, home charging could be a ways off for me in a condo building.
@uni4rm
@uni4rm 2 года назад
@@TheBstakz Uh wut? For a plug in all the maverick needs is a larger battery and a charge door.
@reginaldbowls7180
@reginaldbowls7180 2 года назад
20K for a hybrid truck? I just need one to pick up gardening stuff and take leaves to the transfer. It's PERFECT!
@duckdive9334
@duckdive9334 7 месяцев назад
The Santa Cruz is Not a Truck, the Maverick is a Mini-Truck, thus Apples vs Oranges. The Santa Cruz is Hyundai version of the discontinued Ford Ranchero and Chevrolet El Camino which neither were consider trucks.
@larryrowe5259
@larryrowe5259 Год назад
From the future: The problem is availability. I actually liked both trucks but couldn't find any setting on the lot. Until July 2022 my wife pulled into the local Hyundai dealership and an SEL trimmed Santa Cruz was just sitting there. My wife test drove it and loved it. She called and told me to get my butt over there and sign papers. We paid MSRP. If this had been a maverick, we would have done the same thing.
@pearlbubbles6885
@pearlbubbles6885 2 года назад
Could you talk about warrantys with each vehicle ?
@worldlyobserver
@worldlyobserver 2 года назад
Just waiting for that Santa Cruz hybrid awd limited and I’m buying one
@joeneonturbo
@joeneonturbo Год назад
Bembli chose the maverick for looks and more power. Doesn’t the SC have a bigger available engine with my power?
@uni4rm
@uni4rm 2 года назад
The most common drivetrain for passenger vehicles is front wheel drive. Almost no one needs AWD for anything. Neither of these vehicles are going to do any serious offroading, and you'd destroy them doing any serious towing. They are strictly street vehicles that you can toss stuff in the back, and SUV's going for 30k+ are a far better value. All AWD is good for in a small vehicle is increasing maintenance profit for the manufacturer in the future. Since the Maverick has the hybrid option, it actually fills a demand need of a cheap get around truck, while the Santa Cruz is certainly cool, but its overpriced due to bells and whistles and more or less a wannabe Ridgeline.
@bliglum
@bliglum 2 года назад
The Hyundai is overstyled... The Maverick will likely age more gracefully.
@joec.5009
@joec.5009 2 года назад
but maverick looks like it was designed in 2011. it's painfully boring to me
@ryancheco4794
@ryancheco4794 2 года назад
Yes I think the front light gimmick will age poorly, look at early 2000s hyundai sonatas they aged horribly with all the chrome and stupod lines
@Ka_Gg
@Ka_Gg 2 года назад
@@joec.5009 I prefer boring over bad styling... I think most people think that's the same way in terms of trucks
@joec.5009
@joec.5009 2 года назад
@@Ka_Gg Hyundai knows this and that's why they are not going after truck guy like myself. i just want something that is a compact SUV with some truck ability. that's why they are following the SUV trend. i thought about buying this, but at the end of the day, my next car will be an EV. this would've been an awesome EV. too bad they didn't go for it.
@Ka_Gg
@Ka_Gg 2 года назад
@@joec.5009 Yeah I agree. this is probably geared more toward the soccer moms although I don't think it's the best target.
@143lps
@143lps 2 года назад
In any angle view Santa Cruz move to next level. Futuristic.
@ShogunAutoworks
@ShogunAutoworks 2 года назад
Santa Cruz is available with AWD without the turbo. So I can get the AWD with the good fuel mileage like my Baja. Maverick doesn't have the hybrid AWD and to get AWD you gotta go turbocharged. May be a deal breaker for me.
@robertkinney3481
@robertkinney3481 2 года назад
Turbos wear things out faster and to replace one will cost you a pretty penny too...
@PapawFenix
@PapawFenix Год назад
Great review. I do feel the Maverick is very trucky & Santa Cruz is SUVish. Two different communities.
@x101abndevil4
@x101abndevil4 Год назад
You commented several times about the "Typical South Korean Design" aspects of the Santa Cruz yet the vehicle marketed and marked on the rear tail lights as "Designed in California". So which is it, South Korea or California?
Далее
10 things I hate about 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz
6:53
Просмотров 70 тыс.