@@1986subway Other Mechanics should be able to work on everything but the electrical hybrid system. An internal Combustion engine is an internal Combustion engine.
@@1986subway Guess I am the Fortunate one then. My Mechanic has worked on hybrids and is more than willing to work on mine and knows about Atkinson Cycle motors which the Maverick hybrid is. Enjoy your Ecoboost.
I bought the FWD 2.0 because it was literally all I could find after calling around to a couple dozen dealers in Atlanta. I love it. It’s exactly what I needed and didn’t break the bank. Engine is really responsive and I’m getting around 28 mpg on the highway. Couldn’t be happier with it.
Those are all good points for people who need to be able to tow or need or want all-wheel drive. I’ll stick with my hybrid. I live in a large city and getting 46 mpg on my daily commute beats out all other considerations for me. Plus, I still have a 3/4 ton payload capacity for hauling stuff, which I do. That’s the same payload capacity that my 2011 Silverado had, but I literally get 3x the mpg.
As a daily driver of a 2010 Silverado, I think you have stated the case very succinctly. I would be elated to get 45MPG AND be able to easily fetch a few bags of mulch or a sheet of plywood.
I have a 2022 XL hybrid and do a lot of hauling. It handles fine with light 500-1200lb loads. Milage goes down to mid 30s on highway. I load it up most weekends going to garage sales and never have a handling or power problem. Usually 1/3 to 1/2 battery power so low to mid 50s mpg. Over 3 times what I'd get in my Ram. Lower tailgate height so easier to load large items too. With handtruck I can load stoves, Washers, driers, AC condenser units by myself.
Good video! I originally wanted the hybrid. But after waiting months with no build date set, I took an FX4 4k XLT that was coming to their lot. No disappointments! Two weeks with it and loving every minute with it. Appreciating the increased capabilities.
Unfortunately hybrid models are the only Maverick offering that can be flat towed. It would be perfect behind our motorhome if only you could find one.
I want a hybrid Maverick. At first I was concerned about the low towing. However, I realized I won't be towing much anyway plus the jump from 2k to 4k pounds is not worth the additional cost of the turbo engine/tow package/decreased fuel economy
The 8-speed is a handicap. Its based on the GM 9-speed transmission that has been wrecked by critics, and Ford initially declined using it even though they got its development completely for free from GM (due to a deal they worked out). Ford did decide to redesign it a bit and removed one of the gears to stop its constant hunting problem, but its not as good as Ford's 10-speed they use on RWD based platforms. Its also not nearly as efficient as the eCVT, and it is important to note the e-part as that electric motor in the transmission means that stop-start is much smoother and helps with the otherwise rubber-band feeling that CVTs that most people are familiar with have. The eCVTs efficiency means that in 0-30mph it actually outruns the FWD ecoboost off the line when not brake boosting, and is very close in 0-60mph when not brake boosting (which again, nobody brake boosts off of every stop sign in the real world). IMO get the Ecoboost if: 1) You do almost 100% highway driving. 2) You live in a very cold climate 3) You need AWD 4) You need 4K tow rating. If those 4 don't apply to you, get the hybrid, its better in every way and saves $1K off the MSRP, provided you can order one at MSRP and don't pay an upcharge.
I love the conciseness, clarity, and stage presence! Thanks for this breakdown. Back in the summer I was absolutely obsessed with getting a Maverick, and didn't get to see the advantages till now. Nice job breaking it down. Super minor nitpick but I didn't know what the mpg difference was off the top of my head, so that would have been good to say along with the other downsides of the ecoboost engine that you mentioned. I also really liked the example of the boat - more examples like that are super informative in helping me make a buying decision. For example, AWD vs FWD if I wanted to take the Maverick to Tahoe in the winter, or what the difference in MPG is between the AWD and FWD.
@Just think The ecoboost is rated at 25 miles per gallon with all-wheel drive and 26 miles per gallon with front wheel drive. You get 59 more horsepower and 122 more pound feet of torque over the hybrid.
Good review and not saying I agree or disagree but its a matter of what works for an individual. WIth Ford only making a Mustang if someone is looking for a daily driver with great MPH the Hybrid is the way to go, if your gonna tow and need the extra oomph then upgrade engine the way to go. Me personally the Hybrid would work best for me as I am not towing anything and the off road package does nothing for me as I dont off road. Its nice to see that with the Maverick their are plenty of options to fit one's need. Good video!
I have ordered a hybrid. I personally prefer the great economy over the extra power and I don't need all the extra packages. Not only that, I saved a lot of money!
You have a great screen presence, and 'presenter's voice'. If you continue to make videos, have a frequent and consistent upload schedule, and can follow through on coming up with informative and novel ideas for videos, I think you'll accrue views and subscribers quickly, and grow a ton in this next year. On topic: I agree that the 2.0 turbo is the more appealing drive-train choice simply because its necessary for AWD, which I think is an important accessory in capable trucks. The Maverick seems to be specifically designed for city dwellers who want some truck utility while still being able to park and afford fuel, and the 2wd hybrid seems to really excel there, and the 2.0 is not shabby either in that dept. The hybrid would probably be the ultimate small-duty city fleet vehicle, but if you're often driving in bad weather or if you have to go off the paved road for work or play, the AWD is afar and away the best option. If Ford sells a ton of these and finds a way to hybridize the 2.0 and offer AWD, I think they will sell a whole hell of a lot more. I see people saying that dealerships sell these Mavericks almost the moment they hit the lots, so Ford is obviously selling a ton of them, so let's hope that encourages them to really put it all together and combine the 2.0 turbo, AWD/4WD and some hybrid similar to their 3.5 powerboost system, and sell ALL the compact trucks. It might encourage GM and Ram and Toyota and Honda to offer up their own compact trucks and really get the competitive ball rolling, which should be nothing but good for the consumer.
Thanks for review, have seen literally one on the road since they’ve been out. I personally love the styling especially the front end and the utilitarian interior. Hoping in a little over a year I can get one when my current lease is up on my Mazda, want the Ecoboosr in the XL trim btw!
I've owned a Ram 1500 for four years and have yet to tow anything. I don't drive off road. I don't have a boat. So the only disadvantage is a different sound the transmission would make? Naw, I think I need the hybrid engine. It's 10 more MPG. If I wanted to tow stuff I'd stick with my Ram.
Great trucks. Keep in mind that the E-ctv transmission is alot different than the old ctv transmission. It has planetary gears in it. I've thought long and had on it and did order the hybrid. That fuel efficiency is just to worth it.
@@HistoricalWeapons the type of battery in the maverick is much cheaper than they used to be and probably only getting cheaper. Hopefully the vehicle will not need a new one for at least it's warranty which is probably when I'll be selling it
@@HistoricalWeapons they did a recall about drilling holes in the skidplate to make sure there were no fires. They never actually had one catch on fire.
You should have done just a bit more research before claiming the 8 speed automatic over their eCVT. The Hybrid Maverick's eCVT does not use a metal band, it is a very simple transmission just gears and 1/3 the moving parts of a traditional transmission. No rubber band effect at all when I test drove it.
I don’t mean to say the CVT itself makes noise if that’s what you mean, but of course I should have been clearer. I mean the engine rpm’s and noise don’t rise and fall in close correlation with speed, which occurs with any drivetrain where the engine speed is not tied to the wheel speed with set gear ratios. This effect can easily be seen in POV driving videos of the Maverick. Thanks for your comment Miguel 👍🏼
@@JamesPlaysWithCars what I meant was that in your video you dismissed the hybrid's CVT as a bad thing and almost sounded as if being compared to CVTs found in Nissans and Toyotas. I just meant that this eCVT in the hybrid Maverick is not in any way mechanically related to any CVTs that a lot of us are familiar with. I test drove a hybrid Maverick and ordered one, I am also speaking from first hand experience
Great review! As attractive as the Hybrid is regarding fuel efficiency, Ford's available hybrids for the Maverick are sold out for the 2022 model year and you can't order a 2023 yet. I ordered my Maverick XLT this week with the 2.0 Egoboost, AWD, and the FX4 package. Went with the XLT Luxury package which includes the spray-in bedliner, towing receiver hitch, and a few other niceties. Added a soft tonneau and full-size spare, and, because the last thing I will ever get accused of is being subtle, Cyber Orange (a $495 upgrade). Cost? $32k. Oh, and look for the QR codes throughout the vehicle that encourages you to discover and share "hacks" for further personalization.
Same. Maverick is going to be my first truck. Currently have a 2013 Focus. Wanted the hybrid for the amazing fuel economy, but it's impossible to get one for over a year, and I really want a new car. Placed an order this week for an XLT. It was a great test drive, but going from 33.7 mpg to the test drive model saying 19.2 mpg hurts.
I ordered my Maverick a few weeks ago, and the salesman told me that they're no longer doing the spray ends because it's delaying production. They send it off to a different facility, so everyone who ordered a truck with a spray in is just getting a drop in, unfortunately
Thank you for the info, my wife and I yesterday just payed to be put on a list to be notified when we can place our order. Very helpful info. We are going with the 2.0awd and the 4k tow package. Thanks again!!!
I’ve ordered my AWD XLT W/Tow & FX4 should be getting it in March. I live on the Lake & have Grandkids, so the extras are needed. Thanks for the update!
Ordered the xlt hybrid with luxury package in Nov 2021 with confirmation from Ford. Just waiting for them to schedule the build. Very excited since it appears the mpg is as good or better than advertised.
I currently own a Ford Focus Se hatchback 5sp. It been an awesome little car and daily driver. As I live in northern Minnesota and I need something to tow with I’ve been putting serious thought into the awd eco boost maverick with the tow package. Your video was quit helpful.
We made an 1190 mile road trip recently and our XLT FX4 Maverick got 32mpg at standard high way speeds, you know that means driving faster than posted to keep from being killed, and was very comfortable and had plenty of get up and go and felt confident in heavy rain and crappy roads. The AT tires are more All Season tire but feel great on the road
Had a 2017 Escape with one of Fords little ecoboost engines. Thing had a known mechanical coolant leak in the cylinder that caused "total engine failure" at 76,000 miles. Ford wanted $10,000 for a new engine (and would only warranty the new engine for 3 years). I will avoid their small turbo engines like the plague now. Give me the hybrid Maverick all day every day.
Richard, I have 100 Mav only videos on my channel that can help you. No credit checks on orders so I recommend ordering a 2024MY this fall from a dealer that charges msrp they are out there. The truck will take a few months for delivery so build your credit by summer of 2024 you should be good. No obligation to complete your purchase and the $100 deposit is refundable. Ask any questions.
Different tools for different jobs. We have two trucks and two SUV’s in the family. The hybrid is perfect for me to go to work and light hauling….40MPG with regular fuel will be a nice change from a V8 that runs on premium fuel and gets 15-17MPG😧
My brother is confused as to why I want a Maverick as it's "Not a real truck". In my view, I currently drive a car, and it suits my purposes 99% of the time. I'd just like the option to haul yard waste, the occasional small appliance, or a couple bicycles without needing to borrow a pickup. I'm not going off roading, I'm not hauling huge trailers, and I'm not doing construction.
If I wanted FX4, towing, more torque . . . I'd just get a Ranger or F150, yes? The beauty of the Maverick is in the stripped down version. To me, anyway.
I changed my order to the Ecoboost engine. Ford let me do that at no extra charge for my 2023 order. Now, I will have to wait and see if I get my 2023 Maverick XL.
Good choice Bill! I have one of each I show on my channel and the hwy mpg of the turbo is not much different than hybrid even with way more passing power and capability.
Please note I am saying the following fully well and knowing I am in the minority. So yeah, I respect your opinion, but what good is the internet if we can't provide a counterpoint, eh? Being nostalgic about how a conventional automatic works is much like arguing about how the electric starter whines on a Model T which is why one would prefer the crank handle. The 8 speed automatic to me is the sound of a relatively inefficient way of delivering power, with only 8 ratios instead of an infinite number of ratios. The CVT in the Ranger isn't a traditional CVT. It's two electric motors, a gasoline engine, and a few gears plus a planetary. There isn't much there and they simply don't break. The whine, or as you called it, the "moo" that you hear is the RPM of the engine being held constant, providing the specific amount of power and torque needed at that specific time. Then the drivetrain adjusts the ratio to ensure the engine can stay at that ideal RPM. So while it's not conventional, it is better in every way when compared to a relatively small number of ratios attempting to provide the ideal RPM and honestly failing all the time. With hybrids or anything with a CVT, people feel it doesn't accelerate because they can't hear the rise in RPM. If they just brought the engine to a specific RPM and watched the speedometer, they would see how responsive a CVT truly is. But like I said, I am in the minority. The other things, like an intrusive stop/start, comparatively miserable MPG, and the lack of "right now' electric motor torque are other reasons the hybrid is the best choice.
I agree with you. My son has a hybrid Toyota C-HR and there is none of the “mooing” described here. The Maverick hybrid would be perfect for me as an urban driver as the vehicle is basically a small SUV that is shaped like a truck. Essentially, it is what I’d call a “99 percenter”. It will do about 99% of what I need and the rest requires a half-ton truck with about a 6000 pound towing capacity.
Dude the 4k tow package is abslutely an insane valie for only 750. That is unbelievable amount of very very performance upgrading add ons. Any one of those is worth 750. A final drive alone is easiy 750. Tranmision cooler easily 750 alone. Hitch receiver easily 750 alone. That is such an insane pakage vaue wise. Those arent just gimmick worthless "upgrades" like floor mats that dont do anything for performance. All those parts seriously improve performance
I think I will buy a Tacoma. Just because these Mavericks are cheaply made either Ecoboost or Hybrid. I will deal with the worse MPG but I will have it for 20 years. Now if your going to keep the truck for a few years go with the Maverick
I know this is weird, but I like the idea of a plain-jane XL but with Ecoboost. I much prefer the idea of an 8-speed; the upcharge is low. Don't need or want to tow; it's the lightest choice of all that's offered. All wheel drive is almost always a gas sucking option in any vehicle; more so that even 4WD part time; and that's not even considering the high up charge in order to devastate ones mpg voluntarily. No cruise control, however, is a real downer.
One thing, and I was thinking of ordering one, is that the ECO only comes with a 16 gal gas tank. Even though MPG maybe great, it means my twice a month visits of 450 miles each would mean a lot off fill-ups. If they had a 19/20 gal tank, I would re-consider. To some, 3 gals may not seem much, but many times its whats left between fill-ups, 3 gals.
What's so exhausting about pumping gas for 2 minutes not like it costs you extra money that is the dumbest reason not to get a car unless it's a big diesel and you're gonna be towing 10000+ lbs all day the fuel tank size really doesn't matter
I have heard that there is a one-year backlog of orders and the Bronco has as much as a 1.5-year backlog. That's crazy. I wonder what the actual numbers are.
Neat, but if you are looking for a vehicle to pull/tow/carry etc, and you want a Ford, just get the Ranger. It is a superior truck for all those truck things. Maverick is great because its a budget vehicle with a budget drivetrain. But once you add up all the options to transform it from a city hybrid into a small truck, the price difference between it and a Ranger isn't that much. The Ranger isn't even that much bigger than the Maverick, literal inches.
Thanks for your review. I appreciate your presentation style and succinct points . Definitely in the market for eco boost Maverick but with current chip shortage and supply constraints it’s a terrible time to buy a vehicle. There seems to be overlap with 4K tow and FX4 pkg so which would you recommend with better features if you wanted to save some money.
Between 4K Tow and FX4, I think only get the 4K Tow if you need the towing capacity. Otherwise, I personally prefer the FX4 aeshetic upgrades for not too much money above the AWD cost.
I think you're missing one things about CVT transmissions in the Ford Maverick only. The CVT is a GEAR type CVT not belt so it does not make that MOOOOOOOOOing sound.
With either normal CVT’s or hybrid vehicle eCVT’s, the disconnection between engine rpm and vehicle speed is why the engine sound can be weirdly constant under hard acceleration (what I describe as the “mooing”). That’s a commonality of any transmission that doesn’t use set gear ratios between the engine and the wheels but instead uses continuously varying ratios to maximize efficiency.
@@JamesPlaysWithCars ahh...pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes this transmission ......the moaning sound you're talking about comes from the steel belts in a CVT changing positions, the Mavericks trans mission doesn't have belts.. steel or other..it's a planetary gear set, very smooth and quiet....just saying.
Sorry if I wasn’t clear! I don’t mean the transmission itself. I mean the engine noise when it’s hooked up to a CVT of any kind. That’s why in the video I contrasted it with the rising and falling engine rpm’s with a transmission with set ratios-so, not talking about the sound of the trans itself.
From one James to another, your math is off... $3305 gets you the eco engine, 8 speed auto + AWD. You also get upgraded independent rear suspension. These upgrades are worth every penny. Also know that 4k tow gets you both the 4 pin + the 7 pin connector, along with a brake controller next to the steering wheel. As a road trip vehicle, hwy mpg not much different than the hybrid even with way more power, safer passing, and better in the snow or towing with AWD.
The only reason the highway MPG can be compared to the 2.0 ecoboost is because the hybrid drivetrain that Ford uses is about 3 generations behind Toyota. Currently we have a 2021 Toyota Sienna hybrid. 5000lbs and fully loaded going 75MPH on the interstate we got right around 37MPG. With only three people, we got over 40MPG. The conventional 2020 Sienna V6 driven under the same conditions couldn't sniff 25 mpg if its life depended on it.
It's really a matter of preference. Do you tow a lot of stuff , most people don't. Had an ecoboost in my '19 Ranger that I traded in for my '24 Lariat Hybrid. Practically never had a need for the extra pick up. My car is a '22 Escape Titanium Hybrid , which I love for both mpg and overall performance, so I opted for the Hybrid Maverick and absolutely love it. It does everything I need with no problem. And, nice gas saving getting up to about 550 miles on a 13.8 gallon tank.
You should do some additional research on e. CVT. Not anywhere near the same as CVT. Also hybrid drive system is very torquey. So I believe your first reason and second reason are on shaky ground. The main reason for getting EcoBoost would be due. I need all-wheel drive and 4K toy capacity. Really FX4 package May look cool with your sticker, but Maverick at this point is not an off of the road type of vehicle. I'm in team hybrid obviously, but if I were going to get an EcoBoost version I would order it with all-wheel drive and 4K tow package.
Good points especially in regards to towing, FWD is really no good. However, as you option the Maverick with AWD and 2.0L, it gets pretty close to a base 2WD Ranger, otherwise known as a real truck, instead of an El Escapo. Having said that, I still am seriously looking at the Maverick as my kids' first vehicle, I still have a year or two to figure it out. Good video.
I liked your explanation on the Ford Maverick, I've seen other reviews & some are just too whiney, (could also be Me), since I'm consider Old School in my thinking
So everything you mentioned, how much(ballpark) does that add to the base price? Can I just get the ecoboost and standard toe configuration? Very informative videos by the way!
The hybrid Maverick doesn't have a CVT. It has an eCVT. They're entirely different things. One is a cone and belt system. The other is an orbital gear system that allows the proper power distribution from both the motor and engine.
Man so many people in the comments seem to be judgmental of people who want/like the Ecoboost Mav. Who cares lol if you want the hybrid get the hybrid, if some random dude that commented wants the ecoboost then mind your business, their use case/wants is clearly different form your own
Good video but, you have forgotten about fuel mileage. This model is rated at 25 mpg combined. The Hybrid is rated at 37 mpg combined with most people obtaining around 43 mpg or higher. With fuel prices as high as they have been lately, and not likely to go down any time soon, getting the Hybrid is is the best decision these days. If you were not concerned economy, you would not be buying a Maverick in the first place.
Glenn, you will be happy with the Eco version. I have one of each I show on my channel and the turbo is way more fun. It's like a little race truck in sport mode. For road trips, hwy mpg is not much different than the hybrid which probably would not have been built anyway. Ask any questions.
Yes, and with inflation announced at 7% last month, 2023 model likely to get another price increase but much higher this time. Ordering the eco now at this year's msrp makes sense.
When equipped with the 2.0L EcoBoost I-4, the front-wheel drive 2022 Ford Maverick returns 23 city, and 30 MPG on the highway... Equipped with its standard four-cylinder engine that's paired with an electric motor, the Maverick gets between 33 highway and 42 city MPG, making it America's most fuel-efficient hybrid pickup... so highway driving is a push... Ford has obviously prepped this truck for both markets... those that need power and towing... and those that want city driving economy...
To be more transparent.....the Maverick hybrid transmission is not your traditional CVT which you were referencing (mooo...). It's an eCVT and is composed of an electric motor/generator pair (MG1 and MG2) and not a mechanical belt or chain as in the traditional CVT "which everyone hates". This eCVT is a much better implementation...
I like the 2.0 because less systems and components to maintain/replace than hybrid. 10 years from now the hybrids will be in scrapyards while the 2.0s will be getting modded
ECO Boast = Turbo, I would avoid these Turbos like the plague. I know several mechanics and several people who have had ECO Boast engines. I’ll never buy one.
It's hard for me to determine if I want the AWD 4k towing. I want to save money. I dont like sedan designs, because I like being able to transport furniture, appliances and things that small suv or sedans wont allow. Not really an off roader and not really planning on towing sizable trailers. I feel i may cone across times where I may want or need to tow 3-4k though. I have a slight hesitancy on buying a new gas truck with pushes towards electric, I worry about resell value in the future. I don't find this to be my final car or truck, but sonething I'll need to get me through the next 4-8 years.
I would be careful about going with the 2L version of the Ecoboost. While the performance is smooth and quick, the 2L EcoBoost has history of being problematic on the second generation. The 2L Ecoboost had many issues failing on Ford Egde models.
I can care less about the city slicker hybrid as the EcoBoost with the 4K and the all-wheel drive gives me the closest to mid-size capabilities without actually having a midsize truck.
And you can get an EcoBoost off the lot for under sticker price! It's a good think you want an EcoBoost because the Hybrids are going from $7-$10k over sticker now.
@@joeking433 The hybrids are at sticker here and the EcoBoost are just a hair under sticker. The front wheel drive EcoBoost on the dealer lots are collecting dust as the dealers here are having a hard time selling them.
@@jamesm568 I'm thinking of getting a Front wheel Drive ecoboost. My current car I've been driving for 17 years now and it's a front wheel drive (2005 Impala) and I live in rural Iowa. Never really needed the 4wd. Maverick is similar length, width, and weight to what I'm used to, it's just taller.
Problem is you cant find them anywhere nor able to even order them anywhere @ this time, I found one con dealership that has a Lariat edition they tell me they marked it up 10K$ more which would make it 38K$?.. way too much not even a hybrid?.. I was thinking bout the AWD if I can ever get one.
What about the warranty... its super high compression engine with a turbo... You will without a doubt be repairing the turbo !! Love the truck but would never buy it without an extended warranty !
Nice review! However, any car review that uses the words "interminable moo" automatically gets a thumbs up from me pretty much no matter what else is said.
I have a I will drive eco boost 2.0 with 72000 miles on already have to replace motor due coolant Intrusion so has this issue been fixed with the new maverick
i like your video, youre somewhat off on the hybrid trans, its not cvt, it has a planatery gear, otherwise, you sound like a journalist give us more content, pls i have to wait over a year to get the hybrid xl that i would like to have
Hybrid is not cvt. It is eCVT and just because the three letters are the same, it is a completely different type of transmission and design. Don't misrepresent
I wouldn't buy an Ecoboost if you paid me. Maybe ford has fixed prior issues but I worry until proven wrong that placing such pressures in a small displacement engine will lead to long term issues as many Ecoboost buyers have stated.
I think it was in 2017 Ford brought out Gen 2 of the 2 liter, hopefully solving several problems. My more powerful 2 L turbo is fine after 9, almost 10 yrs, doesn't burn any oil to speak of, very good fuel economy for something that can still tow my boat.
@@drewthompson7457 To be fair there are many engines that deal with high pressures. The question is whether they can actually handle those pressures or not.
@@gabrieliacoboni6951 ; true. Let's hope the manufacturers are smart enough to not take a highly stressed 100 hp engine and bolt on 200 extra horses to an unmodified engine. I did read of the mods in the Gen 2 turbo 2 l, but I don't recall them now. I do remember that what i read did make sense, you could probably look it up, if you're interested.
The Maverick FX4 pkg seems like a ripoff, IMO, compared to the offroad pkg that is available with the Bronco Sport. How about offering "locking" center and rear diffs for the Maverick? Skids and Hill Descent seem to be the only real offroad "upgrades". I couldn't care less about the FX4 wheels and tires, as Ford isn't likely to fit truly-aggressive ATs or MTs. I like the boosted engine. Boost retains a lot of power at high altitudes. 30MPG or so with a pickup is still pretty darn good too.
I purposely left off fx4 on this low softroader. AWD handles the dirt road to the trailhead, this is no rock hopper. Plus I did not want the fx4 stickers messing up my paint. You lose eco and sport modes with fx4 and that makes no sense on a 250hp engine.
so much more to the package in lie of upgraded cooling and added drive modes not just the decal like on an f150 the package has lots of value, and the bronco and maverick have different awd systems
Great video! Is this Maverick 2 wheel or 4 wheel drive? I noticed the wheel spin upon acceleration! But with the fx 4 package, you lose eco and sport mode! Thanks!
