01:10 - 0-100 Sport TC ON 01:26 - 0-100 Sport TC ON 01:41 - 0-100 Sport TC OFF 01:56 - 0-100 Sport TC OFF 02:12 - 50-100 Sport 3rd gear 02:24 - 70-100 Sport 4th gear 02:36 - 0-100 Normal TC ON 02:51 - 0-100 Normal TC ON 03:06 - 50-100 Normal 3rd gear 03:22 - 60-100 Normal 4th gear 03:36 - 70-100 Normal 4th gear 03:48 - 70-100 Normal 5th gear 04:00 - 80-110 Normal 5th gear 04:12 - 90-110 Normal 6th gear More videos with this car: Fuel Consumption - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BKvFuxAgcbs.html POV Test Drive - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_Wdd6YYsmSk.html Interior & Exterior - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OozqnX0Kl4c.html
Hello! This is because of my editing software. I made a workaround for the last videos, I snap a photo with the chronometer in the last frame and place it over for 3 seconds.
I think that with an automatic transmission arriving around June, it will be faster. For the 0-100 it claims 8.5s and not 9s. Otherwise great video and sorry I do not speak Spanish or English, I use google translation lol :)
Hello, Mathieu! Thank you! Your English is fine, or at least the Google translation :D. With an automatic transmission I think that it will still be around 9 seconds. I verified on few places: auto data, car info and Ford official website, the 0-100 km/h in 9 seconds is the correct time for this Puma 1.0 155 hp hybrid. 0-60 mph is around 8.6 seconds, because 60 mph = ~96.56 kmh.
Oui j'ai même vue 8.2 ! Au 100m ! En juillet ellf arrive en France dans la fiesta avec le même moteur 1.0 155 cv hybride je pense qu'elle passera même sous les 8 sec !
I completely disagree with this statement. The difference between "Normal" and "Sport" is actually very noticeable. The response is much more direct in Sport mode than in Normal mode. If you don't have your accelerator foot under control, you quickly lose traction when accelerating, which is not so much the case in normal mode.
@@GeNePoDu just the mapping of the gas pedal is different in sport (faster response with less pedal travel) - however there is not more power or similar. if you fully step on it acceleration is completely identical between eco, normal and sport.
Hello! 1280kg includes the driver. Usually, manufacturers consider 75kg weight of the driver, this means that Puma has 1205 kg. I verified again on Ford website. Thanks!
Salut, Andrei! Multumesc! Mi-a placut Ford Puma. Arata foarte bine, se conduce la fel de bine (cred ca cel mai bine din clasa lui). Ecoboost sunt motoare premiate ani la rand, pentru un motiv bun. Nu ai ce sa reprosezi acestui 1.0 Ecoboost, e cel mai bun din clasa sa. Le are pe toate: rafinament (cat se poate de la un motor in 3 cilindri), cuplu bun, disponibil devreme si silentiozitate (chiar si la 4000 rpm abia il auzi daca mergi cu viteza constanta). E un pachet bun acest Puma, dar neaparat o vizita la dealer pentru preturi si oferte concrete. Politica Ford e cu multe discount-uri, nu sunt la curent cu toate.
no big difference between 1.0 125hp (tc off) and 1.0 155hp (tc on) on 0-100 acceleration: almost 9.3 seconds; i dont know why...the horses becaming donkeys?
It could be the extra weight for the Hybrid system takes away any performance advantages over the 125. I’d like to see a 1.5 Hybrid with 200bhp that would interest me
la schimbul de viteze cum intervine motorul electric? sau incarca bateria? cum ti se pare motorul fata de 1.5 150 cai? se simte contributia motorului electric la vuteze reduse?
Salut! La schimbul de viteze nu intervine motorul electric. In frana de motor incarca bateria, iar la acceleratii mai puternice ajuta destul de mult. La viteze reduse se simte o mica contributie, dar acolo e destul de importanta aceasta si imbunatateste putin consumul. Fata de 1.5 tsi 150 cai se simte ceva mai lent per total.
Aerodynamic coefficient is different. Larger tires maybe, lower high speed, or different gear setup. I verified again, for the 2019 Puma model 155 hp hybrid top speed is 200 km/h. For the 2020 model top speed is slightly higher, 205 km/h.
Ian Verdecchia Hello! That’s what I heard too. Will be available in production starting May 18th, 7 gears for sure, only for 1.0l ecoboost 125hp without hybrid.
@@Cristi3453 not really clio is less powerful in acceleration but on highway it goes up to 195 km h , the hybrid has just 120 hp 155 are in full charge of batteries and after 130 km h is very slow. I have a x1 150 cv chipped to 178 and 405 Nm when I approach a Toyota C HR it has more horsepower and in acceleration 0 100 is almost near to mine but when I approach same car at 130 and I arrive 190 the Toyota is 200 meters behind me. Thats why I think with my wife clio 1.5 tdi chipped 115 cv I can surpass that stupid hybrid .even the ones with 200 ore more hp. With my car I arrive 225 km h gps and 235 on display an can drive at 170 for 200 km no stop which you cannot do with that stupid car furthermore my care consumption is less like the clio one. Next car audi q 3 230 cv same engine golf gti and reship 290 hp
Hello, I’m going to buy a Ford Puma. Which model should i buy (155 hybrid or 125 hybrid)? Is it worth spending more than 1000€ for the higher model (in terms of performances)? Thanks in advance!
I had the old Puma. If you pair the new one with the old one just because of the name.. Well.. Maybe that means you ain't so smart. Better luck next time, dude.
@@gabryniccolini Ford Puma 1.7: 125HP 157Nm 1040kg Power to weight ratio 9.2HP/kg Ford Puma 1.0 ECOBOOST: 155HP 240Nm 1205kg Power to weight ratio 9.0HP/kg Tel me why i can't compare this two? SMARTASS