Тёмный

Forgotten Soviet Helicopter Plane - The Kamov KA-22 and KA-35 

Found And Explained
Подписаться 711 тыс.
Просмотров 518 тыс.
50% 1

Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.... Start your free trial TODAY so you can watch Faster Than Light about reaching other stars and the rest of MagellanTV’s science collection:
www.magellantv...
Discord: / discord
New Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Or Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
In 1953, the USSR started the development of a new type of heavy-lift helicopter.
Both Mil and Kamov were selected to come up with designs and the race was on to develop what would be at the time - the worlds largest helicopter. Its requirements would be simple - BIG, FAST and POWERFUL.
Mil was already having their previous designs in the serial production, like the legendary Mi-4, while Kamov was still struggling to make a name for itself in the Soviet military circles.
Ka-25 and their coaxial rotor design would become their springboard to success, but at the time, they thought the big break would be with the new heavy lift helicopter programme, so they decided to go all in.
Kamov would base its design on the Bratukhin B-11. They figured that if the twin-rotor helicopter was larger, you could fit two horizontal propellers under the wings - and ta da! a monster helicopter to inspire fear in the west!
Heres how it would have worked!
The Ka-22 would have two large engines fixed on each wing tip. These engines would power both a four-bladed propeller and a four-bladed main rotor - operating them for either vertical or horizontal flight. Not at the same time however. During vertical flight, the horizontal propeller would be disconnected - then when switching to forward flight, the rotors were allow to spin naturally but were left witout power. These engines on the wingtips would be badass, having up to 5,900 horsepower.
These blades would push the aircraft up to a planned 400 km/h - although during tests it only achieved a still impressive 356km/h.
The four crew cockpit would sit above the nose of the aircraft, with seating for a futher 80 soliders in the rear. If not men, the KA-22 would be able to carry 16.5 tons of bulky cargo - with the nose of the aircraft swinging open at airfields of quick loading and unloading.
While the team initially wanted to use the Li-2 fuselage as a base but ended scrapping it for a more costly new airframe.
Or so the brilliant minds at Kamov thought. In reality, the project was doomed as soon as the rotors started to spin.
In 1961. The test pilot of the first flight, Dmitriy Yefremov, would go on to break the world record for gyrodyne speed and set it at 356km/h. Along that one, several other world records have been broken with the aircraft, some of which still stand to this day.
The one record they didn’t break however, was beating Mil to the punch with a first flight. Their rival, who you may remember was also going for the same lucrative heavy lift helicopter project, had already flown their aircraft in 1957.
But this would only be a footnote in history compared to what happened a year later.
In 1962, while testing one of the four prototypes, the aircraft rolled to the left and crashed - killing all onboard, including Dimitriy.
The flaw was discovered in the starboard rotor collective pitch control linkage, and further inspection found that two of the other three Ka-22s suffered from similar problems. A complicated autopilot feature had to be built just to correct this issue for the rest of the aircraft.
Because of these 2 crashes and the fact that the aircraft was super complex to build and hard to fly, goverment decided to pull the plug and meanwhile Mi-6 got the contract and became one of the most popular heavy helis of Soviet air force later on
Kamov had one more design that would be the fastest, biggest helicopter ever built.
In 1967, the Kamov Deisgn Bureau decided to have another crack at the Gyrodyne concept with a project simply called the Kamov Ka-35D. This version would be huge, and was designed to work in tandem with the impressive An-12.
The big difference between the KA-22 and this monster was its twin turbojet eninges. This would increase its speed to 550 km per hour, and its lifting capacity to over 20 tons. These engines would give it a range of around 800 km, which would make it perfect for deploying troops, up to 100 of them, to remote locations from airbases. Models at the time even feature the aircraft taking onboard SAMs or other lightly armoured tanks - so you know they ment buisness.
However, this project never saw the light of day, but their biggest rival Mil, actually tried their chance with a similar concept, Mi V-12, of which prototype was made and also broke several records in the helicopter world, but ended up in a museum.

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 311   
@SpaceMonkeyBoi
@SpaceMonkeyBoi 2 года назад
I wish people would talk about Soviet engineering more often. It's so interesting and outlandish
@alexdhall
@alexdhall 2 года назад
@@chamberlane2899 Yep. I believe Paper Skies made a video on this ..
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 2 года назад
@@chamberlane2899 Link to it? I keep finding the SU 34. animals, and some plane from Sweden, haha.
@nicks238
@nicks238 2 года назад
@@dianapennepacker6854 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m-ZePrgir4Q.html
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 2 года назад
@@nicks238 Honestly that link looks crazy. I won't click on that. Thank you for replying.
@nicks238
@nicks238 2 года назад
@@dianapennepacker6854 rly? That's how short links look like via youtube's share function. Try pressing 'share' on this video, link will look similar.
@asingh5482
@asingh5482 2 года назад
The Russian engg and intelligence is highly underestimated. During my engg graduation years in India we use to have book on electronic materials written by a Soviet author Tareev. The book was recommended by our university. It was one of the best written books on that subject.
@TangoChatney
@TangoChatney 2 года назад
Sir, do you suggest any electronic engg books from this respected author?
@asingh5482
@asingh5482 2 года назад
@@TangoChatney Electronic Materials - By Tareev. It emphasises on dielectric materials used in electronic components like capacitors, resistors, inductors, transformers, etc.
@TangoChatney
@TangoChatney 2 года назад
@@asingh5482 Thank you so much. Do you work in electronics industry Sir?
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent 2 года назад
The irony is that if someone was to recreate these type of craft right now with current computer and flight technology you'll likely have very servicable and useful aircraft.
@Generic_Noob
@Generic_Noob 2 года назад
V-22 osprey is pretty similar
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent 2 года назад
@@Generic_Noob Yes infact its better even. However Osprey's tilt rotor system is very complicated. Its unlikely Osprey is useful for a army that likely can't maintain the complex tilt rotor and computer systems. KA-22 however likely would be a possible solution. Basically a poor mans Osprey but still with most of its capabilities. Modify the design a little update avionics with off the shelf tech, new but reliable engines and you'll likely have a perfectly servicable craft that could be exported to countries looking for a osprey type aircraft but can't afford the Osprey or wants something a faster than say the Mi-26. but has similar capabilities.
@isuruthiwanka9448
@isuruthiwanka9448 2 года назад
@@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent yuh..it should be ..why? Its new era heli..so it should.. but idea came with old creation..just like f35 abbreviated from YAK-141 and Harrier
@tasa4904
@tasa4904 2 года назад
@@isuruthiwanka9448 Same reason that the US still fields B-52s 70 years after they were first flown. Quetzalcoatl stated most of the basic reasons, but some designs don't need much improvement to be far more useful than the designs of today. No temperature controlled hangars, no situational environment to maximize mission efficacy, no extended maintenance when a panel falls off...load the bombs, fuel them up, and send them back into the air... Granted, you're going to need air superiority before you can field them en-masse against the latest tech, but not everyone is going to have the modern air defense systems
@robertalaverdov8147
@robertalaverdov8147 2 года назад
Similar issues with uncontrollable roll pitch due to the rotors creating competing vortex caused a lot of fatal accidents in the V-22 Osprey as well. The problem has mostly been overcome with fly by wire and computerized autopilot input. But when flying a literal brick that requires perfect balance between rotors, it's not exactly reassuring to think that you're one defective circuit away from crashing.
@kirkc9643
@kirkc9643 2 года назад
"a literal brick"? I thought it was an aircraft.
@robertalaverdov8147
@robertalaverdov8147 2 года назад
@@kirkc9643 Ok a figurative brick! Are you happy now, Kirk?
@andreinarangel6227
@andreinarangel6227 2 года назад
WRONG X 100!! Vortex ring state can occur with any helicopter. The sole solution is for the pilot to ensure that he does not end up in such aerodynamic condition. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_ring_state
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 2 года назад
That's why you build in multiple redundancies and have regular maintenance and spare parts. If something is critical, then having one is having none, two is one and if you want it to work near flawless, you put in at least three. That's why these things get expensive.
@rayjames6096
@rayjames6096 2 года назад
There hasn't been an Osprey crash in 5 years.
@Celtic4ever
@Celtic4ever 2 года назад
Great video! I found another interesting and crazy Soviet helicopter design- the Mil mi- 32. It is actually triangular in shape. It would be cool to see a video on that. Keep up the great work!
@woofkaf7724
@woofkaf7724 2 года назад
I think that its too expensive. That's it.
@greateraviationgl91
@greateraviationgl91 2 года назад
I mean, the Kamov Ka-22 and Boeing Bell V-22 almost looks indentical to the others with the same designation name "22" Btw, happy 100th anniversery of USSR's birth! (1922-2022)
@rkadi6540
@rkadi6540 2 года назад
Wait for 22 february to make it perfect
@GameMaker3_5
@GameMaker3_5 Год назад
@@rkadi6540 LOL that didn't work out too well...
@GaionSputro
@GaionSputro 22 дня назад
​@@rkadi6540I think Russia its planing _that thing_ in purpose, because if you look it back again, the number of date is so unique. I mean this ›22 Feb 2022 = 22-2-22‹ Unique numbers for me.
@quillmaurer6563
@quillmaurer6563 2 года назад
Interesting to compare this with the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor, the only helicopter-airplane hybrid (at least so far) to be mass produced or enter regular service, really to count as a successful aircraft rather than failure or experiment. Similar in some ways - same objectives, similar capabilities to my understanding (though I think this is a bit bigger than the V-22 - the V-22's concept could theoretically be scaled up to this size or larger though), and same basic idea of engine and rotor/prop at each wingtip. Main difference is that this has a separate propeller and rotor, while the V-22 has a single proprotor per side that serves both functions, tilting between vertical and horizontal axis. I wonder what the pros and cons of each are? This design allows propeller and rotor to each be more optimized for their role (rotor much bigger than propeller) while the V-22 is a compromise, and the complicated tilting mechanism isn't required, nor an engine specially designed to function in either orientation. I also imagine the control system design of this is simpler, the V-22 wasn't really possible (or at least not practical) until fly-by-wire came about, which didn't exist in the '60s. But the V-22's design is probably more aerodynamically efficient and possibly lighter by not having an extra rotor causing drag in horizontal flight, and the gearbox is surely much simpler by not having to have - and clutch and de-clutch - both a rotor and propeller driven by the same engine, that would reduce weight, complexity, and failure possibilities. Based on all this, I think the tilt-rotor comes out ahead, and apparently the engineers at Bell and Boeing agree.
@PixlRainbow
@PixlRainbow 2 года назад
I think though that in forward flight, the disconnected rotors essentially become autogyros, acting as extensions of the wing for extra lift and providing anti-stall safety.
@jamesburleson1916
@jamesburleson1916 2 года назад
@@PixlRainbow They do indeed, but autogyrotating rotors are not known for their lack of drag.
@rkadi6540
@rkadi6540 2 года назад
I need to make the rc version of this
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent 2 года назад
It would still be useful in countries that can't support the V-22 or unable to properly maintain them. This could be seen as a cheaper alternative especially if built with today's technology.
@safetyfirstintexas
@safetyfirstintexas 2 года назад
engines outboard of the blade towers with the ability to translate 90° from lift to forward flight😎😲
@bazoo513
@bazoo513 2 года назад
OK, you _did_ mention Mil V-12 which was, unlike Kamov designs, true helicopter, not compound gyroplane.
@jimsvideos7201
@jimsvideos7201 2 года назад
The Li-2 was the anomaly in the DC-3 family in having the cargo door on the right.
@t3h51d3w1nd3r
@t3h51d3w1nd3r 2 года назад
damn can you imagine a ka-35 fully kitted with missiles on the wings, guns front, back and on the side, a spooky version, or close air support version with 4 miniguns per side and side firing rpgs, mount ball turrets at the ends of the wings and have the guns timed to the rotors so they can shoot through the props.
@KlaxontheImpailr
@KlaxontheImpailr 2 года назад
So this is like a really big Rotodyne? Cool.
@kunaalsharma1039
@kunaalsharma1039 2 года назад
V-22 Osprey always faced many issues, crashes n deaths of test pilot n crews.
@ANDREALEONE95
@ANDREALEONE95 2 года назад
Kamov: ultra complex gyrocopter. Mil: Mil-8 but bigger
@lincolnkemling7655
@lincolnkemling7655 2 года назад
Both the ka 22 and ka 35 would be really good for naval combat
@dillongamer1131
@dillongamer1131 2 года назад
These animations always look so good :D
@portuguesnomundo
@portuguesnomundo 2 года назад
Nice video my friend
@alwayscensored6871
@alwayscensored6871 2 года назад
Serious graphics skills on this channel.
@FernandoVisserCedrola
@FernandoVisserCedrola 11 месяцев назад
It seems the blades have to advance by the center and retract in the wing tips, if you know what i mean, the way it is may limit more any yaw, it is a monter inertia in term of yaw ...
@mattthebongo
@mattthebongo 2 года назад
I absolutely love these videos! Such great quality and so little views, you deserve more!
@thejurnalist9870
@thejurnalist9870 2 года назад
always good videos in this channel
@shot2092
@shot2092 2 года назад
Would love to see a video on the Aggregate A6 manned ICBM
@MrDino1953
@MrDino1953 2 года назад
With the lift rotors placed laterally, weight balance on the length axis must have been tricky to manage. No mention of that?
@oLevLovesLove
@oLevLovesLove 2 года назад
Chinook and it's banana like predecessor seemed to do fine without too much sensitivity to lift imbalance.
@safetyfirstintexas
@safetyfirstintexas 2 года назад
ka -22 with outboard engines that rotate like the v22 osperey while the rotors continue to lift. that would be badass.
@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692
@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692 2 года назад
Alternative tittle : The Soviet V-22 osprey
@alexandrgarkusha2154
@alexandrgarkusha2154 2 года назад
Оспрей,только на 40 лет раньше
@edhikurniawan
@edhikurniawan 2 года назад
Basically the real Airwolf in terms of propulsion concept. I wonder if the rotor blades can be fixed during horizontal flight.
@quillmaurer6563
@quillmaurer6563 2 года назад
I seem to recall that helicopter-plane hybrids want to keep them spinning slowly rather than stopping them, as forward motion would cause excessive aerodynamic loads on the rotor, possibly more lift on one side than the other, without centrifugal force to counter it. If stopped the rotor would tilt over and hit the fuselage, or the blades would bend upward or downward, possibly breaking them. As long as it's spinning, centrifugal forces keep it reasonably level (within limits) and straight. Helicopter blades aren't really rigid, they're quite flexible (we see them sagging under their own weight when a helicopter is sitting on the ground, said own weight is tiny compared to the weight of the helicopter), could never withstand the aerodynamic forces without centrifugal force holding them out - sort of like the string of a weedwhacker. And likewise I understand that most helicopter rotors are not rigidly connected to the mast but free to tilt, to control roll and pitch the blade angles are changed side-side or fore-aft with the cyclic pitch control, which tilts the entire rotor disc (forces have to be applied 90° from the desired tilt axis due to gyroscopic effect), the helicopter fuselage basically dangling under it. Having it spinning helps keep it level, I vaguely recall a helicopter pilot explaining that more lift on one side is compensated for naturally (no pilot input required) by the rotor tilting up on the high-lift side, the blade moving down - having a higher angle of attack - as it goes over to the low-lift side, resulting in balanced lift, the blades moving up and down through the tilt compensates for the different amount of lift due to different relative airspeed. Plus the rotation axis remains vertical relative to the helicopter, centrifugal force pulls the blades perpendicular to that - thanks to this single-blade rotors or propellers are possible (and do exist though are quite rare). Thus on a helicopter-plane hybrid, the rotors wouldn't be supporting the weight of the aircraft, meaning less forces that would need to be counteracted by these effects, so it doesn't need to go full speed. But even with the rotors neutral-pitch going so fast would put forces on the rotors that would damage them if not spinning. They would go slower than usual to reduce power consumption (I think just auto-rotating by setting the blade pitch, similar to a gyrocopter, but relatively slowly so they don't produce as much drag as they would if auto-rotating at full speed), as well as to avoid tips going supersonic (or even transsonic) as forward speed increases. Advancing tip velocity = airspeed + rotor speed (in rad/sec ideally, otherwise conversion factors are needed) * rotor dia/2. This needs to be kept subsonic, so slower rotor speed allows for more airspeed without hitting this limit. I seem to recall one helicopter-plane hybrid design had the rotor tips packed with depleted uranium to maximize centrifugal force on the rotor, allowing it to spin slower without damage. I do think I've heard of other concepts that actually do stop the rotor, but they use a very different rotor design. Shorter, wider, fully rigid blades, look more like airplane wings than helicopter rotor blades. If I remember right that would stop with the rotor blades perpendicular to the fuselage and they would act as wings. I'm a bit skeptical of how well that would work though, as such short and wide-chord blades would be rather inefficient as a helicopter rotor. And there's the problem that as the rotor is slowing down or speeding up it would get too slow to act like a helicopter rotor but at moments be parallel to the fuselage, effectively meaning no wings, so transitioning between helicopter and airplane mode would be problematic. Maybe it had fixed wings as well, once the rotor is stopped it was a biplane. Or maybe it goes zero-G during the transition so lift is momentarily not needed. Or maybe the designers hadn't thought of that problem. Probably a much longer answer than you were looking for, but it's a very interesting question.
@edhikurniawan
@edhikurniawan 2 года назад
@@quillmaurer6563 All the examples shown in this video has fixed wings. I got a hunch transition to the ga horizontal flight may be simple. But as you mentioned, back to helicopter mode may be not as responsive. Hmm. Definitely i would think something more rigid blades as they also an airfoil or wings. Like if somehow can be stopped, it would be a kin to an + or x shaped wing. Which if they kept free spinning i think would interfere while at high horizontal speed. Like all the experiments here 'only' aiming at 400-500kmh ish maximum airspeed. You have explained this but, thinking from my perspective. Also an option to 'pack' the rotor when not in use but it would be sluggish to unfold and would need extreme precision design. I think? Or maybe ducted rotor design? But it has dimension limit. Then again idk how fast it will transition to helicopter. Imagining from near mach 1 to a safe airspeed for hovering. The duct will keep the rotor not interfering while at horizontal flight. But from all of my ideas, i think this is the most plausible option. Although will need multiple of those, not just twin.
@ericstromberg9608
@ericstromberg9608 2 года назад
I think they need to autorotate to provide lift.
@edhikurniawan
@edhikurniawan 2 года назад
@@ericstromberg9608 It seems they provide drag and unnecessary turbulence to me. During the horizontal flight. Helos do not flying horizontally (they tilted down-forward while flying to get the forward push), but those planes does. As the fixed wing would provide most the lift during the time. I could be wrong, but it is what i see.
@mewantkrinkov4206
@mewantkrinkov4206 2 года назад
I always had this favorited in my tabs because I found it while looking at other kamovs but there was no information about it, I didn’t think it flew.
@philipmartin708
@philipmartin708 2 года назад
On the KA-35, I don't see how a turbofan/turboshaft engine could work. With the engines powering the rotors, they'd also be producing forward thrust, so hovering would not be possible.
@cocindaucocindau354
@cocindaucocindau354 2 года назад
Sorry guys..i..i must do it, it is my Duty to do it..HELIKOPTER! HELIKOPTER! PARAKOPER! PARAKOPER!!!
@Aroxsch
@Aroxsch 2 года назад
Yes we need that sh*t
@ShivamYadav-jy2hm
@ShivamYadav-jy2hm 4 месяца назад
Please do a video for Mi 24 series
@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890
@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890 2 года назад
osprey, but.. not osprey
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 2 года назад
Osprey rotodyne lovechild.
@BlueSky-ub4fx
@BlueSky-ub4fx 2 года назад
...your bass level is mixed a bit too high on your voice there... ...Outstanding work you're doing there, though! 👍👍I really love your videos! 😍😍Thank you!
@blu5021
@blu5021 2 года назад
Great video!
@FRITZI999
@FRITZI999 2 года назад
reminds me on the Rotodyne
@zawchs
@zawchs 2 года назад
soviet engineers when no magellanTV: bruh soviet enginners wwhen magellanTv: ez sercet intel
@tentimesful
@tentimesful 2 года назад
I have dreamt of a jet helicopter... but F35 can do the same...
@ainzooalgown7589
@ainzooalgown7589 2 года назад
KA22 looks kinda like a unrefined version of V22 Osprey
@isaacschmitt4803
@isaacschmitt4803 2 года назад
Mil: I present the MI-26 for- what the блять is that?!? Kamov: I did a thing
@jimmyj1969
@jimmyj1969 2 года назад
Did rotors on Ka-35 had their own engines, or they take power from the jet engines?
@muskreality
@muskreality 2 года назад
I believe the Soviets got some inspiration from the German made Focke Achgelis FA 223
@sergeychmelev5270
@sergeychmelev5270 2 года назад
As the author mentions, the inspiration came from Bratukhin B-11, which in turn was a late development of Bratukhin Omega that flew back in 1941.
@stephenhall3515
@stephenhall3515 2 года назад
The Fairey Rotodyne avoided KA and Osprey limitations decades ago by using the large rotor for taking off and landing only. It was physically separate from the props, could double as a 'parachute' in the event of main engines failure and use free spinning to generate electricity. Also it was pressurized which the Osprey cannot be. Kamov's twin large rotor system was too complicated and always linked to motive engines whereas Rotodyne's gyroplane classification achieved what the others -- old and new -- could not and even early tests showed that airliner speeds of the period were built in. It failed because the USA cancelled orders on grounds of 'noise' and bullied Canada to do the same. Noise levels from the rotor tip boosters were reduced to being below the levels of Boeing and Douglas airliners but a foolish UK government failed to support development. Russia would have advanced ALL of its aviation (inclusive of lift gyrodynes for the BAM railway project) had it used Fairey Co design personnel.
@constantinosschinas4503
@constantinosschinas4503 2 года назад
why V22 can't be pressurised? due to the tilt mechanism?
@rkadi6540
@rkadi6540 2 года назад
Pressurised? So you can fly it at high altitude?
@mmawad100
@mmawad100 2 года назад
The right helicopter propeller blades are reversed in relation to the rotation direction
@lampy5490
@lampy5490 2 года назад
Fairly Rotodyne? Clearly it was VERY Rotodyne! 😀
@richmondlopez13
@richmondlopez13 2 года назад
Would you do the Lokheed ATT
@HeriNafian
@HeriNafian 2 года назад
mantabs "".
@zeanyt2372
@zeanyt2372 2 года назад
Isn't this basically a twin engine sustained VTOAL capable rotadyne?
@georgebarnes8163
@georgebarnes8163 2 года назад
No, the horizontal rotors are constantly powered so not a rotadyne
@AyaxRo
@AyaxRo 2 года назад
wait is this channel riding off the mustard format? This is like watching a mustard video, down to the animations... hmm..
@lille0le502
@lille0le502 2 года назад
just thougth the same thing
@quannga99
@quannga99 2 года назад
Looks like troubles everywhere.
@remi_gio
@remi_gio 2 года назад
Awesome! 👍🤗
@k3D4rsi554maq
@k3D4rsi554maq 2 года назад
Awesome indeed!
@mohamedbinelias3246
@mohamedbinelias3246 2 года назад
Big show all
@joharimatesan3528
@joharimatesan3528 2 года назад
Baik buat dron rasaksa lagi bagus
@lusqwerty
@lusqwerty 2 года назад
This is the main reason why the Americans and the Russians compete for when it comes to war machines. It produced mixed result like in the past up until now. Also aside from companies america and russians also are manufacturers of death. Like how the Russians and the Americans used Afghanistan as their so called adventurism. This wars were created by both nations so that they could test their readiness and of course profitability of their weapons and war machines. It also serves as advertisement for their wars. For example how helicopters were widely used in warfare. Its like how Americans manufactured the Vietnam Wars where it was the first wars that fully utilised the capability of the Americans. But despite how the Helicopter revolutionised military mobility and warfare it also goes to show how vulnerable low flying slow moving helicopter. Americans and Russians sacrificed their footsoldiers just to test this helicopter usage in Vietnam and Afghanistan wars. Both the Americans and the Russians failed in Afghanistan. For these two world powers escape the humiliation of defeat and the numerous death and destruction they created they call those who serve and died in those wars a war heroes. Heroes is the key word every now and then.
@subhagatadatta3032
@subhagatadatta3032 2 года назад
Ahead of its time
@pontuswendt2486
@pontuswendt2486 2 года назад
AMAZINGNES!!!
@edutaimentcartoys
@edutaimentcartoys 8 месяцев назад
similar to osprey
@blacksounds3512
@blacksounds3512 2 года назад
I saw so much ad that i left the video
@vladr73
@vladr73 2 года назад
Привет. Это не самолёт и не вертолёт, а Автожир "AutoGyro". Привет из России. Кстати, в США разработчиком и владельцем компании по разработке и производству был Российский инженер И.И.Сикорский
@JaysasterGaming
@JaysasterGaming 2 года назад
This is GTA Online's Avenger IRL
@girafffurious
@girafffurious 2 года назад
v-22 Rosprey
@mdshawkathossain1038
@mdshawkathossain1038 2 года назад
Tani koto years hole ata ok hobe bojia bol
@CAP198462
@CAP198462 2 года назад
You know, if you have two shots of vodka and squint you can see some MV-22 and Horsa glider in it, 🤔
@希姆萊-s2e
@希姆萊-s2e 2 года назад
沒有中文字幕
@terrydavis8451
@terrydavis8451 2 года назад
God: I name the drag.
@F-1415
@F-1415 2 года назад
Kalinin K-7 Airplane
@F-1415
@F-1415 2 года назад
Fine russian engineering
@skoldmo762
@skoldmo762 2 года назад
Kakalin 22 instead of catch22
@Raphael-pt7rx
@Raphael-pt7rx 11 месяцев назад
10:19 hit ROBLOX
@teriday954
@teriday954 2 года назад
Fairey rotodyne
@rayjames6096
@rayjames6096 2 года назад
It would get shot down by a bottle rocket like all their helicopters.
@kaylzshter6153
@kaylzshter6153 2 года назад
This channel is dope AF
@hoilst
@hoilst 2 года назад
So, you're like the bogan Mustard?
@angelocavaliere4196
@angelocavaliere4196 2 года назад
Bizzarri senz'altro, ma poi ???!
@dataman6744
@dataman6744 2 года назад
It was nice meeting the Osprey's ancestor....and as I suspected, it was Russian. Similarly, The Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, famously branded “a flying shame has been involved in 12 crashes resulting in killing 42. The V-22 made it through its troubled development and into service thanks to a complex welter of political agendas, largely driven by the Marine Corps....makes one wonder whether Osprey designers copied everything from the Ka-22, including the design flaws...?
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent 2 года назад
Of course you naturally left out the part that many of the issues with the V-22 were largely resolved and its current safety record is fairly normal in service as most current front line choppers. The US has a long history of lawn darts. They do fix the issues of most. Others they just use until something better comes along. The F-104 comes to mind.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman 2 года назад
👍👍
@kiwiwifi
@kiwiwifi Год назад
Stinger bait
@daravikki
@daravikki 2 года назад
V-22 Osprey looks way better and advanced
@mohamedbinelias3246
@mohamedbinelias3246 2 года назад
Now day on. Off now after 30 so why help
@jackstephenson1339
@jackstephenson1339 2 года назад
Whats your fav Soviet prototype F & E?
@BrightonBeachNews
@BrightonBeachNews 2 года назад
Everything was invented in USSR) hahaha Lol
@richard1493
@richard1493 2 года назад
01:03 Thank you for pronouncing KA instead of saying the letters! Many channels overlook this when talking about Russian acronyms and us Rus speakers appreciate that attention to detail.
@TheRunaway115
@TheRunaway115 29 дней назад
I didn’t know the acronyms were pronounced in Russian. That’s pretty neat.
@davidrivero7943
@davidrivero7943 2 года назад
Military Coaxials with pusher props are here to stay. Mesmerizing to watch twin opposing rotors & the stability they provide.
@mmmddd4366
@mmmddd4366 2 года назад
They're my G spot
@nickparr835
@nickparr835 2 года назад
⁹ó
@Enigmod
@Enigmod 2 года назад
This heliplane/vtol is pretty lit ngl
@mastathrash5609
@mastathrash5609 2 года назад
Agreed, one of those i never knew existed until now
@bierce716
@bierce716 2 года назад
Huge animation mistake, dude, you have one rotor with the blades advancing into the trailing edge.
@ronidude
@ronidude 2 года назад
HUGE
@sssbob
@sssbob 2 года назад
I noticed that immediately as well.
@camil721
@camil721 2 года назад
Right!
@macmac0712
@macmac0712 2 года назад
WOOOOOO YEAHHHHH THATS WHAT IVE BEEN WAITING FOR BABYYYY
@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890
@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890 2 года назад
woooooooooo yeeeaaaaa babayyyyyy
@UncleManuel
@UncleManuel 2 года назад
I never knew THAT history of Kamov, interesting... 😎 But you should definitely do a video on the massive Mil Mi-12 (W-12 / V-12), how it came to be and why it failed. ✌️
@johnnycruzzz
@johnnycruzzz 2 года назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yOApFeEgHcE.html
@MrYart
@MrYart 2 года назад
Soviet version of the rotordyne
@Darren_Xero
@Darren_Xero 2 года назад
Imagine Ka-35 "gyrodyne" would have been the real-life Pelican transport craft from Halo universe
@jasperhunter8386
@jasperhunter8386 2 года назад
I actually saw a Mil V-12 in Monino airbase in Russia where there is also a Myasishchev M-50 and a Tupolev Tu-144.
@MartinMizner
@MartinMizner 2 года назад
*Ah yes, the Ka-22, Mil-12's "little" brother. And also V-22 Osprey's grandfather*
@michaelmckinnon7314
@michaelmckinnon7314 2 года назад
The SH-34 (HH-34) Choctaw landing US troops in Vietnam during the Vietnam War was an interesting touch in a video about a Soviet Era vertiplane. The Ka-22 and Ka-35 resemble the Focke Achgelis helicopter known as "Hitler's Dragon".
@expatinbrazil
@expatinbrazil 2 года назад
I think is one of the most important piece of engineering ever !
@eee9034
@eee9034 2 года назад
Just love these outrageous designs
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 2 года назад
Glad you like them!
@captain_commenter8796
@captain_commenter8796 2 года назад
These animations truly are a sight to see! Keep it up F&E!
@skoldmo762
@skoldmo762 2 года назад
Looks par on with Mustard
@dawnsparrow4477
@dawnsparrow4477 2 года назад
Thanks for sharing....what an enjoyable video about two powerful Soviet made helicopter...kamov-22 & kamov- 35 strange & powerful designed helicopters 🚁
@jmi5969
@jmi5969 2 года назад
I wonder what was the intent behind attaching the KGB shield to the photo of Dmitry Yefremov. Yefremov's short biography (1920-1961) is well known in very fine detail, there is absolutely no connection to the organization.
@allangibson2408
@allangibson2408 2 года назад
The KGB was the source of a lot of Russians biographic data…
@trionghost
@trionghost 2 года назад
Kamov design bureau was defunct at 04/01/2020. Rest of designers and engineers was merget to Mil design bureau and all this called "National Helicopters Center of Mil and Kamov". But Kamov facilities was sold and design school ceased to exist. I worked there for last 10 years of Kamov JSC existence.
@camil721
@camil721 2 года назад
Beautiful Kamov design (not Ka-22, though...) on Ka 31 and 35. I saw real Kamov helicopters on civil use in Romania, and some older than Ka-31 in a museum in Varna, Bulgaria. A pilot said that civilian Kamov was dull and so predictible very stable, literally boringly reliable (simple radial engines)...
@smarakmohanta1445
@smarakmohanta1445 2 года назад
These were way ahead of their time
@davidebonni3967
@davidebonni3967 2 года назад
So soviets had the idea for the v-22 first?
@anthonymolina7416
@anthonymolina7416 2 года назад
I guess the designers for the v22 got inspired by this aircraft
@tahustvedt
@tahustvedt 2 года назад
Your 3D modeling is getting better.
@poodlescone9700
@poodlescone9700 2 года назад
This hybrid gyroplane design should be reexamined with modern materials. Imagine the Osprey internals with use with this design.
Далее
Катаю тележки  🛒
08:48
Просмотров 293 тыс.
Самая сложная маска…
00:32
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Inside Out 2: BABY JOY VS SHIN SONIC 4
00:16
Просмотров 3 млн
Mil V-12 - Soviet rotorcraft titan
22:39
Просмотров 1,5 млн
This Could’ve Changed Air Travel Forever
10:08
Просмотров 10 млн
Did Russia build the best attack helicopter ever?
19:02
The Device that Won WW2 - The Cavity Magnetron
18:33
Просмотров 1,7 млн
1950s INSANE VTOL Jet Fighter - Lockheed CL-346
15:18
How Pratt & Whitney Changed Aviation
18:18
Просмотров 751 тыс.