"Four Disturbing Things Which Happened In The Country"- Justice Nariman Explains 

The unity and integrity of our nation have been destroyed. No one is dare to speak out except a few people like you sir.

Politician: I Tell people what to do because I am Elected. District Judges: We get elected through Examination. We are trained in judicial academies and then We apply Law while deciding case on Facts. Nariman: I Tell People what to do because I am selected by my Father' Uncle by Well Approved process of Supreme court.

we need many more fearless judges like Nariman

Judiciary needs to be completely independent. Govt and judiciary need to work together to provide justice to people

What about CJ having midnight sessions to rescue terrorists when you can't have time for 50 yrs to solve other cases ?

Nariman conveniently skips Judicial Accountability, he should look in the mirror , no word on opaque collegium of which he is a beneficiary ,judges deciding judges,…very convenient, eh Fali. Before sermonising, look in the mirror,..Lok Sabha has the will of the people, unlike nepotist, biased and opaque judiciary which tries to hoist itself on high moral platform, which people, majority of them don’t buy,.so there you are and there’s the govt, who’s better, not difficult to choose, of course the govt, smell coffee Fali

These Judges In Earlier, Even The Fellow Who Is Speaking Kept Quite When The Kashmiri Pandits Women Raped and Brutally Killed, What's These Are All Doing, Why Didn't Given Instructions To The Then Congress Government. They All Enjoyed The Government Services and Know Speaking. Are They Blind. This Is The Hypocrisy Of " The Intelligent Judges "

I salute you, Justice Nariman.

Very much true, Sir. Thank you for sharing.

First clear all the pending case in your SUPREME court. Then worry about other issues

Those in post should be bold and judicious. What is the point of criticising after retirement?❤❤❤❤❤

Just shows the people pretend to be saviours . Thank you Sir for unveiling the mask of the pretentious minds 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Jai Hind . 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

Sir , Why not have a 5 member committee to select EC . 1. PM 2. CJI 3. Leader of the opposition. 4. Out going EC . 5 . Cabinet Minister selected by PM .

This justice (Retired) Nariman, mentions 4 disturbing aspects - banning BBC film on Gujarat riots - overturning Judicial intervention in Election Commission appointment - Abrogation of Art 370 and bifurcation of a State into 2 union territories - How Kerala Governor is disturbing federalism by not signing bills If one looks at Bangladesh, an elected Govt was overthrown, a selected head was appointed, Chief Justice was forced to resign, and many blatant violation of Constitution. The Bangladesh crisis started because of a Judicial ruling to provide reservation for freedom fighters. The problem with the line of thinking of Nariman is, he is selective, does not address key issues such as national integration, unconstitutional actions by State Govts, list is long. Clearly, these judges are out of touch with the Global geopolitical developments.

Sadly why being choosy, the rule should be the same for all. Did anything against any congress leaders, including anti sikh riots? secondly there needs to be nationalism rather than minority appeasement. You talking about Kerala CM tells a lot. Why not talk about his actions. Why 370, when they were siding with terrorists?

Justice Nariman has no skin in the game and does not know the ground reality of Kashmir.. everyone is happy here in Kashmir now.. he just knows about law

Sir , please raise your voice against cores of cases pending at various courts , winter and sumner vacations of judges , only 150 days of working in a year and getting 365 days salary from tax payers money , spending months in only academic issues and giving 2mints time for other important matters ! It would be great !, Finally legilature and parliament is supreme !

Supreme court in india already dead. Now people coming to street and protest

This guy dont know that BBC case was going for long time and BBC accepted criminality

He is speaking the tone of Congress

Very much agreed , it all has started since the Judge got compromised Mr Gogoi and was offer a seat in the Lok Sabha , his decision prior to that all went in the favour of the Govt including the Mandir issue , if Judges start getting compromised than these disturbing acts are mere a trailor of the movie😊

Excellent, Only the Judges themselves can comment with authority on such matters. This is the need of today when the government at the centre is misusing the majority it has got.

Very good points!

Just one counter question, what about the selection of Judges (collegium) procedures??

These people become vocal in public forums and criticise everyone. They have a garb, black in every respect. Under that they threaten contempt, under that exorbitant charges are exhorted by advocates, justice is delayed and bought. Why don't they clean up the judiciary? Are the judges illiterate to listen to years long arguments by extorting Vakils, instead of studying the papers submitted by the applicant and defendant? Until and unless we stop these advocates and fix their charges, justice will be influenced by other means than facts.

what about jayalalitha's case kept for years?

DUE TO POLITICAL PRESSURE JUSTICE AT STAKE

Mr. Modi wants the posts of honour of judiciary and execution like President, Governers and Chief Justice as well all the Government Agencies become subordinate to him, claiming that he should have unopposed rule and still the public in a euphoria of fundamentalists in the name of religion blindly following him is a tragedy of Democracy

Just concerned about election commission ? What about the other instiurions that have Government appointed Board of Director Member ?

Well said sir❤

Chief Justice has been bought? Thank you for speaking out

He refuses to mention the revampent of judiciary which is the most important

English media including mirror has very few trp

Same speeches current CJI will give after retirement on future issues

Such old persons live in a utopia. They can't see the reality of today's world. It's sad. They are trying to creat unease in the minds of masses. We should take their views with a pinch of salt.

Is there any person who can strictly be stamped as 'impartial'? SC judges have their specific duties to perform, it is unethical to poke their nose in non-judicial matters. SC has detailed out their observation on Art 356, a person has the right to express his personal opinion, not necessarily right nor to be given any importance.

Entirely disagree with his views. Why he disturbed now. Why not last 65 years when more disturbances are allowed to occur. Thanks.

If judiciary takes years to pronounce judgements on important national issues, the purpose of justice will be lost. Justice delayed is justice denied. Our judiciary should be fiercely independent and pronounce judgements as per the law. In India, politicians have made a mockery of the Anti Defection law. Now MLAs elected on one party symbol swich sides and join another minority party and make that minority into a majority and thereafter form goveenment. Then, some such MLAs become ministers! But, what our judiciary is doing? It takes years to decide a case and by the time the decision is pronounced, the term of the assembly would have been over or some important developments take place. The Maharashtra case is a glaring case. The unfortunate thing is that the people who elected these MLAs have no say in such cases. Still, we proclaim that India is the 'Mother of Democracy' and we are entering the Amrit Kal! If democracy is to flourish, our political system must be revamped.

We have much more disturbing things which can even disturb you...😂😂

Where was this guy when kashmiri Hindus were being slaughtered These guys are on pay roll of NGOs inimical to Indian security.

The current govt utilized ingenious ways to overcome a stalemate in Kashmir, which was being celebrated by the vested political families there. When Pandits were being massacred nobody bothered to question it. His 4 issues can have their place in the dustbin.

You criticise a few judgements. Yet say the CEC selection panel retain a judge. Are you in your senses?

He his ability become to chief justice sc one most brilliant legend

Sir only custodians of Law like you can save this democracy which has turned into Autocracy already.

It is just not some logic that matters.. we need to see a broader impact on the nation in terns of terrorism, economy, human impact, etc.. The so called judge and educated person seem to miss this point.. All this lecture doesnt mean anything, when there was a Pandits exodus and no protection.. what was this person doing at that time? enjoying the benefits of congress and ignore human suffering? Big BS

Thank you Sir. However the present judges in the supreme court are as learned n legally erudite as you. They are also upholders of the Constitution of India. Casting aspersions on sitting supreme court judges is not a done thing.

100 %

This person against BJp govt.

Well said

Can he give the same speech in Pakistan afganistan or syria ya bangladesh or in any islamic country now we dont want psedo secularism

What's the other side of the coin? As I am sure there is one!!

Sir with great respect to you, Sanatan dharma being targeted for n number of generations by two notorious communities on the earth. Sanatan which only believe in enlightenment of humanity and never preach or believe in conversions. But when it's own existence is in danger it takes it's own course in the interest of humanity. As it's said in Geeta. Sir come out of lunatic mindset, it don't suit you.

He is probably the first anti-dharmic parsee. But i have to admit some of the points he made here is correct. Unfortunately he is anti-dharmic and hence no one will take him seriously

👍👍👍

Good analysis most of are I agree with but please also explain the process of selection process of judges of Supreme Court and chief justice??

How Apex has been degraded, is there any dire consequences or inefficiency, let Hon Nariman give cut and right judgement on this small based sentence.

Clean your house first, before pointing fingers at others. How is this justice giving this speech on a work day? How many holidays do these people take?

The judge who given the judgement that Section 66A of IT ACT,2000 if anyone commits annoyance to anyone while online conversation can ke booked under 3 years of imprisonment but Shreya singhal approached the supreme court of India because it is the custodian of our fundamental right and constitution which means section 66A of IT ACT 2000 violates article 19 of Indian constitution which is right to speech and expression because section 66A booked 2 girls in prison because they both commited annoyance to shiv sena group headed by bal Thackeray on his death anniversary. Both girls commented against the shiv sena party. This judgement explains best that constitution is the supreme law of land which enjoys special legal sanctity.

Politics entry alert

Cant recall a more prejudiced mind in judiciary. Facts are irrelevant it seems.

Please stop your lecture and stop criticizing modi . enough of your colonial mindset

Great moves for Bharat. You congress lovers want the old corrupt system. Nahin hoga.

🙏

You don't see any danger in foreign media meddling with our internal matters, you are ok with terrorism in Kashmir,you are ok with division of society on the basis of caste and lastly you are ok with anarchy in States like Maharashtra,Punjab,WB and in AP.

"We won't decide means you have decided "...

❤👌❤️👍❤️👌❤️👍❤️

these snakes started coming out of hibernation ....intellectual chatukar

he should now keep quit bahut maje kar lie kaun sa exam deke judge bana tha elected the jisne elect kiya tha uska gun abhi bhi ga rahe ho.

1. BBC Tamil channel sh ould be watched with proper translation by this learned judge. Highly detrimental to India 2. BBC agreed to tax evasion and paid the dues. 3. BBC's reportage on Gujarat itself mocks at our judicial system of which the learned judge is a part 4. Kashmir judgement was given after listening to hours of arguments by a battery of lawyers and they could not convince 5 judges that Indian Constitution was in any way compromised 5. CEC ruling by SC was a mere technical one and tried to set right a procedural lacuna, which has been corrected by the new law in Parliament. Averring an elected MP is less sincere about Indian constitution than a chosen judge smacks of arrogance 6. Ultimately what is democracy for, apart from saving the country and constitution? For letting JeM bomb pandits and get rid of them? Rants of a privileged lot.

Sir , It is high time the Parliament did away the Collegium system , by an Act , and incorporating the same in the Constitution . The selection of the CJI be democratically considered :- 5 member committee :- 1. PM 2. Outgoing CJI 3. Leader of Opposition 4 . EC 5. Nominated cabinet Minister .

How come none of the other legal luminaries are distributed but only R Nariman is disturbed?? It shows where his loyalties lie. We need to get of such slavish mentality to the foreign forces which he symbolises.

Bharat Mata ki Jai... Jald hi roti ki tarah sattaa pultege.

Hate Indian judiciary

Wow. These many bjp supporters in comments 😂

What About Nehru Banning BBC Earlier In His Terms, What About Indira Ghandi Imposing Emergency Why This Judge Kept Quite. Was He Enjoying The Treatments At That Time

I'm guessing all the long faces in that crowd has something to do with their bacon-train getting derailed ?!!😂 ..pretty obvious Modi ji is doing truckload of things right !👍😊

Sorry your voice has no effects in brutal India

Dont show his face

Why you uploading this video one week later. Plz do your work as you done in early 23.

Justice Nariman was a wonderful judge. I have immense respect for him when I see him as a judge. However , with great respect to Mr Nariman , outside the court his opinions fails to elicit the same respect. India is a democracy he is entitled to express his opinion freely and we are also entitled to say 'sorry sir , we disagree! '

Didnt get Rajya Sabha seat???

All chief justices in past had no political biases😢

He seems to be Envoy of BBC. Ir does he tihink its still Queen's empire? Where was he in 1975? Or Emergen y was sanc tioned by the Queen?

Just make a gigolo member of collegium!