Тёмный

Fractional part of x 

Prime Newtons
Подписаться 249 тыс.
Просмотров 11 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

27 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 65   
@m.h.6470
@m.h.6470 8 месяцев назад
Solution: x + 3{x} = 11 let x = k + {x}, where k is an integer, so we have k + {x} + 3{x} = 11 k + 4{x} = 11 since both k and 11 are integers, 4{x} also has to be an integer. also, the boundaries of {x} are 0 ≤ {x} < 1. therefore {x} can only be 0, 1/4, 2/4 or 3/4, as no other fraction in that range, multiplied by 4, results in an integer. {x} = 0 → x + 3 * 0 = 11 → x = 11 {x} = 1/4 → x + 3/4 = 11 → x = 41/4 {x} = 2/4 → x + 6/4 = 11 → x = 28/2 → x = 19/2 {x} = 3/4 → x + 9/4 = 11 → x = 35/4 therefore x ∈ {35/4, 19/2, 41/4, 11}
@m.h.6470
@m.h.6470 8 месяцев назад
After watching the video: Stunned, how complicated you can make a very simple task!
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
Would you like to recommend your own videos. Email me some links. I'm sure I can learn one or two things from your style. Never Stop Learning!
@m.h.6470
@m.h.6470 8 месяцев назад
@@PrimeNewtons Sorry, I don't make videos. I don't have time for it. I am a software developer with focus on writing and optimizing algorithms to analyze data (mostly statistical, but often also logical). So this kind of math is literally my bread and butter...
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
From experience, if other viewers find your solution easier to understand, they would give it a thumbs up. Use that as a yardstick. I'd pin your comment.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
@m.h.6470 I actually see your point. When, it's obvious, your way is the way.
@butch2kow549
@butch2kow549 8 месяцев назад
Notice that the coefficient of k divided by the denominator of x is the difference between two consecutive solutions of an equation of this type(whatever you want to call or name this equation). Furthermore, the number of solutions is the sum of the coefficients of x and {x} in the original equation. I always enjoy your videos.
@muhammedrayan4048
@muhammedrayan4048 8 месяцев назад
guys like the video cause this guy deserves the world
@savaesmek
@savaesmek 8 месяцев назад
i thought about writing x as [x] + {x} so the equation becomes [x] + 4{x} =11 which means 4{x} is an integer but {x} is also lower than 1 this can happen only if {x} ={0/4,1/4,2/4,3/4} and then you just solve for each case
@boguslawszostak1784
@boguslawszostak1784 5 месяцев назад
[x] + 4{x} =11 is positive integer, so 4{x} =11 - [x] is integer. {x} is nonnegative so 4{x} in Natural number less then 4 4{x}
@punditgi
@punditgi 8 месяцев назад
Prime Newtons raises the floor of math knowledge! 🎉😊
@jennymarx9228
@jennymarx9228 8 месяцев назад
I really appreciate your efforts in making us clear in mathematics... because of you I developed interest in mathematics sir 😊😅
@markusmcgee
@markusmcgee 8 месяцев назад
Software developer here. I love the videos. I also studied mathematics. Watching your videos get are pleasant mental gymnastics for me!!!
@kragiharp
@kragiharp 8 месяцев назад
With your videos I never stop learning. Thank you for living. ❤️🙏
@thorhilda
@thorhilda 8 месяцев назад
I found it more intuitive to start with 0
@ReyazulislamReayal
@ReyazulislamReayal 8 месяцев назад
amazing class sir❤
@77Chester77
@77Chester77 8 месяцев назад
Please keep the high quality of your videos (i.e. interesting math problems presented in your great unique way)! Even if it means to lower the quantity ;-)
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
Thank you!
@nothingbutmathproofs7150
@nothingbutmathproofs7150 8 месяцев назад
Nice job! I have never learned anywhere (other than here!!) that {x} = the fractional part of x. Thanks. Here's a topic for a new video. Show how you can use the the floor of x to round off numbers to any decimal place of your choice.
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
Are you assuming I already know how to do that 😏. Haha, that's great faith you have in me.
@nothingbutmathproofs7150
@nothingbutmathproofs7150 8 месяцев назад
You're the best. I thought that knew everything. Say you have 7.8. Add .5, then just take the integer part and you'll round off 7.8 to 8. If you have 7.3, add .5, get 7.8, take integer part and get 7. If you want to round off 7.3892 to two decimals, then multiply 100, do the trick like above and then divide by 100.It's very cool. I bet that you knew this(??). let me know.
@christopherarreola9066
@christopherarreola9066 8 месяцев назад
I love your stuff Newton, I’ve seen you around CSUN. Maybe one day we can chat about applied math topics since you took a class on numerical.
@jamesharmon4994
@jamesharmon4994 8 месяцев назад
I followed you every step of the way, understanding it, but I doubt I could do it myself yet.
@adw1z
@adw1z 8 месяцев назад
The shortcut for this problem is to notice that 4{x} must be an integer, which means {x} can only take some modulo multiple of 1/4 - however, your video is better IMO, as it allows u to solve any general problem of this kind e.g. if we had a mix of fractional and negative terms, or even if we had a simultaneous system of such equations, your approach is fool-proof
@mtk2iscool247
@mtk2iscool247 4 месяца назад
Great video!
@shahmatsimplex4144
@shahmatsimplex4144 8 месяцев назад
I have taken many advanced math classes back in the early 80s and can't remember LambertW, or equations with floors or fractional parts. Did I sleep through those classes or am I suffering from senility?Your videos are awesome, great handwriting, and teaching style.
@dirklutz2818
@dirklutz2818 5 месяцев назад
Fantastic!
@VimrrezvBvqeri
@VimrrezvBvqeri 8 месяцев назад
🤩🤩
@ひろ-j9s
@ひろ-j9s 7 месяцев назад
That would be great.❗️ Polite and easy to understand . 🇯🇵
@brenobelloc8617
@brenobelloc8617 8 месяцев назад
Cleaning the floor funcion with my brain. Thank you so much sir.❤
@treybell40501
@treybell40501 8 месяцев назад
.75 difference was beautiful. I wonder if there’s like a pattern like that or similar for all sets
@vitotozzi1972
@vitotozzi1972 8 месяцев назад
What a beautiful equation!!! Thanks friend!
@CharlesShorts
@CharlesShorts 8 месяцев назад
I love your videos
@falbert86
@falbert86 8 месяцев назад
so fun to start the day with one of your videos!
@JourneyThroughMath
@JourneyThroughMath 8 месяцев назад
My biggest hang up was not knowing the definition of {x}. I spent a little too much time trying to think what times of rational numbers added to 3 times the fractional part gives us an integer. So I knew that the answer would be in fourths. After that, I got stuck. Great video though
@enderguz3213
@enderguz3213 8 месяцев назад
I solved it by spliting x into floor(x) and fractional(x) giving floor(x)+4*fractional(x)=11 and since floor(x) is an integer it must then imply that 4*fractional(x) is also an integer and since the fractional part of a number is allways less than 1 and greater than or equal to 0 fractional(x) must be 0/4 or 1/4 or 2/4 or 3/4 plug those into fractional(x) for the original equation and solve for each x giving x = 11 or 10,25 or 9,5 or 8,75
@WhiteGandalfs
@WhiteGandalfs 8 месяцев назад
Using simple symbols the whole thing even becomes trivial to formally write and solve: x + p + 3p = 11 4p = 11 - x p = (11 - x) / 4 = any_int / 4 yields directly 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 (0
@enderguz3213
@enderguz3213 8 месяцев назад
@@WhiteGandalfs ik it is just alot of effort to write formally in a youtube comment 😂
@CashueTM
@CashueTM 8 месяцев назад
Does this (fractional part of x) only work for rational numbers?
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
Irrational numbers have no finite fractional parts. So, yes, it only works for rational numbers AFAIK
@jovemmeninoel526
@jovemmeninoel526 8 месяцев назад
hello form brazil! its 5:12 here
@ILove_ALL
@ILove_ALL 2 месяца назад
Here is another way : x + 3.{x} = 11 (k = floor(x)) so that means k + 4.{x} = 11 so we know that {x} is between 0 and 1 so 4.{x} must be between 0 and 4 That means k must be between 7 and 11 but we know that 4.{x} can not be 4 so we got options that k = 8,9,10,11 and when you get these you can find {x} and mix them and get the andwer SOLUTION 2 : ------------------ x + 3{x} = 11 floor(x) + 4.{x} = 11 so 4.{x} € Z {x} € Z/4 0 ≤ {x} < 1 so 4 values : 0/4 1/4 2/4 3/4 If you got 0/4 it means x = 11 If you got 1/4 it means x = 10.25 If you got 2/4 it means x = 9.5 If you got 3/4 it means x = 8.75 Thanks!
@Rohan___38
@Rohan___38 8 месяцев назад
Sir the thumbnail is having - sign
@aizensosukeisgoat5
@aizensosukeisgoat5 8 месяцев назад
Can't we just put the value of x = 11 as in fractional part function when we will put {11}= it will give answer as 0 , so the equation will directly be x=11 and value of x =11 Edit: i am commenting on this by seeing the thumbnail 👍
@justyourfriendlyneighborho2061
@justyourfriendlyneighborho2061 8 месяцев назад
That is indeed one of the solutions, like Prime Newton said at the start of the video, but there are more solutions
@aizensosukeisgoat5
@aizensosukeisgoat5 8 месяцев назад
@@justyourfriendlyneighborho2061 yes, after commenting, I saw the full video
@Onlyforfun1992tube
@Onlyforfun1992tube 8 месяцев назад
Just like sir Isaac Newton 😊
@mahoremujini
@mahoremujini 5 месяцев назад
Let x= n+d; n+4d=11 Then 4d is an integer ; d= .25 or .5 or .75 or 0 Thus x= 10.25 or 9.5 or 8.75 or 11
@f5673-t1h
@f5673-t1h 8 месяцев назад
11 - 3n/4 for n in {0,1,2,3}
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 8 месяцев назад
Interesting. Please share how your solution is so clean
@PabloLlaria
@PabloLlaria 8 месяцев назад
If a solution is 8.75, how can it be 8 + 3x.75 equal to 11?
@PabloLlaria
@PabloLlaria 8 месяцев назад
Sorry, Washington my fault. Its correct
@JSSTyger
@JSSTyger 8 месяцев назад
8.75
@jamal369
@jamal369 8 месяцев назад
Hello again
@wes9627
@wes9627 8 месяцев назад
The fractional part of x must be less than 1 and the integer part of x must be 10. 1/4 +3(1/4)=1, so x=10.25.
@POLMAZURKA
@POLMAZURKA 7 месяцев назад
floor??
@grosman4934
@grosman4934 7 месяцев назад
8:52 You're just a train
@BelBravo
@BelBravo 8 месяцев назад
9.5 is my guess. Cuz .5 times 3 is 1.5 and 9.5 plus 1.5 is 11. But this isn’t systematic. I just know .5 times 3 is 1.5, and 1.5 plus .5 is 2, and 11 minus 2 is 9, so 9.5 is good
@mystery8420
@mystery8420 8 месяцев назад
There's actually another one, 7.999999999... as 9 repeating can be considered a fractional part
@AmitDash
@AmitDash 8 месяцев назад
My first guess is 10.25
@1729Calculus
@1729Calculus 8 месяцев назад
Please add turkish subtitles
@comdo777
@comdo777 8 месяцев назад
asnwer=1 is it
@quigonkenny
@quigonkenny 4 месяца назад
Judging from the results, it looks like any equation of the form x + k{x} = n (assuming k, n ∈ ℤ) is going to have k+1 solutions, with one of them being n and the other k solutions each descending in value from n by k/(k+1). So the solutions will all be of the value n - mk/(k+1), where m are the integers from 0 to k.
Далее
The fixed point of a function
3:34
Просмотров 6 тыс.
Solving a septic equation
10:43
Просмотров 60 тыс.
Купил КЛОУНА на DEEP WEB !
35:51
Просмотров 2,5 млн
How to Solve Palindrome Equations
13:01
Просмотров 14 тыс.
the most controversial limit in calculus 1
8:19
Просмотров 121 тыс.
Finding the domain of x^x (my attempt)
12:30
Просмотров 33 тыс.
Harvard Entrance Exam - Algebra - Advanced Difficulty
8:59
Ceiling over floor plus 2x = 8
14:26
Просмотров 8 тыс.
X! = X³ - X
12:42
Просмотров 17 тыс.
solving equations but they get increasingly awesome
10:44
Can A Function Be Continuous At Only One Point?
14:21
Solving a golden equation
14:45
Просмотров 12 тыс.
How Math Becomes Difficult
39:19
Просмотров 138 тыс.
Купил КЛОУНА на DEEP WEB !
35:51
Просмотров 2,5 млн